Résumés
Abstract
Locke traces the concept of active power to the experience of voluntary action in ourselves. I argue that Locke does not find in voluntary action a necessary connection binding volition and action. I defend the application of Locke’s regularity theory of causal judgment to the operation of the will. The will is classified as a cause because it is regularly accompanied by a movement in our limbs or a change in our thoughts. I argue that Locke does not equate the concepts of cause and active power. He maintains that something can serve as a cause, and so bring about change, in virtue of activity or in virtue of its susceptibility to external influence. I go on to develop what I refer to as the ascription puzzle. Locke, who provides a criterion for classifying something as a cause, does not develop a criterion of for classifying causes as either active or passive in nature. The ascription puzzle is vexing because Locke has no principled way to establish, among other things, that humans, in acting voluntarily, exercise active power. The result is that Locke should not be taken to identify the experience of voluntary action as the origin of the concept of active power because of any metaphysical considerations bearing on human agency.
Keywords:
- Locke,
- agency,
- active power,
- voluntary action,
- causation,
- volition,
- occasionalism
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aaron, Richard I. John Locke. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.
- Allison, Henry. Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise. New York: Oxford, 2008.
- Ayers, M. R. “The Ideas of Power and Substance in Locke’s Philosophy.” In Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays, edited by I. C. Tipton, 77–104. London: Oxford University Press, 1977.
- Ayers, M. R. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. Vol. 2, Ontology. London: Routledge, 1991.
- Bennett, Jonathan. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. New York: Oxford, 1971.
- Bragge, Robert. A Brief Essay concerning the Soul of Man. London, 1725.
- Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Locke and Leibniz on the Structure of Substance and Powers: The Metaphysics of Moral Subjects.” In Studies on Locke: Sources, Contemporaries, and Legacy in Honour of G. A. J. Rogers., edited by Sarah Hutton and Paul Schuurman, 107–26. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 2008.
- Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.
- Chappell, Vere. “Power in Locke’s Essay.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s Essay, edited by Lex Newman, 130–56. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- Connolly, John. “David Hume and the Concept of Volition: The Will as Impression.” Hume Studies 13, no. 2 (1987): 276–305.
- Connolly, Patrick. “The Idea of Power and Locke's Taxonomy of Ideas.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95, no 1 (2017): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1159237.
- Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
- Jacovides, Michael. “Locke’s Construction of the Idea of Power.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 329–50.
- Locke, John. An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke. New York: Clarendon Press, 1975.
- Locke, John. An Examination of P. Malebranche’s Opinion. In vol. 9 of The Works of John Locke, 211–55. London, 1823.
- Locke, John. John Locke: Drafts for the Essay concerning Human Understanding and Other Philosophical Writings, Volume 1. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch and G. A. J. Rogers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
- Locke, John. John Locke: Drafts for the Essay concerning Human Understanding and Other Philosophical Writings, Volume 2. Edited by J. R. Milton and G. A. J. Rogers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2021.
- Locke, John. Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Bishop of Worchester’s Answer to his Second Letter. In vol. 4 of The Works of John Locke, 191–498. London, 1823.
- Locke, John. Some Remarks upon Some of Mr. Norris’s Books. In vol. 10 of The Works of John Locke, 247–59. London, 1823.
- LoLordo, Antonia. Locke’s Moral Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- Mabbott, J. D. John Locke. London: Macmillan Press, 1973.
- Malebranche, Nicholas. The Search after Truth: With Elucidations of The Search after Truth. Translated and edited by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
- Mattern, R. M. “Locke on Active Power and the Obscure Idea of Active Power from Bodies.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 11, no. 1 (1980): 39–77.
- Ott, Walter. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Priarolo, Mariangela. “Rethinking Occasionalism: John Locke and the Power(s) of Nature.” Studi Lockiani 2 (2021): 177-96.
- Rickless, Samuel C. “Locke on Active Power, Freedom, and Moral Agency.” Locke Studies 13 (2013): 33–54.
- Schneewind, Jerome B. “The Active Powers.” In The Cambridge History of 18th-Century Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonssen, 557–607. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
- Stuart, Matthew. Locke’s Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
- Yaffe, Gideon. Liberty Worth the Name. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.