Résumés
Résumé
L’anthropologie est définie comme l’étude de l’être humain (anthrôpos) ; mais où peut-on localiser le sujet de cette discipline ? Dans cet article, je propose d’explorer un type particulier d’entités que j’appelle les objets-frontières humains. Ces entités peuvent simultanément appartenir ou non au corps humain, relever de la personne et de la chose, du soi et du non-soi. La biomédecine actuelle repose en grande partie sur l’utilisation de tels objets, tant pour la recherche que pour le traitement. Cet article vise à montrer qu’ils constituent de nouveaux sites productifs pour l’analyse de thèmes classiques comme l’identité, la catégorisation et la liminalité. À partir d’exemples concrets, il s’agit de comprendre comment de tels espaces facilitent l’étude des négociations actuelles de l’identité dans la fabrique d’une nouvelle vie (traitement contre l’infertilité), la reconstruction du corps (technologie liée à la transplantation) et même la mort (incinération).
Mots-clés :
- corps,
- objet-frontière,
- ethnographie multi-sites,
- médecine de la transplantation
Abstract
Anthropology is known as the study of anthrôpos, the human being. But where should one locate this study ? In this paper I suggest exploring a particular type of entity that I call human boundary object : an object which is deemed both part of and not-part of the body ; both person and thing ; both self and not-self. Current biomedicine to a large extent depends upon the use of such objects for both research and treatment, and I suggest that they constitute productive sites for the study of classical themes such as personhood, categorization and liminality. I give examples of how such sites can facilitate examination of current negotiations of personhood in the making of new life (e.g. infertility treatment), in the reshaping of bodies (e.g. transplant technology), and upon death (e.g. cremation).
Keywords:
- body,
- boundary object,
- multi-sited ethnography,
- transplant me
Resumen
La antropología es definida como el estudio del ser humano (anthrôpos), pero ¿dónde puede localizarse el sujeto de esta disciplina ? En este artículo propongo explorar un tipo particular de entidades que llamo los objetos-fronteras humanas. Estas entidades pueden, simultáneamente, pertenecer o no al cuerpo humano, depender de la persona y de la cosa, de sí mismo y no de sí mismo. La biomedicina actual se basa en gran parte en la utilización de tales objetos, tanto para la investigación como para el tratamiento. Este artículo busca demostrar que ellos constituyen nuevos sitios productivos para el análisis de temas clásicos como la identidad, la categorización y la liminalidad. Se trata de comprender, a partir de ejemplos concretos, cómo tales espacios facilitan el estudio de las negociaciones actuales de la identidad en la fábrica de una nueva vida (tratamiento contra la infertilidad), la reconstrucción del cuerpo (tecnología relacionada con los trasplantes) e inclusive en la muerte (incineración).
Palabras clave:
- cuerpos,
- objetos-frontera,
- etnografía multisitios,
- medicina de los trasplantes
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Addelson, K. P. (1999), « The Emergence of the Fetus », in L. Morgan, et M.W. Michaels (dir.), Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions, Philadelphie, University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 26-42.
- Alnaes, A. H. (2003), « The Anthropological Fieldworker in a Biomedical High-Tech Setting. Some Methodological Problems and Experiences », Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice, vol. 10, no 3, p. 9-18.
- Anagnost, A. S. (2006), « Strange Circulations : the Blood Economy in Rural China », Economy and Society, vol. 35, no 4, p. 509-529.
- Anderson, M. W. et R. Schapiro (2004), « From Donor to Recipient : The Pathway and Business of Donated Tissues », in S. J. Youngner, M. W. Anderson et R. Schapiro (dir.), Transplanting Human Tissue : Ethics, Policy and Practice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 3-13.
- Appadurai, A. (1986), « Introduction : Commodities and the Politics of Value », in A. Appadurai, (dir.), The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 3-63.
- Bashford, A. (2004), Imperial Hygiene : A Critical History of Colonialism, Nationalism and Public Health, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bodenhorn, B. et G. V. Bruck (2006), « “Entangled in Histories” : An Introduction to the Anthropology of Names and Naming », in G. V. Bruck, et B. Bodenhorn (dir.), The Anthropology of Names and Naming, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 1-30.
- Bower, G. C. et S. L. Star (1999), Sorting Things Out — Classification and Its Consequenses, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
- Brown, N. (2005), « Regulating Hybrids — “Making a Mess” and “Cleaning up” in Tissue Engineering and Transpecies Transplantation », Social Theory and Health, vol. 4, p. 1-23.
- Butler, P. E. M. (2005), « Facial Transplantation — A New Option in Reconstruction of Servere Facial Injury », BMJ, vol. 331, no 7527, p. 1349-1350.
- Callon, M. (1998), « The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics », in M. Callon, (dir.), The Laws of the Markets, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 1-57.
- Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2004), « The Social and Ethical Issues of Post-Genomic Human Biobanks », Nature Review Genetics, vol. 5, p. 6-13
- Carsten, J. (2000), « Introduction : Cultures of Relatedness », in J. Carsten, (dir.), Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 1-36.
- Charo, R. A. (2004), « Legal Characterizations of Human Tissue », in S. J. Youngner, M. W. Anderson et R. Schapiro (dir.), Transplanting Human Tissue : Ethics, Policy and Practice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 101-119.
- Clarke, A. E. (1998), Disciplining Reproduction, Modernity, American Life Sciences, and « the Problems of Sex », London, University of California Press.
- Danish council of ethics (2004), « Det Etiske Råds udtalelse om donation af ubefrugtede aeg », Høringssvar til Folketinget, Janvier 26.
- Desjarlais, R. (2000), « The Makings of Personhood in a Shelter for People Considered Homeless and Mentally Ill », Ethos, vol. 27, no 4, p. 466-489.
- Douglas, M. (1995), Purity and Danger. An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, Londres, Routledge.
- Ellen, R. (1988), « Fetishism », Man, vol. 23, no 2, p. 213-235.
- Ellis, B. (2002), « Why Is a Lucky Rabbit’s Foot Lucky ? Body Parts as Fetishes », Journal of Folklore Research, vol. 39, no 1, p. 51-84.
- Franklin, S. (2003), « Ethical Biocapital. New Strategies of Cell Culture », in S. Franklin et M. Lock (dir.), Remaking Life and Death. Toward and Anthropology of the Biosciences, Santa Fe, School of American Research Press/James Currey, p. 97-127.
- Franklin, S. (2006), « Embryonic Economies : The Double Reproductive Value of Stem Cells », BioSocieties, vol. 1, p. 71-90.
- Franklin, S. (1997), Embodied Progress. A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception, Londres, Routledge.
- Frazer, J. (1993), The Golden Bough, Hertfordshire, Wordsworth Editions Ltd, Cumberland House.
- Geertz, C. (1973), « Person, Time, and Conduct in Bali », in The Interpretation of Cultures, New York, Basic Books, p. 345-359.
- Gibbons, S. M. (2008), « From Principles to Practice : Implementing Genetic Database Governance », Medical Law International, vol. 9, no 2, p. 101-109.
- Hacking, I. (2006), « The Cartesian Body », BioSocieties, vol. 1, p. 13-15.
- Haraway, D. (2004), « A Manifesto for Cyborgs : Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980’s », The Haraway Reader, Londres : Routledge, p. 7-45.
- Hoeyer, K. (2008), « The Ethics of Research Biobanking : A Critical Review of the Literature », Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, vol. 25, p. 429-452.
- Hoeyer, K. (2009), « Tradable Body Parts ? How Bone and Recycled Prosthetic Devices Acquire a Price without Forming a “Market” », BioSocieties, 4(2-3), 239-256.
- Hoeyer, K. et R. Tutton (2005), « “Ethics Was Here” : Studying the Language-Games of Ethics in the Case of UK Biobank », Critical Public Health, vol. 15, no 4, p. 385-397.
- Hogle, L. (1996), « Transforming “Body Parts” into Therapeutic Tools : A Report from Germany », Medical Anthropology Quarterly, vol. 10, no 4, p. 675-682.
- James, W. (2003), The Ceremonial Animal — A New Portrait of Anthropology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Kelly, S. (2003), « Public Bioethics and Publics : Consensus, Boundaries, and Participation in Biomedical Science Policy », Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 28, no 3, p. 339-364.
- Kent, J. (2003), « Lay Experts and the Politics of Breast Implants », Public Understanding of Science, vol. 12, no 4, p. 403-421.
- Kent, J., A. Faulkner, I. Geesink et D. Fitzpatrick (2006), « Culturing Cells, Reproducing and Regulating the Self », Body & Society, vol. 12, no 2, p. 1-23.
- Kopytoff, I. (1986), « The Cultural Biography of Things : Commoditization as Process », in A. Appadurai, (dir.), The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 64-91.
- Kroløkke, C. (2009), « Click a Donor : Viking Masculinity On the Line », Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 9, no 7, 7-30.
- Lawrence, S. (1998), « Beyond the Grave — The Use and Meaning of Human Body Parts : A Historical Introduction », in R. F. Weir, (dir.), Stored Tissue Samples. Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications, Iowa, University of Iowa Press, p. 111-142.
- Leach, E. R. (1958), « Magical Hair », The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 88, no 2, p. 147-164.
- Linke, U. (2005), « Touching the Corpse. The Unmaking of Memory in the Body Museum », Anthropology Today, vol. 21, no 5, p. 13-19.
- Lock, M. (2002), Twice Dead. Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death, Berkeley, University of California Press.
- Marcus, G. E. (1995), « Ethnography in/of the World System : The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography », Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 24, p. 95-117.
- Mauss, M. (1985), « A Category of the Human Mind : The Notion of Person ; the Notion of Self », in M. Carrithers, S. Collins et S. Lukes (dir.), The Category of the Person. Anthropology, Philosophy, History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Milton, K. (2003), « Human-Animal Relations », Anthropology Today, vol. 19, no1, p. 19-20.
- Morgan, L. (2003), « Embroyo Tales », in S. Franklin et M. Lock (dir.), Remaking Life and Death. Toward and Anthropology of the Biosciences, Santa Fe, School of American Research Press/James Currey, p. 261-291.
- Muraleedharan, V. R., S. Jan et S. R. Prasad (2006), « The Trade in Human Organs in Tamil Nadu : The Anatomy of Regulatory Failure », Health Economics, Policy and Law, vol. 1, p. 41-57.
- Orobitg, G. et C. Salazar (2005), « The Gift of Motherhood : Egg Donation in a Barcelona Infertility Clinic », Ethnos, vol. 70, no 1, p. 31-52.
- Pálsson, G. (2002), « Medical Databases. The Icelandic Case », in S. Lundin et L. Åkesson (dir.), Gene Technology and Economy, Lund : Nordic Academic Press, p. 22-41.
- Parry, B. et C. Gere (2006), « Contested Bodies : Property Models and the Commodification of Human Biological Artefacts », Science as Culture, vol. 15, no 2, p. 139-158.
- Rabinow, P. (1999), French DNA. Trouble in Purgatory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
- Rosenthal, N. (2005), « Youthful Prospects for Human Stem-cell Therapy », EMBOreports, 6 numéro spécial : Science & Society, p. 30-34.
- Scheper-Hughes, N. (2000), « The Global Traffic in Human Organs », Current Anthropology, vol. 41, no 2, p. 191-224.
- Scheper-Hughes, N. et L.J.D. Wacquant (2002), Commodifying Bodies, Londres, Sage.
- Seale, C., D. Cavers et M. Dixon-Woods (2006), « Commodification of Body Parts : By Medicine or by Media ? », Body & Society, vol. 12, no 1, p. 25-42.
- Sharp, L. A. (2000), « The Commodification of the Body and its Parts », Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, p. 287-328.
- Simpson, B. (2004), « Impossible Gifts : Bodies, Buddhism and Bioethics in Contemporary Sri Lanka », Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 10, no 4, p. 839-859.
- Sqier, S.M. (2004), Liminal Lives, Durham, N.C., Duke University Press.
- Star, S. L. (1989), « The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions : Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving », in L. Gasser et M. Huhns (dir.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence — vol. 2, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., p. 37-54.
- Star, S. L. et J. R. Griesemer (1989), « Institutional Econology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects : Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 », Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, no 3, p. 387-420.
- Strathern, M. (1995), After Nature. English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Strathern, M. (2004), Partial Connections, Walnut Creek, Californie, AltaMira Press.
- Svendsen, M. N. et Koch, L. (2008), « Unpacking the “ Spare Embryo” : Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape », Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no 1, 93-110.
- Taylor, J. S. (2005), « Surfacing the Body Interior », Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, p. 741-756.
- Thacker, E. (2005), The Global Genome. Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
- Thompson, M. (1979), Rubbish Theory. The Creation and Destruction of Value, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Turner, V. (1967), « Betwixt and Between : The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage », in The Forest of Symbols. Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Itacha, New York, Cornell University Press, p. 93-111.
- Verdery, K. (1999). « Dead Bodies Animate the Study of Politics », in The Political Lives of Dead Bodies — Reburial and Postsocialistist Change, New York, Columbia University Press, p. 23-53.
- Waldby, C. et R. Mitchell (2006), Tissue Economies. Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism, Durham, Duke University Press.
- Waldby, C. (2006), « Umilical Cord Blood : From Social Gift to Venture Capital », BioSocieties, vol. 1, p. 55-70.
- Weston, K. (2001), « Kinship, Controversy, and the Sharing of Substance : The Race/Class Politics of Blood Transfusion », in S. Franklin et S. McKinnon (dir.), Relative Values. Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, Durham, Duke University Press, p. 147-174.
- Whyte, S. R. (2005), « Going Home ? Belonging and Burial in the Era of Aids », Africa, vol. 75, no 2, p. 154-172.
- Williams, G. et D. Schroeder (2004), « Human Genetic Banking : Altruism, Benefit and Consent », New Genetics and Society, vol. 23, no 1, p. 89-103.
- Wolputte, S.V. (2004), « Hang on to Your Self : Of Bodies, Embodiment, and Selves », Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 33, no 1, p. 251-269.