Résumés
Abstract
Monitoring technologies are increasingly used in schools to track students’ digital activity—including web browsing, app use, and more—and can even follow them beyond the physical schoolhouse gates. Informed by interviews with twenty-two US-based teachers, we propose a theory of “algorithmic theater” that captures the negotiated role these technologies play as instruments of schooling and state control. This theory situates the relationship among labor, performativity, infrastructure, and audience in the production of an algorithmic script, much as a theater company employs those elements in producing a play. We use algorithmic theater to frame the teachers’ statements about these technologies and to disentangle the coordinated and contested narratives about algorithmic omniscience, efficiency, and care from the material realities of the classroom. For example, while tracking technologies are often marketed as omniscient, students can successfully resist and evade the tools. These technologies elicit strong beliefs among teachers: some feel assured by a cheating-proof, distraction-free learning environment; others are concerned about the extreme nature of the monitoring. But all of the teachers who used the tools experienced a reconfiguring of the school environment to make space for algorithms that changed the nature of deviance, productivity, and accountability. Drawing on literature of surveillance and performativity, we argue that school tracking regimes employing monitoring tools harbor constrictive views of teachers and students’ capacities, as the biases encoded within these tools promote the othering and disciplining of non-normative behaviors related to movement, self-expression, exploration, learning, and creativity. Ultimately, we contend that tracking technologies exceed a necessary level of surveillance in schools while covertly promoting racist and ableist socio-technical arrangements.
Keywords:
- Student Activity Monitoring Software,
- Algorithmic Surveillance,
- Artificial Intelligence,
- teachers,
- resistance,
- performativity,
- schools
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bayne, Siân, Peter Evans, Rory Ewins, Jeremy Knox, and James Lamb. 2020. The Manifesto for Teaching Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Benitez, Michael. 2010. Resituating Culture Centers within a Social Justice Framework: Is There Room for Examining Whiteness? In Culture Centers in Higher Education, edited by Lori D. Patton, 119–134. New York: Routledge.
- Bentham, Jeremy. 1791. Panopticon, or The Inspection House. London: T. Payne.
- Blum-Smith, Ben. 2021. Remote Proctoring: A Failed Experiment in Control. On Teaching and Learning Mathematics (blog), January 19. https://blogs.ams.org/matheducation/2021/01/19/remote-proctoring-failed-experiment-in-control/ [accessed May 24, 2024].
- Brayne, Sarah. 2020. Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Bryk, Tony, and Barbara Schneider. 2003. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for School Reform. ASCD, March 1. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/trust-in-schools-a-core-resource-for-school-reform [accessed December 4, 2021].
- Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
- Carey v. Population Services International. 431 US 594 (1977).
- Carlile, Anna. 2018. School Surveillance, Control, and Resistance in the United Kingdom. The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control, edited by Jo Deakin, Emmeline Taylor, and Aaron Kupchik, 17–42. New York: Springer.
- Christin, Angèle. 2017. Algorithms in Practice: Comparing Web Journalism and Criminal Justice. Big Data & Society 4 (2): https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855.
- Clarke, Roger. 1988. Information Technology and Dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 31 (5): 498–512.
- Crooks, Roderic. 2019. Cat-and-Mouse Games: Dataveillance and Performativity in Urban Schools. Surveillance & Society 17 (3/4): 484–498.
- Crooks, Roderic. 2024. Access Is Capture: How Edtech Reproduces Racial Inequality. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
- Cuban, Larry. 1998. How Schools Change Reforms: Redefining Reform Success and Failure. Teachers College Record 99 (3): 453–477.
- Cunningham, Jordan, Cottie Petrie-Norris, and Buffy Wicks. 2022. California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB2273/id/2606836 [accessed October 10, 2024].
- Desai-Hunt, Khayaal. 2021. Gaggle: MPS’s New Student Surveillance Software Brings Possible Protection and Danger. The Southerner (blog), March 14. https://www.shsoutherner.net/features/2021/03/14/gaggle-mpss-new-student-surveillance-software-brings-possible-protection-and-danger/ [accessed April 9, 2024].
- Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Paris, FR: Gallimard.
- Gallagher, Micheal. 2010. Are Schools Panoptic? Surveillance & Society 7 (3/4): 262–272.
- Gilbert, Chris. 2021. Punching the Clock: A Foucauldian Analysis of Teacher Time Clock Use. Critical Studies in Education 62 (4): 439–454.
- Gilliard, Chris. 2022. The Rise of “Luxury Surveillance.” The Atlantic (blog), October 18. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/10/amazon-tracking-devices-surveillance-state/671772/ [accessed June 11, 2024].
- GoGuardian. 2024. GoGuardian. April 25. http://web.archive.org/web/20240425013333/https://www.goguardian.com/ [accessed April 25, 2024].
- Goodman, Ellen P. 2019. The Challenge of Equitable Algorithmic Change. The Regulatory Review Depth 8: 1–9.
- Hadar, Linor L., and Maya Benish-Weisman. 2019. Teachers’ Agency: Do Their Values Make a Difference? British Educational Research Journal 45 (1): 137–160.
- Hall, Rachel, Torin Monahan, and Joshua Reeves. 2016. Surveillance and Performance. Surveillance & Society 14 (2): 153–167.
- Hassrick, Elizabeth McGhee, and Barbara Schneider. 2009. Parent Surveillance in Schools: A Question of Social Class. American Journal of Education 115 (2): 195–225.
- Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
- Hruby, Carrie. 2021. Gobelin or Guild?: A Foucauldian Analysis of Teachers’ Professional Learning Under the Illinois ESSA. PhD Diss., Illinois State University. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1441.
- Hubler, Shawn, and Troy Closson. 2024. California Schools Must Restrict Phones Under New Law Signed by Newsom. The New York Times, September 23. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/california-school-cellphone-ban.html [accessed October 10, 2024].
- In re Adam. 120 Ohio App. 3d. 364 (1997).
- Johnson, Khari. 2024. California’s Two Biggest School Districts Botched AI Deals. Here Are Lessons from Their Mistakes. CalMatters, August 6. http://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2024/08/botched-ai-education-deals-lessons/ [accessed October 10, 2024].
- Johri, Aditya, and Ashish Hingle. 2023. Students’ Technological Ambivalence toward Online Proctoring and the Need for Responsible Use of Educational Technologies. Journal of Engineering Education 112 (1): 221–242.
- Keierleber, Mark. 2022. The Risks of Student Surveillance amid Abortion Bans and LGBTQ Restrictions. The Guardian, September 8. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2022/sep/08/abortion-bans-school-surveillance-lgbtq-restrictions [accessed May 22, 2024].
- Kelley, Jason. 2021. Students Are Learning To Resist Surveillance: Year in Review 2021. Electronic Frontier Foundation, December 29. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/students-are-learning-resist-surveillance-year-review-2021 [accessed May 24, 2024].
- Kumar, Priya C., Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, and Tamara L. Clegg. 2019. The Platformization of the Classroom: Teachers as Surveillant Consumers. Surveillance & Society 17 (1/2): 145–152.
- Laird, Elizabeth, and Maddy Dwyer. 2023. Off Task: EdTech Threats to Student Privacy and Equity in the Age of AI. Center for Democracy and Technology, September 20. https://cdt.org/insights/report-off-task-edtech-threats-to-student-privacy-and-equity-in-the-age-of-ai/ [accessed October 7, 2024].
- Lawton, Denis. 2012. The Politics of the School Curriculum. New York: Routledge.
- Layton, Danielle, and Paula Gerstenblatt. 2022. “They’re Just, like, There”: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study of Student Experiences with School Resource Officers. Journal of Community Psychology 50 (8): 3470–3486.
- Lebrun, Sylvan, and Yash Roy. 2022. City Leaders Sign off on Contract to Surveil Students’ Technology Usage during School Day. Yale Daily News, February 23. https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2022/02/23/city-leaders-sign-off-on-contract-to-surveil-students-technology-usage-during-school-day/ [accessed October 7, 2024].
- Levy, Karen. 2022. Data Driven: Truckers, Technology, and the New Workplace Surveillance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Loxley, James. 2006. Performativity. New York: Routledge.
- Lyon, David. 2018. The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Maass, Dave, Daly Barnett, and Jason Kelley. 2023. GoGuardian: A Red Flag Machine By Design. Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://redflagmachine.org [accessed April 29, 2024].
- Madrigal, DeVan Hankerson, Cody Venzke, Elizabeth Laird, Hugh Grant-Chapman, and Dhanaraj Thakur. 2021. Implications of School-Issued Devices and Student Activity Monitoring Software. Center for Democracy and Technology, September 21. https://cdt.org/insights/report-online-and-observed-student-privacy-implications-of-school-issued-devices-and-student-activity-monitoring-software/ [accessed April 29, 2024].
- Mahanoy Area School District, Petitioner v. B. L. 141 S. Ct. 2038 (2021).
- Munn, Luke. 2024. Expansive and Invasive: Mapping the ‘Bossware’ Used to Monitor Workers. Surveillance & Society 22 (2): 104–119.
- Nemorin, Selena. 2017. Post-Panoptic Pedagogies: The Changing Nature of School Surveillance in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society 15 (2): 239–253.
- New Jersey v. T. L. O. 469 US 325 (1985).
- Parker, Andrew, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. 1995. Performativity and Performance. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
- Pelletier, Caroline. 2024. Against Personalised Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 34 (1): 111–115.
- Peterson, Dylan. 2016. Edtech and Student Privacy: California Law as a Model Cyberlaw and Venture Law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31: 961–996.
- Priestley, Mark, Gert Biesta, and Sarah Robinson. 2013. Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum. In Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice, edited by Mark Priestley and Gina Biesta, 187–206. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Riley v. California. 573 US 373 (2014).
- Selwyn, Neil. 2013. Distrusting Educational Technology: Critical Questions for Changing Times. New York: Routledge.
- Selwyn, Neil, and Bronwyn Cumbo. 2024. “We’ve Tried to Keep the Beast on a Leash”: The Domestication of Digital Classroom Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 22 (2): 88–103.
- Shinde, Advait. 2021. Response to Senators Warren, Markey, and Blumenthal. Gaggle, October 26. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21574603/all-gaggle-letters.pdf.
- Solis, Mariah. 2024. “There Is Not Enough of Me To Go Around”: Schools Need More Counselors. neaToday, February 15. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/schools-need-more-counselors [accessed May 23, 2024].
- Tschannen-Moran, Megan. 2014. The Interconnectivity of Trust in Schools. In Trust and School Life: The Role of Trust for Learning, Teaching, Leading, and Bridging, edited by Dimitri Van Maele, Patrick B. Forsyth, and Mieke Van Houtte, 57–81. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Netherlands.
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2022. National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), “Public School Teacher Data File” and “Private School Teacher Data File,” 2020–21. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2022144 [accessed October 7, 2024].
- United States v. Jones. 565 US 400 (2012).
- Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton. 515 US 646 (1995).
- Wayt, Theo. 2024. How Amazon’s Big Bet on “Just Walk Out” Stumbled. The Information, April 2. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-amazons-big-bet-on-just-walk-out-stumbled [accessed May 20, 2024].
- Williamson, Ben. 2021. Education Technology Seizes a Pandemic Opening. Current History 120 (822): 15–20.
- Zeide, Elana. 2014. The Proverbial Permanent Record. SSRN Scholarly Paper, October 12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2507326

