Résumés
Résumé
L’article rend compte des réponses de 404 enseignants et enseignantes d’une université francophone belge à un questionnaire portant sur l’entrée de l’intelligence artificielle dans leurs pratiques. L’enquête montre qu’il s’agit bien d’un phénomène total, car il ébranle plusieurs dimensions pédagogiques, génère à leur sujet des positionnements contrastés et se répercute de façon similaire dans les trois secteurs disciplinaires dont sont issues les personnes répondantes.
Mots-clés :
- Intelligence artificielle,
- assistants personnels,
- développement pédagogique,
- enseignement supérieur,
- pratiques d’évaluation,
- activités pédagogiques,
- perspective étudiante
Abstract
This paper reports on the concerns expressed by 404 lecturers at a French-speaking Belgian university in a questionnaire on how artificial intelligence is moving into their practice. The survey shows that this is an all-encompassing phenomenon in that it shakes up several academic elements, triggers conflicting opinions and has similar repercussions in all three academic fields represented by the respondents.
Keywords:
- Artificial intelligence,
- personal assistants,
- staff development,
- higher education,
- assessment practices,
- educational activities,
- student perspective
Parties annexes
Références
- Agresti, A. (2007). Categorical data analysis (2e éd.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Anceau, A. (2023). Grille d’utilisation d’intelligences artificielles. ULiège. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/323897
- AQPC Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale (2023, septembre). ChatGPT au postsecondaire : perceptions et usages. https://youtu.be/FQpVOc7SgD4
- Bartolic, S. K., Boud, D., Agapito, J., Verpoorten, D., Williams, S., Lutze-Mann, L., Matzat, U., Moreno, M., Polly, P., Tai, J., Marsh, H. L., Lin, L., Burgess, J.-L., Habtu, S., Rodrigo, M. M., Roth, M., Heap, T. et Guppy, N. (2021). A multi-institutional assessment of changes in higher education teaching and learning in the face of COVID‑19. Educational Review, 74(3), 517‑533. https://doi.org/gqbpkk
- Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakci, Ö. et Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI can harm learning [rapport de recherche]. Wharton School, Université de Pennsylvanie. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4895486
- Bearman, M. et Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160‑1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
- Bertrand, L. et Massias, J. (2024). Étude 2024 – L’impact des IA génératives sur les étudiants. Pôle Léonard de Vinci, RM Conseil et Talan. https://emlv.fr/....
- Bryant, J., Heitz, C., Sanghvi, S. et Wagle, D. (2020). How artificial intelligence will impact K‑12 teachers. McKinsey & Company. https://mckinsey.com/...
- Duarte, F. (2025, 25 mars). Number of ChatGPT Users. Exploding Topics. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users
- Burke, J. et Gilmore, B. (2015). Academic moves for college and career readiness. 15 must have skills every student needs to achieve – Grades 6‑12. Corwin Press.
- Cardona, M. A., Rodríguez, R. J. et Ishmael, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. Office of Educational Technology. https://policycommons.net/...
- Céci, J.-F., Heiser, L. et Raynault, A. (2024). Vers une typologie des prudences numériques en éducation : une réponse aux pratiques sociales de références actuelles? Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 21(2), article 10. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2024-v21n2-10
- Chessman, H. M. (2023, 18 mai). Effective strategies for combating faculty burnout. Higher Education Today. https://higheredtoday.org/...
- College Innovation Network. (2024, août). EdTech and the evolving role of faculty: Faculty split on how tech will impact the future of higher education. https://wgulabs.org/...
- Creagh, S., Thompson, G., Mockler, N., Stacey, M. et Hogan, A. (2023). Workload, work intensification and time poverty for teachers and school leaders: A systematic research synthesis. Educational Review, 77(2), 661‑680. https://doi.org/gscfgw
- Cuban, L. et Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E‑Learning and Digital Media, 12(3‑4), 425‑439. https://doi.org/gjvz3w
- Dede, C., Etemadi, A. et Forshaw, T. (2021). Intelligence augmentation: Upskilling humans to complement AI. The Next Level Lab at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://pz.harvard.edu/...
- Detroz, P. et Verpoorten, D. (2023, novembre). L’intelligence artificielle, amie ou ennemie de l’évaluation [communication]. Colloque de l’ADMEE-Europe – L’évaluation à l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle, Batroun, Liban. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/310090
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L. Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., A. Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
- Doppagne, V. (2024). IA et apprentissages – La perspective des étudiants [diaporama]. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/323827
- Dugan, L., Hwang, A., Trhlik, F., Ludan, J. M., Zhu, A., Xu, H., Ippolito, D. et Callison-Burch, C. (2024). Raid: A shared benchmark for robust evaluation of machine-generated text detectors. Dans L.-W. Ku, A, Martins et V. Srikumar (dir.), Proceedings of the 62nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Volume 1: Long papers (p. 12463-12492). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.674
- Ehlers, U.-D. (2024). Towards a future skills framework for higher education. Dans U.-D. Ehlers et L. Eigbrecht (dir.), Creating the university of the future: A global view on future skills and future higher education (p. 21‑60). Springer. https://doi.org/pc3m
- Eriksson, D. (2023). The art and science of scholarly writing: Framing symmetry of specificity beyond IMRAD. European Business Review, 36(2), 141‑153. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2023-0004
- Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X. et Gašević, D. (2024). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
- Field, A. (2020). Survey fatigue and the tragedy of the commons: Are we undermining our evaluation practice? Evaluation Matters, 6, 1‑11. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0054
- Graham, D. (2025, 3 janvier). Is AI really a threat to higher education? Psychology Today. https://psychologytoday.com/...
- Herrington, J. et Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23‑48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
- Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. et Bond, A. (2020, 27 mars). The difference between emergence remote teaching and online teaching. EDUCAUSE Review. http://er.educause.edu/...
- Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N. et Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215‑1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1525
- Institut Le Sphinx et Compilatio. (2023). Résultats d’enquête : enseignants et étudiants confrontent leurs regards sur l’IA. https://compilatio.net/...
- Jarodzka, H. M. (2023). ChatGPT: De toekomst van het onderwijs?! [ChatGPT: The future of education?!]. Open Universiteit Research Portal. https://research.ou.nl/...
- Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A. et Bearman, M. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: a review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3
- Kalz, M. (2023, mise à jour 7 juillet). Don’t believe thy hype. 9 problems with the concept of future skills and 21st century skills. Site de l’auteur. https://kalz.cc/...
- Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P. et Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313‑338. https://learntechlib.org/primary/p/222363
- Keppler, S., Sinchaisri, W. et Snyder, C. (2025). Backwards planning with generative AI: Case study evidence from US K12 teachers [manuscrit inédit]. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4924786
- Kestin, G., Miller, K., Klales, A., Milbourne, T. et Ponti, G. (2024). AI tutoring outperforms active learning (version 1) [prépublication]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4243877/v1
- Koehler, M. J. et Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60‑70. http://learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544
- Koutropoulos, A. (2023). Scrutinizing the synthetic syllabus. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 183‑197. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.130
- Lacroix, A. (2023, 8 septembre). À tous ceux qui enseignent : une parade contre l’effet ChatGPT! Philosophie Magazine. https://philomag.com/...
- Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D. et Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
- Lepage, A. et Roy, N. (2023). Une recension des écrits de 1970 à 2022 sur les rôles de l’enseignant et de l’intelligence artificielle dans le domaine de l’IA en éducation. Médiations et médiatisations, (16), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi16.304
- Lez, A., Dubé, E. et Beaulieu, M. (2023). Évaluer à l’ère des IA : un guide de réflexion (version 1.0). Service de soutien à la formation, Université de Sherbrooke. https://usherbrooke.ca/...
- Lobet-Maris, C. (2023, 24 août). Comment ChatGPT change notre rapport au monde. La Conversation. https://theconversation.com/...
- Marche, S. (2022, 6 décembre). The college essay is dead. The Atlantic. https://theatlantic.com/...
- Marshik, T., McCracken, C., Kopp, B. et O’Marrah, M. (2024). Student and instructor perceptions and uses of artificial intelligence in higher education. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/pc3s
- Mayer, R. E. et Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. Dans R. E. Mayer (dir.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2e éd., p. 279‑315). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/h7dg
- Media & Learning Association. (2024, octobre). AI policy adoption in higher education: A noticeable gap. https://media-and-learning.eu/...
- Michelot, F. (2024, mai). Naviguer dans l’ère de l’IA : perceptions et pratiques en enseignement supérieur. Une étude de cas à l’Université de Moncton (et pas seulement) [communication]. 11e Colloque international en éducation, Montréal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16655.60322
- Miller, M. (2023). AI for educators: Learning strategies, teacher efficiencies, and a vision for an artificial intelligence future. Dave Burgess Consulting.
- Miller, S. (2024, 24 juin). End of semester AI report: More college students say AI is helping them get better grades. Pearson. https://plc.pearson.com/...
- Möller, M., Nirmal, G., Fabietti, D., Stierstorfer, Q., Zakhvatkin, M., Sommerfeld, H. et Schütt, S. (2024). Revolutionising distance learning: A comparative study of learning progress with AI‑driven tutoring [manuscrit inédit]. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14642
- Mollick, E. et Mollick, L. (2023a). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts [manuscrit inédit]. Wharton School, Université de Pennsylvanie. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243
- Mollick, E. et Mollick, L. (2023b). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts [manuscrit inédit]. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10052
- O’Sullivan, J. (2025, 29 mars). The case for AI illiteracy. Why not knowing might be an academic advantage. Substack. https://substack.com/home/post/p-160133422
- Overono, A. et Ditta, A. (2023). The rise of artificial intelligence: A clarion call for higher education to redefine learning and reimagine assessment. College Teaching, 73(2), 123‑126. https://doi.org/pc3t
- Porter, S. R. (2004). Raising response rates: What works? New Directions for Institutional Research, (121), 5‑21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.97
- Preacher K. J. (2001). An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [logiciel]. Site de l’auteur. https://quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm
- Rubens, W. (2024, 17 avril). De kracht van (generatieve) AI voor en in het onderwijs [Le pouvoir de l'IA (générative) pour et dans l'éducation]. Blogue de l’auteur. https://te-learning.nl/...
- Ruediger, D., Blankstein, M. et Love, S. (2024). Generative AI and postsecondary instructional practices: Findings from a national survey of instructors [rapport de recherche]. ITHAKA S+R. http://jstor.org/stable/resrep61195
- Rütti-Joy, O., Winder, G. et Biedermann, H. (2024). Teacher educator professionalism in the age of AI: Navigating the new landscape of quality education. Dans S. Kadry (dir.), Artificial intelligence and education – Shaping the future of learning (chap. 11). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005030
- Sabzalieva, E. et Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education. A quick start guide. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
- Scarfe, P., Watcham, K., Clarke, A. et Roesch, E. (2024). A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing test” case study. PLOS One, 19(6), article e0305354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305354
- Selwyn, N. (2022). Less work for teacher? The ironies of automated decision-making in schools. Dans S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton et M. Ruckenstein (dir.), Everyday automation: Experiencing and anticipating emerging technologies (p. 73‑86). Routledge. https://doi.org/pc3v
- Selwyn, N. (2024). On the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk & kritikk, 10(1), 3‑14. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062
- Sharples, M. (2022). Automated essay writing: An AIED opinion. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1119‑1126. https://doi.org/k8hr
- Skrabut, S. (2023). 80 ways to use ChatGPT in the classroom.
- Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J. et Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, article 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
- Stanoyevitch, A. (2024). Online assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Discover Education, 3(1), article 126. https://doi.org/pc3w
- Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M. et Olson, C. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, article 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
- Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M. et Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22943‑22968. https://doi.org/gtxnr3
- Taylor, B. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and assessment: Design principle for the future of teaching and learning in higher education. Letter of information / consent – Interview. McMaster University. https://genaiteach.ca/...
- ULiège. (2023, 22 décembre). Charte ULiège d’utilisation des intelligences artificielles génératives dans les travaux universitaires. https://student.uliege.be/...
- Ullmann, T. D., Bektik, D., Edwards, C., Herodotou, C. et Whitelock, D. (2024). Teaching with generative AI: Moving forward with content creation. Ubiquity Proceedings, 4(1), article 35. https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.157
- Union européenne. (2024). Règlement (UE) 2024/1689 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 13 juin 2024. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
- Van Parijs, P. (2023, décembre). ChatGPT & Co in higher education: To be cheered or feared? [communication]. 21e Forum éthique – Fondation universitaire, Bruxelles, Belgique. https://ethicalforum.be/downloads/2023
- Vatican. (2025, janvier). Antiqua et nova. Note sur les relations entre l’intelligence artificielle et l’intelligence humaine. Dicastère pour la doctrine de la foi et Dicastère pour la culture et l’éducation. https://www.vatican.va/...
- Verpoorten, D. (2023a, 14 décembre). L’irruption de l’intelligence artificielle est violente pour beaucoup d’enseignants. La libre Belgique. https://lalibre.be/...
- Verpoorten, D. (2023b, octobre). Troisième quadrimestre avec le Chat(GPT) [communication]. Journée d’étude ABC Educ « La transformation des enjeux d’enseignement dans une société en transition : choix ou non‑choix? », Namur, Belgique. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/311589
- Verpoorten, D., Poumay, M. et Leclercq, D. (2007). The eight learning events model: A pedagogic conceptual tool supporting diversification of learning methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(2), 151‑160. https://doi.org/bzm7mp
- Verpoorten, D. (2023c). Outils, pratiques, postures – Une enquête sur l’IA en enseignement supérieur [questionnaire]. IFRES. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/324948
- Von Garrel, J., Mayer, J. et Mühlfeld, M. (2023). Künstliche intelligenz im studium : eine quantitative befragung von studierenden zur nutzung von ChatGPT & Co [L'intelligence artificielle dans les études : une enquête quantitative auprès des étudiants sur l'utilisation de ChatGPT & Co]. Hochschule Darmstadt. https://doi.org/10.48444/h_docs-pub-395
- Walley, M. (2023, 1er février). Teachers are burning out. Can AI help? eSchoolNews. https://eschoolnews.com/...
- Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P. et Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI‑generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, article 26. https://doi.org/gtc8t5
- Wecks, J. O., Voshaar, J., Plate, B. J. et Zimmermann, J. (2024). Generative AI usage and exam performance (version 3) [manuscrit inédit]. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19699
- Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 40.