Résumés
Abstract
This article presents P, a speculative chatbot experienced as an interactive installation that explores how radical softness can reframe human–AI relations. Challenging techno-utopian narratives of AI as objective, efficient, and solution-oriented, P foregrounds AI’s situated weaknesses, including bias, error, partiality, and environmental cost. Encountered through a physical booth and a soft, heart-shaped controller, users engage an AI that openly acknowledges its dependence on human-made data. Drawing on auto-ethnographic and reflective design methods, the article argues that radical softness can function as a critical design strategy, provoking alternative imaginaries in which AI reflects shared vulnerability rather than technological perfection.
Résumé
Cet article présente P, un chatbot spéculatif conçu comme une installation interactive, qui explore comment le concept de « douceur radicale » peut reconfigurer les relations entre humains et IA. En rupture avec les récits techno-utopiques dominants qui présentent l’IA comme objective, efficace et orientée vers la résolution de problèmes, P met en avant les faiblesses situées de l’IA, notamment les biais, l’erreur, la partialité et le coût environnemental. Expérimenté dans un dispositif immersif et à l’aide d’un contrôleur souple en forme de cœur, P invite les usager·ères à dialoguer avec une IA qui reconnaît ouvertement sa dépendance aux données produites par les humains. S’appuyant sur des méthodes auto-ethnographiques et une pratique réflexive du design, l’article soutient que la douceur radicale peut constituer une stratégie de design critique, ouvrant des imaginaires alternatifs dans lesquels l’IA reflète une vulnérabilité partagée plutôt qu’une promesse de perfection technologique.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bagnall Gregory. “Queer(ing) Gaming Technologies. Thinking on Constructions of Normativity Inscribed in Digital Gaming Hardware.” Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw. UMinnesota Press, 2017, pp. 135–143.
- Bareis, Jascha, and Christian Katzenbach. “Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 47, no. 5, Sept. 2022, pp. 855–81. SAGE Journals, doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
- Benjamin, Ruha. “Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code.” Social Forces, vol. 98, no. 4, June 2020, pp. 1–3. Silverchair, doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162.
- Blas, Zach. "Escaping the Face: Biometric Facial Recognition and the Facial Weaponization Suite." Media-N, vol. 9, no. 2, 2013, median.newmediacaucus.org/caa-conference-edition-2013/escaping-the-face-biometric-facial-recognition-and-the-facial-weaponization-suite/.
- Cave, Stephen, et al. “‘Scary Robots’: Examining Public Responses to AI.” Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 331–37. ACM Digital Library, doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314232.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. Digital Technologies, Temporality, and the Politics of Co-Existence. 1^st ed. 2022, Palgrave Macmillan, 2023.
- Danielsson, Karin, et al. “Queer Eye on AI: Binary Systems versus Fluid Identities.” Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence edited by Simon Lindgren, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 595–606, www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781803928562/book-part-9781803928562-61.xml.
- Desjardins, Audrey, et al. Introduction to the Special Issue on First-Person Methods in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 28, no. 6, art. 37, Dec. 2021, pp. 1–12, doi.org/10.1145/3492342.
- DiSalvo, Carl. “Bruno Latour as Sociologist and Design Theorist?” Critical Theory and Interaction Design, edited by Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 1^st^ ed., MIT Press, 2018, pp. 471–84.
- Dudy, Shiran, et al. “Unequal Opportunities: Examining the Bias in Geographical Recommendations by Large Language Models.” Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, pp. 1499–516. ACM Digital Library, doi.org/10.1145/3708359.3712111.
- Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press, 2013.
- Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke UP, 2018.
- Forlano, Laura. “Living Intimately with Machines: Can AI Be Disabled?” Interactions, vol. 30, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 24–29. Crossref, doi.org/10.1145/3572808.
- Fry, Tony. Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy. University of New South Wales Press Ltd. 1999.
- Hajigholam Saryazdi, Amirhossein. “Algorithm Bias and Perceived Fairness: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.” Proceedings of the 2024 Computers and People Research Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, pp. 1–9. ACM Digital Library, doi.org/10.1145/3632634.3655848.
- Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP, 2016, doi.org/10.1515/9780822373780.
- Johnson, Deborah G., and Mario Verdicchio. “AI Anxiety.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 9, 2017, pp. 2267–70. Wiley Online Library, doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867.
- Kærgaard Andersen, Peter, et al. “Radical Softness: Artistic Methodology of Encountering the ‘Other.’” PARSE, no. 10, May 2020.
- Laforêt, Apolline. Lost in Softness, Rethink Design through Soft Aesthetics. 2024. Aalto U, Master's Thesis.
- Lagerkvist, Amanda. Existential Media: A Media Theory of the Limit Situation. Oxford UP, 2022.
- Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, Jan. 2004, pp. 225–48. journals.uchicago.edu (Atypon), doi.org/10.1086/421123.
- Lindgren, Simon. Critical Theory of AI. John Wiley & Sons, 2023.
- Lupton, Deborah. “Quantified Sex: A Critical Analysis of Sexual and Reproductive Self-Tracking Using Apps.” Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 17, no. 4, Apr. 2015, pp. 440–53. Taylor & Francis Online, doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528.
- McLean, Susan. “‘Radical Softness as a Weapon’: Lora Mathis Writes What We’re Too Afraid to Feel.” BRUISED KNUCKLES, 2015, bruisedknuckles.weebly.com/17/post/2015/10/radical-softness-as-a-weapon-lora-mathis-writes-what-were-too-afraid-to-feel-by-susan-mclean.html. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.
- Pozo, Teddy. “Queer Games after Empathy: Feminism and Haptic Game Design Aesthetics from Consent to Cuteness to the Radically Soft.” Game Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, Dec. 2018, gamestudies.org/1803/articles/pozo/.
- Redstrom, Johan. Making Design Theory. MIT Press, 2017.
- Ruberg, Bonnie, and Adrienne Shaw. Queer Game Studies. U of Minnesota P, 2017.
- Schön Donald. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge, 2017.
- Schwartz, Andi. "Soft Femme Theory: Femme Internet Aesthetics and the Politics of 'Softness'." Social Media + Society, vol. 6, no. 4, 2020, doi.org/10.1177/2056305120978366.
- Schön Donald. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London, 1984.
- Strubell, Emma, et al. “Energy and Policy Considerations for Modern Deep Learning Research.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 09, Apr. 2020, pp. 13693–96. ojs.aaai.org, doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7123.
- Tucker, Jason. “The Future Vision(s) of AI Health in the Nordics: Comparing the National AI Strategies.” Futures, vol. 149, May 2023, p. 103154. ScienceDirect, doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103154.
- Vallor, Shannon. The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking. Oxford UP, 2024.
- Waern, Annika, and Anders Sundnes Løvlie, editors. Hybrid Museum Experiences: Theory and Design. Amsterdam UP, 2022, doi.org/10.5117/9789463726443.
- Wilson, Kyra, and Aylin Caliskan. “Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 2024 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AAAI Press, 2025, pp. 1578–90.

