Résumés
Abstract
This article proposes a Translation Quality Assessment (TQA) framework for a particular type of intralingual translation, namely the interregisterial transformation of specialized texts into ones suitable for a lay target readership, also known as diaphasic intralingual translation. Based on a functionalist linguistic and translation-theoretical approach, this framework is designed to assess and promote registerial adequacy in diaphasic intralingual target texts. The article associates this adequacy with maximum transparency of meaning in target texts and identifies five different principles as more specific quality criteria: (1) iconicity between meanings and wordings, (2) familiarity of lexis, (3) explicitness of meanings, (4) groundedness or concreteness, and (5) coherence. These five principles are in some cases subcategorized and in all cases defined in terms of linguistic manifestations. Examples are drawn from the lay-oriented genre known as Patient Information Leaflets, i.e., the small brochures included with medicinal products that provide information and instructions to the user. Most cases include both “positive” and “negative” examples, i.e., instances of both adherence and non-adherence to a given principle. Many of the “negative” examples are followed by suggestions for improvement.
Keywords:
- diaphasic intralingual translation,
- Translation Quality Assessment,
- registerial adequacy,
- functionalism
Résumé
Cet article propose un cadre d’évaluation de la qualité de la traduction (AQT) pour un type particulier de traduction intralinguale, à savoir la transformation interregistérielle de textes spécialisés en textes adaptés à un lectorat profane, également connue sous le nom de traduction intralinguale diaphasique. Basé sur une approche linguistique fonctionnaliste et une théorie de la traduction fonctionnaliste, ce cadre est conçu pour évaluer et promouvoir l’adéquation de registre dans les textes cibles intralinguales diaphasiques. L’article associe cette adéquation à une transparence maximale du sens dans les textes cibles et identifie cinq principes différents comme critères de qualité plus spécifiques: 1) l’iconicité entre les significations et les formulations, 2) la familiarité du lexique, 3) l’explicitation des significations, 4) l’ancrage ou le caractère concret, et 5) la cohérence. Ces cinq principes sont dans certains cas sous-catégorisés et dans tous les cas définis en termes de manifestations linguistiques. Les exemples sont tirés du genre non spécialisé connu sous le nom de « Patient Information Leaflets », c’est-à-dire les petites brochures accompagnant les médicaments et fournissant des informations et des instructions à l’utilisateur. La plupart des cas comprennent à la fois des exemples « positifs » et « négatifs », c’est-à-dire des cas d’adhésion et de non-adhésion à un principe donné. De nombreux exemples « négatifs » sont suivis de suggestions d’amélioration.
Mots-clés :
- traduction intralinguale diaphasique,
- évaluation de la qualité de la traduction,
- adéquation du registre,
- fonctionnalisme
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Albachten, Özlem Berk (2013). “Intralingual Translation as ’Modernization’ of the Language: The Turkish Case.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 21, 2, pp. 257-271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.702395 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Albachten, Özlem Berk (2014). “Intralingual Translation: Discussions within Translation Studies and the Case of Turkey.” In Sandra Bermann and Catherine Porter, eds. A Companion to Translation Studies. Oxford, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 571-585. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118613504.ch43 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- den Broeck, Raymond van (1985). “Second Thoughts on Translation Criticism: A Model of its Analytic function.” In Theo Hermans, ed. The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London, Croom Helm, pp. 54-62.
- Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry (2009). “Guideline on the Readability of the Labelling and Package Leaflet of Medicinal Products for Human Use.” European Commission, Brussels. Available at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/d8612682-ad17-40e3-8130-23395ec80380_en [consulted 3 July 2024].
- European Medicines Agency (2012). “QRD Product-Information Quality Annotated Template (English) Version.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/template-form/qrd-product-information-annotated-template-english-version-104_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2024].
- European Union (2004). “Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 Amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community Code Relating to Medicinal Products for Human Use.” Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:136:0034:0057:en:PDF [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Gerzymisch-Arbogast, Heidrun (2001). “Equivalence Parameters and Evaluation.” Meta, 46, 2, pp. 227-242. Available at https://doi.org/10.7202/002886ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Gottlieb, Henrik (2018). “Semiotics and Translation.” In K. Malmkjaer, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics. London and New York, Routledge, pp. 45-63.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London, Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. (2002 [1979]). “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions.” In Jonathan Webster, ed. On Grammar. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. Vol. 1. London, Continuum, pp. 196-218.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. (2002 [1981]). “Text Semantics and Clause Grammar.” In Jonathan Webster, ed. On Grammar. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. Vol. 1. London, Continuum, pp. 219-260.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. (2003 [1977]). “Ideas about Language.” In Jonathan Webster, ed. On Language and Linguistics. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. Vol. 3. London, Continuum, pp. 92-115.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. London, Longman.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London, Cassell.
- Halliday, Michael A.K. and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London and New York, Routledge.
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2015). “Lexical Strategies in Intralingual Translation between Registers.” HERMES—Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 54, pp. 85-105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22949 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2019). “The Heterogeneity of Intralingual Translation.” Meta, 64, 2, pp. 537-560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/1068206ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2022a). “Semantic Density and Gravity in Lay-Oriented Medical Knowledge Communication: The Case of the EPAR Summary for the Public.” Nordic Journal of English Studies, 21, 2, pp. 195-225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.781 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2022b). “Transformational Strategies in Diaphasic Translation: Three Case Studies.” Perspectives—Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 30, 4, pp. 643-661. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1953085 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2024a). “A Typology of the Various Aspects of Diaphasic Intralingual Translation—A Systemic-Functional Approach.” In Linda Pillière and Özlem B. Albachten, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Intralingual Translation. London and New York, Routledge.
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (2024b). “Intralingual Translation in Didactic Practice: Five Case Studies.” Semiotica, 257, pp. 49-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0097 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Hill-Madsen, Aage (forthcoming). “’Simplification’ and ’Accessibility’ in Diaphasic Intralingual Translation: A Semantic Interpretation.” In Hilla Karas and Hava Bat Zeev Shyldkrot, eds. Intralingual Translation: Language, Text and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing.
- Hasan, Ruqaiya et al. (2007). “Semantic Networks: The Description of Linguistic Meaning in SFL.” In Ruqayia Hasan, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, and Jonathan Webster, eds. Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective. London and Oakville, Equinox, pp. 697-738.
- House, Juliane (1977). A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag.
- House, Juliane (1997). Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag.
- House, Juliane (2015). Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. London and New York, Routledge.
- Jakobson, Roman (1959). “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In Reuben A. Brower, ed. On Translation. Harvard, Harvard University Press, pp. 232-239.
- Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Leckie-Tarry, Helen (1995). Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. London and New York, Pinter.
- Maaß, Christiane (2020a). Easy Language—Plain Language—Easy Language Plus. Berlin, Frank & Timme.
- Maaß, Christiane (2020b). “Übersetzen in Leichte Sprache [Translation into Easy Language].” In Christiane Maaß and Isabel Rink, eds. Handbuch Barrierefreie Kommunikation [Handbook of Obstacle-Free Communication]. Berlin, Frank & Timme, pp. 273-300.
- Maaß, Christiane and Isabel Rink, eds. (2020). Handbuch Barrierefreie Kommunikation [Handbook of Obstacle-Free Communication]. Berlin, Frank & Timme.
- Maton, Karl (2013). “Making Semantic Waves: A Key to Cumulative Knowledge-Building.” Linguistics and Education, 24, 1, pp. 8-22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Maton, Karl (2014). Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Knowledge. London and New York, Routledge.
- Neubert, Albrecht (1985). Text and Translation. Leipzig, Enzyklopädie.
- Nord, Christiane (1997). Translating as a Purposeful Activity. Manchester, St. Jerome Publishing.
- Patton, Michael Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks and London, Sage.
- Petrilli, Susan (2003). “Translation and Semiosis. Introduction.” In Susan Petrilli, ed. Translation Translation. Amsterdam and New York, Rodopi, pp. 17-37.
- Pillière, Linda (2010). “Conflicting Voices: An Analysis of Intralingual Translation from British English to American English.” E-Rea, 8, 1, pp. 1-10.
- Pillière, Linda (2021). Intralingual Translation of British Novels: A Multimodal Stylistic Perspective. London, Bloomsbury.
- Pillière, Linda and Özlem B. Albachten, eds. (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Intralingual Translation. London and New York, Routledge.
- Plain Language Action and Information Network (2011). Plain Language Guidelines. Available at: https://www.plainlanguage.gov/media/FederalPLGuidelines.pdf [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Reiß, Katharina and Hans J. Vermeer (1984). Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie [Foundations for a General Theory of Translation]. Tübingen, Niemeyer.
- Remediaki, Ionna (2013). “Intralingual Translation into Modern Greek.” In Georgio K. Giannakis, ed. Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Online. Leiden, Brill. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_COM_00000193 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Sanford, Anthony (2006). “Coherence: A Psycholinguistic Approach.” In Keith Brown, ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford, Elsevier, pp. 585-591.
- Schmid, Benjamin (2008). “A Duck in Rabbit’s Clothing: Integrating Intralingual Translation.” In Michele Kaiser-Cooke, ed. Das Entenprinzip: Translation aus neuen Perspektiven [The Duck Principle: Translation from New Perspectives]. Bern, Peter Lang, pp. 19-80.
- Schmid, Benjamin (2012). “A Bucket or a Searchlight Approach to Defining Translation? Fringe Phenomena and their Implications for the Object of Study.” In Isis Herrero and Todd Klaiman, eds. Versatility in Translation Studies: Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2011. KU Leuven, Leuven, pp. 1-21. Available at: https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/files/schmid.pdf [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Stecconi, Ubaldo (2004). “Interpretive Semiotics and Translation Theory: The Semiotic Conditions to Translation.” Semiotica, 150, pp. 471-489. Available at: https://doi.org.10.1515/semi.2004.056 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Stecconi, Ubaldo. (2007). “Five Reasons Why Semiotics is Good for Translation Studies.” In Yves Gambier, Miriam Shlesinger and Radegundis Stolze, eds. Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Lisbon 2004. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 15-26.
- Vaerenbergh, Leona van (2003). “Fachinformation und Packungsbeilage: Fachübersetzung oder mehrsprachiges inter- und intrakulturelles Technical Writing? [Specialized Information and Package Leaflets: LSP Translation or Multilingual Inter- and Intracultural Technical Writing?].” In Klaus Schubert, ed. Übersetzen und Dolmetschen: Modelle, Methoden, Technologie [Translation and Interpreting: Models, Methods, Technology]. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag, pp. 207-224.
- Vaerenbergh, Leona van (2007). “Wissensvermittlung und Anweisungen im Beipackzettel. Zu Verständlichkeit und Textqualität in der Experten-Nichtexperten-Kommunikation [Knowledge Mediation and Instructions in Package Leaflets. Regarding the Comprehensibility and Textual Quality of Expert-Non-Expert Communication].” In Claudia Villiger and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, eds. Kommunikation in Bewegung: Multimedialer und multilingualer Wissenstransfer in der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation [Communication in Development: Multimedial and Multilingual Knowledge Transfer in Expert-Lay Communication]. Frankfurt a. M., Peter Lang, pp. 167-185.
- Vermeer, Hans J. (2000 [1989]). “Skopos and Commission in Translational Action.” In Lawrence Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies Reader. London and New York, Routledge, pp. 221-232.
- Williams, Malcolm (2001). “The Application of Argumentation Theory to Translation Quality Assessment.” Meta, 46, 2, pp. 326-344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/004605ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Zethsen, Karen Korning (2007). “Beyond Translation Proper.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction, 20, 1, pp. 281-308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/018506ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Zethsen, Karen Korning (2009). “Intralingual Translation—An Attempt at Description.” Meta, 54, 4, pp. 795-812. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/038904ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Zethsen, Karen Korning (2018). “Access is Not the Same as Understanding: Why Intralingual Translation is Crucial in a World of Information Overload.” Across Languages and Cultures, 19, 1, pp. 79-98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2018.19.1.4 [consulted 3 July 2024].
- Zethsen, Karen Korning and Aage Hill-Madsen (2016). “Intralingual Translation and its Place Within Translation Studies—A Theoretical Discussion.” Meta, 61, 3, pp. 692-708. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7202/1039225ar [consulted 3 July 2024].
- European Medicines Agency (2009a). “Evista: EPAR—Product Information.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/evista-epar-product-information_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2024].
- European Medicines Agency (2009b). “Helicobacter Test INFAI: EPAR—Product Information.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/helicobacter-test-infai-epar-product-information_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2024].
- European Medicines Agency (2009c). “Helicobacter Test INFAI: EPAR—Scientific Discussion.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/helicobacter-test-infai-epar-product-information_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2023].
- European Medicines Agency (2009d). “Osseor: EPAR—Product Information.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/osseor-epar-product-information_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2023].
- European Medicines Agency (2011). “Jevtana: EPAR—Product Information.” Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/jevtana-epar-product-information_en.pdf [consulted 3 July 2023].
10.7202/002886ar