Résumés
Abstract
In this paper, we study the reverse U-shaped relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and firms’ use of equity capital. Using a large sample of U.S. publicly listed companies, we provide strong evidence that CSR is positively associated with the use of equity capital when CSR practices are below a certain level. Once the CSR investment exceeds this level, the relationship between CSR and the equity financing becomes negative. Our findings are robust when we use the individual components of CSR, and several approaches to address endogeneity. Overall, our results enrich the debate about capital structure of high CSR firms and suggest that the CSR-capital structure relationship is more complex than what has been demonstrated in previous literature.
Keywords:
- Corporate Social Responsibility,
- Capital Structure,
- Corporate Governance,
- Agency Theory
Résumé
Nous étudions la relation en U inversé entre la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) et leur financement par capitaux propres. Nos estimations économétriques effectuées sur la base d’un large échantillon de sociétés américaines cotées montrent que la RSE est positivement associée à l’utilisation des fonds propres lorsque les pratiques RSE sont inférieures à un certain niveau. Quand l’engagement RSE dépasse ce niveau, la relation entre la RSE et le choix des capitaux propres devient négative. Nos résultats sont robustes lorsque nous utilisons les différentes dimensions individuelles de la RSE et plusieurs approches pour corriger une éventuelle endogénéité. Nos résultats contribuent au débat sur la structure du capital des entreprises socialement responsables et fournissent de nouvelles contributions empiriques et managériales.
Mots-clés :
- Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises,
- Structure du Capital,
- Gouvernance d’Entreprise,
- Théorie d’Agence
Resumen
Estudiamos la relación en forma de U invertida entre la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y su financiación mediante equidad. Nuestras estimaciones econométricas basadas en una gran muestra de empresas estadounidenses que cotizan en bolsa muestran que la RSC se asocia positivamente con el uso de equidad cuando las prácticas de RSC están por debajo de cierto nivel. Cuando el compromiso de RSC de las empresas supera este nivel, la relación entre RSC y la elección de la equidad como fuente de financiación se vuelve negativa. Nuestros resultados son sólidos cuando utilizamos las diferentes dimensiones individuales de la RSC y varios enfoques econométricos para corregir la posible endogeneidad. Nuestros resultados contribuyen al debate sobre la estructura de capital de las empresas socialmente responsables y proporcionar nuevas contribuciones empíricas y prácticas.
Palabras clave:
- Responsabilidad social empresarial,
- Estructura capital,
- Gobierno corporativo,
- Teoría de la Agencia
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Al-Malkawi, H. A. N., Pillai, R., & Bhatti, M. I. (2014). Corporate governance practices in emerging markets: The case of GCC countries. Economic Modelling, 38, p. 133-141.
- Attig, N., Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S. & Guedhami, O. (2016). Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 134(2), p. 171-197.
- Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O. & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics 117(4), p. 679-694.
- Bae, K.-H., Kang, J.-K. & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 100(1), p. 130-153.
- Bae, K. H., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product markets interactions. Journal of Banking & Finance.
- Baker, M., Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance 57, p. 1-32.
- Barclay, M. J., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), p. 609-631.
- Barnea, A., & Rubin. A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(1), p. 71-86.
- Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), p. 1101-1122.
- Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), p. 1304-1320.
- Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society 41(3), p. 319-344.
- Ben Larbi, S., Lacroux, A., & Luu, P. (2019). La performance sociétale des entreprises dans un contexte international: Vers une convergence des modèles de capitalisme? Management International/International Management/Gestión Internacional, 23(2), p. 56-72.
- Benlemlih M, & Girerd-Potin I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 44, p. 1137-1166.
- Benlemlih, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm debt maturity. Journal of Business Ethics 144(3), p. 491-517.
- Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-25.
- Benlemlih, M., Jaballah, J., & Peillex, J. (2018). Does it really pay to do better? Exploring the financial effects of changes in CSR ratings. Applied Economics, 50(51), p. 5464-5482.
- Benlemlih, M., & Peillex, J. (2019). Revisiter la question “Does it pay to be good?” dans le contexte européen. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, (1), p. 243-263.
- Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance 12(5), p. 855-877.
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4), p. 497-505.
- Chang, Y. K., Oh, W. Y., Park, J. H., & Jang, M. G. (2017). Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), p. 225-242.
- Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), p. 1-23.
- Dardour, A., Husser, J. (2016). Does It Pay to Disclose CSR Information? Evidence from French Companies. Management International/International Management/Gestión Internacional, 20, p. 94-108.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A. & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86(1), p. 59-100.
- Di Giuli, A., Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics 111(1), p. 158-180.
- Easterbrook, F.H., (1984), Two agency-cost explanations of dividends, American Economic Review, 74 (4), p. 650-659.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y. & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance 35(9), p. 2388-2406.
- El Ouadghiri, I., Guesmi, K., Peillex, J., & Ziegler, A. (2019). Public attention to environmental issues and stock market returns (No. 22-2019). Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2005). Financing decisions: who issues stock?. Journal of financial economics, 76(3), p. 549-582.
- Farre-Mensa, J., & Ljungqvist, A. (2016). Do measures of financial constraints measure financial constraints?. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(2), p. 271-308.
- Feng, Z. Y., Wang, M. L., & Huang, H. W. (2015). Equity financing and social responsibility: further international evidence. The International Journal of Accounting 50(3), p. 247-280.
- Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of financial economics, 67(2), p. 217-248.
- Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
- Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970.
- Fulghieri, P. & Lukin D. (2001). Information production, dilution costs, and optimal security design. Journal of Financial Economics 61, p. 3-42.
- Gallén, M. L., & Peraita, C. (2018). The effects of national culture on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross-country comparison. Applied Economics, 50(27), p. 2967-2979.
- García-Gallego, A., & Georgantzís, N. (2009). Market effects of changes in consumers’ social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), p. 235-262.
- Girerd-Potin, I., Jimenez-Garces, S., & Louvet, P. (2017). L’influence de la culture nationale sur les politiques socialement responsables des entreprises. Management international/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 21(4), p. 146-163.
- Godfrey, P.C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. The Academy of Management Review 30(4), p. 777-798.
- Goss, A. & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance 35(7), p. 1794-1810.
- Granado-Peiró, N., And López-Gracia, J. (2017) Corporate Governance and Capital Structure: A Spanish Study. European Management Review, 14, p. 33-45.
- Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), p. 1909-1940.
- Hovakimian, A., Hovakimian, G., Tehranian, H. (2004). Determinants of target capital structure: The case of dual debt and equity issues. Journal of Financial Economics 71, p. 517-540.
- Hillman, A. J. & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2), p. 125-139.
- Hong, H. & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93(1), p. 15-36.
- Husser, J., & Evraert-Bardinet, F. (2014). The effect of social and environmental disclosure on companies’ market value. Management International/International Management/Gestion Internacional, 19(1), p. 61-84.
- Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), p. 323-329.
- Johnson, S.A. (2003). Debt maturity and the effects of growth opportunities and liquidity risk on leverage. Review of Financial Studies 16, p. 209-236.
- Kim, Y., Park, M. S. & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87(3), p. 761-796.
- Manasakis, C., Mitrokostas, E., & Petrakis, E. (2013). Certification of corporate social responsibility activities in oligopolistic markets. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 46(1), p. 282-309.
- Manasakis, C., Mitrokostas, E., & Petrakis, E. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility activities and corporate governance in imperfectly competitive markets. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(7), p. 460-473.
- Mishra, S., Modi, & S. B. (2013). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics 117(2), p. 431-448.
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), p. 261-97.
- Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), p. 187-221.
- Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance 34, p. 128-149.
- Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling 52, p. 400-407.
- Peillex, J., & Ureche-Rangau, L. (2016). Identifying the determinants of the decision to create socially responsible funds: An empirical investigation. Journal of business ethics, 136(1), p. 101-117.
- Peillex, J., Boubaker, S., & Comyns, B. (2019). Does It Pay to Invest in Japanese Women? Evidence from the MSCI Japan Empowering Women Index. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-19.
- Peillex, J., & Comyns, B. (2020). Pourquoi les sociétés financières décident-elles d’adopter les Principes des Nations Unies pour l’Investissement Responsable? Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 2020.
- Price, J. M., & Sun, W. (2017). Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance. Journal of Business Research 80, p. 82-97.
- Rajan, R.R., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from International data. Journal of Finance 50, p. 1421-1460.
- Servaes, H. & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science 59(5), p. 1045-1061.
- Sharfman, M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics 15(3), p. 287-296.
- Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C.S., (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal 29, p. 569-592.
- Verwijmeren, P., & Derwall, J. (2010). Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking & Finance 34(5), p. 956-964.
- Viviani, J. L., Fall, M., & Revelli, C. (2019). The Effects of Socially Responsible Dimensions on Risk Dynamics and Risk Predictability: A Value-at-Risk Perspective. Management International/International Management/Gestión Internacional, 23(3).
- Zheng, X., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2012). National culture and corporate debt maturity. Journal of Banking & Finance 36, p. 468-488.
10.7202/1060031ar