Perceptions de la complexité chez les acteurs de projet : une étude exploratoire internationale par les situations managériales

Leroy, Daniel; Kama, Joseph

doi:https://doi.org/10.59876/a-6m4n-vyx0

Feuilleter les articles de ce numéro

Expert knowledge, ambidexterity, and is in Automotive Industry Engineering Projects (AIEP): Overview of a post clinical research

Le performing/patterning, moteur d’évolution des compétences collectives ? Le cas de la gestion forestière en contexte de grands défis

Plan de l’article

Retour au début
Résumé
Bibliographie

Boîte à outils

PDFTélécharger
Citer cet article
Partager

Résumés

Résumé

En mobilisant deux dimensions (évaluation personnelle et instanciation), cet article se propose d’identifier et de caractériser les situations de management perçues comme complexes dans les projets. À travers une enquête internationale, l’analyse de 40 224 situations de management selon six dimensions qualitatives caractérisant la complexité subjective fait émerger une typologie en quatre clusters : les situations ordinaires, à forte exigence, à défi personnel et inductrices de stress.

En testant la robustesse de cette matrice en fonction de caractéristiques spécifiques des projets ou des répondants, cette typologie est vérifiée tout en révélant des spécificités intra-cluster très intéressantes. En discutant de l’intérêt de cette typologie de la complexité perçue, une approche renouvelée de coaching managérial différencié des acteurs projet est proposée.

Mots-clés :

situation de management de projet,
évaluation individuelle,
instanciation,
complexité

Abstract

By mobilizing two dimensions (personal evaluation and instantiation), this article aims to identify and characterize the management situations perceived like complex in projects. Through an international survey, the analysis of 40,224 management situations according to six qualitative dimensions characterizing subjective complexity reveals a typology in four clusters: ordinary, high demands, personal challenges and stress-inducing situations.

By testing the robustness of this matrix depending on specific characteristics of project types and respondents, this typology is verified while revealing very interesting intra-cluster specificities. By discussing the interest of this typology of perceived complexity, a renewed approach to differentiated managerial coaching of project actors is proposed.

Keywords:

Project management situation,
individual evaluation,
instantiation,
complexity

Resumen

A partir de dos dimensiones (evaluación personal e instanciación), este artículo se propone identificar y caracterizar las situaciones de gestión percibidas como complejas en los proyectos. A través de una encuesta internacional, el análisis de 40224 situaciones de gestión según seis dimensiones cualitativas que caracterizan la complejidad subjetiva da lugar a una tipología en cuatro grupos: situaciones ordinarias, muy exigentes, personalmente desafiantes e inductoras de estrés.

Al comprobar la solidez de esta matriz en relación con las características específicas de los proyectos o de los encuestados, se verifica esta tipología, al tiempo que se revelan especificidades intracluster muy interesantes. Discutiendo el interés de esta tipología de complejidad percibida, se propone un enfoque renovado del coaching directivo diferenciado de los actores del proyecto.

Palabras clave:

Situación de gestión de proyectos,
evaluación individual,
instanciación,
complejidad

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Aggeri, F. (2017). Situation de gestion et agencement organisationnel Retour sur deux concepts clés de l’oeuvre de Jacques Girin. Le Libellio d’AEGIS, 13(3), 21-27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320515911
Google Scholar
Aitken, A. & Crawford L. (2007). Coping with stress: Dispositional coping strategies of project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 5(7), 666-673. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.003
10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.003 Google Scholar
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S. & Keskin, H. (2007). Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects. Technovation, 27, 628–639. Available at, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2151410
10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.008 Google Scholar
Alderman, N., Ivory, C., Mcloughlin, I. & Vaughan, R. (2005). Sense-making as a process within complex service-led projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 380-385. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.004
10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.004 Google Scholar
Asquin, A., Garel, G. & Picq, T. (2010). When project-based management causes distress at work. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2), 166-172. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.006
10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.006 Google Scholar
Aubry, M. & Hobbs B. (2011). A Fresh Look at the Contribution of Project Management to Organizational Performance. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pmj.20213
10.1002/pmj.20213 Google Scholar
Austin, S., Newton, A., Steele, J. S. & Waskett, P. (2002). Modelling and managing project complexity. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00068-0
10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00068-0 Google Scholar
Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity- a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201-204. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3 Google Scholar
Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V. & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct : Past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1199-1213. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002 Google Scholar
Bentahar, O., & Ika, L.A. (2019). Matching the project manager’s roles to project types: Evidence from large dam projects in Africa. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 830-845. https://colab.ws/articles/10.1109%2Ftem.2019.2895732
Google Scholar
Bichon, S. (2017). Le mode projet dans le système de décision des organisations bureaucratiques. Thèse de sciences de gestion, Université de Tours, 376p.
Google Scholar
Bolzan de Rezende, L. & Blackwell, P. (2019). Revisiting project complexity: a new dimension and framework. Journal ModernPM.com., 6 (3), 127-141. 18(03), 126. https://doi.org/ 10.19255/JMPM01808
Google Scholar
Boutinet, J. P. (1993). Psychologie des conduites à projet, Paris, P.U.F.
Google Scholar
Brady, T. & Davies, A. (2014). Managing Structural and Dynamic Complexity: A Tale of Two Projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 21–38. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pmj.21434
10.1002/pmj.21434 Google Scholar
Brockhoff, W. (2006). On the novelty dimension in project management. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 26-36. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/875697280603700304
10.1177/875697280603700304 Google Scholar
Cicmil, S., Marshall, D. (2005). Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research and Information, 33(6), 523-535. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09613210500288886
10.1080/09613210500288886 Google Scholar
Cicmil, S., Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L. & Richardson, K. (2009). Exploring the complexity of projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute Inc.
Google Scholar
Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L. & Richardson, K. (2007). We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: Mapping the strange landscape of Complexity theory, and its relationship to Project Management. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/875 697 280 703 800 206
10.1177/875697280703800206 Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1993 (1938)), Logique. La théorie de l’enquête, Paris, PUF.
Google Scholar
Daniel, P. A. & Daniel, C. (2018). Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 184–197. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004 Google Scholar
Desgourdes, C. & Leroy, D. (2020). Proposition d’une échelle de mesure du sensegiving en période de changement organisationnel. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, 139(4), 197-223. https://doi.org/ 10.3917/resg.139.0197
10.3917/resg.139.0197 Google Scholar
Eftekhari, N., Mani, S. & Bakhshi, J. (2022). Project Manager Competencies for Dealing with Socio-Technical Complexity: A Grounded Theory Construction. Systems, 10,161. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/systems10050161
10.3390/systems10050161 Google Scholar
Farjoun, M., Ansell, C. & Boin, A. (2015). Pragmatism in organization studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and Complex World. Organization Science, 26(6), 1787-1804. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.2015.1016
10.1287/orsc.2015.1016 Google Scholar
Favari, E. (2012). Reducing Complexity in Urban Infrastructure Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 9–15. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.855
10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.855 Google Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
Google Scholar
Gâllstedt, M. (2003). Working conditions in projects: perceptions of stress and motivation among project team members and project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 449-455. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00098-4
10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00098-4 Google Scholar
Gautier, A. (2015). L’erreur dans la prise de décision en situation, le cas d’une collision aviaire en phase d’écopage. Revue Française de Gestion, 41(246), 41-62. https://doi.org/ 10.3166/rfg.246.41-62
10.3166/RFG.246.41-62 Google Scholar
Geraldi, J., Maylor, H. & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966-990. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/01443571111165848
10.1108/01443571111165848 Google Scholar
Girin, J. (1990). L’analyse empirique des situations de gestion : éléments de théorie et de méthode in A.-C. Martinet (dir.). Epistémologies et Sciences de Gestion. Economica, Paris.
Google Scholar
Girin, J. (2011). Empirical Analysis of Management Situations: Elements of Theory and Method. European Management Review, 8(4), 197–212. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01022.x
10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01022.x Google Scholar
Gioia, D.A. & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), 433–448. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511618925.008
10.1002/smj.4250120604 Google Scholar
Golsorkhi, D. (2006). coord., La fabrique de la stratégie : une perspective multidimensionnelle. Vuibert, Paris.
Google Scholar
Hair, J., Black, W., Badin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Faculty and Research Publications. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/2925
Google Scholar
Hansen, M. J., Vaagen H. & van Oorschot, K. (2020). Team Collective Intelligence in Dynamically Complex Projects-A Shipbuilding Case. Project Management Journal, 51(8), 633–655. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/8 756 972 820 928 695
10.1177/8756972820928695 Google Scholar
Henning, C. & Wald, A. (2019). Toward a wiser projectification : Macroeconomic effects of firm-level project work. International Journal of Project Management, 37(6), 807-819. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.002
10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.002 Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology: an international review, 50(3), 337-421. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1464-0597.00062
10.1111/1464-0597.00062 Google Scholar
Howick, S. & Eden, C. (2004). On the nature of discontinuities in system dynamics modelling of disrupted projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(6), 598-605. https://doi.org/ 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601720
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601720 Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1994). Comment le « cockpit » se souvient de ses vitesses. Sociologie du travail, 36(4), 451-473. https://doi.org/ 10.3406/SOTRA.1994.2190
10.3406/sotra.1994.2190 Google Scholar
Ika, L., Couillard, J. & Garon, S. (2021). Coping with Project Complexity: The Complexity Based Project Management Framework. PM World Journal, Vol. X, Issue V.
Google Scholar
Ireland, V., White, B.E., Gandhi, S.J., Sauser, B. & Gorod, A. (2015). Relevant aspects of complex systems from complexity theory. In book : Case Studies in System of Systems, Enterprise Systems, and Complex Systems, Taylor& Francis Group. https://doi.org/ 10.1201/b 17139-4
Google Scholar
Jaafari, A. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and change. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 47-57. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/875697280303400407
10.1177/875697280303400407 Google Scholar
Jamshidi, M. (2008). System of Systems Engineering. Innovations for the 21^st Century. John Wiley & Sons.
10.1002/9780470403501 Google Scholar
Jensen, A., Thuesen, C. & Geraldi, J. (2016). The projectification of everything: projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21-34. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/875697281604700303
10.1177/875697281604700303 Google Scholar
Joam, C., Metcalfe, M. & Sastrowardoyo, S. (2009). Project conceptualization using pragmatic methods. International Journal of Project Management, 7(8), 787-794. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.002
10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.002 Google Scholar
Journe, B. & Raulet-Croset, N. (2008). Le concept de situation : contribution à l’analyse de l’activité managériale en contextes d’ambiguïté et d’incertitude. M@n@gement, 11(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/ 10.3917/mana.111.0027
10.3917/mana.111.0027 Google Scholar
Journe, B. & Raulet-Croset, N. (2012). La décision comme activité managériale située : Une approche pragmatiste. Revue française de gestion, 38(225), 109-128. https://doi.org/ 10.3166/rfg.225.109-128
10.3166/rfg.225.109-128 Google Scholar
Kama, J. (2016). L’influence du genre sur les situations de management de projet. Thèse de sciences de gestion, Université de Tours, 424p.
Google Scholar
Karasek, R.A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: implications for job re-design. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(2), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
10.2307/2392498 Google Scholar
Keegan, A., Ringhofer, C. & Huemann, M. (2018). Human resource management and project based organizing: Fertile ground, missed opportunities and prospects for closer connections. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.003
10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.003 Google Scholar
Kiridena, S. & Sense, A. (2016). Profiling project complexity: Insights from complexity science and project management literature. Project Management Journal, 47(6), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700605
10.1177/875697281604700605 Google Scholar
Knief, U. & Forstmeier, W. (2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2576-2590. https://doi.org/ 10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5
10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5 Google Scholar
Lalonde, P.-L., Bourgault, M. & Findeli, A. (2011). An empirical investigation of the project situation: PM practice as an inquiry process. International Journal of Project management, 30(4), 418-431. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.005
10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.005 Google Scholar
Lenfle, S. (2008). Exploration and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 469-478. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.017
10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.017 Google Scholar
Lenfle, S., Midler, C. & Halgren, M. (2019). Exploratory projects: From strangeness to theory. Project Management Journal, 50(5), 519-523. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/8756972819871781
10.1177/8756972819871781 Google Scholar
Leroy, D. (2002). System of process capitalization in project management: design and implementation, a case study. 2nd Research World Congress in project management, PMI, Seattle.
Google Scholar
Leroy, D. (2006). Le recours à des structures temporaires de type projet est-il un vecteur de maturité managériale ? Une approche par les situations managériales. In : XVII° Congrès annuel de l’Association francophone de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, Reims.
Google Scholar
Leroy, D. (2007). Evolution récente du mode projet en France : repérage statistique et interprétation par la théorie néo-institutionnaliste. XVI° Conférence AIMS, Montréal.
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Sun T., Shou, Y. & Sun, H. (2020). What makes a competent international project manager in emerging and developing countries? Project Management Journal, 51(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/8756972820901387
Google Scholar
Lievre, P. (2016). État et développement d’un programme de recherche, Management des situations extrêmes. Revue Française de Gestion, 42(257), 79-94. https://doi.org/ 10.3166/rfg.2016.00045
10.3166/rfg.2016.00045 Google Scholar
Lorino, P. (2020). Pragmatisme et étude des organisation. Economica, Paris.
Google Scholar
Loch, C., Mahring, M. & Sommer, S. (2017). Supervising Projects You Don’t (Fully) Understand: Lessons for effective Project Governance by Steering Committees. California Management Review, 59(2), 45-67. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0008125617697944
10.1177/0008125617697944 Google Scholar
Love, P. E. D., Holt, G. D., Shen, L.Y., Li, H. & Irani, Z. (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6), 425–436. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00039-4
10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00039-4 Google Scholar
Lundin, R.A., Arvidsson, N., Brady, T., Ekstedt, E., Midler, C. & Sydow, J. (2015). Managing and Working in Project Society. Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9781139939454 Google Scholar
Luţaş, M., Nistor, R., Radu, M. & Beleiu, I. (2020). Perceptions regarding the profile of an ideal project manager. Amfiteatru economic, 22(54), 608-622. https://doi.org/ 10.24818/EA/2020/54/608
10.24818/EA/2020/54/608 Google Scholar
Lyneis, J. M. & Ford, D. N. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 23(2-3), 157-189. https://doi.org/ 0.1002/sdr.377
10.1002/sdr.377 Google Scholar
Mackay, C. J. & Cooper, C. L. (1987). Occupational stress and health: some current issues. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cooper & Robertson Ed, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Google Scholar
Makui, A., Zadeh, P. M., Bagherpoura, M. & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2018). A structural equation modeling approach to examine the relationship between complexity factors of a project and the merits of project manager. Journal of Project Management (3), 1–12. https://doi.org/ 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.12.001
10.5267/j.jpm.2017.12.001 Google Scholar
Martinet, A.-C. (2015). Stratégie et pensée complexe. Revue française de Gestion, 253(8), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.160.31-46
10.3166/RFG.160.31-46 Google Scholar
Maylor, H.R., Turner, N. & Murray-Webster R. (2013). How Hard Can It Be? Actively Managing Complexity in Technology Projects. Research-Technology Management, 56(4), 45-51. https://doi.org/ 10.5437/08956308X5602125
10.5437/08956308X5602125 Google Scholar
Maylor, H., Vidgen, R., & Carver, S. (2008). Managerial complexity in project-based operations: A ground model and its implications for practice. Project Management Journal, 39(S1), 15-26. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pmj.20057
10.1002/pmj.20057 Google Scholar
Maylor, H.R. & Turner, N. (2017). Understand, reduce, respond: Project complexity management theory and practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(8), 1076–1093. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IJOPM-05-2016-0263
10.1108/IJOPM-05-2016-0263 Google Scholar
Midler, C. (1986). Logique de la mode managériale. Annales des Mines-Gérer et Comprendre, 74-85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281792873
Google Scholar
Midler, C. (1993, 2012). L’auto qui n’existait pas : management des projets et transformation de l’entreprise. Paris, InterEditions.
Google Scholar
Midler, C. (1995). Projectification of the firm: the Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T
10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T Google Scholar
Midler, C. (1996). Modèle gestionnaire et régulation économique de la conception. Coopération et conception. G. d. T. E. Friedberg. Toulouse, Editions Octares : pp. 63-85. https://hal.science/hal-00263267
Google Scholar
Midler, C. (2021). Comment gérer l’urgence et l’incertitude radicale dans les hyper-projets ? Tirer les leçons du management de la crise COVID-19. Revue française de gestion, 47(295), 105-116. https://doi.org/ 10.3166/rfg.2021.00518
10.3166/rfg.2021.00518 Google Scholar
Murray-Webster, R., & Hillson, D. A. (2008). Managing Group Risk Attitude. Farnham, UK: Gower Publications.
Google Scholar
Ogien, A. (1999). Emergence et contrainte : situation et expérience chez Dewey et Goffman. in M. de Fournel et L. Quéré (dir.), La logique des situations : nouveaux regards sur l’écologie des activités sociales. Editions de l’EHESS, Paris.
Google Scholar
Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., Gardiner, P., Williams, T., Mota, C., Maguire, S., Shou, Y. & Stamati, T. (2014). Effect of project role, age and gender differences on the formation and revision of project decision judgements. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 556-567. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.001
10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.001 Google Scholar
Padalkar, M. & Gopinath, S. (2016). Are complexity and uncertainty distinct concepts in project management? A taxonomical examination from literature. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 688-700. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.009
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.009 Google Scholar
Packendorff, J. & Lindgren, M. (2014). Projectification and its consequences:narrow and broad conceptualizations. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807
10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807 Google Scholar
Perminova O., Gustafsson M. & Wikstro K. (2008). Defining uncertainty in projects – a new perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005
10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005 Google Scholar
Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H. & de Meyer, A. (2002). On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163 Google Scholar
Pinto, J. S., Novaski, O., Anholon, R. & Besteiro, E. N. C. (2014). Measuring Project Complexity and Uncertainty: Scale Proposal. Business Management Dynamics, 4(1), 29-51. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2135039050?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
Google Scholar
Project Management Institute (2013). PMI’s Pulse of the Profession In-Depth Report: Navigating Complexity (USA).
Google Scholar
Qureshi S. M. & Kang, C. (2015). Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 65-176. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006
10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006 Google Scholar
Richmond, A. & Skitmore, M. (2006). Stress and coping; a study of project managers in a large ICT Organization. Project Management Journal, 37(5), 5–16. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/875697280603700502
10.1177/875697280603700502 Google Scholar
Saynisch, M. (2010). Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: An approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory—Results of the research program. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pmj.20159
10.1002/pmj.20159 Google Scholar
Schlindwein, S.L., & Ison, R. (2004). Human Knowing and Perceived Complexity: Implications for Systems Practice. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 6(3), 27–32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42788371
Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Fabbri, R. & Gallais, M. (2011). Situation de gestion, proximité cognitive et changement dans les organisations. Revue Française de gestion, 4(213), 157-169. https://doi.org/ 10.3166/rfg.213.157-169
10.3166/rfg.213.157-169 Google Scholar
Schön D. A. (1994). Le praticien réflexif. A la recherche du savoir caché dans l’agir professionnel. Les Editions Logiques.
Google Scholar
Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394-414. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772
10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772 Google Scholar
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation : HBS Press Book.
Google Scholar
Schoper, Y.-G., Wald, A.b & Ingason, H. T. (2018). Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Project Management Journal, 36(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008
10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008 Google Scholar
Snowden, D.J., Boone, M.E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business. Review. 85 (11), 68-76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5689229
Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (1993). Situated Action : À Symbolic Interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(05)80008-4
Google Scholar
Thamhain, H. J. & Wilemon, D. L. (1975). Conflict management in project life cycles. Sloan Management Review, 16(3):31-50. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/conflict-management-project-life-cycles/docview/206799600/se-2
Google Scholar
Thiry, M. (2001). Sensemaking in value management practice. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 71-77. DOI:10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00023-5
10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00023-5 Google Scholar
Thomas, J., & Mengel, T. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity - Advanced project management education. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304-315. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.001
10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.001 Google Scholar
Tywoniak, S., & Bredillet, C. N. (2017). Project governance and risk management: From first-order economizing to second-order complexity. In Cambridge handbook of organizational project management. S. Shankar, R. Müller, & N. Drouin (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 134-148. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781316662243.014
10.1017/9781316662243.014 Google Scholar
Tywoniak, S., Ika, L. & Bredillet, C. (2021). A Pragmatist Approach to Complexity Theorizing in Project Studies: Orders and Levels. Project Management Journal, 52(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/8 756 972 821 999 501
10.1177/8756972821999501 Google Scholar
Vidal, L. A., Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094-1110. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/03684920810884928
10.1108/03684920810884928 Google Scholar
Vidal, L.A., Marle, F. & Bocquet, J.-C. (2013). Building up a project complexity framework using an international Delphi study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 62(2/3/4), 251-283. https://doi.org/ 10.1504/IJTM.2013.055158
10.1504/IJTM.2013.055158 Google Scholar
Vignikin, A., Leroy, D. & Chedotel, F. (2016). L’improvisation en tant que situation managériale ? comment évolue-t-elle durant la vie d’un projet ?. @GRH, 18(1):65-98, https://doi.org/ 10.3917/grh.161.0065
Google Scholar
Ward, S. & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2),97-105. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1
10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1 Google Scholar
Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339.
10.2307/2393339 Google Scholar
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations, sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 Google Scholar
Whitty, S.J., Maylor, H. (2009). And then came complex Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 304-310. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.004
10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.004 Google Scholar
Williams, T.M. (2002). Modelling Complex Projects. Wiley.
Google Scholar
Williams, T. (2005). Assessing and moving from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 497-508. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TEM.2005.856572
10.1109/TEM.2005.856572 Google Scholar

Résumés

Résumé

Abstract

Resumen

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Parties annexes

Parties annexes

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article