Résumés
Abstract
The rise of the maker movement, including hackathons and fablabs, provides new opportunities for companies to boost innovation by collaborating with creative, tech-savvy and intrinsically motivated people, known as makers. This paper connects open innovation and maker movement research by investigating how makers and companies can work together within an industry-specific makerspace setting. We use a qualitative case study design and focus on the German photonics industry. Our results shed light on the expectations makers and companies have when considering a collaboration, along with the perceived benefits and risks. Furthermore, we uncover crucial design factors for industry-specific makerspaces.
Keywords:
- open innovation,
- collaborative innovation,
- makerspaces,
- fablabs,
- maker movement,
- hackathons,
- photonics industry
Résumé
L’essor du mouvement des makers notamment des hackathons et des fablabs, offre aux entreprises de nouvelles possibilités de stimuler l’innovation en collaborant avec des personnes créatives, douées pour la technologie et intrinsèquement motivées, appelées makers. Cet article établit un lien entre l’innovation ouverte et la recherche sur le mouvement des makers en examinant comment les makers et les entreprises peuvent coopérer dans un makerspace propre à un secteur d’activité. Nous utilisons une étude de cas qualitative et nous nous concentrons sur l’industrie photonique allemande. Nos résultats font la lumière sur les attentes des makers et des entreprises lorsqu’ils envisagent une collaboration, ainsi que sur les avantages et les risques perçus. En outre, nous découvrons des facteurs de conception cruciaux pour les makerspaces propres à un secteur d’activité.
Mots-clés :
- innovation ouverte,
- innovation collaborative,
- makerspaces,
- fablabs,
- mouvement maker,
- hackathons,
- industrie photonique
Resumen
El auge del movimiento maker y, en especial, de los hackathons y los fablabs, brinda nuevas oportunidades para que las empresas impulsen la innovación colaborando con personas creativas, conocedoras de la tecnología y altamente motivadas, conocidas como makers. Este artículo establece un vínculo entre la innovación abierta y la investigación del movimiento maker, analizando cómo los makers y las empresas pueden cooperar en un makerspace de un sector industrial concreto. Para ello, emplearemos un diseño cualitativo de estudio de caso y nos centramos en la industria fotónica alemana. Con los resultados obtenidos, trataremos de arrojar luz sobre las expectativas de los makers y las empresas al considerar una colaboración, así como sobre los beneficios y riesgos percibidos. Además, revelaremos factores de diseño cruciales para los makerspaces de sectores industriales específicos.
Palabras clave:
- innovación abierta,
- innovación colaborativa,
- makerspaces,
- fablabs,
- movimiento maker,
- hackatones,
- industria fotónica
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bergman, Brian; McMullen, Jeffery. S. (2020). “Entrepreneurs in the making: Six decisions for fostering entrepreneurship through maker spaces,” Business Horizons, in press.
- Briscoe, Gerard; Mulligan, Catherine (2014). “Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon,” CreativeWorks London, Working Paper No 6, p. 1-13.
- Browder, Russel E.; Aldrich, Howard E.; Bradley, Steven W. (2019). “The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 34, No 3, p. 459-476.
- Chesbrough, Henry W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Chesbrough, Henry W.; Brunswicker, Sabine (2013). Managing open innovation in large firms, Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering.
- Chesbrough, Henry W.; Crowther, Adrienne K. (2006). “Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries,” R&D Management, Vol. 36, No 3, p. 229-236.
- Chesbrough, Henry W.; Eichenholz, Jason (2013). “Open Innovation in Photonics,“ SPIE Professional, Vol. 8, p. 24-25.
- De Jong, Jeroen P. J.; Von Hippel, Eric; Gault, Fred; Kuusisto, Jari H.; Raasch, Christina. (2015). “Market Failure in the Diffusion of Consumer-Developed Innovations: Patterns in Finland,” Research Policy, Vol. 44, No 10, p. 1856-1865.
- Dougherty, Dale (2012). “The maker movement,” innovations, Vol. 7, No 3, p. 11-14.
- Enkel, Ellen; Gassmann, Oliver; Chesbrough, Henry W. (2009). “Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon,” R&D Management, Vol. 39, No 4, p. 311-316.
- Forest, Craig; Farzaneh, Helena Hashemi; Weinmann, Julian; Lindemann, Udo (2016). “Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented Universities,” in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, p. 1-13.
- Forest, Craig R.; Moore, Roxanne A.; Jariwala, Amit S.; Fasse, Barbara B.; Linsey, Julie; Newstetter, Wendy; Ngo, Peter; and Quintero, Christopher (2014). “The invention studio: A university maker space and culture,” Advances in Engineering Education, Vol. 4, No 2, p. 1-32.
- Gassmann, Oliver; Enkel, Ellen (2004). “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes,” R&D Management Conference, July 6–9, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Gassmann, Oliver; Enkel, Ellen; Chesbrough, Henry W. (2010). “The future of open innovation,” R&D Management, Vol. 40, No 3, p. 213‐221.
- Gershenfeld, Neil (2005). Fab: the coming revolution on your desktop – from personal computers to personal fabrication, New York: Basic Books.
- Gläser, Jochen; Laudel, Grit (2010). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (Expert interviews and qualitative content analysis), Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Goglio-Primard, Karine; Crespin-Mazet, Florence (2015). “Organizing Open Innovation in Networks - the role of boundary relations,” Management International, Special Issue, Vol. 19, p. 135‐147.
- Halbinger, Maria A. (2018). “The role of makerspaces in supporting consumer innovation and diffusion: An empirical analysis,” Research Policy, Vol. 47, No 10, p. 2028-2036.
- Helm, Roland; Endres, Herbert; Hüsig, Stefan (2019). “When and how often to externally commercialize technologies? A critical review of outbound open innovation,” Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 13, No 2, p. 327-345.
- Huizingh, Eelko, K. R. E. (2011). “Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives,” Technovation, Vol. 31, No 1, p. 2-9.
- Kera, Denisa (2012). “NanoŠmaNo Lab in Ljubljana: disruptive prototypes and experimental governance of nanotechnologies in the hackerspaces,” JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 11, No 4, p. 1-5.
- Kostakis, Vasilis; Niaros, Vasilis; Giotitsas, Christos (2015). “Production and governance in hackerspaces: A manifestation of Commons-based peer production in the physical realm?,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18, No 5, p. 555-573.
- Laursen, Keld; Salter, Ammon (2006). “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms,” Strategic management journal, Vol. 27, No 2, p. 131-150.
- Magaudda, Paolo (2012). “Nanotechnologies and emerging cultural spaces for the public communication of science and technologies: an introduction,” JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 11, No 4, p. 1-5.
- Maker Faire (2017). “Maker Faire Fast Facts,” [Online], [consulted on September 28, 2020], http://makerfaire.com/media-center/#fast-facts
- Mauroner, Oliver (2017). “Makers, hackers, DIY-innovation, and the strive for entrepreneurial opportunities,” International Journal for Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 31, No 1, p. 32-46.
- Mauroner, Oliver; Zorn, Josephine (2017). “Cluster Branding – A Case Study on Regional Cluster Initiatives, Cluster Management, and Cluster Brands,” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Vol. 7, No 4, p. 290-312.
- Mayer, Horst O. (2008). Interview und schriftliche Befragung: Entwicklung. Durchführung und Auswertung (Interview and written surveys: development, execution and evaluation), München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
- Mayring, Philipp (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (Qualitative content analysis: principles and techniques), Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
- McMahon, Christopher A. 1994. “Observations on modes of incremental change in design,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 5, No 3, p. 195-209.
- OptoNet (2019). “Photonics Report 2019–Economic Situation and Skill Development in the free state of Thuringia photonics Industry,” Jena: OptoNet e.V.
- Patton, Michael Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Perkmann, Markus; Walsh, Kathryn (2007). “University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9, No 4, p. 259-280.
- Porter, Michael E.; Heppelmann, James E. (2014). “How smart, connected products are transforming competition,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92, No 11, p. 64-88.
- Porter, Michael E.; Heppelmann, James E. (2015). “How smart, connected products are transforming companies,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 93, No 10, p. 96-114.
- Rieken, Finn, Böhm, Thomas, Heinzen, Mareike, Meboildt, Mirko (2019). “Corporate makerspaces as innovation driver in companies: a literature review-based framework,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 31, No 1, p. 91-123.
- Ritchie, Jane; Lewis, Jane; Elam, Gilliam R. (2003). “Designing and selecting samples,” in: Ritchie, Jane; Lewis, Jane (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, p. 77-108.
- Rosa, Paulo; Ferretti, Federico; Pereira, Ângela G.; Panella, Francesco; Wanner, Maximilian (2017). Overview of the Maker Movement in the European Union, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Silverman, David (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Trias consult (2019). Photonics in Germany 2019, Berlin: trias Consult.
- Van de Vrande, Vareska; De Jong, Jeroen P.; Vanhaverbeke, Wim; De Rochemont, Maurice (2009). “Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges,” Technovation, Vol. 29, No 6-7, p. 423-437.
- Von Hippel, Eric (2005). Democratizing innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Von Hippel, Eric (2017). Free Innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- West, Joel; Bogers, Marcel (2014). “Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31, No 4, p. 814-831.
- Willner, Allen E.; Byer, Robert L.; Chang-Hasnain, Constance J.; Forrest, Stephen R.; Kressel, Henry; Kogelnik, Herwig; Tearney, Guillermo J.; Townes, Charles H.; Zervas, Michalis N. (2012). “Optics and photonics: key enabling technologies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 100, p. 1604-1643.
- Yin, Robert K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Zakoth, David; Best, Sabine; Geiß, Reinhard; Helgert, Christian; Lutzke, Peter; Mauroner, Oliver; Pertsch, Thomas (2019). “Open Source Photonics at the Abbe School of Photonics: How Makerspaces foster Open Innovation Processes at Universities,” in Proceedings of ETOP, Vol. 11143, p. 1-8.