Abstracts
Résumé
La nature en ville offre de multiples bienfaits tant sur le plan écologique que sociologique, en favorisant la santé physique et mentale. De nombreuses initiatives municipales à travers le monde se penchent ainsi sur l’identification et le maintien de ces services écosystémiques, à l’heure où ces derniers risquent d’être durement touchés par les changements climatiques. Pourtant, peu de recherches se sont concentrées sur les facteurs régulant la combinaison des services rendus par la nature urbaine et des risques auxquels elle est exposée. Notre étude vise donc à quantifier 6 services (perméabilité des sols, régulation de la température de surface, séquestration/stockage de carbone, biodiversité, interactions humaines avec les écosystèmes et cueillette de champignons comestibles) et 5 risques (mortalité des arbres, maladies/dépérissement, dépôts de neige, vulnérabilité aux intempéries et espèces exotiques envahissantes) pour 12 écosystèmes du campus de l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières. Les résultats révèlent que les services et les risques varient selon le type d’écosystème. La jeune pinède blanche et les milieux mixtes surannés fournissent les services les plus importants, tandis que la pinède grise et le milieu mixte sont les plus exposés aux risques. Plus les écosystèmes sont âgés et éloignés des perturbations anthropiques, plus ils rendent un grand nombre de services, sans augmenter le niveau moyen des risques. Cette étude fournit une méthodologie facilement ajustable pour évaluer la dynamique spatiale des services offerts et des risques encourus par la nature urbaine et, de ce fait, formuler des recommandations aux gestionnaires.
Mots-clés :
- forêts urbaines,
- gestion durable des espaces verts,
- régulation climatique,
- services écosystémiques,
- télédétection
Abstract
Urban nature provides multiple benefits, both ecological and sociological, with the latter including supporting physical and mental health. Therefore, many municipal initiatives worldwide are focusing on identifying and maintaining these ecosystem services. However, this comes at a time when urban nature risks being severely affected by climate change. Despite this, few studies have examined the factors governing the combination of services provided by urban nature and the risks to which it is exposed. The present study aimed to quantify 6 services (soil permeability, surface temperature regulation, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, human-ecosystem interactions, and edible wild mushroom harvesting) and 5 risks (tree mortality, disease or decline, snow deposits, vulnerability to extreme weather, and invasive alien species) across 12 ecosystems on the campus of the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (Canada). The results show that services and risks vary according to ecosystem type. Young white pine stands and mature mixed stands provide the highest levels of services, while jack pine stands and younger mixed stands are most exposed to risks. Older ecosystems located farther from anthropogenic disturbances, deliver a greater number of services without increasing their average level of risk. This study provides a methodology that can be easily adjusted to evaluate the spatial dynamics of services delivered and risks faced by urban nature, thereby offering actionable recommendations for managers.
Keywords:
- climate regulation,
- ecosystem services,
- remote sensing,
- sustainable green space management,
- urban forests
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Adame, P., M. Del Río et I. Cañellas, 2010. Modeling individual-tree mortality in Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) stands. Annals of Forest Science, 67 (8) : 810. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010046.
- Alberti, M., 2015. Eco-evolutionary dynamics in an urbanizing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30 (2) : 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.007.
- Anderegg, W.R.L., J.M. Kane et L.D.L. Anderegg, 2013. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nature Climate Change, 3 (1) : 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1635.
- Beltran, R.S. et C.E. Tarwater, 2024. Overcoming the pitfalls of categorizing continuous variables in ecology, evolution and behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 291 (2032) : 20241640. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.1640.
- Bergeron, G., M. Point, S. Rojo, A. Thériault, J. Fournier et S. Béland, soumis. Point de vue d’étudiants universitaires sur une expérience d’outdoor education : quelles retombées et quels vecteurs à l’apprentissage ? Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur.
- Bergeron, Y. et N.J. Fenton, 2012. Boreal forests of eastern Canada revisited: Old growth, nonfire disturbances, forest succession, and biodiversity. Botany, 90 (6) : 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1139/b2012-034.
- Bertram, C. et K. Rehdanz, 2015. Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use. Ecosystem Services, 12 : 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011.
- Bigler, C., D.G. Gavin, C. Gunning et T.T. Veblen, 2007. Drought induces lagged tree mortality in a subalpine forest in the Rocky Mountains. Oikos, 116 (12) : 1983-1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16034.x.
- Bolduc, A.M., 1999. Géologie des formations superficielles, région de Trois-Rivières, Québec. Commission géologique du Canada, Ottawa, Dossier public 2994, carte géologique, échelle 1/50 000. https://doi.org/10.4095/210533.
- Bongers, F.J., B. Schmid, H. Bruelheide, F. Bongers, S. Li, G. von Oheimb, Y. Li, A. Cheng, K. Ma et X. Liu, 2021. Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 5 (12) : 1594-1603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3.
- Boulet, B. et G. Landry, 2015. La carie des arbres : fondements, diagnostic et application. 3e éd. Les Publications du Québec, Québec, 368 p.
- Bourdeau-Lepage, L., 2019. De l’intérêt pour la nature en ville : cadre de vie, santé et aménagement urbain. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 5 : 893-911. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.195.0893.
- Brockerhoff, E.G., L. Barbaro, B. Castagneyrol, D.I. Forrester, B. Gardiner, J.R. González-Olabarria, P.O’B. Lyver, N. Meurisse, A. Oxbrough, H. Taki, I.D. Thompson, F. van der Plas et H. Jactel, 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26 (13) : 3005-3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2.
- Burkhard, B., F. Kroll, S. Nedkov et F. Müller, 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21 : 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
- Cadotte, M.W., K. Carscadden et N. Mirotchnick, 2011. Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48 (5) : 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x.
- Chang, J., Z. Qu, R. Xu, K. Pan, B. Xu, Y. Min, Y. Ren, G. Yang et Y. Ge, 2017. Assessing the ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces along urban center-edge gradients. Scientific Reports, 7 (1) : 11226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11559-5.
- Cheng, X., S. Van Damme, L. Li et P. Uyttenhove, 2019. Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37 : 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
- Chojnacky, D.C., L.S. Heath et J.C. Jenkins, 2014. Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 87 (1) : 129-151.
- Cronshey, R., R. McCuen, N. Miller, W. Rawls, S. Robbins et D. Woodward, 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division. Technical Release 55 (TR-55), Washington, DC.
- Dinter van, M., M. Kools, G. Dane, M. Weijs-Perrée, K. Chamilothori, E. van Leeuwen, A. Borgers et P. van den Berg, 2022. Urban green parks for long-term subjective well-being: Empirical relationships between personal characteristics, park characteristics, park use, sense of place, and satisfaction with life in the Netherlands. Sustainability, 14 (9) : 4911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094911.
- Dobbs, C., D. Kendal et C.R. Nitschke, 2014. Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecological Indicators, 43 : 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007.
- Dupuy, L., T. Fourcaud et A. Stokes, 2005. A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant and Soil, 278 (1) : 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2.
- Erlwein, S. et S. Pauleit, 2021. Trade-offs between urban green space and densification: Balancing outdoor thermal comfort, mobility, and housing demand. Urban Planning, 6 (1) : 5-19. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3481.
- Felipe-Lucia, M.R., S. Soliveres, C. Penone, P. Manning, F. van der Plas, S. Boch, D. Prati, C. Ammer, P. Schall, M.M. Gossner, J. Bauhus, F. Buscot, S. Blaser, N. Blüthgen, A. de Frutos, M. Ehbrecht, K. Frank, K. Goldmann, F. Hänsel… et E. Allan, 2018. Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services. Nature Communications, 9 (1) : 4839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4.
- Foltran, E.C. et N. Lamersdorf, 2024. Tree species identity drives soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in nutrient-poor sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 567 : 122090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122090.
- Fountain, W.M., C. Kaiser, M.L. Witt et J.R. Hartmann, 1990. Transplanting trees and shrubs. University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, Publication ID-80, 8 p. https://publications.mgcafe.uky.edu/id-80.
- Genua-Olmedo, A., G.M. Verutes, H. Teixeira, A.L. Sousa et A.I. Lillebø, 2023. A spatial explicit vulnerability assessment for a coastal socio-ecological Natura 2000 site. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10 : 1086135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1086135.
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., Å. Gren, D.N. Barton, D.N.J. Langemeyer, T. McPhearson, P. O’Farrell, E. Andersson, Z. Hamstead et P. Kremer, 2013. Urban ecosystem services. Dans : Elmqvist, T. M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P.J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, M. Sendstad, K.C. Seto et C. Wilkinson (édit.). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht, p. 175-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1.
- Guo, H., Y. Cai, B. Li, H. Wan et Z. Yang, 2023. An improved approach for evaluating landscape ecological risks and exploring its coupling coordination with ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 348 : 119277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119277.
- Haase, D., N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, M. Artmann, S. Borgström, J. Breuste, E. Gomez Baggethun, Å. Gren, Z. Hamstead, R. Hansen, N. Kabisch, P. Kremer, J. Langemeyer, E. Lorance Rall, T. McPhearson, S. Pauleit, S. Qureshi, N. Schwarz, A. Voigt et T. Elmqvist, 2014. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43 (4) : 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
- Haddad, N.M., L.A. Brudvig, J. Clobert, K.F. Davies, A. Gonzalez, R.D. Holt, T.E. Lovejoy, J.O. Sexton, M.P. Austin, C.D. Collins, W.M. Cook, E.I. Damschen, R.M. Ewers, B.L. Foster, C.N. Jenkins, A.J. King, W.F. Laurance, D.J. Levey, C.R. Margules… et J.R. Townshend, 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1 (2) : e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
- Haines-Young, R. et M. Potschin, 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Dans : Raffaelli, D.G. et C.L.J. Frid (édit.). Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 110-139.
- Havel, J.E., C.E. Lee et J.M. Vander Zanden, 2005. Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? BioScience, 55 (6) : 518-525. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0518:DRFIIL]2,0.CO; 2.
- Hilbert, D.R., L.A. Roman, A.K. Koeser, J. Vogt et N.S. van Doorn, 2019. Urban tree mortality: A literature review. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 45 (5) : 167-200. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.015.
- Hong, S.-K., S.-W. Lee, H.-K. Jo et M. Yoo, 2019. Impact of frequency of visits and time spent in urban green space on subjective well-being. Sustainability, 11 (15) : 4189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154189.
- Hosseini, S., J. Oladi et H. Amirnejad, 2021. The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 (6) : 9052-9075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01011-6.
- [IPBES] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Dans : Díaz, S., J. Settele, E.S. Brondízio, H.T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K.A. Brauman, S.H.M. Butchart, K.M.A. Chan, L.A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S.M. Subramanian, G.F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura,… et C.N. Zayas (édit.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 56 p. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553458.
- Jutras, S., H. Hökkä, V. Alenius et H. Salminen, 2003. Modeling mortality of individual trees in drained peatland sites in Finland. Silva Fennica, 37 (2) : 504. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.504.
- Keith, H., B.G. Mackey et D.B. Lindenmayer, 2009. Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world’s most carbon-dense forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (28) : 11635-11640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901970106.
- Lee, T.D., S.E. Eisenhaure et I.P. Gaudreau, 2016. Pre-logging treatment of invasive glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus Mill.) promotes regeneration of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Forests, 8 (1) : 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8010016.
- Leemans, R. et R.S. De Groot, 2003. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 245 p.
- Loreau, M., N. Mouquet et R.D. Holt, 2003. Meta-ecosystems: A theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecology Letters, 6 (8) : 673-679.
- Maas, J., S.M.E. van Dillen, R.A. Verheij et P.P. Groenewegen, 2009. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15 (2) : 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006.
- Madureira, H. et A. Monteiro, 2021. Going green and going dense: A systematic review of compatibilities and conflicts in urban research. Sustainability, 13 (19) : 10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910643.
- Magurran, A.E., 2021. Measuring biological diversity. Current Biology, 31 (19) : PR1174-R1177. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049.
- Manning, P., F. van der Plas, S. Soliveres, E. Allan, F.T. Maestre, G. Mace, M.J. Whittingham et M. Fischer, 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2 (3) : 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7.
- [MDDELCC] Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, 2017. Arbres et arbustes à utiliser pour la végétalisation des terrains réhabilités par analyse de risque. Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, 34 p. https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/sol/terrains/guide-plantation.pdf.
- [MELCCFP] Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs, 2024. 2030 Nature Plan : 2024-2028 Action Plan. Gouvernement du Québec. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/environnement/biodiversite/plan-nature-2030-plan-action-en.pdf.
- Miron, J., A.A. Millward, M. Vaziriyeganeh, J.J. Zwiazek et J. Urban, 2022. Winter climate variability, de-icing salt and streetside tree vitality. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10 : 749168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.749168.
- Mitchell, S.J., 2013. Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: A synthesis. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 86 (2) : 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cps058.
- Mukherjee, N., J. Hugé, W.J. Sutherland, J. McNeill, M. Van Opstal, F. Dahdouh-Guebas et N. Koedam, 2015. The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: Applications and guidelines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6 (9) : 1097-1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12387.
- Munns, W.R., Jr., V. Poulsen, W.R. Gala, S.J. Marshall, A.W. Rea, M.T. Worensen et K. von Stackelberg, 2016. Ecosystem services in risk assessment and management. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13 (1) : 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1835.
- Nations Unies, 2019. Département des affaires économiques et sociales, Division de la population. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York: Nations Unies.
- Nicoll, B.C., B.A. Gardiner, B. Rayner et A.J. Peace, 2006. Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36 (7) : 1871-1883. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-072.
- Nowak, D.J. et D.E. Crane, 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116 (3) : 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7.
- Olah, B., V. Kunca et I. Gallay, 2020. Assessing the potential of forest stands for ectomycorrhizal mushrooms as a subsistence ecosystem service for socially disadvantaged people: A case study from Central Slovakia. Forests, 11 (3) : 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030282.
- Padayachee, A.L., U.M. Irlich, K.T. Faulkner, M. Gaertner, Ş. Procheş, J.R.U. Wilson et M. Rouget, 2017. How do invasive species travel to and through urban environments? Biological Invasions, 19 (12) : 3557-3570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1596-9.
- Pataki, D.E., M. Alberti, M.L. Cadenasso, A.J. Felson, M.J. McDonnell, S. Pincetl, R.V. Pouyat, H. Setälä et T.H. Whitlow, 2021. The benefits and limits of urban tree planting for environmental and human health. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9 : 603757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.603757.
- Pauw de, K., L. Depauw, K. Calders, S. Caluwaerts, S.A.O. Cousins, E. De Lombaerde, M. Diekmann, D. Frey, J. Lenoir, C. Meeussen, A. Orczewska, J. Plue, F. Spicher, F. Zellweger, P. Vangansbeke, K. Verheyen et P. De Frenne, 2023. Urban forest microclimates across temperate Europe are shaped by deep edge effects and forest structure. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 341 : 109632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109632.
- Peller, T. et F. Altermatt, 2024. Invasive species drive cross-ecosystem effects worldwide. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 8 (7) : 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02380-1.
- Reid, W.V., H.A. Mooney, A. Cropper, D. Capistrano, S.R. Carpenter, K. Chopra, P. Daskupta, T. Dietz, A.K. Duraiappap, R. Hassan, R. Kasperson, R. Leemans, R.M. May, A.J. McMichael, P. Pingali, C. Samper, R. Scholes, R.T. Watson, A.H. Zakri… et M.B. Zurek, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being − Synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 137 p.
- Rojo, S. et G. Bergeron, 2021. Les médiations dans l’intervention psychosociale par la nature et l’aventure. Sociographe, no Hors-série 14 : 39-60. https://doi.org/10.3917/graph1.hs014.0039.
- Roman, L.A., J.J. Battles et J.R. McBride, 2016. Urban tree mortality: A primer on demographic approaches. General Technical Report NRS-158, Newtown Square, PA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 24 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-158.
- Romanello, M., C. di Napoli, C. Green, H. Kennard, P. Lampard, D. Scamman, M. Walawender, Z. Ali, N. Ameli, S. Ayeb-Karlsson, P.J. Beggs, K. Belesova, L. Berang Ford, K. Bowen, W. Cai, M. Callaghan, D. Campbell-Lendrum,∙J. Chambers, T.J.Cross…et A. Costello, 2023. The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: The imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms. The Lancet, 402 (10419) : 2346-2394.
- Schwarz, N., A. Haase, D. Haase, N. Kabisch, S. Kabisch, V. Liebelt, D. Rink, M.W. Strohbach, J. Welz et M. Wolff, 2021. How are urban green spaces and residential development related? A synopsis of multi-perspective analyses for Leipzig, Germany. Land, 10 (6) : 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060630.
- Seidl, R., D. Thom, M. Kautz, D. Martin-Benito, M. Peltoniemi, G. Vacchiano, J. Wild, D. Ascoli, M. Petr, J. Honkaniemi, M.J. Lexer, V. Trotsiuk, P. Mairota, M. Svoboda, M. Fabrika, T.A. Nagel et C.P.O. Reyer, 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7 (6) : 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303.
- Shanahan, D.F., R.A. Fuller, R. Bush, B.B. Lin et K.J. Gaston, 2015. The health benefits of urban nature: How much do we need? BioScience, 65 (5) : 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv032.
- Sheets, V.L. et C.D. Manzer, 1991. Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: Some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23 (3) : 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591233002.
- Speak, A., F.J. Escobedo, A. Russo et S. Zerbe, 2018. An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees. Ecological Indicators, 95 (1) : 544-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048.
- Sposito, G., 2024. Soil. Encyclopedia Britannica. Disponible en ligne à : https://www.britannica.com/science/soil.
- Sun, R. et L. Chen, 2017. Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: Mitigation and diversification. Ecosystem Services, 23 : 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.011.
- Tilman, D., F. Isbell et J.M. Cowles, 2014. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 45 (1) : 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917.
- Uddin, M.D.N. et R.W. Robinson, 2017. Responses of plant species diversity and soil physical-chemical-microbial properties to Phragmites australis invasion along a density gradient. Scientific reports, 7 (1) : 11007. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11205-0.
- Vainio, E.J., A. Rumbou, J.J. Diez et C. Büttner, 2024. Forest tree virome as a source of tree diseases and biological control agents. Current Forestry Reports, 10 (2) : 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00214-8.
- Villeneuve, N., 2011. Avis concernant la valeur des forêts de pin blanc et de pin gris du campus de l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l’aménagement et de l’environnement forestier, Québec, 10 p.
- Vries de, S., R.A. Verheij, P.P. Groenewegen et P. Spreeuwenberg, 2003. Natural environments—healthy environments ? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35 (10) : 1717-1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111.
- Wang, C., Z. Ren, X. Chang, G. Wang, X. Hong, Y. Dong, Y. Guo, P. Zhang, Z. Ma et W. Wang, 2023. Understanding the cooling capacity and its potential drivers in urban forests at the single tree and cluster scales. Sustainable Cities and Society, 93 : 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104531.
- Wattenhofer, D.J. et G.R. Johnson, 2021. Understanding why young urban trees die can improve future success. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64 : 127247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127247.
- Xu, C., T.A. Kohler, T.M. Lenton, J.-C. Svenning et M. Scheffer, 2020. Future of the human climate niche. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (21) : 11350-11355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910114117.
- Zhao, Q., Y. Guo, T. Ye, A. Gasparrini, S. Tong, A. Overcenco, A. Urban, A. Schneider, A. Enterazi, A.M. Vicedo-Cabrera, A. Zanobetti, A. Analitis, A. Zeka, A. Tobias, B. Nunes, B. Alahmad, B. Armstrong, B. Forsberg, S.-C. Pan… et S. Li, 2021. Global, regional, and national burden of mortality associated with non-optimal ambient temperatures from 2000 to 2019: A three-stage modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5 (7) : E415-E425. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00081-4.
