Résumés
Résumé
L’éducation ouverte et libre (EOL) est souvent présentée comme favorisant l’accès au savoir, la démocratisation et l’équité dans l’enseignement supérieur. Cette vision masque toutefois la persistance d’inégalités systémiques, notamment celles découlant de la logique du don ou de l’instrumentalisation néolibérale de l’ouverture. Le partage de ressources est systématiquement promu sous un angle positif avec quelques auteurs et autrices soulevant la question de la justice cognitive. Cet article s’inscrit dans cette lignée pour proposer des leviers favorisant l’émergence de pratiques de coconstruction des savoirs. En recourant à une revue de littérature narrative, la démarche s’appuie sur les apports conceptuels de la Bildung de Von Humboldt ainsi que des épistémologies du Sud. Les leviers identifiés pour une EOL fondée sur la justice cognitive nécessitent le développement de savoirs épistémiques, pédagogiques et techniques afin de rompre avec la reproduction systémique des asymétries Nord-Sud.
Mots-clés :
- éducation ouverte et libre,
- justice cognitive,
- épistémologies du Sud,
- Bildung,
- approches critiques
Abstract
Open Education (OE) is generally portrayed as fostering the democratization of access to knowledge and equity in higher education. However, this vision obscures the persistence of systemic inequalities, particularly those arising from the logic of the gift or from the neoliberal instrumentalization of openness. Resource sharing is systematically promoted in a positive light, with only a few scholars raising the issue of cognitive justice. This article aligns with this line of inquiry by proposing levers that may foster the emergence of knowledge co-construction practices. Drawing on a non-systematic literature review combined with a critical analysis, the approach builds on the conceptual contributions of Von Humboldt’s notion of Bildung as well as on the epistemologies of the South. The identified levers for OE grounded in cognitive justice call for the development of epistemic, pedagogical, and technical forms of knowledge to break with the systemic reproduction of North–South asymmetries.
Keywords:
- open education,
- cognitive justice,
- epistemologies of the South,
- Bildung,
- critical approach
Resumen
La Educación Abierta (EA) suele presentarse como promotora de la democratización del acceso al conocimiento y de la equidad en la educación superior. Sin embargo, esta visión oculta la persistencia de desigualdades sistémicas, en particular aquellas derivadas de la lógica del don o de la instrumentalización neoliberal de la apertura. El intercambio de recursos se promueve sistemáticamente bajo una luz positiva, y solo algunos autores y autoras plantean la cuestión de la justicia cognitiva. Este artículo se inscribe en esta línea de reflexión al proponer palancas que favorezcan la emergencia de prácticas de coconstrucción de saberes. A partir de una revisión no sistemática de la literatura, combinada con un análisis crítico, la propuesta se apoya en las contribuciones conceptuales de la Bildung de Von Humboldt, así como en las epistemologías del Sur. Las palancas identificadas para una EA basada en la justicia cognitiva requieren el desarrollo de saberes epistémicos, pedagógicos y técnicos con el fin de romper con la reproducción sistémica de las asimetrías Norte–Sur.
Palabras clave:
- educación abierta,
- justicia cognitiva,
- epistemologías del sur,
- Bildung,
- enfoque crítico
Resumo
A Educação Aberta (EA) costuma ser apresentada como promotora da democratização do acesso ao conhecimento e da equidade no ensino superior. Contudo, essa visão oculta a persistência de desigualdades sistêmicas, em particular aquelas derivadas da lógica da dádiva ou da instrumentalização neoliberal da abertura. A troca de recursos é promovida sistematicamente sob uma luz positiva, e apenas alguns autores e autoras levantam a questão da justiça cognitiva. Este artigo insere-se nessa linha de reflexão ao propor alavancas que favoreçam o surgimento de práticas de coconstrução de saberes. Com base numa revisão não sistemática da literatura, combinada com uma análise crítica, a proposta apoia-se nas contribuições conceituais da Bildung de von Humboldt, bem como nas epistemologias do Sul. As alavancas identificadas para uma EA orientada pela justiça cognitiva exigem o desenvolvimento de saberes epistêmicos, pedagógicos e técnicos, a fim de romper com a reprodução sistêmica das assimetrias Norte–Sul.
Palavras chaves:
- educação aberta,
- justiça cognitiva,
- epistemologias do sul,
- Bildung,
- abordagem crítica
Parties annexes
Liste de références
- Adam, T. (2019). Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): Colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365‑380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740
- Allain, M., et Maillet, A. (2021). Les mobilisations autour de l’extractivisme. Circulation et potentiel heuristique d’un concept en voie de globalisation. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 28(3), 7‑29. https://doi.org/10.3917/ripc.283.0007
- Atari, M., Xue, M., Park, P., Blasi, D., et Henrich, J. (2023). Which Humans? OSF. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5b26t
- Baker, F. W. (2017). An Alternative Approach: Openness in Education Over the Last 100 Years. TechTrends, 61(2), 130‑140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0095-7
- Bali, M. (2017). April Open Perspective: What is Open Pedagogy? Year of Open. https://www.yearofopen.org/april-open-perspective-what-is-open-pedagogy/
- Bali, M. (2022). Outside-In: Entangled Openness as Subversion Influencing Emergent Change. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 2(1), 1‑10. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2022.1.1.25
- Bali, M. (2025). A Compassionate Approach to Critical AI Literacy. Consulté 15 novembre 2025, à l’adresse https://events.oregonstate.edu/event/a-compassionate-approach-to-critical-ai-literacy-maha-bali-phd
- Bali, M., Cronin, C., et Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565
- Barblan, A. (2010). From the university in europe, to te university of europe. Dans W. Rüegg, A History of the University in Europe: Volume 4, Universities since 1945 (p. 550‑574). Cambridge University Press.
- Bayne, S., Knox, J., et Ross, J. (2015). Open education: The need for a critical approach. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 247‑250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1065272
- Belikov, O. M., et Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
- Bergson, H. (1932). Les Deux sources de la morale et de la religion. Félix Alcan.
- Blessinger, P., et Bliss, T. (dir.). (2017). Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education. Open Book Publishers. http://books.openedition.org/obp/3522
- Bock, A., et Tribukait, M. (2019). Kultur des Teilens: Ein kritischer Blick auf ein zentrales Konzept der OER-Bewegung. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 34, 47‑66. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/34/2019.02.22.X
- Bollier, D. (2024). Challenges in Expanding the Commonsverse. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1389
- Bourdieu, P. (1971). Reproduction culturelle et reproduction sociale. Social Science Information, 10(2), 45‑79. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847101000203
- Brinkmann, M., Mattig, R., et Kipf, S. (dir.). (2024). Wilhelm von Humboldt: Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung zwischen Praxis, Theorie und Empirie der Bildung (2ᵉ éd.). Beltz Juventa. https://doi.org/10.3262/978-3-7799-7555-7
- Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Cardona-Rivera, R. E., Alladin, J. K., Litts, B. K., et Tehee, M. (2024). 14. Indigenous Futures in Generative Artificial Intelligence: The Paradox of Participation. Dans B. Buyserie, T. Thurston et Utah State University (dir.), Teaching and Generative AI. Pedagogical Possibilities and Productive Tensions. Sous licence CC B- NC-SA. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/...
- Chiappe, A., et Adame, S. I. (2017). Open Educational Practices: A learning way beyond free access knowledge. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 26, 213‑230. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362018002601320
- Cisel, M. T. (2023). On the Ethical Issues Posed by the Exploitation of Users’ Data in MOOC Platforms: Capturing Learners’ Perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 20‑43. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7265
- Class, B., et Akkari, A. (2020). Le projet RESET-Francophone : vers une formation ouverte et libre à la méthodologie de la recherche en éducation. L’éducation en débats : analyse comparée, 10(2), article 2. https://doi.org/10.51186/journals/ed.2020.10-2.e346
- Class, B., et Salzmann, A. (2024, 4 septembre). L’Open Education dans le parcours d’un·e enseignant·e-chercheur·e : Open Educational Resources [Communication orale]. Open Science Days, Université de Genève, Genève, Suisse. https://rb.gy/9q0q22
- Class, B., Sagayar, M. M., Mounkaïla, H., Adamou, A. S., Akkari, A., Dupertuis, F., Soumaila, R. A., Sanda, I. M., et Agagliate, T. (2025). Certificate of Open Studies - Education in Emergencies: Leveraging African Orality in a Freiran Approach. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.881
- Collier, A., et Ross, J. (2017). For whom, and for what? Not-yetness and thinking beyond open content. Open Praxis, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.406
- Connell, R. (2016). Les sciences sociales à l’échelle mondiale. Connecter les pages. Justice cognitive, libre accès et savoirs locaux. Dans F. Piron, S. Regulus et S. Dibounje Madiba (dir.), Justice cognitive, libre accès et savoirs locaux. https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/...
- Creative Commons (s. d.). CC Signals: A New Social Contract for the Age of AI. Creative Commons. Consulté 19 août 2025, à l’adresse https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
- Dardot, P., et Laval, C. (2015). Commun. Essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.dardo.2015.01
- de Sousa Santos, B. (2016). Épistémologies du Sud : mouvements citoyens et polémique sur la science. Desclée de Brouwer.
- Deimann, M. (2013). Open Education and Bildung as Kindred Spirits. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2), 190‑199. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.2.190
- Deimann, M. (2018). Open Education: Auf dem Weg zu einer offenen Hochschulbildung. Dans Open Education. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839444962
- Deimann, M. (2019). Openness. Dans I. Jung (dir.), Open and Distance Education Theory Revisited: Implications for the Digital Era (p. 39‑46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_5
- Deimann, M., et Farrow, R. (2013). Rethinking OER and their Use: Open Education as Bildung. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 344‑360. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1370
- Descarpentries, J. (2021). Les Épistémologies du Sud à Paris 8 UAES. https://hal.science/hal-03896929/
- Descarpentries, J. (2022). Théories critiques et épistémologies du Sud. https://education.cuso.ch/?id=902&L=0&tx_displaycontroller[showUid]=6140
- dos Santos, T. (2011). Imperialismo y dependencia. CLACSO.
- Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world (New ed). Princeton University Press.
- Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130‑146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
- Farrow, R. (2025). Cosmopolitics and The Commons. Education Ouverte et Libre - Open Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.52612/journals/eol-oe.2025.e1632
- Farrow, R., et Deimann, M. (2012, 16–18 octobre). Bildung as a critical foundation for Open Education. Dans Open Education 2012: Beyond Content [présentation]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/bildung-open-ed-final/14771373
- Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy—technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
- Fawns, T. (s. d.). An Entangled Pedagogy: Views of the relationship between technology and pedagogy – Open.Ed. Consulté 14 novembre 2025, à l’adresse https://open.ed.ac.uk/an-entangled-pedagogy-views-of-the-relationship-between-technology-and-pedagogy/
- Fotu, B. O. (2024). Rude Reflections: Current AI Acts as a Mirror of Our Flawed Society. Dans B. Buyserie, T. Thurston et Utah State University (dir.), Teaching and Generative AI. Pedagogical Possibilities and Productive Tensions. Sous licence CC B- NC-SA. https://uen.pressbooks.pub/...
- Franzel, S. (2014). Recycling Bildung : From the Humboldt-Forum to Humboldt and Back. Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies, 50(3), 379‑397. https://doi.org/10.3138/sem.50.3.379
- Fraser, S., et Deane, E. (1997). Why Open Learning? Australian Universities’ Review, 40(1), 25‑31.
- Freire, P. (1980). Pädagogik der Unterdrückten: Bildung als Praxis der Freiheit (E. Lange, introd.; W. Simpfendörfer, trad.). Rowohlt.
- Godrie, B. (2021). Intégration des usagers et usagères et extractivisme des savoirs expérientiels : une critique ancrée dans le modèle écologique des savoirs dans le champ de la santé mentale. Participations, 30(2), 249‑273. https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.030.0249
- Grant, M. J., et Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Hammersley, M. (2024). What is an ‘open society’? Bergson, Strauss, Popper, and Deleuze. History of European Ideas, 50(8), 1422-1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2024.2365143
- hooks, b. (2019). Apprendre à transgresser : l’éducation comme pratique de la liberté (M. Portron, Trad.). SYLLEPSE.
- Hug, T. (2022). Paradoxien virtueller Partizipation. Sondierungen im Spannungsfeld ko-kreativer Gestaltung von freien Bildungsmedien und globaler Bildungsindustrie. Dans G. Marci-Boehncke, M. Rath, M. Delere, et H. Höfer (dir.), Medien – Demokratie – Bildung: Normative Vermittlungsprozesse und Diversität in mediatisierten Gesellschaften (p. 95‑115). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36446-5_7
- Kerres, M. (2016). Open Educational Resources (OER). Dans N. Gronau, J. Becker, E. J. Sinz, L. Suhl, et M. Leimeister (dir.), Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik (9). https://wi-lex.de/...
- Kerres, M. (2019). Offene Bildungsressourcen und Open Education: Openness als Bewegung oder als Gefüge von Initiativen? MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 34, 1‑18. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/34/2019.02.17.X
- Koller, H.-C. (2020). Problems and Perspectives of a Theory of Transformational Processes of Bildung. Educational Theory, 70(5), 633‑651. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12448
- Koller, H.-C. (2023). Bildung anders denken: Einführung in die Theorie transformatorischer Bildungsprozesse. Kohlhammer Verlag.
- Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing Our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 225‑244.
- Lane, A. (2016). Emancipation through Open Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dans P. Blessinger et T. J. Bliss (dir.), Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education (p. 31‑50). Open Book Publishers. http://oro.open.ac.uk/48054/
- Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science. Elements in the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368
- Leonelli, S. (2025, 20 août). Contrasting Visions of Inquiry for an Open Society: Henri Bergson and Karl Popper Between Humane and Rational Openness (prepublication). https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26292/
- Leonelli, S., Castaño, P., Koranteng-Acquah, J., Tsiroukis, F., Cavazzoni, E., Trappes, R., Sheehan, N., Goble, C., Williams, R., Hajek, K., Trauttmansdorff, P., et Goldstein, R. B. (2025). Towards a Philosophy of Open Scientific Practices: Comparing Research Environments (1.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15295361
- Lewis, R. (1986). What is open learning? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1(2), 5‑10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051860010202
- Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., et Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140‑158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
- Luth, C. (1998). On Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Theory of Bildung Dedicated to Wolfgang Klafki for his 70th birthday. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 43‑60. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202798183756
- Lutris, H. F., et Simon, N. P. (2021). The True and False Promise of Open Educational Resources, or, How Open Educational Resources are Condemned to Wither without Open Pedagogy. International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 4(1). https://ijoer.scholasticahq.com/...
- Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
- Magdeleine, A., Guével, A., de La Higuera, C., Depoterre, S., Deville, Y., Class, B., Akkari, A., Sagayar, M., Dubé, M., Potvin, C., Bourque, M., Lachaîne, C. et Massou, L. (2024, 28-31 mai). L’éducation ouverte et libre : un champ d’action interdisciplinaire au service des perspectives scientifiques, sociales et pédagogiques de l’enseignement supérieur francophone? Association internationale de pédagogie universitaire Sherbrooke, Canada. https://hal.science/hal-04572383
- Mboa Nkoudou, T. H. (2016). Les injustices cognitives en Afrique subsaharienne : réflexions sur les causes et les moyens de lutte. Dans F. Piron, S. Regulus et S. Dibounje Madiba (dir.), Justice cognitive, libre accès et savoirs locaux. https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/...
- Mclaren, P. (2020). The future of critical pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(12), 1243‑1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1686963
- Menze, C. (1975). Die Bildungsreform Wilhelm von Humboldts. H. Schroedel.
- Mignolo, W. (2009a). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7‑8), 159‑181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
- Mignolo, W. (2009b). La fin de l’université telle que nous la connaissons. Cahiers des Amériques latines, 62, article 62, p. 97-109. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.1608
- Mignolo, W. D. (2010). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives (2e édition). De Boeck Supérieur.
- Morris, S. M. et Stommel, J. (2018). An Urgency of Teachers. Hybrid Pedagogy Inc. https://pressbooks.pub/criticaldigitalpedagogy/
- Nantes Université. (2022). Éducation ouverte. Stratégie 2022-2027. https://www.univ-nantes.fr/...
- Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and Diffusion of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472
- Pereira, I. (2020). Paulo Freire ou la pédagogie critique comme agir éthique. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 44, article 44, p. 68-84. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.4862
- Perplexity AI. (2023). Claude Sonnet 4.0. Assistant [modèle de langage d’intelligence artificielle]. https://www.perplexity.ai
- Peter, S. et Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
- Peters, M. A. (2015). Scientific Communication and the Open Society: The Emerging Paradigm of “Open Knowledge Production”. Dans Peters, M., Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (p. 1‑14). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_415-1
- Petrucco, C., et Ferranti, C. (2020). Wikipedia as OER: the « Learning with Wikipedia » project. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 38‑45. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135322
- Piron, F. (2018). Justice et injustice cognitives : de l’épistémologie à la matérialité des savoirs humains. Dans É. Tremblay et R. Dorcé (dir.), Les Classiques des sciences sociales : 25 ans de partage des savoirs dans la francophonie. https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/classiques25ans/chapter/justice-et-injustice-cognitives/
- Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Routledge.
- Ramose, M. (2023). The meaning of sharing under marketised education: An Ubu-ntu perspective. Éducation ouverte et libre - Open Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.52612/journals/eol-oe.2023.e939
- Rivera, R. E. C., Jhala, A., Porteous, J., et Young, R. M. (2024). The Story So Far on Narrative Planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 34, 489‑499. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v34i1.31509
- Rüegg, W. (2004). A History of the University in Europe: Volume 3, Universities in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (1800-1945). Cambridge University Press.
- Saracci, C., Mahamat, M., et Jacquérioz, F. (2019). Comment rédiger un article scientifique de type revue narrative de la littérature. Rev Med Suisse, 15(664), 1694-1698. https://www.chuv.ch/fileadmin/sites/mia/documents/RMS_revue_narrative.pdf
- Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the Problem with Learning Analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 11‑19. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.3
- Selwyn, N., Ljungqvist, M., et Sonesson, A. (2025). When the prompting stops: Exploring teachers’ work around the educational frailties of generative AI tools. Learning, Media and Technology, 0(0), 1‑14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2537959
- Stallman, R. (2007). Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software. GNU Project – Free Software Foundation. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html.en
- Stracke, C. M. (2019). Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4213
- Tenorth, H.-E. (2011). “Bildung“ – ein Thema im Dissens der Disziplinen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(3), 351‑362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-011-0223-2
- Thompson, M. J. (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5
- UNESCO (2019a). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer
- UNESCO (2019b). UNESCO’s Internet universality indicators: a framework for assessing Internet development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000367617
- UNESCO (2024). Dubai Declaration on Open Educational Resources (OER): digital public goods and emerging technologies for equitable and inclusive access to knowledge. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000392271
- UTA Libraries (s. d.). Introduction to Open Pedagogy: Examples. Introduction to Open Pedagogy. Consulté 13 mai 2025, à l’adresse https://libguides.unm.edu/openped/examples
- Visvanathan, S. (2016). La quête de justice cognitive. Dans F. Piron, S. Regulus et S. Dibounje Madiba (dir.), Justice cognitive, libre accès et savoirs locaux. a https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/justicecognitive1/chapter/en-quete-de-justice-cognitive/
- Waghid, Y. (2018). On the Educational Potential of Ubuntu. Dans E. J. Takyi-Amoako et N. T. Assié-Lumumba (dir.), Re-Visioning Education in Africa: Ubuntu-Inspired Education for Humanity (p. 55‑65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70043-4_4
- Wallenhorst, N. (2016). De la Bildung à la citoyenneté existentielle. Une approche franco-allemande de l’éducation des travailleurs sociaux. Le Sociographe, Hors-série 9(5), 55‑70. https://doi.org/10.3917/graph.hs09.0055
- Wang Szilas, J. (2025). Revitalise an endangered language and writing via MOOC: What and how. Ubiquity Proceedings, 41. https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.209
- Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bam
- Widder, D. G., West, S., et Whittaker, M. (2023). Open (For Business): Big Tech, Concentrated Power, and the Political Economy of Open AI (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4543807). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807
- Wiley, D. (2014). The Access Compromise and the 5th R. learning [blogue]. improving learning eclectic, pragmatic, enthusiastic. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
- Wiley, D. (s. d.). Defining the ‘Open’ in Open Content and Open Educational Resources. https://opencontent.org/definition/
- Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., et McEwen, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, et M. J. Bishop (dir.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (p. 781‑789). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63
- Wiley. (2024, 9 avril). How Generative AI Affects Open Educational Resources – improving learning [blogue]. improving learning eclectic, pragmatic, enthusiastic. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/7568

