Résumés
Résumé
L’objectif de cette étude est de comparer les effets du jeu de construction accompagné et du jeu de construction libre sur le développement de la pensée des enfants à l’éducation préscolaire 4 ans. Un devis expérimental avec prétest et post-test est mis en oeuvre auprès de classes de maternelle 4 ans du Québec (N = 15). Au total, 27 enfants ont été observés avec la Grille d’observation des habiletés de la pensée développée pour cette étude. Les résultats démontrent une différence significative entre le prétest et le post-test pour l’habileté « expérimente ou investigue », plus élevée lorsque l’enseignante accompagne le jeu de construction. De même, une diminution des comportements ne correspondant pas à du jeu de construction dans le coin blocs est observée dans cette condition. Le jeu de construction accompagné serait donc à privilégier pour soutenir le développement de la pensée des enfants à l’éducation préscolaire.
Mots-clés :
- Jeu accompagné,
- jeu de construction,
- éducation préscolaire,
- développement de la pensée,
- habiletés de la pensée
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of guided constructive play on the manifestations of thinking development of preschoolers (4-year-old) in comparison with free constructive play, i.e. without teacher support. We used an experimental research design with pre and posttest. Fifteen 4-year-old preschool classes from Quebec participated in the study and 27 children were observed using the Grille d’observation des habiletés de la pensée, a tool developed for this study. The findings showed a statistically significant difference between the pre- and posttest behaviors of “experimentation or investigation”, as they increased in the guided play condition. Similarly, a difference was also observed for behaviors that does not correspond to constructive play, showing that children's constructive play is less interrupted in the guided constructive play condition. These results demonstrate that guided play is a form of support which has the potential to improve the development of 4-year-old preschoolers’ thinking.
Keywords:
- Guided play,
- constructive play,
- preschool education,
- thinking skills,
- cognitive development
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los efectos del juego de construcción acompañado y del juego de construcción libre en el desarrollo del pensamiento de los niños de educación preescolar de 4 años. Se implementa un diseño experimental con pretest y postest con clases de jardín de infantes de 4 años en Quebec (N = 15). En total, se observó a 27 niños utilizando la Cuadrícula de observación de habilidades de pensamiento desarrollada para este estudio. Los resultados demuestran una diferencia significativa entre el pretest y el postest para la habilidad “experimentar o investigar”, mayor cuando el docente acompaña el juego de construcción. Asimismo, en esta condición se observó una reducción de comportamientos no correspondientes al juego constructivo en la esquina de manzana. Por lo tanto, sería preferible el juego de construcción acompañado para apoyar el desarrollo del pensamiento de los niños en la educación preescolar.
Palabras clave:
- Juego acompañado,
- juego de construcción,
- educación preescolar,
- desarrollo del pensamiento,
- habilidades de pensamiento
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Aksoy, M. et Aksoy, A.B. (2023). An investigation on the effects of block play on the creativity of children. Early Child Development and Care, 193(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2022.2071266
- Allard, É., Bouchard, C. et Richard, V. (sous presse). Vers une intégration de modèles de l’intervention enseignante dans le jeu des enfants à l’éducation préscolaire. Revue canadienne de l’éducation.
- Bagiati, A. et Evangelou, D. (2016). Practicing engineering while building with blocks: Identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1120521
- Bakeman, R. et Quera, V. (2012). Behavioral observation. Dans H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf et K.J. Sher (dir.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 1. Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (p. 20-225). American Psychological Association.
- Bergen, D. (2009). Play as the Learning Medium for Future Scientists, Mathematicians, and Engineers. American Journal of play, 1(4), 413-428. https://www.museumofplay.org/app/uploads/2022/01/1-4-article-play-as-learning-medium.pdf
- Beyer, B.K. (2008). What research tells us about teaching thinking skills. The Social Studies, 99(5), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.99.5.223-232
- Birbili, M. (2013). Developing young children's thinking skills in Greek early childhood classrooms: curriculum and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 183(8), 1101-1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.772990
- Casey, B.M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J.E., Samper, A. et Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177177
- Chorney, J.M., McMurtry, C.M., Chambers, C.T. et Bakeman, R. (2015). Developing and modifying behavioral coding schemes in pediatric psychology: a practical guide. Journal of pediatric psychology, 40(1), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu099
- Costa, A.L. et Kallick, B. (2019). Nurturing Habits of Mind in Early Childhood: Success Stories from Classrooms Around the World. ASCD.
- Counsell, S.L., et Geiken, R. (2019). Improving STEM teaching practices with R&P: increasing the full range of young children’s STEM outcomes. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(4), 352-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2019.1603173
- Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A. et Stylianidou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in early years science. Education 3-13, 43(4), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020655
- Ferrara, K., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Newcombe, N.S., Golinkoff, R.M. et Lam, W.S. (2011). Block talk: Spatial language during block play. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01122.x
- Fortin, M.-F. et Gagnon. J. (2016). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche. Méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives. Chenelière Éducation.
- Guikas, I., Morin, D. et Bigras, M. (2016). Développement d’une grille d’observation : considérations théoriques et méthodologiques. Revue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle, 27, 163-178. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043131ar
- Johnson, J.E., Christie, J.F. et Wardle, F. (2005). Play, development, and early education. Pearson.
- Karlsen, L. et Lekhal, R. (2019). Practitioner involvement and support in children’s learning during free play in two Norwegian kindergartens. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X19856390
- Kline, R.B. (2020). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters (2e éd.). Guilford Press.
- Lippard, C.N., Lamm, M.H., Tank, K.M. et Choi, J.Y. (2019). Pre-engineering thinking and the engineering habits of mind in preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0898-6
- Loebach, J. et Cox, A. (2020). Tool for observing play outdoors (Topo): A new typology for capturing children’s play behaviors in outdoor environments. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(5611), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155611
- Mavungu-Blouin, C., Laurent, A., Letarte, M.J. et Lemelin, J.P. (2022). Pratiques éducatives en maternelle quatre ans : comment l’enseignante s’engage-t-elle dans le jeu de l’enfant ? Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 48(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.7202/1096358ar
- McCain, M.N. (2020). Early Years Study 4: Thriving Kids, Thriving Society. Margaret and Wallace McCain Family Foundation Inc. https://earlyyearsstudy.ca/
- Otsuka, K. et Jay, T. (2017). Understanding and supporting block play: video observation research on preschoolers’ block play to identify features associated with the development of abstract thinking. Early Child Development and Care, 187(5-6), 990-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1234466
- Plante, I., Fréchette-Simard, C., Brault-Foisy L.-M. et Charron A. (2021). Les études expérimentales et quasi expérimentales. Dans J. Lehrer, N. Bigras, A. Charron, et I. Laurin, (dir.), La recherche en éducation à la petite enfance. Origines, méthodes et applications (p. 25-49). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Pellegrini, A. D. (2009). The Role of Play in Human Development. Oxford University Press.
- Potvin, P. et Cantin, G. (2016). Science et technologie à l’éducation préscolaire : des idées plus que des réponses. Dans C. Raby et A. Charron, (dir.) Intervenir à l’éducation préscolaire pour favoriser le développement global de l’enfant (2e éd., p. 114-122). Les Éditions CEC.
- Pyle, A. et Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
- Shipley, D. (2002). Empowering Children. Play-Based Curriculum for Lifelong Learning (3e éd.). ITP Nelson.
- Simoncini, K. (2017). Guide to the Early Childhood STEM Habits of Mind. University of Canberra. https://serc.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Vic-Ed-STEM-ECStem-Habit-Booklet-070419-1.pdf
- Simoncini, K. et Lasen, M. (2018). Ideas about STEM among Australian early childhood professionals: How important is STEM in early childhood education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(3), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0229-5
- Singer, E., Nederend, M., Penninx, L., Tajik, M. et Boom, J. (2014). The teacher's role in supporting young children's level of play engagement. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1233-1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.862530
- Sliogeris, M. et Almeida, S.C. (2019). Young children’s development of scientific knowledge through the combination of teacher-guided play and child-guided play. Research in Science Education, 49, 1569-1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9667-6
- Solis, S.L., Curtis, K.N. et Hayes-Messinger, A. (2017). Children’s exploration of physical phenomena during object play. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(1), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1244583
- Taggart, G., Ridley, K., Rudd, P. et Benefield, P. (2005). Thinking skills in the early years: a literature review. National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/73999/1/Thinking_skills_in_early_years.pdf
- Thériault, J. et Doucet, M. (2018). En jouant avec les blocs de construction… l’enfant construit son monde (2e éd.). JFD Éditions.
- Wager, A. A. et Parks, A.N. (2016). Assessing early number learning in play. ZDM, 48(7), 991-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0806-8
- Weisberg, D.S. Hirsh‐Pasek, K., et Golinkoff, R.M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12015
- Zan, B. et Geiken, R. (2010). Ramps and pathways: Developmentally appropriate, intellectually rigorous, and fun physical science. Young Children, 65(1), 12-17.
10.7202/1043131ar