Résumés
Abstract
In this study, a new model of translation as a general theoretic concept and as a social practice is outlined, drawing form Greimassian semiotics. As a theoretic concept, translation is defined by the Semiotic Square of Translation as the emergence of the general category self coming into being in relation to the category non-self, through the semio-logic operations that correlate the immanent concepts, equivalence and difference. As a social practice, translation arises from the contractual interaction between two actants, the Initiator and the Translator, which operate through acts of manipulation, performance and sanction. This theoretical framework is applied to the study of a parallel corpus.
Keywords:
- epistemology,
- translation concept and practice,
- semiotics
Résumé
En s’appuyant sur l’approche sémiotique de l’École de Paris, notre article présente une modélisation du concept, de la pratique et de la critique de traduction. Nous avons élaboré une définition générale et formelle du concept de traduction, basée sur les relations et les opérations du carré sémiotique : la traduction est un objet sémiotique s’articulant sur la catégorie de l’identité et de la véridiction. La « mise en situation » de cette définition de la traduction débouche sur la formalisation de son expression pratique dans le modèle traductif : la détermination des actants (donneur d’ouvrages, traducteur et traductologue), de leurs interactions et des instructions contractuelles permet d’expliquer et de décrire les aspects normatifs, éthiques et énonciatifs de la pratique de la traduction. Pour confirmer la validité de cet appareil théorique, nous avons procédé à son application à un corpus parallèle.
Mots-clés :
- épistémologie,
- concept et pratique de traduction,
- sémiotique
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aguiar Daniella, Pedro Atã and João Queiroz (2015). “Intersemiotic Translation and Transformational Creativity.” Punctum, 1, 2, pp. 96-117.
- Baer, Brian James (2006). “Literary Translation and the Construction of a Soviet Intelligentsia.” The Massachusetts Review, 47, 3, pp. 537-560.
- Bernal-Merino, Miguel Á. (2016). “Creating Felicitous Gaming Experiences: Semiotics and Pragmatics as Tools for Video Game Localisation.” Signata, 7, pp. 231-253.
- Bernardini, Silvia (2001). “Think-aloud Protocols in Translation Research.” Target, 13, 2, pp. 241-263.
- Bertrand, Denis, Alexandre Dézé and Jean-Louis Missika (2009). “Le carré sémiotique des discours politiques.” Sciences humaines, 209.
- Chesterman, Andrew (1996). “On Similarity.” Target, 8, 1, pp. 159-163.
- Chesterman, Andrew (1997a). “Ethics of Translation.” In M. Snell-Hornby, Z. Jettmarová, and K. Kaindl, eds. Translation as Intercultural Communication. Selected papers from the EST Congress, Prague 1995. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 147-157.
- Chesterman, Andrew (1997b). Memes of Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
- Chesterman, Andrew (2002). “Semiotic Modalities in Translation Causality.” Languages and Cultures, 3, 2, pp. 145-158.
- Chesterman, Andrew, and Rosemary Arrojo (2000). “Shared Grounds in Translation Studies.” Target, 12, 1, pp. 151-160.
- Cosculluela, Cécile (2003). “Semiotics and Translation Studies: An Emerging Interdisciplinarity.” Semiotica, 145, 1/4, pp. 105-137.
- Courtés, Joseph (1991). Introduction à la sémiotique narrative et discursive: de l’énoncé à l’énonciation. Paris, Hachette.
- Fontanille, Jacques (2003). Sémiotique du discours. Limoges, Presses universitaires de Limoges.
- Fontanille, Jacques and Claude Zilberberg (1998). Tension et signification. Liège, P. Mardaga.
- Gamsa, Mark (2008). The Chinese Translation of Russian Literature: Three Studies. Leinden, Brill.
- Gorlée, Dinda (1994). Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam, Rodopi.
- Gorlée, Dinda. 2004. On Translating Signs: Exploring Text and Semiotranslation. Amsterdam, Rodopi.
- Gorlée, Dinda (2015). From Translation to Transduction: The Glassy Essence of Intersemiosis. Tartu, University of Tartu Press.
- Greimas, Algirdas J (1970). Du sens: essais sémiotiques. Paris, Seuil.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. (1976). Maupassant. La sémiotique du texte: exercices pratiques. Paris, Seuil.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. (1983a). Du sens 2: essais sémiotiques. Paris, Seuil.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. (1983b). “La traduction et la Bible.” Sémiotique et Bible, 32, pp. 1-11.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. (1987). On Meaning. Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Trans. and ed. by Paul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. and François Rastier (1968). “The Interaction of Semiotic Constraints.” Yale French Studies, 41, pp. 86-105.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. and Joseph Courtés (1979). Sémiotique: dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Tome I. Paris, Hachette.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. and Joseph Courtés (1982). Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Trans. by Larry Christ, Daniel Patte, James Lee, Edward McMahon II, Gary Phillips and Michael Rengstorf. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
- Greimas, Algirdas J. and Joseph Courtés (1986). Sémiotique: dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Tome II. Paris, Hachette.
- Hartama-Heinonen, Ritva (2008). Abductive Translation Studies: The Art of Marshalling Signs. Imatra, International Semiotics Institute at Imatra.
- Hermans, Theo (1996). “Norms and the Determination of Translation: A Theoretical Framework.” In R. Alvarez and M. Vidal, eds. Translation, Power, Subversion. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, pp. 25-51.
- Hewson, Lance (2011). An Approach to Translation Criticism. Emma and Madame Bovary in Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
- Hewson, Lance (2012). “Équivalence, leurre, divergence.” In C. Fort and F. Lautel-Ribstein, eds. Des mots aux actes, 3. Jean-René Ladmiral, une oeuvre en mouvement. Perros-Guirec, Anagrammes, pp. 257-270.
- Holmes, James S. (2000 [1972]). “The Name and Nature of the Translation Studies.” In L. Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies Reader. London & New York, Routledge, pp. 172-185.
- Kempthorne, Loveday and Peter Donelan (2016). “Barbilian-Barbu—A Case Study in Mathematico-poetic Translation.” Signata, 7, pp. 337−360.
- Landowski, Eric (1989). La société réfléchie. Essais de socio-sémiotique. Paris, Seuil.
- Nida, A. Eugene (2004). “Similar but Different.” In S. Arduini and R. Hodgson, eds. Similarity and Difference in Translation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Similarity and Translation. Rimini, Guaraldi, pp. 15-24.
- O’Halloran, Kay, Sabine Tan and Peter Wignell (2016). “Intersemiotic Translation as Resemiotisation: A Multimodal Perspective.” Signata, 7, pp. 199−229.
- Perron Paul and Frank Collins, eds. (1989). Paris School Semiotics I. Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
- Petrilli, Susan (1992). “Translation, Semiotics, and Ideology.” TTR, 5, 1, pp. 233-264.
- Petrilli, Susan (2014). Riflessioni sulla teoria del linguaggio e dei segni. Milan, Mimesis.
- Petrilli, Susan (2015). “Translation of Semiotics into Translation Theory, and Vice Versa.” Punctum, 1, 2, pp. 96−117.
- Petrilli, Susan (2016). “Translation Everywhere.” Signata, 7, pp. 23−56.
- Popa, Ioana (2010). Traduire sous contraintes. Littérature et Communisme. Paris, CNRS Editions.
- Pym, Anthony (1997). Pour une éthique du traducteur. Arras, Artois Presses Université.
- Ricoeur, Paul (1989). “Greimas’s Narrative Grammar.” In P. Perron and F. Collins, eds. Paris School Semiotics I. Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 3-33.
- Schleifer, Ronald (1987). A.J. Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics and Discourse Theory. London, Croom Helm.
- Stecconi, Ubaldo (2004). “Interpretive Semiotics and Translation Theory: The Semiotic Conditions to Translation.” Semiotica, 150, 1/4, pp. 471-489.
- Torop, Peeter (2014). “Culture and Translation.” In V. Lang and K. Kull, eds. Estonian Approaches to Culture Theory. Tartu, University of Tartu Press, pp. 36-63.
- Toury, Gideon (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
- Troqe, Rovena (2014). Traduttologia e semiotica generativa. Per un nuovo approccio interdisciplinare. Berne, Peter Lang.
- Troqe, Rovena (2015). “On the Concept of Translation: A Perspective based on Greimassian Semiotics.” Semiotica, 204, pp. 33-59.
- Troqe, Rovena and Jacques Fontanille (2015). “Who Said It? Voices in News Translation, from a Semiotic Perspective.” Semiotica, 207, pp. 411-441.
- Tymoczko, Maria (2007). Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester, St. Jerome.
- Van Doorslaer, Luc (2007). “Risking Conceptual Maps: Mapping as a Keywords-related Tool Underlying the Online Translation Studies Bibliography.” Target, 19, 2, pp. 217–233.
- Vandepitte, Sonia (2008). “Remapping Translation Studies: Towards a Translation Studies Ontology.” Meta, 53, 3, pp. 569–588.
- Venuti, Lawrence (2002). “The Difference That Translation Makes.” In A. Riccardi, ed. Translation Studies: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 214-241.
- Zauberga, Ieva (2005). “A Knock at the Door: on the Role of Translated Literature in Cultural Image Making.” Across Languages and Cultures, 6, pp. 67-77.
10.7202/037115ar