Résumés
Résumé
Plusieurs recherches jugent que le contenu des plans d’intervention (PI) ou de transition (PT) en milieu scolaire ne satisfait pas le niveau d’exigence ou de qualité attendu. Dans ce contexte, cette recherche a pour objectif principal de proposer des instruments de mesure qui servent à analyser, à évaluer et à améliorer la qualité des PI/PT. Les résultats dressent un portrait de la qualité des PI/PT, exposent les différents moyens proposés par divers chercheurs pour les analyser, les évaluer et les améliorer, présentent les procédures utilisées par différents chercheurs pour les analyser et évaluer la qualité des PI/PT, et concluent en suggérant trois instruments de mesure utiles pour l’analyse, l’évaluation et l’amélioration de la qualité des PI/PT.
Mots-clés :
- Adaptation scolaire,
- Efficacité,
- Élèves handicapées ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage (HDAA),
- Évaluation,
- Plan d’intervention,
- Qualité,
- Plan de transition
Abstract
Several studies find that the contents of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) do not meet the required and expected level of quality or adequately address needs and concerns laid out by the Special Education Policy. The main objective of this research is to propose rating scales to analyze, evaluate and improve the quality of IEPs. The results provide an overview of the quality of IEPs, describe the various means proposed and used by various researchers to analyze, evaluate and improve IEPs, and conclude by proposing three rating scales useful for analyzing, evaluating and improving the quality of IEPs.
Keywords:
- Individualized Education Program (IEP),
- Special Education,
- Special needs
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Baine, D. (2003). Guide to best practices: Developing and evaluating special needs programs (3e éd.). Edmonton, AB: Vector International.
- Beaupré, P., Ouellet, G., Roy, S. et Bédard, A. (2002). Recension des écrits sur le plan d'intervention auprès des personnes handicapées ou en difficulté. Rapport de recherche sur les plans d'intervention auprès des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté. Québec, QC : Ministère de l'Éducation.
- Boavida, T., Aguiar, C. et McWilliam, R. A. (2013, Juillet). Increasing the quality of intervention goals and objectives: Outcomes of a training program. Communication présentée à l’International Society on Early Intervention Regional Conference. St Petersburg, Russie.
- Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., McWilliam, R. A. et Pimentel, J. S. (2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23(3), 233-243.
- Broughton, V. (1997). The individualized family service plan: Does the form make a difference to the process? (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université de Cincinnati, OH.
- Codding, R. S., Skowron, J. et Pace, G. M. (2005). Making data-based decisions: Training teachers to use data to create instructional objectives. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 165-176.
- DePaepe, P., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Shriner, C. L. et Cameron, J. (1994). A preliminary evaluation of written individualized habilitation objectives and their correspondence with direct implementation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 94-104.
- Eichler, J. B. (1999). The individualized program requirement: Conceptualization versus reality. (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
- Hamilton, D. A. (1995). The utility of the assessment, evaluation, and programming system in the development of quality IEP goals and objectives for young children, birth to three, with visual impairments. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(08), 2994A-3198A.
- Hoehle, R. L. (1993). The development of an expert system to evaluate the IEP components of student records (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Utah State University, Logan, UT.
- Hunt, P., Goetz, L. et Anderson, J. (1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11(2), 125-130.
- Gaudreau, L., Legault, F., Brodeur, M., Hurteau, M., Dunberry, A., Séguin, S. P. et Legendre, R., (2008). Rapport d'évaluation de l'application de la. Politique de l'adaptation scolaire. Montréal, QC: Université du Québec à Montréal
- Giangreco M. F., Cloninger C. J., Dennis, R. E. et Edelman S. W. (1993). National expert validation of COACH: Congruence with exemplary practice and suggestions for improvement. The Association for Persons with Sever Handicaps, 18(2), 109-120.
- Giangreco, M. F., Dennis, R. E., Edelman, S. W. et Clon, C. J. (1994). Dressing your IEPs for the general education climate. Analysis of IEP goals and objectives for students with multiple Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(5), 288-296.
- Goupil, G., Tassé, M. J., Doré, C., Horth, R., Lévesque, J. Y. et Mainguy, E. (2000). Analyse descriptive des plans d’intervention personnalisés. Rapport de recherche inédit, Université du Québec à Montréal, QC.
- Johnson, L. J., Pugach, M. C. et Hammitte, D. J. (1988). Barriers to effective special education consultation. Remedial and Special Education, 9(6), 41-47.
- Krishnakumar, P., Greeta, M. G. et Palat, R. (2006). Effectiveness of individualized education program for slow learners. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 73, 135-137.
- Lowman, J. J. (2016). A comparison of three professional development mechanisms for improving the quality of standards-based IEP objectives. Communication Disorder Quarterly, 37(4) 211-224
- Maher, C. A. et Barbarck, C. R. (1980). A framework for comprehensive evaluation of the individualized education program (IEP). Learning Disability Quarterly, 3(3), 49-55.
- McGlohon, D. D. (1983). Development of training program to improve the quality of IEPs (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Université d'État de l'Arizona, Trempe, AZ.
- Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec. (1999). Une école adaptée à tous ses élèves : Politique d’adaptation scolaire. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
- Morgan, D. (1981). Characteristics of a quality IEP. Education Unlimited, 3(3), 12-17.
- Myara, N. (2012). Cahier de charges fonctionnel pour la conception et l’évaluation des plans d’intervention (Thèse de doctorat inédite). Université de Montréal, QC.
- Myara, N. (2017). Le plan d’intervention : un processus et des ententes. Montréal, QC: Éditions JFD.
- National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Nolet, V. et McLaughlin, M. J. (2005). Accessing the general curriculum, including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Notari, A. R. et Bricker, D. D. (1990). The utility of a curriculum-based assessment instrument in the development of individualized education plans for infants and young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(2), 5-11.
- Poirier, N. et Goupil, G. (2011). Étude descriptive sur les plans d'intervention pour des élèves ayant un trouble envahissant du développement. McGill Journal of Education, 46(3), 459-472.
- Pretti-Frontczac, K. et Bricker, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 92-105.
- Rakap, S. (2015). Quality of individualized education programme goals and objectives for preschool children with disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 173-186.
- Rocque, S., Langevin, J. et Riopel, D. (1998). L'analyse de la valeur pédagogique au Canada, méthodologie de développement de produits pédagogiques. La valeur des produits et services, 76, 6-11.
- Rodrigue, T. (1999). Incapacités intellectuelles et communication écrite : processus d’identification des besoins (Mémoire de mai^trise inédit). Université de Montréal, QC.
- Rowland, C. M., Quinn, E. D. et Steiner, S. A. M. (2015). Beyond legal: Crafting high-quality IEPs for children with complex communication needs. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 53-62.
- Ruble, L., McGrew, A., Dalrymple, J., Lee, N. et Jung, A. (2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1459-1470.
- Sanches-Ferreira, P. M., Lopes-dos-Santos, S. A., Santos, M. et Silveira-Maia, M. (2013). How individualized are the individualized education programmes (IEPs): An analysis of the contents and quality of the IEPs goals. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 507-520.
- Shriner, J. G., Carty, S. J., Rose, C. A., Shogren, K. A., Kim, M. et Trach, J. S. (2012). Effects of using a web-based individualized education program decision-making tutorial. The Journal of Special Education, 47(3), 175-185.
- Sigafoos, J., Elkins, J., Couzens, D., Gunn, S., Roberts, D. et Kerr, M. (1993). Analysis of IEP goals and classroom activities for children with multiple disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 8, 99-105
- Sigafoos, J., Kigner, J., Holt, K., Doss, S. et Mustonen, T. (1991). Improving the quality of written developmental policies for adults with intellectual disabilities. The BritishJournal of Mental Subnormality, 37(72), 35-46.
- Smith, S. W. (1990). Comparison of individualized education programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 85-99.
- Spillane, M. M. (1990). IEP quality:Changes observed following a period of staff training and form revision (Mémoire de maîtrise inédit). Université du Nebraska à Omaha, NE.
- Stephenson, J. et Carter M. (2015). Improving education planning for students with severe disabilities: An evaluation of school-based professional learning. Australian Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 2-14.
10.7202/1009177ar