Résumés
Abstract
Liberal political thought affirms the moral equality of all persons. The Lockean tradition within liberalism captures this equality by endowing people with equal natural rights. However, a powerful line of criticism holds that the theory fails to live up to its egalitarian billing by treating men and women differently. This article offers a rational reconstruction of the Lockean position on gender equality, and the rights of women in particular. We propose a novel interpretative method which puts Locke into conversation with a contemporary female author, Rachel Speght. In Speght, we find an interesting argument supporting an egalitarian Lockean view, grounded in familiar Lockean assumptions, using familiar Lockean arguments. Voices like Speght have long been unjustly neglected in the liberal tradition. By constructing this imagined conversation, we offer a stronger foundation for Lockean liberalism, and begin to incorporate excluded voices in the formulation of that tradition.
Keywords:
- Locke,
- gender,
- equality,
- freedom,
- Speght,
- subjection
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Brennan, Teresa and Carole Pateman. “‘Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth’: Women and the Origins of Liberalism.” Political Studies 27, no. 2 (1979): 183-200.
- Butler, Charles, ed. Female Replies to Swetnam the Woman-Hater. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995.
- Butler, Melissa. “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy.” American Political Science Review 72, no. 1 (1978): 135-150.
- Clark, Lorraine. “Women and John Locke; Or, Who Owns the Apples in the Garden of Eden?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, no. 4 (1977): 699-724.
- Detlefsen, Karen. “Margaret Cavendish and Thomas Hobbes on Freedom.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Nancy J. Hirschmann and Joanne H. Wright, 149-168. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.
- Erickson, Amy Louise. “Possession—and the Other One‐Tenth of the Law: Assessing Women's Ownership and Economic Roles in Early Modern England.” Women's History Review 16, no. 3 (2007): 369-385.
- Goldie, Mark. “Mary Astell and John Locke.” In Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, edited by Michal Michelson, 65-85. Taylor & Francis, 2007.
- Grant, Ruth. “John Locke on Women and the Family.” In John Locke, Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, edited by Ian Shapiro, 286-308. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.
- Hirschmann, Nancy. “Intersectionality before Intersectionality was Cool: The Importance of Class to Feminist Interpretations of Locke.” In Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, edited by Nancy Hirschmann and Kirstie M. McClure, 155-186. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania University Press, 2007.
- Kelly, Joan. “Early Feminist Theory and the ‘Querelle des Femmes’, 1400-1789.” Signs 8, no. 1 (1982): 4-28.
- Locke, John. A Paraphrase and Notes on The Epistles of St. Paul To the Galatians, Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians. In The Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes. London: Rivington, 1824, 12th ed.
- Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
- Locke, John. Some Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding. Edited by Ruth Grant and Nathan Tarcov. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1996.
- Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
- Locke, John. Political Essays. Edited by Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
- Locke, John. “Virtus.” In Political Writings of John Locke, edited by David Wooton, 240-242. Mentor, 1993.
- LoLordo, Antonia. Locke’s Moral Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- MacDonald, Mary Jo. “Lockean Equality” (unpublished ms.), 2022, typescript.
- O’Neill, Daniel, Mary Lyndon Shanley, and Iris Marion Young, editors. Illusion of Consent: Engaging with Carole Pateman. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
- Pateman, Carol. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.
- Pfeffer, Jacqueline L. “The Family in John Locke’s Political Thought.” Polity 33, no. 4 (2001): 593–618.
- Shanley, Mary. “Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought.” In Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, edited by Nancy Hirschmann and Kirstie M. McClure, 17-38. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.
- Shanks, Torrey. “Feminine Figures and the “Fatherhood”: Rhetoric and Reason in Locke’s First Treatise of Government.” Political Theory 39, no. 1 (2011): 31–57.
- Schochet, Gordon. Patriarchalism in Political Thought. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.
- Simmons, John. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
- Speght, Rachel. “A Mouzell for Melastomus.” In The Polemics and Poems of Rachel Speght, edited by Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, 2-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
- Sreedhar, Susanne. “Locke on Marriage.” In The Lockean Mind, edited by Jessica Gordon-Roth and Shelley Weinberg, 498-506. London: Routledge, 2022.
- Sreedhar, Susanne and Julie Walsh, “Locke, the Law of Nature, and Polygamy.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2, no. 1 (2016): 91–110.
- Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- Waldron, Jeremy. “Locke, Adam, and Eve.” In Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, edited by Nancy Hirschmann and Christie McClure, 241-267. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.