ror.org/002rjbv21
Résumés
Résumé
La valeur ajoutée d’établir des relations entre chercheurs et milieux de pratique pour favoriser l’utilisation des connaissances scientifiques n’est plus à démontrer. Il est cependant difficile de s’assurer que de telles relations amènent réellement une augmentation de l’utilisation des connaissances scientifiques dans la prise de décision. En prenant appui sur la théorie du capital social, cet article illustre trois dimensions (structurelle, relationnelle, cognitive) selon lesquelles les relations recherche-pratique devraient se construire afin de maximiser l’utilisation des connaissances scientifiques. Une réflexion critique entourant les indicateurs actuellement disponibles afin de mesurer le concept de « relations recherche-pratique » est également présentée.
Mots-clés :
- cadre conceptuel,
- indicateurs,
- relations recherche-pratique,
- théorie du capital social,
- utilisation des connaissances scientifiques
Abstract
The added value of establishing and maintaining relationships between research and practice to promote the use of scientific knowledge is well established. However, it is difficult to ensure that such relationships actually increase the use of scientific knowledge in decision-making. Building on the social capital theory, this article illustrates three dimensions (structural, relational, cognitive) on which research-practice relationships should be built to maximize the use of scientific knowledge into practice settings. Critical issues surrounding the indicators currently available to measure the concept of “research-practice relationships” are also presented.
Keywords:
- conceptual framework,
- indicators,
- research-practice relationships,
- social capital theory,
- use of scientific knowledge
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Adler, P. S. et Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
- Bechhofer, F., Rayman-Bacchus, L. et Williams, R. (2001). The dynamics of social science research exploitation. Scottish Affairs, 36(1), 124-155.
- Bédard, P. O. et Ouimet, M. (2012). Cognizance and consultation of randomized controlled trials among ministerial policy analysts. Review of Policy Research, 29(5), 625-644.
- Belkhodja, O., Amara, N., Landry, R. et Ouimet, M. (2007). The extent and organizational determinants of research utilization in Canadian health services organizations. Science Communication, 28(3), 377-417.
- Boyer, J. F. et Langbein, L. I. (1991). Factors influencing the use of health evaluation research in Congress. Evaluation Review, 15(5), 507-532.
- Brown, L. D., Bammer, G., Batliwala, S. et Kunreuther, F. (2003). Framing practice-research engagement for democratizing knowledge. Action Research, 1(1), 81-102.
- Chagnon F., Houle, J., Daigle, M., Mishara, B. et Bardon, C. (2008). Utilisation des connaissances scientifiques en prévention du suicide : vérification d’une stratégie fondée sur la communauté de pratique. Frontières, 21(1), 90-97.
- Chagnon, F., Pouliot, L., Malo, C., Gervais, M. J. et Pigeon, M. È. (2010). Comparison of determinants of research knowledge utilization by practitioners and administrators in the field of child and family social services. Implementation Science, 5(41).
- Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P. et Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners? The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23-34.
- Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. et Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888.
- Cousins, J. B. et Leithwood, K. A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Science Communication, 14(3), 305-333.
- Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Ramde, J. et Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: a review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 8(3), 285-309.
- Estabrooks, C. A., Thompson, D. S., Lovely, J. J. E. et Hofmeyer, A. (2006). A guide to knowledge translation theory. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 25-36.
- Fleury, M. J. (2014). Bonnes pratiques, stratégies d’intégration et enjeux d’implantation des transformations, particulièrement au Québec. Vie Sociale, 2, 37-53.
- Havelock, R. G. (1986). Linkage: key to understanding the knowledge system. Dans G. M. Beal, W. Dissanayake et S. Konoshima (dir.), Knowledge generation, exchange, and utilization (p. 77-104). Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
- Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 363-391.
- Huysman, M. et Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 40-51.
- Kothari, A., MacLean, L., Edwards, N. et Hobbs, A. (2011). Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(3), 203-214.
- Kramer, D., et Wells, R. (2005). Achieving buy-in: building networks to facilitate knowledge transfer. Science Communication, 26, 428-444.
- Landry, R., Lamari, M. et Amara, N. (2000). Évaluation de l’utilisation de la recherche sociale subventionnée par le CQRS. Québec : Chaire FCRSS sur la dissémination et l’utilisation de la recherche.
- Landry, R., Amara, N. et Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30(2), 333-349.
- Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2-31.
- Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C. et Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice : predictors of use. Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation, 37(2), 1-26.
- Mäkelä, K. et Brewster, C. (2009). Interunit interaction contexts, interpersonal social capital, and the differing levels of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management 48(4), 591-613.
- Mohrman, W. et Shani, A.B. (2008). The multiple voices of collaboration: A critical reflection. Dans A.B. Shani, S.A. Mohrman, W. Pasmore, B.A. Stymne et N. Adler (dir), Handbook of Collaborative Management Research (p. 531-538). Sage Thousand Oaks : CA.
- Morton, S. (2015). Creating research impact: the roles of research users in interactive research mobilisation. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 11(1), 35-55.
- Nahapiet, J. et Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
- Newman, J. (2014). Revisiting the “two communities” metaphor of research utilisation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(7), 614-627.
- Oborn, E., Barrett, M. et Racko, G. (2013). Knowledge translation in healthcare: incorporating theories of learning and knowledge from the management literature. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(4), 412-431.
- Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Chorpita, B. F., Hoagwood, K., Landswerk, J. et Weisz, J. R. (2009). Cultural exchange and the implementation of evidence-based practice: Two case studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 602-612.
- Philips, L. J. (2011). Analysing the dialogic turn in the communication of research-based knowledge: An exploration of the tensions in collaborative research. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 80-100.
- Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Utilisations in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 15-18.
- Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Fazey, I., Evely, A. C. et Kruijsen, J. H. J. (2014). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 337-345.
- Robert, L. P., Dennis, A. R. et Ahuja, M. K. (2008). Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 314-334.
- Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York : Free Press.
- Sandoval, J. A., Lucero, J., Oetzel, J., Avila, M., Belone, L., Mau, M., Pearson, C., Tafoya, G., Duran, B., Iglesias Rios, L. et Wallerstein, N. (2012). Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Education Research, 27(4), 680-690.
- Smith, M., Wilkinson, H. et Gallagher, M. (2013). It’s what gets through people’s radars isn’t it : relationships in social work practice and knowledge exchange. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 292-306.
- Thomas, R., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. et Chaffin, M. (2014). Practitioners’ views and use of evidence-based treatment : Positive attitudes but missed opportunities in children’s services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,41(3), 368-378.
- Trocmé, N., Milne, L., Esposito, T., Laurendeau, C. et Gervais, M-J. (2014). Supporting evidence based management in child welfare : A Canadian university-agency collaboration. Dans A. Shlonsky et R. Benbenishty (dir.), From evidence to outcomes in child welfare: An international reader (p.171-188). Oxford University Press.
- van der Arend, J. (2014). Bridging the research/policy gap: policy officials’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to effective links between academic and policy worlds. Policy Studies, 35(6), 611-630.
- Weiss, C. H. et Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Truth tests and utility tests: Decision-makers’ frames of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review, 45(2), 302-313.
10.7202/037878ar