ror.org/052bz7812
Résumés
Résumé
L’objectif de cet article est d’étudier la dynamique de Red Queen Effect (RQE) à travers un prisme particulier : la dimension concurrentielle spécifique, i.e. une caractéristique du produit sur laquelle se focalise la concurrence. Dans notre cas, il s’agit de la résolution en termes de megapixels des appareils photographiques numériques (1994-2011). Les résultats soulignent que la vitesse d’évolution de la tendance centrale de l’industrie, ainsi que la dispersion des positions concurrentielles par rapport à cette tendance centrale de l’industrie influencent la dynamique de RQE. Il apparaît qu’aller toujours plus vite, plus haut n’est paradoxalement pas bénéfique pour l’industrie.
Mots-clés :
- Dynamique concurrentielle,
- Red Queen Effect,
- Innovation,
- Photographie
Abstract
The aim of this article is to study the Red Queen Effect (RQE) dynamics through a particular prism: the specific competitive dimension, i.e. a product characteristic on which competition focuses. In our case, this refers to the megapixel resolution of digital cameras (1994–2011). The results highlight that the evolution speed of the industry's central trend, as well as the dispersion of competitive positions relative to this central industry trend, influence the dynamics of RQE. Always go faster, higher is paradoxically not beneficial for the industry.
Keywords:
- Competitive dynamics,
- Red Queen Effect,
- Innovation,
- Photography
Resumen
El objetivo de este artículo es estudiar la dinámica del Efecto Reina Roja (Red Queen Effect) a través una dimensión particular: la característica competitiva específica, es decir, una característica del producto en la que se centra la competencia. En nuestro caso, esta es la resolución de las cámaras digitales en megapíxel (1994-2011). Los resultados destacan que la velocidad de cambio en la tendencia central de la industria, así como la dispersión de las posiciones competitivas en relación con esta tendencia central de la industria, influyen en la dinámica del Efecto Reina Roja. Paradójicamente, parece que ir cada vez más rápido, más alto, no es siempre beneficioso para la industria.
Palabras clave:
- Dinámica competitiva,
- Red Queen Effect,
- Innovación,
- Fotografía
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail : Why the future of business is selling less of more, New York, NY : Hyperion.
- Arellano, M. et Bond, S. (1991). « Some tests of specification for panel data : Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations », Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58, p. 277-297.
- Arrellano, M. et Bover, O. (1995). « Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models », Journal of Econometrics, vol. 68, p. 29-52.
- Barnett, W.P. (1994). « The liability of collective action : Growth and change among early telephone companies », in J.A.C. Baum & J.V. Singh (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organization, New York, NY : Oxford University Press, p. 337-354.
- Barnett, W.P. (1997). « The dynamics of competitive intensity », Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, n° 1, p. 128-160.
- Barnett, W.P. (2008). The Red Queen among organization : How competitiveness evolves, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
- Barnett, W.P. et McKendrick, D.G. (2004). « Why are some organizations more competitive than others ? Evidence from a changing global market », Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 49, n° 4, p. 535-571.
- Barnett, W.P. et Pontikes, E.G. (2008). « The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia », Management Science, 54, 7, p. 1237-1251.
- Barnett, W. P. et Sorenson, O. (2002), «The Red Queen in organizational creation and development», Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, n° 2, p. 289-325.
- Barney J. (1991). « Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage », Journal of Management, vol. 17, n° 1, p. 99-120.
- Barney, J. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
- Baum, J.A.C., Li, S.X. et Usher, J.M. (2000). « Making the next move : How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions », Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, n° 4, p. 766-801.
- Benner, M. (2010). « Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change : Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony », Organization Science, vol. 21, n° 1, p. 42-62.
- Benner, M. et Tripsas, M. (2012). « Prior industry affiliation and framing in nascent industries : The evolution of digital cameras », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, p. 277-302.
- Blundell, R. et Bond, S. (1998). « Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel datamodels », Journal of Econometrics, vol. 87, p. 115-143.
- Bourgeois, L.J. et Eisenhardt, K.M. (1988). « Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments : Four cases in the microcomputer industry », Management Science, vol. 34, n° 7, p. 816-835.
- Bower, J. et Hout, T. (1988). « Fast-cycle capability for competitive power », Harvard Business Review, p. 110-118.
- Burgelman, R.A. et Grove, A.S. (2007). « Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos – repeatedly : Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, p. 965-979.
- Coombs, R., Narandren, P. et Richards, A. (1996). « A literature-based innovation output indicator », Research Policy, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 403-413.
- Cohen, W.M. et Levinthal, D. (1990). « Absorptive capacity : A new perspective on learning and innovation », Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, n° 1, p. 128-152.
- Curry, B. et George K.D. (1983). « Industrial concentration : A survey », Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 31, n° 3, p. 203-255.
- d’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition : Managing the dynamics of strategic manoeuvring, New York, NY : The Free Press.
- d’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B. et Smith K.G. (2010). « The age of temporary advantage », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 31(summer special issue), p. 1371-1385.
- Denrell, J. (2003). « Vicarious learning, under-sampling of failure, and the myths of management », Organization Science, vol. 14, n° 3, p. 227-243.
- Derfus, P.J., Maggitti, P.G., Grimm, C.M. et Smith, K.G. (2008). « The Red Queen effect : Competitive actions and firm performance », Academy of Management Journal, vol. 51, n° 1, p. 61-80.
- Eisenhardt K. et Martin J. (2000). « Dynamic capabilities : what are they ? », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, n° 10-11, p. 1105-1121.
- Eisenhardt, K.M., & Sull, D.N. (2001). « Strategy as simple rules », Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, n° 1, p. 107-116.
- Ferrier, W., Smith, K. et Grimm, C. (1999). « The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement : A study of industry leaders and challengers”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, n° 4, p. 372-388.
- Fishbein, M. et Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, New Jersey, NJ : Prentice Hall.
- Gavetti, G. et Ocasio, W. (2015). « Perfect timing ? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 36, n° 3, p. 437-448.
- Green, D.H., Barclay, D.W. et Ryans, A.B. (1995). « Entry strategy and long term performance : Conceptualization and empirical examination », Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, n°4, p. 1-16.
- Grimm, C.M., Lee, H. et Smith, K.G. (2005). Strategy as action : Competitive dynamics and competitive advantage, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E, Tatham, R.L. et Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
- Hamilton, B.H., et Nickerson, J.A. (2003). « Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research »,Strategic Organization, vol. 1, p. 51-78.
- Hansen, L.P. (1982). « Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators », Econometrica, vol. 50, p. 1029-1054.
- Haveman, H.A. (1993). « Follow the leader : Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets », Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, n° 4, p. 593-627.
- Hitt M.A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R. (2001). « Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms : a resource-based perspective »,Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, n° 1, p. 13-28.
- Hsee, C.K., Yang, Y., Gu, Y. et Chen, J. (2009). « Specification seeking : How product specifications influence consumer preference »,Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 35, n° 6, p. 952-966.
- Judge, W.Q. et Miller, A. (1991). « Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts »,Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, n° 2, p. 449-463.
- Lampel, J. et Shamsie, J. (2005). « Escalating investments and declining returns : Red Queen competition in the motion picture industry », EBK working paper.
- Lengnick-Hall, C.A. (1992). « Innovation and competitive advantage : What we know and what we need to learn », Journal of Management, vol. 18, n° 2, p. 399-429.
- LeRoy, F. (2004). « L’affrontement dans la relation concurrentielle », Revue Française de Gestion, vol. 1, n° 158, p. 179-193.
- Lieberman, M.B. et Montgomery, D.B. (1998). «First-mover (dis)advantages : Retrospective and link with the resource-based view», Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9 (Summer Special Issue), p. 41-58.
- McKelvey, B. (1999). « Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets : Strategies for rugged landscapes »,Organization Science, vol. 10, n° 3, p. 294-324.
- Merges, R.P. et Nelson, R.R. (1994). « On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress : The effect of patent scope decisions », Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 25, n° 1, p. 1-24.
- Mukoyama, T. (2003). « Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology », Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 50, n° 2, p. 361-380.
- Nam, M., Wang, J. et Lee, A.Y. (2012). « The difference between differences : How expertise affects diagnosticity of attribute alignability », Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 39, p. 736-750.
- Navatte, P. (2016). « Comment lutter contre l’endogeneité dans les études empiriques de la corporate finance ? », working paper, IAE de Rennes.
- Nayyar, P.R. et Bantel, K.A. (1994). « Competitive agility : A source of competitive advantage based on speed and variety », Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 10, p. 193-222.
- Peteraf M. et Barney J. (2003). « Unraveling the resourcebased tangle »,Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 24, n° 4, p. 309-323.
- Porter, M.E. (1996). « What is a strategy ? »,Harvard Business Review, p. 61-78.
- Prahalad, C.K., & Bettis, R.A. (1986). « The dominant logic : A new linkage between diversity and performance », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 7, p. 485-501.
- Schelling T.C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press.
- Stalk Jr, G. (1988). « Time–the next source of competitive advantage »,Harvard Business Review, p. 41-51.
- Suchman, M.C. (1995). « Managing legitimacy : Strategic and institutional approaches »,Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, n° 3, p. 571-610.
- Orru, M., Biggart, N.W. et Hamilton, G.G. (1991). « Organizational isomorphism in East Asia », In W.W. Powell et P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 361-389), Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
- Reich, R.B. (1987). « Entrepreneurship reconsidered : The team as hero »,Harvard Business Review, p. 77-83.
- Roodman, D. (2015), « Xtabond2 : Stata module to extend xtabond dynamic panel data estimator ». Statistical Software Components.
- Semadeni, M., Withers, M.C., et TrevisCerto, S. (2014). « The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research : Understanding through simulations », Strategic Management Journal, vol. 35, p. 1070-1079.
- Srinivasan, R., Haunschild, P. et Grewal, R. (2007). « Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market », Management Science, vol. 53, n° 1, p. 16-28.
- Tripsas, M. (2009). « Technology, identity, and inertia : Through the lens of ‘the digital photography company »,Organization Science, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 441-460.
- VanValen, L. (1973). « A new evolutionary law »,Evolutionary Theory, vol. 1, p. 1-30.
- Verona, G. et Ravasi, D. (2003). « Unbundling dynamic capabilities : An exploratory study on continuous product development », Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 12, n° 3, p. 577-606.
- Voelpel, S, Leibold, M., Tekie, E. et VonKrogh, G. (2005). « Escaping the Red Queen Effect in competitive strategy : Sense testing business models », European Management Journal, vol. 23, n° 1, p. 37-49.