Résumés
Abstract
Scientific discoveries have often been preceded by shifts in ways of seeing. This article argues that William Blake’s critique of eighteenth-century medicine is grounded upon a Romantic view of organic form shared by contemporary scientists such as Lorenz Oken. Eighteenth-century anatomists and microscopists sought to isolate the elementary unit of living matter, which was thought to be the fibre by some, and the globule by others. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, however, scientists began to question the assumption that a living organism was an agglomeration of parts, framing the individual part as something produced only by the division and analysis of the whole. In doing so, they set the terms for the development of modern cell theory in the 1830s. Blake’s evocative descriptions of the fibres and globules which make up living organisms show him undermining the reductionist search for a fundamental unit of life. However, an artist rather than a biologist, Blake is also able to use a metaphorical language of graphical form to challenge his readers to see individuality as a matter of perspective rather than a matter of fact, ultimately helping to craft the epistemic environment that would make later theories of the organism possible.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Baker, J. R. “The Cell-Theory; a Restatement, History and Critique: Part I.” The Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, vol. 89, no. 1 (1948): 103-25.
- Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution, edited by K. Ansell-Pearson, M. Kolkman, and M. Vaughan. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. (1907)
- Blake, William. The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake. Ed. David V. Erdman, University of California Press, 2008. (1965)
- Canguilhem, Georges. Knowledge of Life. Translated by Stefanos Geroulanos and Daniela Ginsburg. Fordham University Press, 2008.
- Chambers, Ephraim. Cyclopaedia: Or, An Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. 2 vols. London, 1728.
- Connolly, Tristanne. William Blake and the Body. Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
- Darwin, Erasmus. The Temple of Nature; Or, The Origin of Society. London, 1804.
- Darwin, Erasmus. Zoonomia; or, The Laws of Organic Life. Vol 1, London, 1794.
- Essick, Robert N., and Joseph Viscomi. “An Inquiry into William Blake’s Method of Color Printing,” Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3 (Winter 2002): 74-103.
- Fend, Mechthild. Fleshing out Surfaces: Skin in French Art and Medicine, 1650-1850. Manchester University Press, 2017.
- Grew, Nehemiah. The Anatomy of Plants: with an Idea of a Philosophical History of Plants: and Several Other Lectures Read Before the Royal Society. London, 1682.
- Hervey, James. Theron and Aspasio: or, a Series of Dialogues and Letters upon the Most Important and Interesting Subjects. Vol 1, London, 1775.
- Hilton, Nelson, Literal Imagination: Blake’s Vision of Words. University of California Press, 1983.
- Hilton, Nelson. “The Spectre of Darwin.” Review of The Botanic Garden, by Erasmus Darwin. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 1 (Summer 1981): 36-48.
- Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty. London, 1753.
- Hooke, Robert. Micrographia: or, Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses With Observations and Inquiries Thereupon. London, 1665.
- Ishizuka, Hisao. “Enlightening the Fibre-Woven Body: William Blake and Eighteenth-Century Fibre Medicine.” Literature and Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1 (2006): 72–92.
- Ishizuka, Hisao. “Untying the Web of Urizen: William Blake, Nervous Medicine, and Culture of Feeling”. In Liberating Medicine: 1720-1835. Edited by Tristanne Connolly and Steve Clark. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2009, 97-107.
- Jacob, François. The Logic of Life: a History of Heredity, and, The Possible and the Actual. Translated by Betty E. Spillmann, Penguin, 1989.
- Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. London, 1755.
- Keill, John. Euclid’s Elements of Geometry: From the Latin Translation of Commandine, London, 1723.
- Kreiter, Carmen S. “Evolution and William Blake,” Studies in Romanticism 4, no. 2 (1965): 110-18.
- Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
- Lussier, Mark. “Scientific Objects and Blake’s Objections to Science” The Wordsworth Circle, 39.3 (2008): 120-22
- Mayer, Paola. Jena Romanticism and Its Appropriation of Jakob Böhme: Theosophy, Hagiography, Literature. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1999.
- Mullen, Pierce C. “The Romantic as Scientist: Lorenz Oken,” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 16, no. 3 (Summer 1977): 381-399.
- Nicholson, Daniel J. “Biological Atomism and Cell Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 41, no. 3 (September 2010): 202-11.
- Oppenheimer, Jane M. “A Note on William Blake and John Hunter”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 1, no. 1 (1946): 41-45.
- Pickstone, John J. “Globules and Coagula: Concepts of Tissue Formation in the Early Nineteenth Century”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 28, no. 4 (1973): 336-56.
- Rousseau, George S. “Nerves, Spirits, and Fibres: Towards Defining the Origins of Sensibility” (1975). In Nervous Acts: Essays on Literature, Culture and Sensibility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 160-184.
- Sachs, Julius von. Lectures on the Physiology of Plants. Translated by H. Marshall Ward, Oxford, 1887.
- Schleiden, Matthias Jakob. “Contributions to Our Knowledge of Phyto-genesis.” Scientific Memoirs, Vol II, edited by Richard Taylor, London, 1841.
- Schwann, Theodor. Microscopical Researches into the Accordance in the Structure and Growth of Animals and Plants. Translated by Henry Smith. London, 1847.
- Sha, Richard C. Perverse Romanticism: Aesthetics and Sexuality in Britain, 1750-1832. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
- Tanaka, Minne. “The Twelve Large Colour Prints of William Blake: A Study on Techniques, Materials and Context.” 2008. Nottingham Trent University, PhD dissertation. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/79/.
- Virchow, Rudolf. Cellular Pathology. Translated by Frank Chance, London, 1860.
- Whitman, Charles Otis. “The Inadequacy of the Cell-Theory of Development.” Journal of Morphology, 8, no. 3 (August 1893): 639-658.

