Résumés
Abstract
This paper introduces a new form of ambidexterity in IS projects, drawing from the falsification of a clinical research conducted in an automotive engineering company, focusing on process reengineering and ERP implementation. It bridges clinical research (1997‑2001) with expert insights (2002‑2021). Addressing a gap in IS project literature, particularly within Automotive Industry Engineering Projects (AIEP), the study highlights that exploration-exploitation strategies may become dysfunctional in turbulent, cyclical environments. The article criticizes the short-sighted results of ERP strategies applied to simple automotive projects, and encourages better dialogue between practitioners and decision-makers, with a view to resourcing the IS in line with business cycles.
Keywords:
- Exploration,
- exploitation,
- ambidexterity,
- performance,
- IS project,
- clinical inquiry,
- ambidexterity
Résumé
Cet article propose une nouvelle forme d’ambidextrie dans les projets de systèmes d’information (SI), basée sur la réfutation partielle d’une recherche clinique menée dans une entreprise d’ingénierie automobile, centrée sur la réingénierie de pilotage de la performance et la mise en oeuvre d’un ERP. Il combine des recherches cliniques (1997-2001) avec des avis d’experts (2002-2021). En comblant une lacune dans la littérature sur les projets SI dans le contexte des projets d’ingénierie automobile (PIIA), l’étude souligne que les stratégies d’exploration et d’exploitation peuvent devenir dysfonctionnelles dans des environnements turbulents et cycliques. L’article critique les résultats à courte vue des stratégies ERP appliquées aux projets automobiles simples et encourage un meilleur dialogue entre praticiens et décideurs, en vue de ressourcer le SI en fonction des cycles d’activités.
Mots-clés :
- Exploration,
- exploitation,
- ambidextrie,
- performance,
- projet SI,
- recherche clinique,
- ambidextrie
Resumen
Este artículo presenta una nueva forma de ambidestreza en proyectos de sistemas de información (SI), basada en la falsificación de una investigación clínica en una empresa de ingeniería automotriz, centrada en la reingeniería de procesos y la implementación de ERP. La investigación conecta estudios clínicos (1997-2001) con perspectivas de expertos (2002-2021) y destaca que las estrategias de exploración y explotación pueden fallar en entornos cíclicos turbulentos. El artículo critica la visión a corto plazo de las estrategias ERP aplicadas a proyectos automotrices simples y aboga por un mejor diálogo entre los profesionales y los responsables de la toma de decisiones.
Palabras clave:
- Exploración,
- explotación,
- ambidextría,
- rendimiento,
- proyecto de SI,
- ciclo,
- investigación clínica,
- cambio,
- ambidextría
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aaltonen, A. & Kallinikos, J. (2013). Coordination and learning in Wikipedia: Revisiting the dynamics of exploitation and exploration. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 37, 161–192. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000037010
- Alhawari, S., Karadsheh, L., Talet, A. N. & Mansour, E. (2012). Knowledge-based risk management framework for information technology project. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.002
- Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P. & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203–230. https://doi.org/ 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109
- Ashby, R. W. (1957). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall LTD, second edition, London.
- Avison, D. E., Davison, R. M. & Malaurent, J. (2018). Information systems action research: Debunking myths and overcoming barriers. Information & Management, 55(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.004
- Azan W. & Beldi A. (2010), “De la cybernétique à la théorie de la human agency : vers un management des SI centré sur les utilisateurs “, Management & Avenir, décembre, 9, 39, p. 192-212. https://doi.org/ 10.3917/mav.039.0192
- Azan, W., Bootz, J. P. & Rolland, O. (2017). Community of practices, knowledge transfer, and ERP project (ERPP). Knowledge management research & practice, 15(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/ 10.1057/s41275-017-0047-9
- Azan W. (2011), Organisation projet et performance, Contribution d’’une étude clinique dans le milieu de l’’intégration automobile, Editions universitaires européennes
- Azan W., Lapoutte A., Delorme F (2022), Exploration de six communautés épistémiques mobilisant le concept de blockchain: une approche lexicométrique sur 125 articles scientifiques. Revue Management et Avenir, (N° 127), 1, pp. 15-34. https://doi.org/ 10.3917/mav.127.0015
- Bachelard G. (2002). The Formation of the Scientific Mind A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge, introd. Mary McAlester Jones, Clinamen Press, London
- Baskerville, R. & Pries-Heje, J. (2004). Short cycle time systems development. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00171.x
- Baskerville, R. & Wood-Harper A.T. (1998). Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00171.x
- Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital First: The Ontological Reversal and New Challenges for Information Systems Research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 44(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/ 10.25300/MISQ/2020/14418
- Beretta, S. (2002). Unleashing the integration potential of ERP systems. The role of process-based performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal, 8(3), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150210428961
- Bernard C. (2013). Introduction à la médecine expérimentale, collection poche, ed. De Principes de Médecine expérimentale, Flamarion, pp. 3-18.
- Besson, P. (1999). Les ERP à l’épreuve de l’organisation. Systèmes d’information et Management, 4(4), 2. https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.162.0017.
- Bootz, J. P., Lièvre, P., & Schenk, E. (2019). L’expert au sein des organisations : définition et cadrage théorique. Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, 25(63), 11-25. 10.3917/rips1.063.0011
- Boudreau, M. C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization science, 16(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0103
- Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
- Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
- Carbonel, M. (2001). Dérives organisationnelles dans les projets ERP: les cas de Guerbet et Gaumont. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 6(1), 4.
- Chang, Y. B. & Gurbaxani, V. (2012). Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: an empirical analysis. MIS quarterly, 36(4), 1043–1063. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41703497
- Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS quarterly, 36(4), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41703503
- Cho, J., Park, I. & Michel, J. W. (2011). How does leadership affect information systems success? The role of transformational leadership. Information & Management, 48(7), 270–277. 10.1016/j.im.2011.07.003
- Ciborra, C. U. & Hanseth, O. (1998). From tool to Gestell: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology & People, 11(4), 305–327. 10.1108/09593849810246129
- Ciborra, C., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Hepsø, V., Failla, A., & Hanseth, O. (2000). From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infastructures. Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Clark, K. & Fujimoto T. (1991). Product development performance. Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
- Davison, R., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information systems journal, 14(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x
- El Amrani, R., Rowe, F., & Geffroy-Maronnat, B. (2006). The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross-functionality. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00206.x
- Garel, G., Giard, V.et C.Midler (2004), Faire de la recherche en management de projet, Ouvrage collectif, Paris.
- Gartner. (2022, April 19). 10 Automation Mistakes to Avoid. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/10-automation-mistakes-to-avoid
- Gattiker, T. F. & Goodhue, D. L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS quarterly, 9(3), 559–585. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/25148695
- Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/20159573
- Girin, J. (1989). L’opportunisme méthodique dans les recherches sur la gestion des organisations. Communication à la journée d’étude la recherche action en action et en question, AFCET, collège de systémique, Ecole centrale de Paris.
- Goes, P. B. (2014). Editor’s comments: big data and IS research. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), iii-viii.
- Godé, C. & Lebraty, J.F. (2013), “Improving decision-making in extreme environment: The case of a military Decision Support System”, The International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction*, Vol. 9, N°1, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/IJTHI
- Gregory, Wr., Keil, M., Muntermann, J. & Mähring, M. (2016). Managerial View, ambidexterity, leadership, paradoxes Case study Production of ambidextrous IT transformation program Management including leadership. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/isre.2014.0554
- Guichardaz R., Pénin J., Schenk E. (2023), Blockchain and Open Innovation for SMEs: Analytical framework and decision model Systèmes d’Information et Management, 28(2), 61–85. https://doi.org/ 10.3917/sim.232.0061
- Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
- Hanseth, O., & Braa, K. (1999). SAP as emergent infrastructure in a global organization. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 4(4), 53–70. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/353053.353069
- Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., & Aanestad, M. (2006). Reflexive standardization: Side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 563–581. 10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1. 10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1
- He, Z. L. & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481–494. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
- Henfridsson, O. & Yoo, Y. (2014). The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 25(3), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0883
- Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
- Jöhnk, J., Ollig, P., Rövekamp, P., & Oesterle, S. (2022). Managing the complexity of digital transformation—How multiple concurrent initiatives foster hybrid ambidexterity. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 547–569. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12525-021-00510-2
- Karimi, J. & Walter Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380
- Kauppila, O. P. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic organization, 8(4), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1897-2
- Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. (2014). Business model renewal and ambidexterity: structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a C loud business model. R&D Management, 44(3), 322–340. 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.15162abstract
- Kranz, J. J., Hanelt, A., & Kolbe, L. M. (2016). Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change–the case of on-premise and cloud-computing software. Information systems journal, 26(5), 477–517. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/isj.12102
- Lavie, D., Kang, J., & Rosenkopf, L. (2009, August). The Performance Effects Of Balancing Exploration And Exploitation Within And Across Alliance Domains, In Academy of management proceedings, 4(1), 1–6. 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44228410
- Lee, O. K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398–417. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/isre.2015.0577
- Lenfle, S. (2008). Exploration and Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.017
- Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/25148682
- Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, 14(2), 95–112. 10.1002/smj.4250141009
- Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., & Schultze, U. (2004). Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(3), 435–472. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/25148646
- Linhart R. (1978), L’Établi, Paris, Les Éditions de minuit, Paris
- March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- Markus, M.-L., & Tanis, C. (2000). The Enterprise System Experience: From adoption to success. In R. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management (pp. 173–208). Cincinnati: Pinnaflex.
- Martinet A.C. (1990), Epistémologies et Sciences de Gestion, ouv. coll. coordonné par A.C. Martinet, Economica, Paris.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
- Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2003). Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. Journal of marketing, 67(1), 63–76. 10.1509/jmkg.67.1.63.18595
- Montealegre, R., Iyengar, K., & Sweeney, J. (2019). Understanding Ambidexterity: Managing Contradictory Tensions Between Exploration and Exploitation in the Evolution of Digital Infrastructure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(5), 647–680. https://doi.org/ 10.17705/1jais.00547
- Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Mis Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/ 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
- Newell, S., Huang, J. C., Galliers, R. D., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity. Information and organization, 13(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-7727(02)00007-6
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, (28), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California management review, 53(4), 5–22. 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
- Ouchi, W. G. (1978). The transmission of control through organizational hierarchy. Academy of management Journal, 21(2), 173–192. 10.2307/255753
- Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848. 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
- Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2392231
- Park, Y., Pavlou, P. A., & Saraf, N. (2020). Configurations for achieving organizational ambidexterity with digitization. Information Systems Research, 31(4), 1376–1397. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/isre.2020.0950
- Popper K. (1973). “La logique de la découverte scientifique”. Traduit de l’anglais par : Nicole Thyssen-Rutten et Philippe Devaux. Préface de Jacques Monod, Prix Nobel. Editions Payot, Paris.
- Poston, R., & Grabski, S. (2001). Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(4), 271–294. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1467-0895(01)00024-0
- Reix, R. (1999). Les technologies de l’information, facteurs de flexibilité. Revue française de gestion, (123), 111-119.
- Rogan, M., & Mors, M. L. (2014). A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science, 25(6), 1860–1877. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.2014.0901
- Schein E. H. (1995). Process Consultation, Action Research, and Clinical Inquiry: Are They the Same? MIT Working Paper 3833 https://doi.org/ 10.1108/02683949510093830
- Schein, E. H. (1969). Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Schein, E. H. (1996). Kurt Lewin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systems practice, 9(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02173417
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Sidhu, J. S., Volberda, H. W., & Commandeur, H. R. (2004). Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 913–932. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00460.x
- Simon H.A. (1959), Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science, American Economic Review, 49, no 1, p. 253–283
- Swift, T. (2016). The perilous leap between exploration and exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1688-1698. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/smj.2423
- Te’eni, D, Seidel, S. & vom Brocke, J. (2017). Stimulating dialog between information systems research and practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(6), 541–545. 10.1057/s41303-017-0067-9
- Tiwana, A. (2010). Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 87–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/29780172
- Wagner, E. L., Moll, J., & Newell, S. (2011). Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices: A sociomaterial perspective. Management accounting research, 22(3), 181-197. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mar.2011.03.001
- Wagner, E.L., and S. Newell. 2007. Exploring the importance of participation in the post-implementation period of an ES project: a neglected area. Journal of the AIS, 8(10), 508–524. https://doi.org/ 10.17705/1jais.00142
- Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
- Xue, L., Ray, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). Efficiency or Innovation: Efficiency or Innovation: How Do Industry Environments Moderate the Effects of Firms’ IT Asset Portfolios? MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 509–528. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41703465
- Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information systems research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/isre.1100.0322