Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Chen, L., Ma, R., Hannák, A., & Wilson, C. (2023). “Investigating the impact of gender on rank in resume search engines.” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). Association for Computing Machinery.
- Chin, M., Zhao, A., Lee, J., & Ko, A. J. (2022). “In their own words: Student reactions to online proctoring.” PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e905. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.905
- Citron, D. K., & Solove, D. J. (2022). “Privacy harms.” Boston University Law Review, 102, 793-889.
- Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.
- Cofone, I. (2023). The privacy fallacy: Harm and power in the information economy. Cambridge University Press.
- Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
- Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
- Richards, N. M., & Hartzog, W. (2019). “The pathologies of digital consent.” Washington University Law Review, 96, 1461-1503.
- Solove, D. J. (2013). “Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma.” Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880-1903.
- Waldman, A. E. (2020). “Privacy law's false promise.” Washington University Law Review, 97(3), 605-675.
- Zeide, E. (2022a). “Big Proctor: Online proctoring problems and how FERPA can promote student data due process.” Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies, 3, 74-140.
- Zeide, E. (2022b). “The Silicon Ceiling: How artificial intelligence creates invisible barriers to opportunity.” UMKC Law Review, 91, 403-436.
- Zeide, E. (2025). “Student privacy's student neglect: Toward a student-centric paradigm.” George Washington Law Review, 93, 535-609.