Résumés
Abstract
We present an eye-tracking study in the context of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) videos. We propose to use a pre-test as a way of priming students about the video content before they watch the video. In this study, we used two versions of the same pre-test: textual and schema based. The results show that priming has an effect on the learning gain as well as the gaze patterns of students as they watch the videos; the type of priming has an effect on whether students spend more time looking at textual or schema video elements.
Keywords:
- Eye tracking,
- Massive Open Online Courses,
- Student engagement,
- Priming
Résumé
Nous présentons une étude oculométrique du visionnement de vidéo par des apprenants dans le contexte des cours massifs en ligne. Les questions du prétest sont proposées en deux versions, l’une textuelle et l’autre schématique. Nous faisons l’hypothèse que le format du prétest influence la perception de la vidéo par les étudiants. Les résultats montrent que l’amorçage a un effet sur le regard des apprenants de même que sur les gains d’apprentissage. Le type d’amorçage a un effet sur le type d’éléments (textuel ou schématique) que les apprenants regardent le plus.
Mots-clés :
- Oculométrie,
- Cours Massifs En Ligne,
- Amorçage
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aleven, V., Rau, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Planned use of eye movement data to explore complementary strengths of individual and collaborative learning. In Proceeding of the DUET 2012.
- Alkan, S., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 538-542. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00721.x Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net
- Amadieu, F., van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 376-386. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.005 Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net
- Gergle, D., & Clark, A. T. (2011). See what I’m saying?: using dyadic mobile eye-tracking to study collaborative reference. In P. Hinds, J. C. Tang, J. Wang, J. Bardram, & N. Ducheneaut (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 435-444). doi:10.1145/1958824.1958892 Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net
- Jermann, P., & Nüssli, M.-A. (2012). Effects of sharing text selections on gaze cross-recurrence and interaction quality in a pair programming task. In S. Poltrock, C. Simone, J. Grudin, G. Mark, & J. Reidl (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1125-1134). doi:10.1145/2145204.2145371
- Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.-A., & Li, W. (2010). Using dual eye-tracking to unveil coordination and expertise in collaborative Tetris. In T. McEwan, & L. M. McKinnon, Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (pp. 36-44). Retrieved from Electronic Workshops in Computing website: http://ewic.bcs.org
- Nüssli, M.-A., Jermann, P., Sangin, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Collaboration and abstract representations: towards predictive models based on raw speech and eye-tracking data. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (vol. 1, pp. 78-82). doi:10.3115/1600053.1600065 Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net
- Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045-1060. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29
- Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407-413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01914.x Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net
- Sharma, K., Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014a, February). How students learn using MOOCs: An eye-tracking insight. Paper presented at EMOOCs 2014, the Second MOOC European Stakeholders Summit, Lausanne, Switzerland. Retrieved from Infoscience of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne website: http://infoscience.epfl.ch
- Sharma, K., Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014b, June). “With-me-ness”: A gaze-measure for students’ attention in MOOCs. Paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences 2014, Boulder, CO. Retrieved from Infoscience of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne website: http://infoscience.epfl.ch
- Sharma, K., Jermann, P., Nüssli, M. A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012, November). Gaze evidence for different activities in program understanding. Paper presented at the 24th Annual conference of Psychology of Programming Interest Group, London, UK. Retrieved from Infoscience of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne website: http://infoscience.epfl.ch
- Sharma, K., Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013, June). Understanding collaborative program comprehension: Interlacing gaze and dialogues. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, Madison, WI. Retrieved from Infoscience of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne website: http://infoscience.epfl.ch
- Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-tracking students’ attention to PowerPoint photographs in a science education setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5-6), 509-520. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-0225-z
- Tormey, R., & LeDuc, I. (2014, June). The activating student knowledge (ASK) method in lectures. Paper presented at Educational development in a changing world conference (ICED 2014), Stockholm, Sweden.
- Van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Paas, F. (2009). Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 785-791. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.007
- Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 205-221. doi:10.1002/acp.1112 Retrieved from Miwa Lab website: http://miwalab.cog.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp
- Van Gog, T., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237
- Van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95-99.
- Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 146-154.