Abstracts
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to advance the accessibility of a hybrid-flexible (HyFlex) learning environment by applying the four attributes of the POUR model (WCAG 2.1, 2018), namely, perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust, to make digital learning content more accessible to all learners. The connections between the POUR principles and the principles of four frameworks instrumental to digital accessibility––Universal Design, Universal Design for Learning, Mobile Seamless Learning, and HyFlex––are discussed. The study describes one educator’s journey to learn the core skills of making learning resources more accessible to undergraduate students at a teaching university in Switzerland. Qualitative data was obtained from a focus group involving three students, as well as from an external evaluator who conducted a digital accessibility check based on commonly used accessibility criteria. This revealed that the criteria were implemented with varying effectiveness. Findings from the focus group suggest that the instructor’s efforts to increase digital accessibility were noticeable. Obstacles were mainly related to navigation issues and the different participation modalities integral to HyFlex. The study offers practical advice for instructors who wish to increase digital accessibility and adaptability in their courses.
Keywords:
- digital accessibility,
- digital learning,
- equitable learning opportunities,
- HyFlex,
- mobile seamless learning,
- POUR model,
- Universal Design for Learning
Résumé
L’objectif de cette étude est de faire avancer l’accessibilité d’un environnement d’apprentissage hybride flexible (comodal) en appliquant les quatre attributs du modèle PUCR (WCAG 2.1, 2018), c’est-à-dire, perceptible, utilisable, compréhensible et robuste afin de rendre le contenu numérique d’apprentissage plus accessible à toutes les étudiantes et étudiants. Les liens entre les principes PUCR et les principes de quatre cadres théoriques essentiels pour l’accessibilité numérique sont examinés, à savoir la conception universelle, la conception universelle de l’apprentissage, l’apprentissage mobile sans interruption et le comodal. L’étude décrit le parcours d’une personne enseignante dans un contexte d’enseignement supérieur qui développe les compétences essentielles pour rendre les ressources d’apprentissage plus accessibles aux étudiantes et étudiants de premier cycle dans une université suisse. Les données qualitatives proviennent d’un groupe de discussion mené avec trois étudiantes et étudiants et d’un rapport d’une personne évaluatrice externe ayant effectué un test d’accessibilité numérique sur la base de critères d’accessibilité couramment utilisés. Le test d’accessibilité numérique a révélé une efficacité variable dans la mise en œuvre des critères d’accessibilité. Les conclusions du groupe de discussion indiquent que les efforts déployés par la personne enseignante pour améliorer l’accessibilité numérique ont été remarqués. Les obstacles étaient principalement liés à des problèmes de navigation et aux différentes modalités de participation inhérentes à de la formule comodale. L’étude offre des conseils pratiques aux enseignantes et enseignants qui souhaitent améliorer l’accessibilité numérique et l’adaptabilité de leurs cours.
Mots-clés :
- accessibilité numérique,
- apprentissage mobile sans interruption,
- apprentissage numérique,
- comodal,
- conception universelle de l’apprentissage,
- égalité de chances d’apprentissage,
- modèle PUCR
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akinyemi, A. (2022, September 8). Website accessibility checklist: 10 things to check compliance. https://www.whoisaccessible.com/guidelines/website-accessibility-checklist/
- Akinyemi, A. (2022, November 23). WCAG 2.0/2.1 simplified checklist (with examples). https://www.whoisaccessible.com/guidelines/wcag/
- Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible Course Design (1st ed.). EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
- Brickfield Education Labs. (2024, October 2). Brickfield Accessibility Toolkit. https://www.brickfield.ie/
- Bureau for Internet Accessibility (2022, October 5). How to make your website more accessible for people with ADHD. https://www.boia.org/blog/how-to-make-your-website-more-accessible-for-people-with-adhd
- Burgstahler, S. (2002). Universal design of distance learning. Information Technology and Disabilities, 8(1). http://itd.athenpro.org/volume8/number1/burgstah.html
- Burgstahler, S. (2021). What higher education learned about the accessibility of online opportunities during a pandemic. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(7). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i7.4493
- Burgstahler, S. (2023, February 6). A tutorial for making online learning accessible to students with disabilities. https://www.washington.edu/doit/tutorial-making-online-learning-accessible-students-disabilities
- CAST. (2024). Provide multiple means of representation. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (Version 3.0). https://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of Universal Design: Version 2.0. NC State University. https://design.ncsu.edu/research/center-for-universal-design/
- Chodock, T., & Dolinger, E. (2009). Applying Universal Design to information literacy: Teaching students who learn differently at Landmark College. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 49(1), 24–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865172
- Choi, G. W., & Seo, J. (2024). Accessibility, usability, and Universal Design for Learning: Discussion of three key LX/UX elements for inclusive learning design. TechTrends, 68, 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00987-6
- Concordia. (2025, July 3). Concordias Moodle accessibility toolkit: Make learning inclusive and accessible. https://teachingacademy.concordia.ca/accessibility/
- Cumming, T. M., Gilanyi, L., & Han, C. (2024). Hyflex delivery mode in a postgraduate course: instructor and student perspectives. Discover Education, 3(24). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00110-0
- ETH Zurich. (2023, July 3). Moodle accessibility: Quick wins. https://ethz.ch/en/the-eth-zurich/education/e-accessibility/faq-quick-wins/moodle-accessibility.html
- Marcus-Quinn, A., & Hourigan, T. (2022). Digital inclusion and accessibility considerations in digital teaching and learning materials for the second-level classroom. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022519
- McCann, S., & Peacock, R. (2021). Accessibility is not a feature: An analysis of common accessibility errors on academic library websites. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 33(4), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1988465
- Microassist. (2017). Accessibility checklist: Microassist accessibility services. https://www.microassist.com/accessibility
- National Center on Accessible Educational Materials. (2022, December 7). Designing for accessibility with POUR. https://aem.cast.org/create/designing-accessibility-pour
- Nes Begnum, M. E., & Foss-Pedersen, R. J. (2018). Digital assessment in higher education: Promoting universal ability through requirements specification and universal design quality (UD-Q) reviews. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0513-9
- Northwestern. (2023, July 3). Creating accessible Canvas content. https://www.northwestern.edu/accessibility/digital-accessibility/seven-core-skills/
- Otter.ai. (2023). Otter.ai (June 27 version) [Transcription service]. https://otter.ai/home
- Raffoul, S., & Jaber, L. (2023). Text-to-speech software and reading comprehension: The impact for students with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28296
- Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2018). The internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018754361
- Sanderson, N. C., Kessel, S., & Chen, W. (2022). What do faculty members know about universal design and digital accessibility? A qualitative study in computer science and engineering disciplines. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00875-x
- UK Home Office. (2023, May 23). Designing for accessibility. https://design.homeoffice.gov.uk/accessibility/resources
- WAVE. (2024). Web accessibility evaluation tool. https://wave.webaim.org/
- Web Accessibility Initiative. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. (WCAG 2.1). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
- Web Accessibility Initiative. (2024). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 3 (WCAG 3). https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/wcag3-intro/
- Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007

