Résumés
Abstract
For years, the Russian authoritarian regime has been seeking to expand its surveillance capacity and collect information on the whole population. The arrival of digital services has made it possible to collect vast amounts of data on their users. Since digital services are frequently designed to assist with various mundane tasks, state-affiliated individuals can also use them, sharing a range of personal data. In Russia, a legal framework has been developed to oblige private digital companies to share collected data with investigative and intelligence agencies. Simultaneously, the collected data, including data on the powerful, may not be adequately protected and, therefore, can be hacked and leaked, thus facilitating sousveillance. This paradox is at the centre of this study, which explores it via the example of the Yandex.Eda, a food delivery service, leak and its use by investigative journalism. This paper, drawing on the concepts of authoritarian surveillance assemblage and mundane surveillance, portrays how authoritarian regimes, through the means of law, engage private digital services in the mundane surveillance of the population. Additionally, the paper draws on the concepts of sousveillance and assemblage of resistance to explore how data leaks from mundane digital services collaborating with authoritarian regimes can stimulate investigation into state actors’ corruption through the work of leaktivism and investigative journalism. The paper shows that although high-profile political actors did not appear in the leak, people closely related to them, along with some lower-ranking special services agents, did. This paper argues that precisely because the app has a mundane nature and sharing personal data with it facilitates its use, these actors left some pieces of their personal information there. In turn, this data sharing has contributed to sousveillance over them.
Keywords:
- authoritarian surveillance,
- Digital Sousveillance,
- Russia,
- data leak,
- Surveillance Assemblage,
- resistance,
- Apps
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Akbari, Azadeh, and Rashid Gabdulhakov. 2019. Platform Surveillance and Resistance in Iran and Russia: The Case of Telegram. Surveillance & Society 17 (2): 223-231. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12928.
- Akbari, Azadeh. 2021. Authoritarian Surveillance: A Corona Test. Surveillance & Society 19 (1): 98-103. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i1.14545.
- Andrejevic, Mark. 2019. Automating Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 17 (1/2): 7-13. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12930.
- Andrew, Jane, Max Baker, and Casey Huang. 2023. Data Breaches in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism: Do Disclosures Have a New Role to Play? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 90: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102396.
- Baym, Nancy K. 2015. Personal Connections in the Digital Age, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Clark, Marianne, and Deborah Lupton. 2023. The Materialities and Embodiments of Mundane Software: Exploring How Apps Come to Matter in Everyday Life. Online Information Review 47 (2): 398-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-12-2020-0565.
- Coleman, Gabriella E. 2017. The Public Interest Hack. limn, May 9. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81p004n4 [accessed July 24, 2025].
- Feldstein, Steven. 2019.The Road to Digital Unfreedom: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Repression. Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 40-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0003.
- Freedom House. 2023. Freedom on the Net 2023. Russia. https://freedomhouse.org/country/russia/freedom-net/2023 [accessed April 28, 2025].
- Gabdulhakov, Rashid. 2020. (Con)trolling the Web: Social Media User Arrests, State-Supported Vigilantism and Citizen Counter-Forces in Russia. Global Crime 21 (3–4): 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836.
- Göbel, Christian. 2013. The Innovation Dilemma and the Consolidation of Autocratic Regimes. June 30. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2287539 [accessed on April 28, 2025].
- Greenwald, Glenn. 2014. No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Metropolitan Books.
- Haggerty, Kevin D., and Richard V. Ericson. 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.
- Hartmann, Maren. 2013. From Domestication to Mediated Mobilism. Mobile Media and Communication 1 (1): 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912464487.
- Karatzogianni, Athina. 2018. Leaktivism and Its Discontents. In The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism, edited by Graham Meikle, 250-258. New York: Routledge.
- Lupton, Deborah. 2019. The Thing-Power of the Human-App Health Assemblage: Thinking with Vital Materialism. Social Theory and Health 17: 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y.
- Lyon, David. 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique. Big Data & Society, 1 (2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.
- MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. China’s “Networked Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 2 (2): 32-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0033.
- Mann, Michael. 1984. The Autonomous Power of the State. European Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600004239.
- Mann, Steve, and Joseph Ferenbok. 2013. New Media and the Power Politics of Sousveillance in a Surveillance-Dominated World. Surveillance & Society 11 (1/2): 18-34.
- Mann, Steve, Jason Nolan, and Barry Wellman. 2003. Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices. Surveillance & Society 1 (3): 331-355.
- Maréchal, Nathalie. 2017. Networked Authoritarianism and the Geopolitics of Information: Understanding Russian Internet Policy. Media and Communication 5 (1): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.808.
- Mills, Anthony, and Katharine Sarikakis. 2016. Reluctant Activists? The Impact of Legislative and Structural Attempts of Surveillance on Investigative Journalism. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716669381.
- Morris, Jeremy M., and Evan Elkins. 2015. FCJ-181 There’s a History for That: Apps and Mundane Software as Commodity. The Fibreculture Journal 25: 62-87. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.25.181.2015.
- Morris, Jeremy M., and Sarah Murray. 2018. Appified: Culture in the Age of Apps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9391658.
- Moscow Times. 2020. Russia’s Yandex.Taxi Admits to Sharing Riders’ Location with Police, March 4. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/03/04/russias-yandextaxi-admits-to-sharing-riders-location-with-police-a69495 [accessed April 28, 2025].
- Net Freedoms Project. 2022. Война Утечек [War of Leaks]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UA_D9DHcQ5iBNw3gkFsM_LKu5ub69yUk/view?pli=1 [accessed April 28, 2025].
- Repnikova, Marina. 2018. Contesting the State under Authoritarianism. Comparative Politics 5 (1): 41-60.
- Rød, Espen Geelmuyden, and Nils B. Weidmann. 2015. Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes. Journal of Peace Research 52 (3): 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314555782.
- Topak, Özgün E. 2019. The Authoritarian Surveillant Assemblage: Authoritarian State Surveillance in Turkey. Security Dialogue 50 (5): 454-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619850336.
- White, Mica. 2016. The Panama Papers: Leaktivism’s Coming of Age. The Guardian, April 5. https://www.theguardian.com/news/commentisfree/2016/apr/05/panama-papers-leak-activism-leaktivism [accessed April 28, 2025].
- Xu, Xu. 2021. To Repress or to Co-opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance. American Journal of Political Science 65 (2): 309-325. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45380806.
- Yandex.Eda. 2024. Пользовательское Соглашение Сервиса Яндекс Еда [User Agreement of the Service Yandex Eda]. Effective December 12, 2021. https://yandex.ru/legal/termsofuse_eda/16122021/index.html [accessed April 28, 2025].

