Résumés
Résumé
Au cours des dernières décennies, une multitude de tests et d’indices ont été développés pour tenter de détecter la non-validité des résultats neuropsychologiques. Cependant, la prolifération et la popularité de ces mesures ont contribué à la perception qu’il est dorénavant possible de les utiliser pour identifier la simulation des troubles cognitifs (malingering). Dans cet article, un cadre conceptuel est présenté pour tenter de favoriser une meilleure compréhension des notions sous-jacentes et permettre une meilleure interprétation de la non-validité en expertise. Selon la présente conceptualisation, il existe deux étapes distinctes : la première consiste à discerner la non-validité des données à l’aide de méthodes psychométriques, notamment les tests de validité de performance (TVP). La deuxième requiert une décision quant à la crédibilité du tableau clinique, incluant un jugement quant à la cohérence de l’ensemble des informations cliniques. C’est seulement dans le contexte de certaines incohérences indéniables qu’il serait possible d’avancer une opinion évoquant l’amplification des problèmes cognitifs.
Mots-clés :
- expertise,
- validité des réponses,
- simulation
Abstract
Over the past few decades, a multitude of tests and indicators have been developed to attempt to detect invalid neuropsychological test findings. However, the proliferation and popularity of these measures have contributed to the impression that it is possible to use them to identify malingering. In the following, a conceptual framework is proposed to attempt to better understand the underlying issues and aid with the interpretation of response invalidity. It is proposed that this involves two distinct steps. The first involves detecting non-valid cognitive results using psychometric methods, and more specifically performance validity tests (PVTs). The second requires judgment of the non-credibility of the overall clinical picture, integrating and assessing inconsistencies among various sources. Only in the presence of compelling inconsistencies might it be possible to make an informed decision about the exaggeration of cognitive symptoms.
Keywords:
- independent medical examination,
- response validity,
- malingering
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- An, K. Y., Kaploun, K., Erdodi, L. A. et Abeare, C. A. (2017). Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: A comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 193-206.
- Armistead-Jehle, P. et Hansen, C. L. (2011). Comparison of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort index and stand-alone symptom validity tests in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(7), 592-601.
- Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J. et Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7–8), 909-916.
- Berry, D. T. R., Harp, J. P., Koehl, L. M. et Combs, H. L. (2017). Applying diagnostic standards to performance validity tests and the individual case. Dans S. C. Bowden (dir.), Neuropsychological assessment in the age of evidence-based practice: Diagnostic and treatment evaluations (p. 239-257). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Bianchini K. J., Greve, K. W. et Glynn, G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal, 5(4), 404-417.
- Bilder, R. M., Sugar, C. A. et Hellemann, G. S. (2014). Cumulative false positive rates given multiple performance validity tests: Commentary on Davis and Millis (2014) and Larrabee (2014). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1212-1223.
- Binder, L. M., Iverson, G. L. et Brooks, B. L. (2009). To Err is human: “abnormal” neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(1), 31-46.
- Boone, K. B. (2007). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York, NY : Guilford Press.
- Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729-741.
- Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology: An evidence-based approach. New York, NY : Guilford Press.
- Boone, K. B. (2017). Neuropsychological evaluation of somatoform and other functional somatic conditions. New York, NY : Routledge.
- Boone, K. B., Lu, P., Back, C., King, C., Lee, A., Philpott, L.,… Warner-Chacon, K. (2002). Sensitivity and specificity of the Rey Dot Counting Test in patients with suspect effort and various clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 625–642.
- Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H.,… Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity (NAN Policy and Planning Committees). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426.
- Carone, D. A. et Bush, S. S. (2012). Introduction: historical perspectives on mild traumatic brain injury, symptom validity assessment, and malingering. Dans D. A. Carone et S. S. Bush (dir.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (p. 1-30). New York, NY : Springer.
- Chafetz, M. (2011). Reducing the probability of false positives in malingering detection of social security disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(7), 1239-1252.
- Chartrand, J.-P. et Kennepohl, S. (2016). Tout ce que vous n’avez jamais voulu savoir sur les probabilités… mais qui vous sera utile. Psychologie Québec, sept. 2016.
- Chouinard, M.-J. et Rouleau, I. (1997). The 48-Pictures Test: A two-alternative forced-choice recognition test for the detection of malingering. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(6), 545–552.
- Dandachi-Fitzgerald, B., Merckelbach, H. et Ponds, R. W. H. M. (2017). Neuropsychologists’ ability to predict distorted symptom presentation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(3), 257-264.
- Davis, J. J. et Millis, S. R. (2014). Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(2), 199–214.
- Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B. et Arnold, G. (2008). The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 705–722.
- Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Philpott, L. M. et Hess, R. A. (2009). Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 133–152.
- Delis, D. C. et Wetter, S. R. (2007). Cogniform disorder and cogniform condition: proposed diagnoses for excessive cognitive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(5), 589-604.
- Desjardins, P. (2009). L’expertise des psychologues en contexte légal. Psychologie Québec, 23(5), 9-10.
- Drane, D. L., Ojemann, J. G., Kim, M. S., Gross, R. E., Miller, J. W., Faught, R. E. Jr. et Loring, D. W. (2016). Interictal epileptiform discharge effects on neuropsychological assessment and epilepsy surgical planning. Epilepsy & Behavior, 56, 131-138.
- Erdodi, L. A. et Lichtenstein, J. D. (2017). Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6-7), 1029-1046.
- Fox, D. D. (2011). Symptom validity test failure indicates invalidity of neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(3), 488-495.
- Fredericks, R. I. (2002). A review of Rey’s strategies for detecting malingered neuropsychological impairment. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 1-25.
- Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees-Haley, P. R. et Allen, L. M. 3rd (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15(12), 1045-1060.
- Guillemette, T. J. (2012). The role of clinical judgement in symptom validity assessment. Dans D. A. Carone et S. S. Bush (dir.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (p. 31-44). New York, NY : Springer.
- Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., Armstrong, I. et Parker, K. C. H. (2010). An investigation of methods to detect feigned reading disabilities. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(2), 89-98.
- Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H. Jr., Lehman, R. A. et Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 892-900.
- Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R. et Conference Participants (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093-1129.
- Iverson, G. L. (2005). Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18(3), 301-317.
- Kirkwood, M. W. (2015). Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment: evaluating, exaggeration, feigning, effort and noncredible effort. New York, NY : Guilford Press.
- Lamberty, G. J. (2008). Understanding somatization in the practice of clinical neuropsychology. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Lange, R. T., Pancholi, S., Bhagwat, A., Anderson-Barnes, V. et French, L. M. (2012). Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(5), 453-466.
- Larrabee, G. J. (2007) (Éd.). Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 666-679.
- Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Assessment of malingering. Dans G. J. Larrabee (dir.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (p. 116-159). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Larrabee, G. J. (2014). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(4), 364-373.
- Lippa, S. M. (2017). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: a clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 391-421.
- Lippa, S. M., Agbayani, K. A., Hawes, S., Jokic, E. et Caroselli, J. S. (2014). Effort in acute traumatic brain injury: Considering more than pass/fail. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(3), 306-312.
- Lippa, S. M., Lange, R. T., French, L. M. et Iverson, G. I. (2017). Performance validity, neurocognitive disorder, and post-concussion symptom reporting in Service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(5), 606-618.
- Loring, D. W., Marino, S. E., Drane, D. L., Parfitt, D., Finney, G. R. et Meador, K. M. (2011). Lorazepam effects on word memory test performance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(5), 799-811.
- Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W. et Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741-776.
- Meehl, P. E. et Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological bulletin, 52(3), 194-216.
- Merten, T. et Merckelbach, H. (2013). Symptom validity testing in somatoform and dissociative disorders: a critical review. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(2), 122-137.
- Meyers, J. E. et Volbrecht, M. E. (2003). A validation of multiple malingering detection methods in a large clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(3), 261-276.
- Meyers, J. E., Volbrecht, M., Axelrod, B. N. et Reinsch-Boothby, L. (2011). Embedded symptom validity tests and overall neuropsychological test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(1), 8-15.
- Meyers, J. E., Miller, R. M., Thompson, L. M., Scalese, A. M., Allred, B. C., Rupp, Z. W. et Junghyun Lee, A. (2014). Using likelihood ratios to detect invalid performance with performance validity measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(3), 224-235.
- Millis, S. R. (2009). What clinicians really need to know about symptom exaggeration, insufficient effort, and malingering: Statistical and measurement matters. Dans J. E. Morgan et J. J. Sweet (dir.), Neuropsychology of malingering casebook (p. 21–38). New York, NY : Psychology Press.
- Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M. et Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094-1102.
- Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., Berry, D. T. R., Bryant, F. B. et Granacher, R. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(3), 440-449.
- Proto, D. A., Pastorek, N. J., Miller, B. I., Romesser, J. M., Sim, A. H. et Linck, J. F. (2014). The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury related postconcussive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(7), 614-624.
- Rey, A. (1941). L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encéphalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 215-285.
- Roberson, C. J., Boone, K. B., Goldberg, H., Miora, D., Cottingham, M., Victor, T.,… Wright, M. (2013). Cross validation of the b Test in a large known groups sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(3), 495-508.
- Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg W. et Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Édimbourg, Royaume-Uni : Churchill Livingstone.
- Slick, D. J. et Sherman, E. M. S. (2012). Differential diagnosis of malingering. Dans D. A. Carone et S. S. Bush (dir.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (p. 57-72). New York, NY : Springer.
- Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S. et Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545-561.
- Slick, D. J., Tan, J. E., Strauss, E. H. et Hultsch, D. F. (2004). Detecting malingering: A survey of experts » practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(4), 465-473. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2003.04.001
- Smith, G. L., Ivnik, R. J. et Lucas, J. (2008). Assessment techniques: Tests, test batteries, norms, and methodological approaches. Dans J. E., Morgan et J. H. Ricker (dir.), Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (p.38-58). New York, NY : Taylor & Francis.
- Suhr, J. A. et Gunstad, J. (2007). Coaching and Malingering: A review. Dans G. J. Larrabee (dir.), Assessment of malingered neuropscyhological deficits (p. 287–311). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Suhr, J. et Spickard, B. (2012) Pain-related fear is associated with cognitive task avoidance: exploration of the cogniphobia construct in a recurrent headache sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(7), 1128-1141.
- Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M. et Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1-26.
- Van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N. et Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1234-1246.
- Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T., Dearth, C. S., Vagnini, V. L., Baser, R. E., Cragar, D. E. et Orey, S. A. (2004). Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological deficits. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(1), 37-48.
- Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Serpa, J. G., Buehler, J. et Ziegler, E. A. (2009). Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(2), 297-313.
- Walters, G. D., Berry, D. T. R., Rogers, R., Payne, J. W. et Granacher, R. P. Jr. (2009). Feigned neurocognitive deficit: Taxon or dimension? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(5), 584-593.
- Williamson, D. J., Holsman, M., Chaytor, N., Miller, J. W. et Drane, D. L. (2012). Abuse, not financial incentive, predicts non-credible cognitive performance in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, the clinical neuropsychologist. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(4), 588-598.
- Youngjohn, J. R. (1995). Confirmed attorney coaching prior to neuropsychological evaluation. Assessment, 2(3), 279–283.