Résumés
Résumé
Cet article explore l'intégration de plateformes numériques dans l'évaluation en aide aux apprentissages, en se concentrant sur de nouveaux alignements entre les objectifs d'apprentissage et l’engagement des élèves dans la formulation de rétroactions à leurs pairs. Le cadre théorique s'appuie sur des perspectives socioculturelles de l'apprentissage qui soulignent l’importance du contexte dans la participation active des élèves en classe et leur engagement. Une méthodologie de recherche collaborative, basée sur l’expérimentation de devis, est employée pour développer ces nouveaux alignements permettant d’exploiter les possibilités de plateformes numériques en situation d’évaluation. Les résultats fournissent des descriptions détaillées de ces alignements et exemplifient les traces laissées par les élèves lors de l’exercice de leur jugement évaluatif à travers notamment leurs rétroactions à leurs pairs. Ces résultats apportent un éclairage nouveau sur l’engagement des élèves en classe en montrant comment l'évaluation en aide à l’apprentissage enrichit la qualité des interactions entre pairs.
Mots-clés :
- engagement,
- élèves,
- évaluation par les pairs
Abstract
This article explores the integration of digital platforms into assessment in aid of learning (formative assessment), focusing on new alignments between learning goals and student engagement in providing feedback to peers. The theoretical framework draws on sociocultural perspectives on learning that emphasize the importance of context in students' active classroom participation and engagement. A collaborative research methodology (design-based research), is employed to develop these new alignments for exploiting the possibilities of digital platforms in assessment situations. The results provide detailed descriptions of these alignments and exemplify the traces left by students when exercising their evaluative judgment, notably through their feedback to their peers. These results shed new light on student engagement in the classroom, showing how assessment as a learning aid enriches the quality of peer interactions.
Keywords:
- student engagement,
- peer feedback,
- peer assessment
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Aksela, O., Lämsä, J., et Järvelä, S. (2024). Secondary School Students’ Enacted Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Computer-Based Writing Task–Insights from Digital Trace Data and Interviews. Tech Know Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09789-4
- Ateş, H., et Köroğlu, M. (2024). Online collaborative tools for science education: Boosting learning outcomes, motivation, and engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 1052-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12931
- Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
- Barab, S. (2022). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 177-195). Third edition. Cambridge University Press.
- Barron, B. (2003). When Smart Groups Fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
- Beaudoin, J., Laferrière, T., Collin, S., Ruel, C. et Voyer, S. (2022). Rapport ÉVA : Équité et Valeur Ajoutée dans les usages du numérique pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage. CTREQ. https://www.ctreq.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CTREQ-Rapport-EVA_VF-6.pdf
- Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
- Boud, D., et Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3),400-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
- Bransford, J. D., Barron, B., Pea, R., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Reeves, B., Roschelle, J., et Sabelli, N. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 9–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.003
- Breuleux, A., Erickson, G., Laferrière, T. et Lamon, M. (2002). Devis sociotechniques pour l’établissement de communautés d’apprentissage en réseau : Principes de conception et conditions de réussite résultant de plusieurs cycles d’intégration pédagogique des TIC. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 28 (2), 411-434. http://www.erudit.org/revue/rse/2002/v28/n2/007361ar.html?vue=resume
- Carless, D., et Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
- Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., et Zheng, L. (2024). Using peer feedback to improve critical thinking in computer‐supported collaborative argumentation: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13078
- Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
- Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
- Danic, I., Lefort, T., et Mell, L. (2024). Aux sources des inégalités face au numérique, le rapport des enseignants du secondaire aux technologies numériques : retrait, appropriation ou partage ?, Recherches en éducation, 55. https://doi.org/10.4000/ree.12402
- Demir, M., et Zengin, Y. (2023). The effect of a technology-enhanced collaborative learning environment on secondary school students' mathematical reasoning: A mixed method design. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11587-x
- Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., et Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
- Dubé, F., Granger, N. et Dufour, F. (2015). Continuing Education for High School Resource Teachers and Their Sense of Self-efficacy. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 707-712. doi: 10.12691/education-3-6-7
- Earl, L.M. (2003). Assessment as learning using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Corwin Press.
- Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71-75.
- Engeström, Y. (1987, 2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., et Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Gee, J. P. (1999/2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. Routledge.
- Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00068-9
- Hattie (2017). L’apprentissage visible pour les enseignants (M. Denis, trad.). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., et Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic Learning Environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, M. Bishop, (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32
- Jeong, H., Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., et Kihyun Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational Research Review, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
- Johnson, D. W., et Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
- Kerman, N.T., Banihashem, S.K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., et Noroozi, O. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 763–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
- Laferrière, T., Baron, G.-L. et Cox, M. J. (2020). Résultats de l’Edusummit 2019 au service de l’innovation pour l’éducation formelle des jeunes. Revue Adjectif : analyses et recherches sur les TICE. https://adjectif.net//spip.php?article510
- Laferrière, T., Parent, S., Deschênes, M. et Barma, S. (2022). L’engagement de l’élève, de l’étudiante ou de l’étudiant : construit revisité selon une perspective socioculturelle. Revue Internationale Du CRIRES : Innover Dans La Tradition De Vygotsky, 6 (1), 111–135. https://revues.ulaval.ca/ojs/index.php/RIC/article/view/51525/409
- Laferrière, T., Tremblay, M., Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Allaire, S., Boisjoly, F., Delobbe, A.-M., Ntebutse, J. G., Robert Mazaye, C., Barma, S., Nicole, M.C., Beaudoin, J. et Bernatchez, J. (2024). L’Évaluation Collaborative Réussie des Apprentissages par le Numérique. FRQSC. https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/app/uploads/2024/03/rapport_lecran_therese-laferriere.pdf
- Laveault, D., et Allal, L. (eds.) (2016). Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. Springer.
- Lave, J., et Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lazonder, A. W., et Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
- Leavy, A. M., Dick, L., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., et Stylianou, E. (2023). The prevalence and use of emerging technologies in STEAM education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12806
- Lijedahl, P. (2020). Building Thinking Classrooms in Mathematics, Grades K-12. 14 Teaching Practices for Enhancing Learning. Cowin Edition.
- Maričić, M., et Lavicza, Z. Enhancing student engagement through emerging technology integration in STEAM learning environments. Education and Information Technologies (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12710-2
- Marion C., Laferrière T. et Tremblay-Gagnon D. (2022). Rétroaction par les pairs : quelles conditions pour un apport optimal aux apprentissages des étudiantes et étudiants?. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 6 (1), (pp. 52-72). https://revues.ulaval.ca/ojs/index.php/RIC/article/view/51446
- Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., et Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199.
- Monney, N., Major, C., Robert-Mazaye, C., Laferrière, T. et Foynard, M. (soumis). La rétroaction constructive par les pairs : exemples de situations d’apprentissage et de retombées sur la motivation et les apprentissages des élèves. Les rencontres du REF 2024.
- Mottier Lopez, L., Girardet, C. et Naji, T. (2021). L’évaluation continue pour apprendre : enjeux de la pluralité des feedbacks entre pairs dans un cours universitaire. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 44 (2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.7202/1090461ar
- Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Tremblay, P. et Desgagné, C. (2024). Apprendre le jugement critique à travers la rétroaction par les pairs. Vivre le primaire, 37 (2), 64-66.
- Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Tremblay, M., Laferrière, T. et Allaire, S. (2022). Les enjeux et défis d’accompagnement d’enseignantes et d’enseignants dans l’évaluation des apprentissages à l’aide de technologies collaboratives au primaire et au secondaire. Médiations et médiatisations, 9, 7-27. https://revue-mediations.teluq.ca/index.php/Distances/article/view/249/208
- Olsson, J. (2017). The contribution of reasoning to the utilization of feedback from software when solving mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9795-x
- Pasquini, R. (2019). Élargir conceptuellement le modèle de l’alignement curriculaire pour comprendre la cohérence des pratiques évaluatives sommatives notées des enseignants : enjeux et perspectives. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 42 (1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066598ar
- Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: Future directions for research in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29(3), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2903_3
- Raynault, A. et Laferrière, T. (2024). Collaborer à l’aide du numérique : fondements et affordances. Collaborer à l’aide du numérique : fondements et affordances. Dans F. Michelot et S. Collin. La compétence numérique en contexte éducatif. Regards croisés et perspectives internationales (pp. 179-203). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, et C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
- Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
- Reeve, J., et Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
- Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., et Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899
- Rodet, J. (2000). La rétroaction, support d’apprentissage ? DistanceS. https://edutice.hal.science/edutice-00000482
- Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: An orientation. Human Development, 57(2-3), 69-81.
- Rogoff, B. (2017). Participer pour apprendre. Réseau PÉRISCOPE. https://periscope-r.quebec/rogoff_final.pdf
- Roth, W.-M., Radford, L., et LaCroix, L. (2012). Working With Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Qualitative Social Research, 13 (2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1814/3380
- Salomon, G. (1995). Reflections on the field of educational psychology by the outgoing journal editor. Educational Psychologist, 30(3),105–108. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3003_1
- Scardamalia, M., et Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
- Scardamalia, M., et Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). Cambridge University Press. https://ikit.org/fulltext/2006_KBTheory.pdf
- Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
- Slotta, J. D. (2014). Knowledge community and inquiry: new opportunities for scripting and orchestration. Paper presented at the Network of Associated Programs in the Learning Sciences (NAPLES) (Munich)
- Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. Springer. La version prépublication est disponible à http://gerrystahl.net/elibrary/svmt/
- Topping, K. J. (2023). Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 38(3), 472-498, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.196
- Tremblay, M. et Delobbe, A.-M. (À paraitre). L’évaluation continue pour apprendre durablement : s’inviter en mathématiques. Actes du 50e colloque Copirelem tenu à Bonneuil-sur-Marne.
- Tsayem Tchoupou, A., Laferrière, T. et Baron, J. (2023). Analyse des outils et instruments numériques pour l’évaluation des apprentissages. https://adjectif.net/IMG/pdf/intruments_apprentissage_at__tl_glb_normes_ok_corrige_.pdf
- Vali (2022). The Impact of Technology on Collaborative Learning. 9th International Conference Edu World 2022 Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, Romania. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences. https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epes.23045.13
- Van Hoe, A., Wiebe, J., Rotsaert, T., et Schellens, T. (2024). The implementation of peer assessment as a scaffold during computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning in secondary STEM education. International journal of STEM Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00465-8
- Van Leeuwen, A., et Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27(June), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
- Voogt, J. M., Erstad, O., Dede, C., et Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
- Voogt, J. M., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R., Hickey, D. T., et McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43, 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice – Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press. Traduction par Fernand Gervais.
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mid: Socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
- Wiggins, G., et McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, expanded (2nd ed.). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Wu, XY. (2024). Exploring the effects of digital technology on deep learning: a meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12307-1
- Yang, X. (2023). A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning. TechTrends, 67, 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
- Yang, Y., Vvan Aalst, J., et Chan, C. K. K. (2020). Dynamics of Reflective Assessment and Knowledge Building for Academically Low-Achieving Students. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1241-1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219872444

