Résumés
Abstract
Although the spatiotemporal dimension of social license to operate (SLO) issues is underexplored, the collective memory of a local community and the territorial anchoring of tensions are important factors in the SLO trajectory. Through the qualitative study of a socio-environmental controversy related to the establishment of a landfill facility in Algeria, this research deepens our understanding of the spatiotemporal dimension of SLO and offers two main contributions. The first clarifies four types of relational legacies. The second theorizes two mechanisms through which these relational legacies influence the SLO process: the mobilization of collective memory and the reification of the territory.
Keywords:
- social license to operate,
- social acceptance,
- social acceptability,
- local communities,
- controversy,
- sustainable development,
- Algeria,
- territory
Résumé
La dimension spatio-temporelle des enjeux d’acceptabilité sociale est relativement sous-explorée. Pourtant, la mémoire collective d’une communauté locale ainsi que l’ancrage territorial des tensions sont des facteurs importants du processus d’acceptabilité sociale. À travers l’étude qualitative d’une controverse socio-environnementale née de l’implantation d’un centre d’enfouissement technique en Algérie, cet article approfondit notre compréhension de la dimension spatio-temporelle de l’acceptabilité sociale et propose deux contributions principales. La première clarifie quatre types de passifs. La seconde théorise deux mécanismes à travers lesquels ces passifs relationnels influencent le processus d’acceptabilité sociale : la mobilisation de la mémoire collective et la réification du territoire.
Mots-clés :
- acceptabilité sociale,
- communautés locales,
- controverse,
- développement durable,
- Algérie,
- territoire
Resumen
La dimensión espacio temporal de los problemas de aceptabilidad social está relativamente poco explorada. Sin embargo, la memoria colectiva de una comunidad local y el anclaje territorial de las tensiones son factores importantes en la trayectoria de la aceptabilidad social. A través del estudio cualitativo de una controversia socioambiental relacionada con el establecimiento de un relleno sanitario en Argelia, esta investigación profundiza nuestra comprensión de la dimensión espacio temporal de la aceptabilidad social y propone dos contribuciones principales. La primera aclara cuatro tipos de legados relacionales. La segunda teoriza dos mecanismos a través de los cuales estos legados relacionales influyen en el proceso de aceptabilidad social: la movilización de la memoria colectiva y la reificación del territorio.
Palabras clave:
- aceptabilidad social,
- comunidades locales,
- controversia,
- desarrollo sostenible,
- Argelia,
- territorio
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aaltonen, K., Jaakko, K., & Tuomas, O. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, 509-516.
- Baba, S. (2016). Vers un cadre conceptuel socio-constructionniste pour appréhender l’acceptabilité sociale. Éthique Publique, 18(1), https://doi.org/10.4000/ethiquepublique.2865.
- Baba, S., & Raufflet, E. (2014). Managing Relational Legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada. Administrative Sciences, Vol. 4(1), p. 15-34.
- Baba, S., & Raufflet, E. (2015). L’acceptabilité sociale: une notion en consolidation. Management International, Vol. 19(3), 98-114.
- Baba, S., & Raufflet, E., Murdoch, J. P., & Courcelles, R. (2016). Reconstruire des relations : Hydro-Québec et la Nation crie (1994-2015). Éthique publique, 18(1).
- Baba, S., Sasaki, I., & Vaara, E. (2020). Increasing Dispositional Legitimacy: Progressive Legitimation Dynamics in a Trajectory of Settlements. Academy of Management Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0330
- Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses. Organization & Environment, Vol. 13(1), p. 3-38.
- Barbier, R., & Trépos, J.-Y. (2007). Humains et non-humains: un bilan d’étape de la sociologie des collectifs. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, Vol. 1(1), p. 35-58.
- Batellier, P. (2015). Acceptabilité sociale. Cartographie d’une notion et de ses usages. (Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada). Taken from http://www.espace-ressources.uqam.ca/images/Documents/Recherche/Rapports_recherche/Batellier-2015-Acceptabilite-sociale.pdf
- Batellier, P. (2016a). Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec: définitions et postulats. VertigO, 16(1). doi: DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.16920
- Batellier, P. (2016b). Le rôle de l’État au regard de l’acceptabilité sociale des grands projets: quelques repères. Éthique Publique: revue internationale d›éthique sociétale et gouvernementale, 18(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/ethiquepublique.2409
- Beaulieu, S., & Pasquero, J. (2002). Reintroducing stakeholder dynamics in stakeholder thinking: a Negotiated Order perspective. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. 6, p. 53-69.
- Bice, S., Brueckner, M., & Pforr, C. (2017). Putting social license to operate on the map: A social, actuarial and political risk and licensing model (SAP Model). Resources Policy, Vol. 53, p. 46-55.
- Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M.-C. (2019). Corporate sustainability and indigenous community engagement in the extractive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, p. 701-711.
- Bouba-Olga, O., Boutry, O., & Rivaud, A. (2009). Un approfondissement du modèle exit-voice par l’économie de la proximité. Natures Sciences Sociétés, Vol. 17, p. 381-390.
- Bouba-Olga, O., & Grossetti, M. (2008). Socio-économie de proximité. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, 3, p. 311-328.
- Boutilier, R. G., & Zdziarski, M. (2017). Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 35(8-9), p. 498-513.
- Brueckner, M., & Eabrasu, M. (2018). Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity. Resources Policy, Vol. 59(1), p. 217-226.
- Chaker, S., & Doumane, S. (2006). La Kabylie et la question berbère: tensions cycliques et inachèvement Cahiers de l’Orient, Vol. 84(12), p. 47-86.
- Colletis, G., Gianfaldoni, P., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2005). Économie sociale et solidaire, territoires et proximité. Économie sociale et territoires, 296, p. 8-25.
- Cooney, J. (2017). Reflections on the 20th anniversary of the term ‘social licence.’ Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, Vol. 35(2), p. 197-200.
- Costanza, J. N. (2016). Mining Conflict and the Politics of Obtaining a Social License: Insight from Guatemala. World Development, Vol. 79, p. 97-113. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.021
- Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2016). Community Religion, Employees, and the Social License to Operate. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), p. 775-807. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2865-0
- Dare, M., Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 32(3), p. 188-197. doi: https://10.1080/14615517.2014.927108
- Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32(2), p. 189-201.
- Delannon, N., Raufflet, E., & Baba, S. (2016). Corporate community engagement strategies and organizational arrangements: a multiple case study in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 129, p. 714-723.
- Demajorovic, J., Lopes, J. C., & Santiago, A. L. F. (2019). The Samarco dam disaster: A grave challenge to social license to operate discourse. Resources Policy, Vol. 61, p. 273-282.
- Derakhshan, R., Turner, R., & Mancini, M. (2019). Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 37(1), p. 98-116.
- Di Maddaloni, F., & Davis, K. (2017). The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 35(8), p. 1537-1556.
- Eskerod, P., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2014). Stakeholder Management Strategies and Practices During a Project Course. Project Management Journal, Vol. 45(5), p. 71-85.
- Fortin, M.-J., & Fournis, Y. (2014). Vers une définition ascendante de social acceptance: les dynamiques territoriales face aux projets énergétiques au Québec. Natures Sciences Sociétés, Vol. 22, p. 231-239.
- Fournis, Y., & Fortin, M.-J. (2015). Une définition territoriale de social acceptance: pièges et défis conceptuels. VertigO: revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 15(3). doi: 10.4000/vertigo.16682
- Fournis, Y., Mbaye, O., & Guy, E. (2016). L’acceptabilité sociale des activités portuaires au Québec: vers une gouvernance territoriale? Organisations & Territoires, Vol. 25(1), p. 21-30.
- Friedl, C., & Reichl, J. (2016). Realizing energy infrastructure projects - A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy, Vol. 89, p. 184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.027
- Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 27(3), p. 284-300.
- Gehman, J., Lefsrud, L. M., & Fast, S. (2017). Social license to operate: Legitimacy by another name? Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 60(2), p. 293-317.
- Gendron, C. (2014). Penser l’acceptabilité sociale: au-delà de l’intérêt, les valeurs. Revue internationale Communication sociale et publique, (11), p. 117-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.584
- Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), p. 15-31.
- Golden-Biddle, K. (2019). Discovery as Abductive Mechanism for Reorienting Habits within Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming).
- Hällgren, M., Rouleau, L., & Rond, M. d. (2018). A Matter of Life or Death: How Extreme Context Research Matters for Management and Organization Studies. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 12(1), p. 111-153.
- Heravi, A., Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2015). Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33, p. 985-997.
- Joy, O., Eileen, K., Norma, J., & Zhi, T. (2017). Stakeholder Transformation Process: The Journey of an Indigenous Community. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-21.
- Karimi, F., & Toikka, A. (2014). The relation between cultural structures and risk perception: How does social acceptance of carbon capture and storage emerge? Energy Procedia, Vol. 63, p. 7087-7095.
- Kemp, D., & Owen, J. R. (2013). Community Relations in Mining: Core to business but not “core business”. Resources Policy, Vol. 38(4), p. 523-531.
- Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2015). The role of value in the social acceptance of science-technology. International Review of Public Administration, Vol. 20(3), p. 305-322.
- McIntyre, M. L., Murphy, S. A., & Sirsly, C. A. T. (2015). Do firms seek social license to operate when stakeholders are poor? Evidence from Africa. Corporate Governance-the International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 15(3), p. 306-314. doi: 10.1108/cg-01-2014-0011
- Melé, D., & Armengou, J. (2016). Moral Legitimacy in Controversial Projects and Its Relationship with Social License to Operate: A Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), p. 729-742. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2866-z
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: USA: Sage Publications.
- Missonier, S., & Loufrani-Fedida, S. (2014). Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, p. 1108-1122.
- Ofori, J. J. Y., & Ofori, D. R. (2019). Earning a social license to operate: Perspectives of mining communities in Ghana. The Extractive Industries and Society, Vol. 6(2), p. 531-541.
- Palard, J. (2003). Territoire et cohésion sociale: la dimension politique. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, Vol. 47(131), p. 317-319.
- Pasquero, J. (2008). Entreprise, development durable et théorie des stakeholders: esquisse d’un arrimage socio-constructionniste. Management International, Vol. 12(2), p. 27-48.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. (2014). A Systems-Based Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Determinants of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry. Environmental Management, Vol. 53(3), p. 672-689. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0221-7
- Raufflet, E. (2014). De l’acceptabilité sociale au développement local résilient. VertigO, Vol. 14(2). doi: DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.15139
- Raufflet, E., Baba, S., Perras, C., & Delannon, N. (2013). Social License. In N. C. S. O. Idowu, L. Zu, & A. S. Gupta (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 2223-2230). Heidelberg, Germany: The Springer.
- Richert, C., Rogers, A., & Burton, M. (2015). Measuring the extent of a Social License to Operate: The influence of marine biodiversity offsets in the oil and gas sector in Western Australia. Resources Policy, Vol. 43, p. 121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.12.001
- Rooney, D., Leach, J., & Ashworth, P. (2014). Doing the Social in Social License. Social Epistemology, Vol. 28(3-4), p. 209-218. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.922644
- Ruckstuhl, K., Thompson-Fawcett, M., & Rae, H. (2014). Maori and mining: Indigenous perspectives on reconceptualising and contextualising the social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 32(4), p. 304-314. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.929782
- Smits, C. C. A., Leeuwen, J., & Tatenhove, J. P. M. v. (2017). Oil and gas development in Greenland: A social license to operate, trust and legitimacy in environmental governance. Resources Policy, Vol. 53, p. 109-116.
- Syn, J. (2014). The Social License: Empowering Communities and a Better Way Forward. Social Epistemology, Vol. 28(3-4), p. 318-339. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.922640
- Talbot, D., & Kirat, T. (2005). Proximité et institutions: nouveaux éclairages. Économie et institutions, Vol. 6-7(1), p. 9-15. Taken from http://journals.openedition.org/ei/882
- Torre, A. (2009). Retour sur la notion de Proximité Géographique. Géographie, économie, société, Vol. 11(1), p. 63-75.
- Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localisation. Regional Studies, Vol. 39(1), p. 37-59.
- Torre, A., & Zuindeau, B. (2008). Économie de la proximité et environnement: état des lieux et perspectives. Revue Canadienne des Sciences Régionales, Vol. 31(1), p. 133-160.
- Torre, A., & Zuindeau, B. (2009). Les apports de l’économie de la proximité aux approches environnementales: inventaire et perspectives. Natures Sciences Sociétés, Vol. 17, p. 349-360.
- Whiteman, G. (2009). All My Relations: Understanding Perceptions of Justice and Conflict between Companies and Indigenous Peoples. Organization Studies, Vol. 30(1), p. 101-120.
- Wolsink, M. (2018). Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 46, p. 287-295.
- Yates, S. (2018). Introduction aux relations publiques: Fondements, enjeux et pratiques. In S. Yates (ed.), L’acceptabilité sociale en tant que nouvel impératif des organisations (p. 251-276). Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Yates, S., & Caron, M.-A. (2012). La communication comme vecteur de l’acceptabilité sociale des grands projets. Journal of Professional Communication, Vol. 2(2), p. 93-106.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Zimmerman, J.-B. (2005). Entreprises et territoires: entre nomadisme et ancrage territorial. La Revue de l’Institut Recherches Économiques et Sociales, Vol. 47(1), p. 21-36.
- Zimmerman, J.-B. (2008). Le territoire dans l’analyse économique: proximité géographique et proximité organisée. Revue Française de Gestion, Vol. 184(4), p. 105-118.
10.7202/1043005ar