Résumés
Abstract
The objective of this article is to determine if the work of full-time professors in Canada varies depending on the type of universities in which they are employed. A nonparametric comparison of multivariate samples based on data from the Academic Profession in the Knowledge Society (APIKS) survey was used to examine faculty perceptions of their academic work. The results show statistically significant, albeit minimal, differences between primarily undergraduate, comprehensive, and research-intensive institutions. This article confirms that, to a small extent, institutional diversity in Canada is mirrored in academic work, and argues that both vertical and horizontal forms of diversity may exist simultaneously depending on the relative value granted to specific academic activities.
Keywords:
- Institutional diversity,
- Horizontal diversity,
- Vertical diversity,
- Canadian professoriate,
- Maclean's ranking,
- U15,
- Academic work
Résumé
L’objectif de cet article est de vérifier si, au Canada, le travail universitaire varie selon le type d’université dans laquelle les professeurs travaillent. En s’appuyant sur les perspectives des professeurs quant à leur travail, des tests de comparaisons non paramétriques d’échantillons multivariés ont révélé des différences statistiquement significatives, mais de faible ampleur, entre les universités de premier cycle, les universités polyvalentes et celles à forte intensité de recherche. Cet article, qui est basé sur les données du questionnaire La profession universitaire dans la société du savoir (APIKS), confirme que la diversité institutionnelle au Canada se reflète dans le travail universitaire et soutient que les diversités horizontales et verticales existent simultanément en fonction de la valeur accordée à certaines activités universitaires.
Mots-clés :
- Diversité institutionnelle,
- diversité horizontale,
- diversité verticale,
- professorat canadien,
- travail universitaire,
- classement du Maclean’s,
- U15
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aghion, P., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2009). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in ‘STIG Systems’. Research policy, 38(4), 681-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.016
- Arimoto, A. (2011). Reaction to academic ranking: Knowledge production, faculty productivity from an international perspective. In J.-C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian & U. Teicher (eds.), University Rankings: Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education (pp. 229-258). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_12
- Banks, J. A. (2012). Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. Sage Publications.
- Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press/SRHE.
- Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass.
- Burchett, W. W., Ellis, A. R., Harrar, S. W., & Bathke, A. C. (2017). Nonparametric inference for multivariate data: The R package npmv. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(4), 1-18.
- Council of Canadian Academies (2018). Competing in a Global Innovation Economy: The Current State of R&D in Canada. Council of Canadian Academies.
- Cantwell, B., Marginson, S., & Smolentseva, A. (Eds.). (2018). High participation systems of higher education. Oxford University Press.
- Canada Foundation for Innovation – CFI (2015). Consultation on the Canada Foundation for Innovation’s Fund Architecture. https://www.innovation.ca/sites/default/files/Fun ds/2015%20CF I%20Consultation%20discussion%20paper.pdf.
- Codling, A., & Meek, L. V. (2006). Twelve propositions on diversity in higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1787/17269822
- Dinno, A. (2017). Dunn.test: Dunn’s Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.3.5. https ://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test
- Fallis, G. (2013). Rethinking higher education: Participation, research, and differentiation. McGill- Queen’s Press.
- Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario - HEQCO (2012). The productivity of the Ontario public postsecondary system: A preliminary report. http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/H EQCO%20Productivity%20Report.pdf.
- Jones, G. A (2018). Decentralization, provincial systems and the challenge of equity: High participation higher education in Canada. In B. Cantwell, S. Marginson, & A. Smolentseva, (Eds.). High participation systems of higher education(pp. 203-226). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828877.003.0. 008
- Jones, G.A. (1998). The Idea of a Canadian University. Interchange 29(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452504974
- Jones, G.A., Gopaul, B., Weinrib, J., Metcalfe, A. S., Fisher, D., Gingras, Y., & Rubenson, K. (2014). Teaching, research and the Canadian professoriate. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings and U. Teichler (eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education (pp. 335- 359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6830-7_18
- Karran, T., & Mallinson, L. (2019). Academic freedom and world-class universities: A virtuous circle? Higher Education Policy, 32(3) 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0087-7
- Kehm, B. (2013). To be or not to be? The impacts of the excellence initiative on the German system of higher education. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 81-97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4975-7_6
- Kwiek, M. (2018). Changing European academics: A comparative study of social stratification, work patterns and research productivity. Routledge.
- Lacroix, R., & Maheu, L. (2015). Leading research universities: Autonomous institutions in a competitive academic world. McGill-Queen's Press.
- Locke, W. (2011). The institutionalization of rankings: Managing status anxiety in an increasingly marketized environment. In J.-C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian & U. Teicher (eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 201-228). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_11
- MacDonald, M. (2016). Four small universities in Eastern Canada rebrand as the “Maple League.” University Affairs. https://www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/maple-league-universities/
- Maclean's (2019). Maclean's University Rankings. https://education.macleans.ca/rankings/
- Metcalfe, A. S., Fisher, D., Gingras, Y., Jones, G. A., Rubenson, K., & Snee, I. (2016). The changing academic profession in Canada: Personal characteristics, career trajectories, sense of identity/commitment and job satisfaction. In J. F. Galaz-Fontes, A. Arimoto, U. Teichler, & J. Brennan (eds.), Biographies and careers throughout academic life (pp. 105-120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27493-5_7
- Milian, R. P., Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2016). Barriers to differentiation: Applying organizational studies to Ontario higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.186019
- The Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities (2013). Ontario's differentiation policy framework for postsecondary education. https://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/publications/Poli cyFramework_PostSec.pdf
- Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. Routledge.
- Neave, G. (1996). Homogenization, integration and convergence: The Cheshire Cats of higher education analysis. In L. Meek (Ed.), The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 26-41). Oxford: Pergamon Press
- Orton, L. (2003). A new understanding of postsecondary education in Canada: A discussion paper . Catalogue, 81-595-MIE2003011. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/81- 595-m/81-595-m2003011-eng.pdf?st=6Z_PjGRp
- Page, S. (1996). Rankings of Canadian universities, 1995: More problems in interpretation. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 26(2), 47-58. Page, S. (2001). Ranking of Canadian universities: A new marketing tool. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(2), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n02_05
- Piché, P. G. (2015). Institutional diversity and funding universities in Ontario: Is there a link?. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i3.188008
- Polster, C. (2015). The Nature and implications of the growing importance of research grants to Canadian universities and academics. In C. Polster & J. Newson (eds.), A penny for your thoughts: How corporatization devalues teaching, research, and public service in canada’s universities (pp. 213-36). Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
- Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026573503271
- Research Infosource Inc. (2018). Canada’s Top 50 Research Universities 2018. https://researchinfosource.com/top-50-research-universities/2018/list.
- Ross, S., Savage, L., & Watson, J. (2019). University teachers and resistance in the neoliberal university. Labour Studies Journal, 45(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X19883342
- Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world class universities. The World Bank.
- Shin, J. C., & Jang, Y. S. (2013). World-class university in Korea: Proactive government, responsive university, and procrastinating academics. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp.147-163). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4975-7_9
- Skolnik, M. L. (1986). Diversity in higher education: The Canadian case. Higher Education in Europe, 11(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772860110205
- Side, K., & Robbins, W. (2007). Institutionalizing inequalities in Canadian universities: The Canada research chairs program. NWSA Journal, 19(3), 163-181. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40071234
- Solem, M. N., & Foote, K. E. (2004) Concerns, attitudes, and abilities of early-career geography faculty. Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600717299
- Teichler, U. (2011). Social contexts and systemic consequence of university rankings: A meta- analysis of the ranking literature. In J.-C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian & U. Teicher (eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 55-69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_4
- U15 – Group of Canadian Research Universities. (2020). About us. http://u15.ca/about-us.
- U15 - Groupe of Canadian Research Universities. (2015). Canada 2030: Making Canada the most Innovative country in the world. https://u15.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Canada-2030- Making-Canada-the-most-innovative-country-in-the-world.pdf.
- University and College Academic Staff System (2018). Full-time teaching staff at Canadian universities, 2017/2018. Statistics Canada. 11-627-M. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11- 627-m/11-627-m2018056-eng.htm.
- Vajoczki, S., Fenton, N., Menard, K., & Pollon, D. (2011). Teaching-stream faculty in Ontario universities. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
- van Damme, D. (2009). The Search for Transparency: Convergence and Diversity in the Bologna Process. In F. van Vught (Ed.), Mapping the Higher Education Landscape (pp. 39-55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2249-3_3
- van Vught, F. A. (2009). Diversity and differentiation in higher education. In F. A van Vught (ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2249-3_1.
- Wasserstein, R., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
- Webber, K. L., & Rogers, S. M. (2018). Gender differences in faculty member job satisfaction: Equity forestalled? Research in Higher Education, 59(8), 1105–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9494-2