Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Anger, Beverley and Catherine Hundleby. 2016. Ad stuprum: The appeal to sex. In Argumentation, objectivity, and bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), eds. Patrick Bondy and Laura Be-nacquista, 18-21. Windsor, ON: OSSA Conference Archive.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bondy, Patrick. 2026. Arguments from ignorance, coverage, and bub-bles. Informal Logic 46(1): 101-115.10.22329/il.v46i1.9706 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bone, Jennifer E., Cindy L. Griffin and T. M. Linda Scholz. 2008. Beyond traditional conceptualizations of rhetoric: Invitational rheto-ric and a move toward civility. Western Journal of Communication 72(4): 434-462.10.1080/10570310802446098 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Bowell, Tracy. 2026. An invitation to transformation: the importance of Cate Hundleby’s work to contemporary scientific epistemology. Informal Logic 46(1): 81-100.10.22329/il.v46i1.9707 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Casey, John. 2020. Adversariality and argumentation. Informal Logic 40(10): 77-108.10.22329/il.v40i1.5969 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Doury, Marianne. 2012. Preaching to the converted: Why argue when everyone agrees? Argumentation 26: 99-114.10.1007/s10503-011-9237-4 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Foss, Sonja K. and Cindy L. Griffin. 1995. Beyond persuasion: A proposal for invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs 62(1): 2-18.10.1080/03637759509376345 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Gilbert, Michael. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: La-wrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Gilbert, Michael. 2014. Arguing with people. Peterborough, ON: Broad-view Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Goldberg, Sanford. 2011. If that were true, I’d have heard it by now. In Social epistemology: Essential readings, eds. A. I. Goldman and D. Whitcomb, 92-108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Govier, Trudy. 1999. The philosophy of argument. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Henning, Tempest. 2018. Bringing wreck. Symposion 5(2): 197-211.10.5840/symposion20185216 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Howes, Moira and Catherine Hundleby. 2018. The epistemology of anger in argumentation. Symposion 5(2): 229-254.10.5840/symposion20185218 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Howes, Moira and Catherine Hundleby. 2021. Adversarial argument, belief change, and vulnerability. Topoi 40(5): 859-872.10.1007/s11245-021-09769-8 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 1997. Where standpoint stands now. Women & Politics 18(3): 25-43.10.1080/1554477X.1997.9970820 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2010. The authority of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation. Informal Logic 30(3): 279-308.10.22329/il.v30i3.3035 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2013. Aggression, politeness, and abstract adver-saries. Informal Logic 33(2): 238-262.10.22329/il.v33i2.3895 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2015. What is argument repair? URL accessed 16 January 2015: <https://chundleby.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/what-is-argument-repair/>.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2016. The status quo fallacy: Implicit biases and fallacies of argumentation. In Implicit bias and philosophy: Volume 1, metaphysics and epistemology, eds. Michael Brownstein and Jen-nifer Saul, 238-264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0010 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2017. Book review: Arguing with people by Michael A. Gilbert. Informal Logic 37(3): 240-245.10.22329/il.v37i3.4952 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2019. Live to argue another day. TEDx talk. URL accessed February 2019: <https://www.ted.com/talks/catherine_hundleby_live_to_argue_another_day>.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021. Epistemic coverage and argument closure. Topoi 40: 1051-1062.10.1007/s11245-020-09693-3 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021a. Thinking outside-in: Feminist standpoint theory as epistemology, methodology, and philosophy of science. In The Routledge handbook of feminist philosophy of science, eds. Sha-ron Crasnow and Kristen Intemann, 89-103. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429507731-10 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021b. Feminist perspectives on argumentation. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2023 edition), eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. URL accessed 2023: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-argumentation/>.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine. Forthcoming. Argument repair: Teaching inter-pretation. In Feminist philosophy and formal logic, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, eds. Roy T. Cook and Audrey Yap. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine and Phyllis Rooney. 2010. Reasoning for change. Informal Logic 30(3): 194-202.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Hundleby, Catherine and Phyllis Rooney. 2021. Argument for social justice and reasoning for change. Informal Logic 41(1): 1-16.10.22329/il.v41i1.6686 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Innocenti, Beth. 2026. Calling out displays and disclaimers of aggres-sion. Informal Logic 46(1): 49-80.10.22329/il.v46i1.9013 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Linker, Maureen. 2014. Do squirrels eat hamburgers? Intellectual empathy as a remedy for residual prejudice. Informal Logic 31(2): 110-138.10.22329/il.v31i2.3063 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Meynell, Letitia. 2026. An invitation to transformation: the importance of Cate Hundleby’s work to contemporary scientific epistemology. Informal Logic 46(1): 23-48.10.22329/il.v46i1.9709 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Mills, Charles. 2005. Ideal theory as ideology. Hypatia 20(3): 165-183.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Moulton, Janice. 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality, eds. S. Harding and M. B. Hintikka, 149-164. Boston: D. Reidel.10.1007/0-306-48017-4_9 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas. 1995. A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Walton, Douglas. 1996. Arguments from ignorance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Wylie, Alison. 2015. A plurality of pluralisms: Collaborative practice in archaeology. In Objectivity in science: New perspectives from science and technology studies, eds. Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson and Jonathan Tsou, 189-210. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_10 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Yap, Audrey. 2013. Ad hominem fallacies, bias, and testimony. Argu-mentation 27(2): 97-109.10.1007/s10503-011-9260-5 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Yap, Audrey. 2015. Ad hominem fallacies and epistemic credibility. In Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation, eds. Thomas Bustamante and Christian Dahlman, 19-35. Cham: Springer Inter-national Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_2 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar
- Yu, Shiyang. 2026. Unpacking appeals to emotion: a dual-path analy-sis. Informal Logic 46(1): 116-145.10.22329/il.v46i1.9705 Google Scholar Rechercher cette référence bibliographique sur Google Scholar