Résumés
Résumé
La féminisation des entreprises a en général été abordée par le biais de législations agissant au niveau de la gouvernance. Dans cet article, nous suggérons que la notion de plafond de verre doit être entendue de façon plus large et concerne potentiellement toutes les strates de l’organisation. En France, la loi Rixain (2021) entend développer la féminisation des comités de direction. Notre article met en évidence le concept de multiplafonds de verre. Notre étude empirique, portant sur un échantillon européen, documente l’existence et la réalité de multiplafonds de verre. Enfin, nous contribuons à la littérature sur la diversité des conseils et des comités de direction en montrant l’importance des contextes nationaux et socio-économiques, appréhendés par la variété des capitalismes (VoCs).
Mots-clés :
- Femmes,
- Gouvernance,
- Europe,
- Conseil d’administration,
- Comités de direction
Abstract
The feminization of companies has generally been addressed through legislation at governance level. In this article, we suggest that the notion of the glass ceiling needs to be understood more broadly, and potentially concerns all strata of the organization. In France, the Rixain law (2021) intends to develop the feminization of executive committees. Our article highlights the concept of multiple glass ceiling. Our empirical study, based on a European sample, documents the existence and reality of glass ceilings. Finally, we contribute to the literature on board and executive committee diversity by demonstrating the importance of national and socio-economic contexts, apprehended through the variety of capitalisms (VoCs).
Keywords:
- Women,
- Corporate Governance,
- Europe,
- Board of Directors,
- Executive committee
Resumen
La feminización de las empresas se ha abordado generalmente a través de la legislación a nivel de gobernanza. En este artículo, sugerimos que la noción de techo de cristal debe entenderse de forma más amplia y afecta potencialmente a todos los niveles de la organización. En Francia, la ley Rixain (2021) pretende aumentar el número de mujeres en los comités de dirección. Nuestro artículo destaca el concepto de techos de cristal múltiples. Nuestro estudio empírico, basado en una muestra europea, documenta la existencia y la realidad de los techos de cristal. Por último, contribuimos a la literatura sobre la diversidad de los consejos de administración y los comités de dirección mostrando la importancia de los contextos nacionales y socioeconómicos, entendidos en términos de variedad de capitalismos (VoC).
Palabras clave:
- Gobernanza,
- Europa,
- Consejo de Administración,
- Comités de Dirección,
- Mujeres
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
- Acker, J. (2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du travail, 51(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.16407
- Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow?. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.001
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
- Adams, R. B., & Kirchmaier, T. (2016). Women on boards in finance and STEM industries. American Economic Review, 106(5), 277-81. 10.1257/aer.p20161034
- Agarwal, S., Qian, W., Reeb, D. M., & Sing, T. F. (2016). Playing the boys game: Golf buddies and board diversity. American Economic Review, 106(5), 272-76. 10.1257/aer.p20161033
- Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28, 447–465. 10.5465/AMR.2003.10196772
- Aguilera, R., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and International Corporate Governance. The Academy Management Annals, 4(1), 485–556. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495525
- Allemand, I., & Brullebaut, B. (2014). Le capital humain des femmes récemment nommées dans les conseils d’administration des sociétés françaises cotées à Paris. Management international, 18(3), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.7202/1025087ar
- Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business ethics, 50(2), 177–186. 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022125.95758.98
- Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers. Human resource management, 33(4), 549‑560. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330405
- Beck, N., and J. N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89: 634–647. 10.2307/2082979
- Belot, F., Ginglinger, E., Slovin, M. B., & Sushka, M. E. (2014). Freedom of choice between unitary and two-tier boards: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(3), 364–385. 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.011
- Bender A-F., Dang R., Scotto M-J., 2016, Les profils des femmes membres des conseils d’administration en France, Travail, Genre et Sociétés, n° 35, p. 67-85. 10.3917/tgs.035.0067
- Breusch, T.S., and A.R. Pagan (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics,Review of Economic Studies 47, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
- Coron, C. (2021). How perceived managerial behaviors influence employees’ perception of gender equality: the case of a French organization. Management international, 25(1), 52-70. 10.7202/1076017ar
- Coron, C., & Pigeyre, F. (2020). L’appropriation des politiques d’égalité professionnelle par les acteurs : éléments de contexte et conditions. Management international, 24(1), 127-139. 10.7202/1069099ar
- Cullen, Z., & Perez-Truglia, R. (2023). The old boys’ club: Schmoozing and the gender gap. American Economic Review, 113 (7), 1703–1740. 10.1257/aer.20210863
- Deloitte, 2022, Deloitte Global Center for Corporate Governance,Women in the boardroom: A global perspective. 1-63. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/services/risk-advisory/research/women-in-the-boardroom-seventh-edition.html
- Driscoll, J. C., and A. C. Kraay. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
- Elstad, B., & Ladegard, G. (2012). Women on corporate boards: key influencers or tokens?. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 595–615. 10.1007/s10997-010-9165-y
- Ferrary, M. (2018). Gender diversity in the labor market: Employer discrimination, educational choices and professional preferences. @ GRH, (2), 83–118. 10.3917/grh.182.0083
- Ferrary, M. (2021). La loi Copé-Zimmermann, quels impacts sur le profil sociologique des administrateur (rice) s du CAC 40. Revue Française de Gestion, 298(5), 97-115. 10.3166/rfg.2021.00557
- Ferrary M. & Déo S., 2022, Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2093121
- Fitzsimmons, T. W., & Callan, V. J. (2016), Applying a capital perspective to explain continued gender inequality in the C-suite. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.003
- Girardone, C., Kokas, S., & Wood, G. (2021). Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives. Journal of Corporate Finance, 71, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101906
- Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51–63. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003
- Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
- Hall P., et A Soskice D., (2001), Varieties of capitalism : The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxforf University Press.
- Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279222
- Huang, J., Diehl, M. R., & Paterlini, S. (2020). The influence of corporate elites on women on supervisory boards: Female directors’ inclusion in Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 347–364. 10.1007/s10551-019-04119-6
- Jeong, S. H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), p. 1219‑1252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0716
- Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990. 10.1086/226 425
- Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.001
- Lewellyn, K. B., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2020). The corporate board glass ceiling: The role of empowerment and culture in shaping board gender diversity. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(2), 329–346. 10.1007/s10551-019-04116-9
- Mateos De Cabo, Terjesen S., Escot L., Gimeno R., 2019, Do ‘soft law’board gender quotas work? Evidence from a natural experiment, European Management Journal 37 (5), 611–624 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.004
- Mateos de Cabo, R., Grau, P., Gimeno, R., & Gabaldón, P. (2022). Shades of power: network links with gender quotas and corporate governance codes. British Journal of Management, 33(2), 703–723. 10.1111/1467-8551.12454
- Maume Jr, D. J. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and occupations, 26(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888499026004005
- Mensi-Klarbach, H. & Seierstad, C. (2020) Gender quotas on corporate boards: Similarities and differences in quota scenarios. European Management Review 17(3): 615–631. 10.1111/emre.12374
- Mensi-Klarbach, H., Leixnering, S. & Schiffinger, M. (2021) The carrot or the stick: Self-regulation for gender-diverse boards via codes of good governance. Journal of Business Ethics 170(3): 577–593. 10.1007/s 10551-019-04336-z
- Morgenroth, T., Kirby, T. A., Ryan, M. K., & Sudkämper, A. (2020). The who, when, and why of the glass cliff phenomenon: A meta-analysis of appointments to precarious leadership positions. Psychological bulletin, 146(9), 797. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000234
- Moulin, Y., & Point, S. (2013). Les administratrices des grands groupes français cotés. Revue Française de Gestion, 4, 15-32. 10.3166/RFG.233.15-32
- Mun, E., & Jung, J. (2018). Change above the glass ceiling: Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity in Japanese firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/000183921771292
- Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of business ethics, 118(2), 227–249. 10.1007/s 10551-012-1576-z
- Nekhili, M., Gull, A. A., Chtioui, T., & Radhouane, I. (2020). Gender-diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(1–2), 52–99.https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12409
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147–160. 10.2307/2095101
- Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
- Perrault, E. (2015). Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 149–165. 10.1007/s 10551-014-2092-0
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Bel-Oms, I. (2020). Varieties of capitalism, corporate governance mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement: An overview of coordinated and liberal market economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1840
- Rebérioux, A., & Roudaut, G. (2019). The Role of Rookie Female Directors in a Post-Quota Period: Gender Inequalities within French Boards. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 58(3), 423–483. 10.1111/irel.12238
- Russo, G., & Hassink, W. (2012). Multiple glass ceilings. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 51(4), 892–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00705.x
- Ryan M. & Haslam S.A, 2007, The Glass Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding the Appointment of Women to Precarious Leadership Positions, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, n° 2, pp. 549–572. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351856
- Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Yousaf, A. (2016). Firm-level determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: Evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 25(5), 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.002
- Shapiro, S. S., and R. S. Francia. (1972). An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67: 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481232
- Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611. 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
- Sheridan, A., & Milgate, G. (2005). Accessing board positions: A comparison of female and male board members’ views. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑8683.2005.00475.x
- Stainback, K., Kleiner, S., & Skaggs, S. (2016). Women in power: Undoing or redoing the gendered organization?. Gender & Society, 30(1), 109‑135. 10.1177/0891243215602906
- Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2021). Contingent effects of workforce diversity on firm innovation: High-tech industry and market turbulence as critical environmental contingencies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), p. 1986–2012. 10.1080/09585192.2019.1579243
- Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483. 10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
- Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65. 10.1017/beq.2016.7
- Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 55–63. 10.1007/s 10551-007-9656-1
- Toé, M. (2014). Les déterminants individuels du plafond de verre : cas de la composition des instances de gouvernance des entreprises françaises cotées. Management international, 18(4), 48-67. 10.7202/1026028ar
- Tyrowicz, J., Terjesen, S., & Mazurek, J. (2020). All on board? New evidence on board gender diversity from a large panel of European firms. European Management Journal, 38(4), 634–645. 10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.001
- Valls Martinez, M. D. C., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1539–1553. 10.1002/csr.1825
- Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277. 10.1177/0149206311428671
- Wooldridge J. M. (2000). A Framework for Estimating Dynamic, Unobserved Effects Panel Data Models with Possible Feedback to Future Explanatory Variables, Economics Letters, Vol. 68, No. 3, p. 245–250. 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00230-5
10.7202/1025087ar