Résumés
Abstract
Grounded in a multiliteracies framework, this article interweaves the authors’ experiences through narrative inquiry, exploring the integrating of multimodal texts and multimodal approaches of assessment within their practice. The article is organized as a conversation between two educators and a former student, and is centred around a multimodal assignment in a secondary English teacher education class that asked teacher candidates to create a digital picture book and use video annotation in peer assessment. Our shared conversation highlights the importance of multimodal texts such as sophisticated picture books in the secondary English classrooms, as well as thinking about alternative multimodal approaches to assessment.
Keywords:
- secondary English Language Arts,
- multilitereacies,
- assessment,
- video annotation,
- digital picture book
Résumé
S’appuyant sur un cadre théorique axé sur les littératies multiples, cet article entremêle les expériences des autrices à travers une démarche narrative, explorant l’intégration de textes multimodaux et d’approches d’évaluation multimodales dans leur pratique. Cet article prend la forme d’une conversation entre deux enseignantes et une ancienne étudiante, et porte sur un projet multimodal réalisé dans le cadre d’un cours de formation des personnes enseignantes d’anglais au secondaire, dans lequel les futures enseignantes devaient créer un livre numérique illustré et utiliser l’annotation vidéo pour l’évaluation par les pairs. Cela met en évidence l’importance des textes multimodaux, tels que les livres illustrés sophistiqués, dans les cours d’anglais du secondaire, ainsi que l’importance de réfléchir à d’autres approches multimodales en matière d’évaluation.
Mots-clés :
- cours d’anglais au secondaire,
- littératies multiples,
- livre numérique illustré,
- évaluation,
- annotation vidéo
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ciecierski, L., Nageldinger, J., Bintz, W. P., & Moore, S. D. (2017). New perspectives on picture books. Athens Journal of Education, 4(2), 123–136. https://www.athensjournals.gr/education/2017-4-2-2-Ciecierski.pdf
- Clarke, C., & Broders, J. A. (2022). The benefits of using picture books in high school classrooms: A study of two Canadian schools. Teachers and Teaching, 28(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2058482
- Colasante, M., Kimpton, A., Hallam, J. (2014). A curriculum model to promote (chiropractic) clinical thinking with video-case annotation. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum models for the 21st century: Using learning technologies in higher education (pp. 181–210). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7366-4_10
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (3rd ed., pp. 477–489). Routledge.
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. Teachers College Press.
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
- Cunningham, C. A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46–61. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/eandc/vol25/iss2/art6/
- Dallacqua, A. K., Kersten, S., & Rhoades, M. (2015). Using Shaun Tan's work to foster multiliteracies in 21st-century classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1395 https://doi-org.proxy.queensu.ca/10.1002/trtr.1395
- Eisner, E. W. (1988). Forward. F. M. Connelly & D. J. Clandinin (Eds.), Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience (pp. ix-xi). Teachers College Press.
- Ellis, J., McFadden, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2015). Investigating the social interactions of beginning teachers using a video annotation tool. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 404–421. https://citejournal.org/volume-15/issue-3-15/general/investigating-the-social-interactions-of-beginning-teachers-using-a-video-annotation-tool/
- Evi-Colombo, A., Cattaneo, A., & Bétrancourt, M. (2020). Technical and pedagogical affordances of video annotation: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(3), 193–226. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215718/
- Korchek, L. (2005). Adventures of cow (M. Taylor, Illus.). Tricycle Press.
- McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of a digital video annotation tool to promote reflective practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9476-2
- Mertova, P., & Webster, L. (2020). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to critical event narrative analysis in research, teaching and professional practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Mirriahi, N., Liaqat, D., Dawson, S., & Gašević, D. (2016). Uncovering student learning profiles with a video annotation tool: Reflective learning with and without instructional norms. Education Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1083–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9449-2
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2023). The Ontario curriculum: English: Grade 9, de-streamed (ENL1W). https://assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com/fbd574c4-da36-0066-a0c5-849ffb2de96e/49263d58-aae3-4fbe-9ab2-8f1f2b124a35/English9PDF.pdf
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007a). The Ontario curriculum grades 9 and 10: English. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/english910currb.pdf #page=70
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007b). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: English. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/english1112currb.pdf #page=92
- Pillay, T., Ahn, C., Gyamerah, K., & Liu, S. (2022). Considering the role of social media: #BlackLivesMatter as a pedagogical intervention to decolonise curriculum. London Review of Education, 20(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.20.1.14
- Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.5.4
- Serafini, F., & Gee, E. (Eds.). (2017). Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to New Times. Teachers College Press.
- Serafini, F., & Reid, S. F. (2022). Analyzing picturebooks: Semiotic, literary, and artistic frameworks. Visual Communication, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211069623
- Smith, J. M., & Pole, K. (2018). What's going on in a graphic novel? The Reading Teacher, 72(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1695
- Trip Tips. (n.d.). Roteiro. http://triptips.com.br/roteiro/
- Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Video-based learning: A critical analysis of the research published in 2003-2013 and future visions [Paper presentation]. The Sixth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning, Barcelona, Spain.