Résumés
Abstract
This article offers an analysis of Thomas Goffe’s portrayal of Turkish persons in his plays The Raging Turk (1618) and The Courageous Turk (1619), which represent specific English understandings of Ottoman beliefs about proper sensorial behaviour in political and religious contexts, in particular those concerning law and justice. The article offers a counter to the “Othering” narrative by arguing that specific characters are represented in sensorially positive manners to protect English political interests, especially related to murders within the family that are portrayed in the national interests of Ottoman leaders. The article seeks to facilitate this aim by examining Goffe’s portrayals of Ottoman rulers and the role that sensory elements played in his representations of their power and legitimacy. In particular, the article focuses on death rituals of official violence—executions—and how the senses were involved in their depiction. It grows out of historiographical debates on perceptions of the Other and stereotypes of Ottoman Islam and Orientalism. In doing so, the article seeks to demonstrate that Goffe’s work provides an alternative view of “the Turk” from that of many contemporaries—one that is less about brutality and barbarism and more about the constraints of law in a regulated polity. It arrives at the consensus that Goffe’s representation of male Turkish rulers is demonstrative of an emerging Turkish stereotype that is less about violence for its own sake and more about lawful, justified violence within the bounds of Ottoman culture and legal institutions.
Keywords:
- Turkish,
- Ottomans,
- Otherness,
- Legality,
- (Mis)representation,
- Islam,
- Crusading,
- Orientalism
Résumé
Le présent article analyse la représentation des Turcs dans deux pièces de Thomas Goffe, The Raging Turk (1618) etThe Courageous Turk (1619). Ces pièces reflètent des interprétations anglaises de croyances ottomanes quant aux comportements sensoriels appropriés dans des contextes politiques et religieux, en particulier ceux ayant trait au droit et à la justice. L’article s’oppose au discours de l’« altérisation » en soulignant que, dans le but de protéger les intérêts politiques anglais, certains personnages sont représentés de manière positive sur le plan sensoriel, notamment quand il s’agit de meurtres intrafamiliaux présentés comme conformes à l’intérêt national des dirigeants ottomans. L’article examine ainsi l’image des dirigeants ottomans chez Goffe, de même que le rôle joué par les éléments sensoriels dans les représentations de leur pouvoir et de leur légitimité. Il met un accent particulier sur les rituels de mort de la violence officielle – les exécutions – et sur la place des sens dans leur représentation. L’article s’inscrit dans des débats historiographiques sur les perceptions de l’Autre et les stéréotypes de l’islam ottoman et de l’orientalisme. Partant de ce cadre, il cherche à démontrer que l’œuvre de Goffe présente une vision du « Turc » différente de celle de nombreux contemporains, moins axée sur la brutalité et la barbarie que sur les contraintes légales d’un État réglementé. Il conclut que la représentation des dirigeants turcs masculins, chez Goffe, témoigne de l’émergence d’un stéréotype turc moins axé sur la violence gratuite que sur une violence légale et justifiée, encadrée par la culture et les institutions juridiques ottomanes.
Mots-clés :
- Turc,
- Ottomans,
- Altérité,
- Légalité,
- Représentation,
- Déformation,
- Islam,
- Croisade,
- Orientalisme
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Al-Olaqi, Fahd Mohammed Taleb. “The Courageous Ottoman in Goffe’s Amurath I (1619).” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7, no. 6 (2016): 175–203.
- Barbour, Richmond. Before Orientalism: London’s Theatre of the East, 1576–1626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
- Bowers, Fredson, ed. Dictionary of Literary Biography. Vol. 58, Jacobean and Caroline Dramatists. Detroit: Gale Research Company, 1987.
- Bright, Timothie. A Treatise of Melancholie. New York: Columbia University Press, 1940.
- Burgess, Glenn. “The Divine Right of Kings Reconsidered.” English Historical Review 107, no. 425 (October 1992): 837–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/CVII.CCCCXXV.837.
- Burian, Orhan. “Interest of the English in Turkey as Reflected in English Literature of the Renaissance.” Oriens 5, no. 2 (December 1952): 209–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578824.
- Burton, Jonathan. Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579–1624. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005.
- Carrera, Elena. “Anger and the Mind-Body Connection in Medieval and Early Modern Medicine.” In Emotions and Health, 1200–1700, edited by Elena Carrera, 95–146. Leiden: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252936_006.
- Dimmock, M. New Turkes: Dramatizing Islam and the Ottomans in Early Modern England. London: Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247984.
- Emmert, Thomas Allan. “The Battle of Kosovo: A Reconsideration of Its Significance in the Decline of Medieval Serbia.” PhD diss., Stanford University, 1973.
- Fanani, Ahmad Fuad. “The Ottoman Empire: Its Rise, Decline and Collapse.” Jurnal Salam 14, no. 1 (January–June 2011): 93–109.
- Goffe, Thomas. The Raging Turk and The Courageous Turk. Edited by David Carnegie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.
- Holm, Bent. The Taming of the Turk: Ottomans on the Danish Stage, 1596–1896. Translated by Gaye Kynoch. Vienna: Hollitzer, 2014.
- Ingram, Anders. “English Literature on the Ottoman Turks in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” PhD diss., Durham University, 2009.
- Khan, Farhana Wazir. “Mirrors of Governance: ‘The Mighty Turkish Diadem’ and English Drama (Selimus. Sc. Xxxvi. 2340).” Journal of European Studies 26, no. 2 (2011): 139–54.
- Knolles, Richard. The Generall Historie of the Turkes, from the First Beginning of That Nation to the Rising of the Othoman Familie […]. London: Printed by Adam Islip, 1603.
- Koç, Yunus. “Early Ottoman Customary Law: The Genesis and Development of Ottoman Codification.” In Shattering Tradition: Custom, Law and the Individual in the Muslim Mediterranean, edited by Walter Dostal and Wolfgang Kraus, 75–121. London: I. B. Tauris, 2005.
- Kollmann, Nancy Shields. “The Quality of Mercy in Early Modern Legal Practice.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 7, no. 1 (Winter 2006): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2006.0008.
- Lander, Bonnie, and Eleanor Decamp, eds. Blood Matters: Studies in European Literature and Thought, 1400–1700. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.
- Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Edited by Brian Richardson. Translated by Leslie J. Walker. 2nd ed. London: Penguin Books, 2013.
- MacLean, Gerald M. The Rise of Oriental Travel: English Visitors to the Ottoman Empire, 1580–1720. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511767.
- Mansfield, Henry C. Machiavelli’s Virtue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226503721.
- McJannet, Linda. The Sultan Speaks: Dialogue in English Plays and Histories about the Ottoman Turks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601499.
- Minadoi, Giovanni Tommaso. The History of the Warres between the Turks and the Persians. Translated by Abraham Hartwell. London: [John Windet for] John Wolfe, 1595.
- Necipoğlu, Gülru. “Framing the Gaze in Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Palaces.” Ars Orientalis 23 (1993): 303–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4629455.
- Pasini, Joy. “Kin with Kin and Kind with Kind Confound: Pity, Justice, and Family Killing in Early Modern Dramas Depicting Islam.” PhD diss., Rice University, 2011.
- Pender, Stephen. “Rhetoric, Grief, and the Imagination in Early Modern England.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 43, no. 1 (2010): 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0049.
- Pinto, Karen. “In God’s Eyes: The Sacrality of the Seas in the Islamic Cartographic Vision.” Espacio, Tiempo y Forma: Serie VII: Historia del Arte 5 (2017): 55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/etfvii.5.2017.18131.
- The Policy of the Turkish Empire: The First Booke. London: Printed by John Windet for W.S., 1597.
- Said, Edward W. Orientalism. London: Vintage Books, 1978.
- Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. Edited by John Russel Brown. In The Arden Shakespeare Complete Works, edited by Richard Proudfoot, Ann Thompson, and David Scott Katsan, 831–58. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 1988.
- Slotkin, Joel Elliot. “‘Now will I be a Turke’: Performing Ottoman Identity in Thomas Goffe’s The Courageous Turk.” In Early Modern England and Islamic Worlds, edited by Bernadette Andrea and Linda McJannet, 159–71. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119826_9.
- Southwell, Robert. The Complete Poems of Robert Southwell. [London]: Printed for private circulation [by Robson and Sons], 1872.
- Swann, Elizabeth L. “God’s Nostrils: The Divine Senses in Early Modern England.” In Sensing the Sacred in Medieval and Early Modern Culture, edited by Robin Macdonald, Emilie Murphy, and Elizabeth L. Swann, 220–44. London: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315608389.
- Vitkus, Daniel. Turning Turk: English Theater and the Multicultural Mediterranean, 1570–1630. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05292-6.
- Yildirim, Duygu. “Coffee: Of Melancholic Turkish Bodies and Sensory Experiences.” In Natural Things in Early Modern Worlds, edited by Mackenzie Cooley, Anna Toledano, and Duygu Yıldırım, 8–11. New York: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351054.