Résumés
Abstract
Given the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance, this study examines the association between board composition and CSR disclosure on a sample of S&P 500 firms over the period from 2004 to 2015. Unlike existing studies, we control for potential sources of endogeneity using a system-generalized method of moments (system GMM) estimator. In doing so, we find no evidence that board size, board independence or CEO duality has any significant influence on CSR disclosure. Rather, our results suggest that, when the problem of endogeneity is correctly taken into account, the link between board composition and CSR disclosure is neutral.
Keywords:
- corporate governance,
- CSR disclosure,
- agency theory,
- resource dependence theory,
- corporate social responsibility,
- board composition
Résumé
Compte tenu de l’importance de la responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) et de la gouvernance des entreprises, cette étude examine l’association entre la composition du conseil d’administration et la divulgation d’informations RSE sur un échantillon d’entreprises composant l’indice S&P 500 au cours de la période 2004 à 2015. Contrairement aux études existantes, nous contrôlons les potentielles sources d’endogénéité à l’aide d’un estimateur de la méthode des moments généralisée (système GMM). Ce faisant, nous ne trouvons aucune preuve que la taille du conseil, son indépendance ou la dualité des fonctions de PDG ont une influence significative sur la divulgation d’information en matière de RSE. Nos résultats suggèrent plutôt que, lorsque le problème d’endogénéité est correctement pris en compte, le lien entre la composition du conseil d’administration et la divulgation d’information RSE est neutre.
Mots-clés :
- gouvernance d’entreprise,
- Divulgation d’information RSE,
- théorie de l’agence,
- théologie de la dépendance aux ressources,
- responsabilité sociale des entreprises,
- composition du conseil
Resumen
Dada la importancia de la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC) y el gobierno corporativo, este estudio examina la asociación entre la composición de la junta directiva y la divulgación de la RSC en una muestra de empresas pertenecientes al S&P 500 durante el período de 2004 a 2015. A diferencia de los estudios existentes, controlamos las posibles fuentes de uso de endogeneidad de un estimador con el método de momentos generalizado por sistema (sistema GMM). Al hacerlo, no encontramos evidencia de que el tamaño de la junta directiva, su independencia o la dualidad del CEO tengan una influencia significativa en la divulgación de la RSC. Nuestros resultados sugieren que, cuando el problema de la endogeneidad se tiene en cuenta correctamente, el vínculo entre la composición de la junta directiva y la divulgación de la RSC es neutral.
Palabras clave:
- gobierno corporativo,
- divulgación de RSC,
- teoría de la Agencia,
- teoría de dependencia de recursos,
- responsabilidad social corporativa,
- composición del tablero
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adams, Renée B., Hermalin, Benjamin E. et Weisbach, Michael S. (2010). “The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, N° 1, p. 58-107.
- Arellano, Manuel et Bover, Olympia. (1995). “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, N° 1, p. 29-51.
- Bai, Ge. (2013). “How do board size and occupational background of directors influence social performance in for-profit and non-profit organizations? Evidence from California hospitals”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 118, N° 1, p. 171-187.
- Baumann-Pauly, Dorothée, Wickert, Christopher, Spence, Laura J. et Scherer, Andreas Georg. (2013). “Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 115, N° 4, p. 693-705.
- Berle, Adolf A. et Means, Gardiner C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property, New York: Macmillan, 396 p.
- Berrone, Pascual et Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. (2009). “Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, N° 1, p. 103-126.
- Bhagat, Sanjai et Bolton, Brian. (2008). “Corporate governance and firm performance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, N° 3, p. 257-273.
- Blundell, Richard et Bond, Stephen. (1998). “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 87, N° 1, p. 115-143.
- Campbell, John Y. (1996). “Understanding risk and return”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, N° 2, p. 298-345.
- Chang, Young Kyun, Oh, Won-Yong, Park, Jee Hyun et Jang, Myoung Gyun. (2017). “Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 140, N° 2, p. 225-242.
- Chau, Gerald et Gray, Sidney J. (2010). “Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 19, N° 2, p. 93-109.
- Cheng, Eugene C. M. et Courtenay, Stephen M. (2006). “Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure”, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 41, N° 3, p. 262-289.
- Clarkson, Max E. (1995). “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, N° 1, p. 92-117.
- Dalton, Dan R., Daily, Catherine M., Ellstrand, Alan E. et Johnson, Jonathan L. (1998). “Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, N° 3, p. 269.
- Dalton, Dan R., Daily, Catherine M., Johnson, Jonathan L. et Ellstrand, Alan E. (1999). “Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, N° 6, p. 674-686.
- David, Parthiban, Bloom, Matt et Hillman, Amy J. (2007). “Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, N° 1, p. 91-100.
- Deutsch, Yuval et Valente, Mike. (2013). “Compensating outside directors with stock: The impact on non-primary stakeholders”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 116, N° 1, p. 67-85.
- Dey, Aiyesha. (2008). “Corporate governance and agency conflicts”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 46, N° 5, p. 1143-1181.
- Dhaliwal, Dan S., Radhakrishnan, Suresh, Tsang, Albert et Yong George, Yang. (2012). “Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure”, Accounting Review, Vol. 87, N° 3, p. 723-759.
- Donaldson, Thomas et Preston, Lee E. (1995). “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, N° 1, p. 65-91.
- Eccles, Robert G., Serafeim, George et Krzus, Michael P. (2011). “Market interest in nonfinancial information”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 23, N° 4, p. 113-127.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). “Agency theory: An assessment and review”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, N° 1, p. 57-74.
- Elkington, John. (1997). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21 st century business, Oxford: Capstone, p.
- Fabrizi, Michele, Mallin, Christine et Michelon, Giovanna. (2014). “The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 124, N° 2, p. 311-326.
- Fama, Eugene F. et Jensen, Michael C. (1983). “Separation of ownership and control”, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, N° 2, p. 301-325.
- Gippel, Jennifer, Smith, Tom et Zhu, Yushu. (2015). “Endogeneity in accounting and finance research: Natural experiments as a state-of-the-art solution”, Abacus, Vol. 51, N° 2, p. 143-168.
- Goodstein, Jerry, Gautam, Kanak et Boeker, Warren. (1994). “The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, N° 3, p. 241-250.
- Granovetter, Mark. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, N° 3, p. 481-510.
- Gray, Rob, Kouhy, Reza et Lavers, Simon. (1995). “Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8, N° 2, p. 47-77.
- Griffin, Jennifer J. et Mahon, John F. (1997). “The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research”, Business & Society, Vol. 36, N° 1, p. 5-31.
- Gujarati, Damodar N. (2003). Basic econometrics - 4th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1002 p.
- Hafsi, Taïeb et Turgut, Gokhan. (2013). “Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 112, N° 3, p. 463-479.
- Haniffa, R. M. et Cooke, Terry E. (2002). “Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations”, Abacus, Vol. 38, N° 3, p. 317-349.
- Haniffa, R. M. et Cooke, Terry E. (2005). “The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 24, N° 5, p. 391-430.
- Hansen, Lars Peter. (1982). “Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators”, Econometrica, Vol. 50, N° 4, p. 1029-1054.
- Harjoto, Maretno A. et Jo, Hoje. (2011). “Corporate governance and CSR nexus”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 100, N° 1, p. 45-67.
- Harris, Milton et Raviv, Artur. (2006). “A theory of board control and size”, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, N° 4, p. 1797-1832.
- Healy, Paul M. et Palepu, Krishna G. (1995). “The challenges of investor communication The case of CUC International, Inc.”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 38, N° 2, p. 111-140.
- Hermalin, Benjamin E. et Weisbach, Michael S. (1998). “Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO”, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, N° 1, p. 96-118.
- Hill, Charles W. L. et Jones, Thomas M. (1992). “Stakeholder-agency theory”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29, N° 2, p. 131-154.
- Hillman, Amy J. et Dalziel, Thomas. (2003). “Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, N° 3, p. 383-396.
- Hillman, Amy J. et Keim, Gerald D. (2001). “Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, N° 2, p. 125-139.
- Hillman, Amy J., Keim, Gerald D. et Luce, Rebecca A. (2001). “Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?”, Business & Society, Vol. 40, N° 3, p. 295-314.
- Himmelberg, Charles P., Hubbard, R. Glenn et Palia, Darius. (1999). “Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, N° 3, p. 353-384.
- Hussain, Nazim, Rigoni, Ugo et Orij, René P. (2018). “Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 149, N° 2, p. 411-432.
- Husted, Bryan W. et de Sousa-Filho, José Milton. (2019). “Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 102, N° p. 220-227.
- Ioannou, Ioannis et Serafeim, George. (2015). “The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36, N° 7, p. 1053-1081.
- Ivashina, Victoria et Scharfstein, David. (2010). “Bank Lending during the Financial Crisis of 2008”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 97, N° 3, p. 319-338.
- Jain, Tanusree et Jamali, Dima. (2016). “Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 24, N° 3, p. 253-273.
- Jamali, Dima, Safieddine, Asem M. et Rabbath, Myriam. (2008). “Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, N° 5, p. 443-459.
- Jensen, Michael C. (1993). “The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, N° 3, p. 831-880.
- Jensen, Michael C. et Meckling, William H. (1976). “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, N° 4, p. 305-360.
- Jiraporn, Pornsit, Jiraporn, Napatsorn, Boeprasert, Adisak et Chang, Kiyoung. (2014). “Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification”, Financial Management, Vol. 43, N° 3, p. 505-531.
- Jizi, Mohammad Issam. (2017). “The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. forthcoming, N° p.
- Jizi, Mohammad Issam, Salama, Aly, Dixon, Robert et Stratling, Rebecca. (2014). “Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125, N° 4, p. 601-615.
- Jo, Hoje et Harjoto, Maretno A. (2011). “Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 103, N° 3, p. 351-383.
- Judge, William Q. et Zeithaml, Carl P. (1992). “Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, N° 4, p. 766-794.
- Linck, James S., Netter, Jeffry M. et Yang, Tina. (2008). “The determinants of board structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 87, N° 2, p. 308-328.
- Linck, James S., Netter, Jeifry M. et Yang, Tina. (2009). “The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, N° 8, p. 3287-3328.
- Lins, Karl V., Servaes, Henri et Tamayo, Ane. (2017). “Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 72, N° 4, p. 1785-1824.
- Luoma, Patrice et Goodstein, Jerry. (1999). “Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, N° 5, p. 553-563.
- Mallin, Christine, Michelon, Giovanna et Raggi, Davide. (2013). “Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: how does governance affect social and environmental disclosure?”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 114, N° 1, p. 29-43.
- McWilliams, Abagail et Siegel, Donald. (2000). “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, N° 5, p. 603-609.
- Michelon, Giovanna et Parbonetti, Antonio. (2012). “The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure”, Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 16, N° 3, p. 477-509.
- Michelon, Giovanna, Pilonato, Silvia, Ricceri, Federica et Roberts, Robin W. (2016). “Behind camouflaging: traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research”, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 7, N° 1, p. 2-25.
- Milne, Markus J. et Gray, Rob. (2013). “W (h) ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 118, N° 1, p. 13-29.
- Nguyen, Tuan, Locke, Stuart et Reddy, Krishna. (2014). “A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 40, N° June, p. 1-11.
- Nollet, Joscha, Filis, George et Mitrokostas, Evangelos. (2016). “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 52, N° Part B January, p. 400-407.
- Padgett, Robert et Galan, Jose. (2010). “The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 93, N° 3, p. 407-418.
- Pfeffer, Jeffrey. (1972). “Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment”, Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 17, N° 2, p. 218-228.
- Pfeffer, Jeffrey et Salancik, Gerald R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row, 300 p.
- Post, Corinne, Rahman, Noushi et Rubow, Emily. (2011). “Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility”, Business & Society, Vol. 50, N° 1, p. 189-223.
- Rechner, Paula L. et Dalton, Dan R. (1991). “CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, N° 2, p. 155-160.
- Reverte, Carmelo. (2009). “Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, N° 2, p. 351-366.
- Reynolds, MaryAnn et Yuthas, Kristi. (2008). “Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 78, N° 1-2, p. 47-64.
- Roodman, David. (2009). “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata”, The Stata Journal, Vol. 9, N° 1, p. 86-136.
- Shabana, Kareem M., Buchholtz, Ann K. et Carroll, Archie B. (2017). “The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting”, Business & Society, Vol. 56, N° 8, p. 1107-1135.
- Sila, Vathunyoo, Gonzalez, Angelica et Hagendorff, Jens. (2016). “Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 36, N° February, p. 26-53.
- Surroca, Jordi et Tribó, Josep A. (2008). “Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 35, N° 5-6, p. 748-789.
- Tuggle, Christopher S., Sirmon, David G., Reutzel, Christopher R. et Bierman, Leonard. (2010). “Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, N° 9, p. 946-968.
- Turnbull, Shann. (2017). “Defining and achieving good governance”, dans Aras G. et Ingley C. (sous la direction de), Corporate Behavior and Sustainability, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, p. 234-251.
- Waddock, Sandra A. et Graves, Samuel B. (1997). “The corporate social performance-financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, N° 4, p. 303-319.
- Walls, Judith L., Berrone, Pascual et Phan, Phillip H. (2012). “Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33, N° 8, p. 885-913.
- Watts, Ross L. et Zimmerman, Jerold L. (1978). “Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards”, Accounting Review, Vol. 53, N° 1, p. 112.
- Windmeijer, Frank. (2005). “A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 126, N° 1, p. 25-51.
- Wintoki, M. Babajide, Linck, James S. et Netter, Jeffry M. (2012). “Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 105, N° 3, p. 581-606.
- Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data - 2nd edition, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1064 p.
- Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2014). Introduction to econometrics, Andover: Cengage Learning, 912 p.
- Zhang, Jason Q, Zhu, Hong et Ding, Hung-bin. (2013). “°Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 114, N° 3, p. 381-392.