Résumés
Abstract
Accessibility in collection development policies (CDPs) and practice in Canada is understudied. Two studies focusing on academic libraries in provinces with accessibility legislation were done to investigate both policy and practice. The first study employed a content analysis of publicly available CDPs of academic libraries in Manitoba, Nova Scotia, and Ontario to determine if accessibility was explicitly mentioned in them. The study aimed to explore possible legislative influence in the wording of CDPs. Since CDPs show only part of the picture as to how selectors make their acquisition decisions, in the second study, a multiple-choice and short answer survey was administered to selectors at academic libraries in these three provinces, in order to discover the factors that influence selectors in deciding if and how they use accessibility as a selection criterion. This article presents the research undertaken and sheds new light on how accessibility functions in collection development in the Canadian academic library context.
Keywords:
- academic libraries,
- accessibility,
- acquisitions,
- collection development
Résumé
L’accessibilité dans les pratiques et les politiques de développement des collections (PDC) au Canada est sous-étudiée. Deux études portant sur les bibliothèques universitaires dans des provinces dotées d’une législation sur l’accessibilité ont été menées afin d'examiner à la fois les politiques et les pratiques. La première étude, une analyse de contenu des PDC accessibles au public des bibliothèques universitaires du Manitoba, de la Nouvelle-Écosse et de l’Ontario, cherchait à déterminer si l’accessibilité était explicitement mentionnée. L’étude tentait d’explorer l’influence potentielle de la législation sur la formulation des PDC. Étant donné que les PDC ne présente qu’une image partielle de la manière dont les personnes responsables pour la sélection prennent leurs décisions quant à l’acquisition, une deuxième étude, un questionnaire à choix multiples et à réponses courtes, a été menée auprès de ces personnes responsables au sein des bibliothèques universitaires des trois provinces ciblées afin de découvrir les facteurs qui les influencent lorsqu’elles décident si et comment elles utilisent l’accessibilité comme critère de sélection. Cet article présente cette recherche et met en lumière le rôle de l’accessibilité dans le développement des collections dans le contexte des bibliothèques universitaires canadiennes.
Mots-clés :
- bibliothèques universitaires,
- accessibilité,
- acquisitions,
- développement des collections
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Accessibility Act, SNS 2017, c 2.
- Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005, SO 2005, c 11.
- Accessible Canada Act, SC 2019, c 10.
- Agresti, A., & Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52(2), 119–126.
- Association of Specialized and Cooperative Library Agencies (ASCLA). (n.d.) “Think accessible before you buy”: Questions to ask to ensure that the electronic resources your library plans to purchase are accessible.
- Council of Nova Scotia University Presidents & Nova Scotia Community College. (2020, June). Nova Scotia post-secondary accessibility framework.
- DeLancey, L. (2015). Assessing the accuracy of vendor-supplied accessibility documentation. Library Hi Tech, 33(1), 103–113.
- DeLancey, L., & Ostergaard, K. (2016). Accessibility for electronic resources librarians.The Serials Librarian, 71(3-4), 180–185.
- Dermody, K. & Majekodunmi, N. (2011). Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 29(1), 149–160.
- Dorothy H. Hoover Library, OCAD University. (2019, January). Appendix A: Library title selection guidelines. Retrieved November 29, 2019.
- Falloon, K. (2015). A case study in practice: Providing accessibility for persons with disabilities at the College of Staten Island Library. In B. Wentz, P. T. Jaeger, & J. C. Bertot (Eds.), Advances in librarianship: Vol. 40. Accessibility for persons with disabilities and the inclusive future of libraries (pp. 89–107). Emerald Group Publishing.
- Falloon, K. A. (2020). Effectively evaluating the accessibility of electronic monographs using VPATs and other resources at the College of Staten Island Library – CUNY. Serials Review, 46(2), 98–113.
- Falloon, K. A., & O’Reilly, F. M. (2020). Prioritizing accessibility in the e-resources procurement lifecycle: VPATs as a practical tool for e-resource acquisitions and remediation workflows at academic libraries. The Serials Librarian, 78(1-4), 130–140.
- Fleming College Library. (2016). Fleming library services collection development policy.Retrieved April 1 and 3, 2020.
- George Brown College Library Learning Commons. (2012, May). Collections management policy. Retrieved April 3, 2020.
- Harpur, P., & Suzor, N. (2014). The paradigm shift in realizing the right to read: How ebook libraries are enabling in the university sector. Disability & Society, 29(10), 1658–1671.
- John E. Robbins Library, Brandon University. (2015, April 6). Collection development policy. Retrieved April 11, 2020.
- Library Accessibility Alliance (LAA). (n.d.). Evaluations.
- Morgan, C., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Questions related to theory. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 41–48). Libraries Unlimited.
- Mount Saint Vincent University Library. (n.d.). Collection policy manual – electronic resources. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
- Mune, C, & Agee, A. (2016). Are e-books for everyone? An evaluation of academic ebook platforms’ accessibility features. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28(3), 172–182.
- Ostergaard, K. (2015). Accessibility from scratch: One library’s journey to prioritize the accessibility of electronic information resources. The Serials Librarian, 69(2), 155–168.
- Ontario Colleges Library Service (OCLS). (n.d.). Library eResources accessibility portal (LEAP).
- Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL). (2014, May). Accessibility information toolkit for libraries.
- Petri, K. (2012). Accessibility issues in e-books and e-book readers. In S. Polanka (Ed.), No shelf required 2: Use and management of electronic books (pp. 35–60). American Library Association.
- Schmetzke, A. (2015). Collection development, e-resources, and barrier-free access. In B. Wentz, P. T. Jaeger, & J. C. Bertot (Eds.), Advances in librarianship: Vol. 40. Accessibility for persons with disabilities and the inclusive future of libraries (pp. 111–142). Emerald Group Publishing.
- Scholars Portal. (n.d.) Accessible content e-portal (ACE).
- Schroeder, H. M. (2018). Implementing accessibility initiatives at the Michigan State University Libraries. Reference Services Review, 46(3), 399–413.
- Spurgin, K. M., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Content analysis. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 307–317). Libraries Unlimited.
- Tatomir, J., & Durrance, J. C. (2010). Overcoming the information gap: Measuring the accessibility of library databases to adaptive technology users. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 577–594.
- Tatomir, J. N., & Tatomir, J. C. (2012). Collection accessibility : A best practices guide for libraries and librarians. Library Technology Reports, 48(7), 36–42.
- Teasdale, R. (2018). Survey research. In R. V. Small & M. A. Mardis (Eds.), Research methods for librarians and educators (pp. 216–225). Libraries Unlimited.
- The Accessibility for Manitobans Act, CCSM 2013, c A1.7.
- University of Guelph Library. (2018, December 11). Collection policies. Retrieved June ph Library. (2018, December 11). Collection policies. Retrieved June 20, 2020.
- Wentz, B., Gorham, U., & Jaeger, P. T. (2023). Academic libraries and their legal obligations for content accessibility. First Monday, 28(1–2).
- Wentz, B., Jaeger, P. T., & Lazar, J. (2011). Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-fact online access for persons with disabilities in the United States. First Monday, 16(11).
- Willis, S. K., & O’Reilly, F. (2020). Filling the gap in database usability: Putting vendor accessibility compliance to the test. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(4), 1–30.
- Winchcombe, T., & Wood, S. (2010, January). Patrick Power Library collection policy. Patrick Power Library, Saint Mary’s University. Retrieved April 22 and 23, 2020.
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2018, June 5). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1.
- Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 318–329). Libraries Unlimited.