ror.org/04y8cs423
Résumés
Résumé
L’internationalisation de la R&D est une tendance lourde, mais très peu de travaux étudient la genèse de centres de R&D à l’international. L’article s’appuie sur l’analyse longitudinale de deux cas dans l’industrie automobile et montre que l’internationalisation de la R&D combine trois mécanismes constitutifs d’une « proximité organisée » : la construction de compétences et capacités, l’établissement de nouvelles routines et la constitution d’une légitimité interne et externe. Ces mécanismes s’inscrivent dans une temporalité longue, et sont à la base de l’enrichissement et de l’évolution des missions des centres de R&D à l’international.
Mots-clés :
- Internationalisation,
- R&D,
- capacité,
- routine,
- légitimité,
- proximité organisée
Abstract
Wheareas the R&D activities get more and more global, we still have little insights or research results about how international R&D units’ genesis – meaning how they emerge and grow. Relying on a longitudinal analysis of two cases in the automotive industry, this article provides such insights. We show that the internationalization of R&D combines three constitutive mechanisms of an “organized proximity” (1), competence building (2) new routines building and (3) internal and external legitimacy building. These mechanisms drive the empowerment of the unit on a multi-year timeframe. They also allow to enriching and reorient the missions of these R&D offshore units.
Keywords:
- internationalization,
- R&D,
- capability,
- routine,
- legitimacy,
- organized proximity
Resumen
La internacionalización de la I + D es una tendencia importante pero muy poco investigaciones estudian la génesis de los centros de I + D en el extranjero. El artículo se basa en un análisis longitudinal de dos casos en la industria del automóvil y muestra que la internacionalización de la I + D combina tres mecanismos constitutivos de una « proximidad organizada » : la creación de competencias y capacidades, el establecimiento de nuevas rutinas y la instauración de una legitimidad interna y externa. Estos mecanismos son parte de una larga temporalidad, y son la base para el enriquecimiento y la evolución de las misiones de los centros de I + D en el extranjero.
Palabras clave:
- internacionalización,
- I + D,
- capacidad,
- rutina,
- legitimidad,
- proximidad organizada
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Almeida, P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, p.155-165.
- Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), p. 905-917.
- Asakawa, K. (2001). Organizational tension in international R&D management: the case of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 30(5), p.735–757.
- Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders : The Multinational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Ben Mahmoud-Jouini, S., Charue-Duboc, F., Midler, C. 2015, Management de l'innovation et globalisation, pp 175-196, Dunod Paris
- Calabrese, G. (2001). R&D globalization in the car industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1(1), 145-159.
- Carrinzeaux, C., & Lung, Y. (1998). La proximité dans l’organisation de la conception des produits automobiles. In B. E. e. al. (Ed.), Proximité(s) : approche interdisciplinaire. Paris : Hermes.
- Chatterji, D. (1996). Accessing external sources of technology. Research Technology Management, 39(2), p.49-56.
- Chiesa, V. (2000). Global R&D Project Management and Organization: A Taxonomy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(5), p.341-359.
- Chung, W., & Yeaple, S. (2008). International knowledge sourcing : evidence from US firms expanding abroad. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), p.1207-1224.
- Cohendet, P., & Llerena, P. (2008). The role of teams and communities in the emergence of organizational routines. In M. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of Organisational Routines (p.256-277): Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
- Cusumano, M. A., & Nobeoka, K. (1998). Le Management multi-projets : Optimiser le développement de produits. Paris : Dunod.
- David, A., Hatchuel, A., & Laufer, R. (2000). Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion : éléments d’épistémologie pour la recherche en management. Paris : Collection FNEGE, Librairie Vuibert.
- Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational : How Companies Win in the Global Economy. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532.
- Feinberg, S., & Gupta, A. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsabilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 25, p. 823-845.
- Florida, F. (1997). The globalization of R&D : Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26, p.85-103.
- Gassmann, O., & Von Zedtwitz, M. (1999). New concepts and trends in international R&D organization. Research Policy, 28(2), 231-250.
- Harfi, M., Mathieu, C., & Pfister, E. (2007). Internationalisation de la R&D des entreprises et attractivité de la France. Paris : Centre d’analyse stratégique.
- Hewitt, G. (1980). Research and development performed abroad by US manufacturing multinationals. KYKLOS, 33, 308-327.
- Iansiti, M. (1995). Technology Integration: Managing Technological Evolution in a Complex Environment. Research Policy(24), p.521-542.
- Lall, S. (1979). The international allocation of research activity by US multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 313-331.
- Larsen, M. M., Manning, S., & Pedersen, T. (2012). Uncovering the hidden costs of offshoring: The interplay of complexity, organizational design, and experience. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), p.533–552.
- Maniak, R., Midler, C., Beaume, R., & Pechmann, F. v. (2014). Featuring capability: How carmakers organize to deploy innovative features across products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), p.114–127.
- Manning, S., Hutzschenreuter, T., & Strathmann, A. (2013). Emerging capability or continuous challenge ? Relocating knowledge work and managing process interfaces. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5), p.1159-1193.
- Manning, S., Massini, S., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). A Dynamic Perspective on Next-Generation Offshoring: The Global Sourcing of Science and Engineering Talent. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), p.35-54.
- Midler, C. (1993). L’Auto qui n’existait pas : Management des projets et transformation de l’entreprise. Paris : InterEditions.
- Midler, C., Garel, G., & Kesseler, A. (1997). Le co-développement : définition, enjeux et problèmes. Education Permanente, n°131, 95-108.
- Miller, R. (1993). Recherche, Développement et globalisation : le cas de l’industrie automobile. Revue française de gestion(sept-oct 1993), p. 53-63.
- Moncada-Paterno`-Castello, P., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2011). Drivers and impacts in the globalization of corporate R&D : an introduction based on the European experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 585–603.
- Monteiro, F. (2008). Connecting the dots : Uncovering the technology scouting process. PhD Dissertation, London Business School (University of London). London, UK.
- Pearce, R. D. (1999). Decentralized R&D and strategic competitiveness : globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Research Policy, 28(2-3), 151-178.
- Reddy, P. (2000). Globalization of Corporate R&D : Implications for Innovation Systems in Host Countries. London and New York : Routledge.
- Reddy, P., & Sigurdson, J. (1994). Emerging patterns of globalisation of corporate R&D and scope for innovation capability building in developing countries ? Science and Public Policy, 21(5), 283-294.
- Reger, G. (2004). Coordinating globally dispersed research centres of excellence – the case of Philips Electronics. Journal of International Management, 10, 51-76.
- Ronstadt, R. C. (1977). Research and Development Abroad by US Multinationals. New York : Praeger.
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques: Sage.
- Torre, A. (2014). Relations de proximité et comportements d’innovation des entreprises des clusters. Le cas du cluster de l’optique en Ile-de-France. Revue française de gestion, Juin-Juillet,(242), 49-80.
- Torre, A., & Zuindeau, B. (2009). Les apports de l’économie de la proximité aux approches environnementales : inventaires et perspectives. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 17, 349-360.
- UNCTAD. (2005a). Globalization of R&D and developing countries. In U. Nations (Ed.).
- UNCTAD. (2005b). World Investment Report : Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. In U. Nations (Ed.).
- Walsh, K. (2003). Foreign High-Tech R & D in China: Risks, Rewards, and Implications for Us-China Relations. Washington DC.
- Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Zander, I. (1999). How do you mean "global"? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation. Research Policy, 28(2), pp. 195-213.