Appendices
Bibliography
- Anger, Beverley and Catherine Hundleby. 2016. Ad stuprum: The appeal to sex. In Argumentation, objectivity, and bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), eds. Patrick Bondy and Laura Be-nacquista, 18-21. Windsor, ON: OSSA Conference Archive.
- Bondy, Patrick. 2026. Arguments from ignorance, coverage, and bub-bles. Informal Logic 46(1): 101-115.
- Bone, Jennifer E., Cindy L. Griffin and T. M. Linda Scholz. 2008. Beyond traditional conceptualizations of rhetoric: Invitational rheto-ric and a move toward civility. Western Journal of Communication 72(4): 434-462.
- Bowell, Tracy. 2026. An invitation to transformation: the importance of Cate Hundleby’s work to contemporary scientific epistemology. Informal Logic 46(1): 81-100.
- Casey, John. 2020. Adversariality and argumentation. Informal Logic 40(10): 77-108.
- Doury, Marianne. 2012. Preaching to the converted: Why argue when everyone agrees? Argumentation 26: 99-114.
- Foss, Sonja K. and Cindy L. Griffin. 1995. Beyond persuasion: A proposal for invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs 62(1): 2-18.
- Gilbert, Michael. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: La-wrence Erlbaum.
- Gilbert, Michael. 2014. Arguing with people. Peterborough, ON: Broad-view Press.
- Goldberg, Sanford. 2011. If that were true, I’d have heard it by now. In Social epistemology: Essential readings, eds. A. I. Goldman and D. Whitcomb, 92-108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Govier, Trudy. 1999. The philosophy of argument. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
- Henning, Tempest. 2018. Bringing wreck. Symposion 5(2): 197-211.
- Howes, Moira and Catherine Hundleby. 2018. The epistemology of anger in argumentation. Symposion 5(2): 229-254.
- Howes, Moira and Catherine Hundleby. 2021. Adversarial argument, belief change, and vulnerability. Topoi 40(5): 859-872.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 1997. Where standpoint stands now. Women & Politics 18(3): 25-43.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2010. The authority of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation. Informal Logic 30(3): 279-308.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2013. Aggression, politeness, and abstract adver-saries. Informal Logic 33(2): 238-262.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2015. What is argument repair? URL accessed 16 January 2015: <https://chundleby.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/what-is-argument-repair/>.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2016. The status quo fallacy: Implicit biases and fallacies of argumentation. In Implicit bias and philosophy: Volume 1, metaphysics and epistemology, eds. Michael Brownstein and Jen-nifer Saul, 238-264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2017. Book review: Arguing with people by Michael A. Gilbert. Informal Logic 37(3): 240-245.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2019. Live to argue another day. TEDx talk. URL accessed February 2019: <https://www.ted.com/talks/catherine_hundleby_live_to_argue_another_day>.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021. Epistemic coverage and argument closure. Topoi 40: 1051-1062.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021a. Thinking outside-in: Feminist standpoint theory as epistemology, methodology, and philosophy of science. In The Routledge handbook of feminist philosophy of science, eds. Sha-ron Crasnow and Kristen Intemann, 89-103. New York: Routledge.
- Hundleby, Catherine. 2021b. Feminist perspectives on argumentation. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2023 edition), eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. URL accessed 2023: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-argumentation/>.
- Hundleby, Catherine. Forthcoming. Argument repair: Teaching inter-pretation. In Feminist philosophy and formal logic, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, eds. Roy T. Cook and Audrey Yap. University of Minnesota Press.
- Hundleby, Catherine and Phyllis Rooney. 2010. Reasoning for change. Informal Logic 30(3): 194-202.
- Hundleby, Catherine and Phyllis Rooney. 2021. Argument for social justice and reasoning for change. Informal Logic 41(1): 1-16.
- Innocenti, Beth. 2026. Calling out displays and disclaimers of aggres-sion. Informal Logic 46(1): 49-80.
- Linker, Maureen. 2014. Do squirrels eat hamburgers? Intellectual empathy as a remedy for residual prejudice. Informal Logic 31(2): 110-138.
- Meynell, Letitia. 2026. An invitation to transformation: the importance of Cate Hundleby’s work to contemporary scientific epistemology. Informal Logic 46(1): 23-48.
- Mills, Charles. 2005. Ideal theory as ideology. Hypatia 20(3): 165-183.
- Moulton, Janice. 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality, eds. S. Harding and M. B. Hintikka, 149-164. Boston: D. Reidel.
- Walton, Douglas. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Walton, Douglas. 1995. A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
- Walton, Douglas. 1996. Arguments from ignorance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Wylie, Alison. 2015. A plurality of pluralisms: Collaborative practice in archaeology. In Objectivity in science: New perspectives from science and technology studies, eds. Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson and Jonathan Tsou, 189-210. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Yap, Audrey. 2013. Ad hominem fallacies, bias, and testimony. Argu-mentation 27(2): 97-109.
- Yap, Audrey. 2015. Ad hominem fallacies and epistemic credibility. In Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation, eds. Thomas Bustamante and Christian Dahlman, 19-35. Cham: Springer Inter-national Publishing.
- Yu, Shiyang. 2026. Unpacking appeals to emotion: a dual-path analy-sis. Informal Logic 46(1): 116-145.