Résumés
Abstract
Background: Baccalaureate nursing students conclude their education with a preceptorship experience to integrate and consolidate knowledge, skills, and attributes in a clinical setting. Within the Canadian context, there is a lack of understanding about the experience of student compensation during the preceptor experience.
Objective: To understand the perceptions of fourth-year nursing students and their instructors regarding the benefits and challenges of students participating in a compensated preceptorship initiative.
Methods: This study used an exploratory mixed-methods design. Participants were fourth-year students in a bachelor of science in nursing preceptorship course and their assigned instructors at a university in Western Canada. This study used a survey design to collect student perceptions about the benefits and challenges of having their preceptorship experience in either a compensated or a traditional model. Survey design also gathered faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of teaching in these two models.
Results: A total of 25 student participants completed the survey, 23 of whom were satisfied with their choice to participate or not participate in the compensated model. The benefits of choosing to participate were being compensated, being part of the system, and having a job after completing their studies. Challenges include missing the student role, poor communication, and pushbacks from staff and other students. The benefits of choosing not to participate were the opportunity to stay in a chosen placement and being under less pressure, while challenges included financial strain and not having a job lined up after completing their studies. Five of seven faculty indicated that the compensated preceptorship experience provided less opportunity for consultation on program concepts and learning opportunities.
Conclusion: Student participants were overall satisfied with their choice to participate or not participate. Faculty members were cognizant of the financial strain on students but worried about the impact on learning in compensated environments. Given the mixed perceptions noted by faculty and students, there is a need for better understanding of how best to implement these initiatives.
Résumé
Contexte : Les étudiantes et étudiants au baccalauréat en sciences infirmières terminent leur formation par un préceptorat pour intégrer et renforcer leurs connaissances, leurs habiletés et leurs compétences en milieu clinique. Au Canada, l’expérience de la compensation financière des étudiantes et étudiants pendant le préceptorat est méconnue.
Objectif : Cette étude a pour but de comprendre les perceptions d’étudiantes et étudiants de quatrième année en sciences infirmières et de leurs formatrices et formateurs cliniques qui ont participé à un projet de préceptorat rémunéré, en ce qui concerne les avantages et les défis.
Méthode : Cette étude exploratoire repose sur une méthodologie mixte. Les personnes participantes étaient des étudiantes et étudiants de quatrième année suivant leur cours de préceptorat au baccalauréat en sciences infirmières et leurs enseignantes et enseignants d’une université de l’Ouest du Canada. Dans le cadre de cette étude, un sondage a été conçu pour recueillir la perception des étudiantes et étudiants au sujet des avantages et des défis de leur expérience du préceptorat, dans un modèle rémunéré ou un modèle traditionnel. Le sondage a également servi à recueillir les perceptions des enseignantes et enseignants en ce qui concerne les avantages et les défis d’enseigner dans l’un ou l’autre de ces modèles.
Résultats : Au total, 25 étudiantes et étudiants ont répondu au sondage. De ce nombre, 23 étaient satisfaits de leur choix de participer ou non au modèle rémunéré. Les avantages associés à la participation étaient de recevoir une rémunération, de faire partie du système et d’avoir un emploi après les études. Les défis comprenaient la perte du rôle d’étudiant, la mauvaise communication et la résistance de la part du personnel et des autres étudiantes et étudiants. La possibilité de rester dans un milieu choisi et la diminution de la pression étaient les avantages de choisir de ne pas participer, alors que les défis comprenaient les pressions financières et ne pas avoir un emploi confirmé après les études. Cinq des sept enseignantes et enseignants ont indiqué que l’expérience de préceptorat rémunéré offrait moins de possibilités de consultation sur les concepts du programme et d’occasions d’apprentissage.
Conclusion : Les étudiantes et étudiants étaient généralement satisfaits de leur choix de participer ou non. Les membres du corps professoral étaient conscients des pressions financières sur les étudiantes et étudiants, mais ils s’inquiétaient de l’effet d’un milieu rémunéré sur l’apprentissage. En raison des opinions partagées des enseignantes et enseignants et des étudiantes et étudiants, il est nécessaire de mieux comprendre la façon de bien mettre en œuvre de telles initiatives.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Anthony, S. E., & Landeen, J. (2009). Evolution of Canadian nursing curricula: A critical retrospective analysis of power and caring. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1766
- Bliss, J. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on practice learning in nurse education. British Journal of Community Nursing, 26(12), 576–580. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.12.576
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2012). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Draper, J., Beretta, R., Kenward, L., McDonagh, L. Messenger, J., & Rounce, J. (2014). ‘Ready to hit the ground running’: Alumni and employer accounts of a unique part-time distance learning pre-registration nurse education programme. Nurse Education Today, 34(10), 1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.007
- Farahbakhsh, J., Hanbazaza, M., Ball, G. D. C., Farmer, A. P., Maximova, K., & Willows, N. D. (2017). Food insecure student clients of a university‐based food bank have compromised health, dietary intake and academic quality. Nutrition & Dietetics, 74(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12307
- Grant-Smith, D., & de Zwaan, L. (2019). Don’t spend, eat less, save more: Responses to the financial stress experienced by nursing students during unpaid clinical placements. Nurse Education in Practice, 35, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.005
- Green, A. J., & Blunden, A. J. (2022). Exploring nursing students’ experiences as paid employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental Health Practice, 25(3), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp.2022.e1595
- Hayter, M., & Jackson, D. (2020). Pre-registration undergraduate nurses and the COVID-19 pandemic: Students or workers? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(17–18), 3115–3116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15317
- Hurst, J. L., Gardner, P., & Dorie, A. (2023). Are unpaid internships just as valuable? A comparison of U.S. work integrated learning students’ perceptions of paid and unpaid experiences. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(1), 57–81.
- Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450
- Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2021). What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. Higher Education, 81, 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/x10734-020-00570-x
- Kenny, A., Dickson-Swift, V., DeVecchi, N., Phillips, C., Hodge, B., & Masood, Y. (2021). Evaluation of a rural undergraduate nursing student employment model. Collegian, 28(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.07.003
- Kenny, A., Nankervis, K., Kidd, T., & Connell, S. (2012). Models of nursing student employment: An Australian action research study. Nurse Education Today, 32(5), 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.005
- Law, Y.-S. B., & Chan, E. A. (2016). Taken-for-granted assumptions about the clinical experience of newly graduated registered nurses from their pre-registration paid employment: A narrative inquiry. Nurse Education in Practice, 20, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.06.001
- McSherry, R., Eost-Telling, C., Stevens, D., Bailey, J., Crompton, R., Taylor, L., Kingston, P., & Simpson, A. (2021). Student nurses undertaking acute hospital paid placements during COVID-19: Rationale for opting-in? A qualitative inquiry. Healthcare, 9(8), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081001
- Mollica, M., & Hyman, A. (2016). Professional development utilizing an oncology summer nursing internship. Nurse Education in Practice, 16(1), 188–192. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.001
- Rugs, D., Nedd, N., Deitrick, L. & Hall, K. S. (2020). A literature review of nursing extern program outcomes. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 36(6), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000680
- Souder, E., Beverly, C. J., Kitch, S., & Lubin, S. A. (2012). Early exposure to geriatric nursing through an externship program. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(3), 166–169.
- Usher, K., Fagan, A., Brown, J. A., Mather, C., Marlow, A., Power, T., van de Mortel, T., West, C., Hutchinson, M., Zhao, L., Terry, V., Woods, C., & Lea, J. (2022). The financial challenges for Australian nursing students attending placement-based work-integrated learning. Collegian, 29(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2021.07.005
- Wallace, J. (2016). Nursing student work-study internship program: An academic partnership. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(6), 357–359. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160516-11
- Wise, M., Ossenberg, C., & Henderson, A. (2022). The contribution of paid employment for students during their pre-registration nursing studies: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 111, 105296.