Résumés
Abstract
Given the recent growing emphasis on citation justice and related concepts, this paper examines "Citation Analysis," published in Library Trends in 1981, and revisits it through the lens of citation justice. Overarching questions include: How can citation analysis be more just? How can research evaluation go beyond citation analysis to be more just? Sections include a discussion of the concept of citation justice, applications of citation analysis with particular emphasis on evaluative bibliometrics, characterization of assumptions underlying citation analysis, identification of problems posed in dealing with citation data, and an outline of possible approaches to achieving citation justice. Several different entities and actions are discussed with the goal of working toward citation justice. These include author roles, pedagogical approaches, resource compilation, editor and reviewer roles, publisher roles, advocacy, recommendations for research evaluation reform, and higher education institutional roles. Viewing citation analysis through the lens of citation justice reveals significant limitations in citation analysis and suggests ways to correct them–both to ensure that more diverse scholars are part of the scholarly conversation that underlies citation analysis and to encourage approaches to research evaluation that are not dependent solely on citation counts.
Keywords:
- citation analysis,
- citation counts,
- citation justice,
- evaluative bibliometrics,
- research evaluation
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.
- Aksnes, Dag W., Liv Langfeldt, and Paul Wouters. 2019. “Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories.” Sage Open 9 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575.
- Algaba, Andres, Carmen Mazijn, Vincent Holst, Floriano Tori, Sylvia Wenmackers, and Vincent Ginis. 2024. “Large Language Models Reflect Human Citation Patterns with a Heightened Citation Bias.” Preprint, last revised August 24, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15739.
- Allen, Liz, and Elizabeth Marincola. 2020. “Rethinking Scholarly Publishing: How New Models Can Facilitate Transparency, Equity, Efficiency and the Impact of Science.” In Transforming Research Excellence: New Ideas from the Global South, edited by Erika Kraemer-Mbula, Robert Tijssen, Matthew L. Wallace, and Robert McLean. African Minds. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23441.
- Aman, Valeria, and Jochen Gläser. 2025. “Investigating Knowledge Flows in Scientific Communities: The Potential of Bibliometric Methods.” Minerva 63 (1): 155–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09542-2.
- American Political Science Review. 2023. “Notes from the Editors: Citation Matters.” American Political Science Review 117 (1): v–viii. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001368.
- Asubiaro, Toluwase, Sodiq Onaolapo, and David Mills. 2024. “Regional Disparities in Web of Science and Scopus Journal Coverage.” Scientometrics 129 (3): 1469–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x.
- Baffour, Tiffany, Myra Garcia, and Mindi Rich. 2024. “Advancing the Grand Challenge to Eliminate Racism: A Call to Action for Citational Justice in Social Work.” Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work 34 (5-6): 275–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2024.2406257.
- Basil, Debra Z., Suzan Burton, Alena Soboleva, and Paul Nesbit. 2023. “Coercive Citation: Understanding the Problem and Working Toward a Solution.” Academy of Management Perspectives 37 (3): 205–19. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0081.
- Biagoli, Mario, and Alexandra Lippman. 2020. “Introduction: Metrics and the New Ecologies of Academic Misconduct.” In Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research, edited by Mario Biagoli and Alexandra Lippman. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.001.0001.
- Bonner Fred A.II, and Barbara L. Garcia-Powell. 2022. “#BlackCitesMatter: Foregrounding a Citational Justice Movement.” Diverse: Issues in Higher Education 39 (14): 12–13. https://www.diverseeducation.com/opinion/article/15297041/blackcitesmatter-foregrounding-a-citational-justice-movement.
- Bornmann, Lutz. 2016. “Scientific Revolution in Scientometrics: The Broadening of Impact from Citation to Societal.” In Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication: A Festschrift in Honor of Blaise Cronin, edited by Cassidy R. Sugimoto. De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464-020.
- Bornmann, Lutz, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation 64 (1): 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150.
- Bornmann, Lutz, and Christian Leibel. 2025. “Citation Accuracy, Citation Noise, and Citation Bias: A Foundation of Citation Analysis.” Preprint, August 18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.12735.
- Bruton, Samuel V., Alicia L. Macchione, Mitch Brown, and Mohammad Hosseini. 2025. “Citation Ethics: An Exploratory Survey of Norms and Behaviors.” Journal of Academic Ethics 23 (2): 329–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2.
- Burbules, Nicholas C. 2015. “The Changing Functions of Citation: From Knowledge Networking to Academic Cash-Value.” Paedagogica Historica 51 (6): 716–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2015.1051553.
- Bush, Vannevar. 1945. “As We May Think.” The Atlantic Monthly 176 (1): 101-8. https://cdn.theatlantic.com/media/archives/1945/07/176-1/132407932.pdf.
- Carlier, Aurélie, Hang Nguyen, Lidwien Hollanders, Nicole Basaraba, Sally Wyatt, and Sharon Anyango. 2021. UM Citation Guide: A Guide by FEM. Maastricht University. https://fasos.maastrichtuniversity.nl/weekly/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/um_citation_guide_fem_2022.pdf.
- Carlier, Aurélie, Hang Nguyen, Lidwien Hollanders, Nicole Basaraba, Sally Wyatt, and Sharon Anyango. 2022. “Aspirational Metrics: A Guide for Working Towards Citational Justice.” LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/05/16/aspirational-metrics-a-guide-for-working-towards-citational-justice/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/3MR8-6SDV.
- Chakravartty, Paula, Rachel Kuo, Victoria Grubbs, and Charlton McIlwain. 2018. “#CommunicationSoWhite.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 254–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003.
- Chenevey, Liz. 2023. “Teaching the Politics of Citation: Challenging Students’ Perceptions.” College & Research Libraries News 84 (5): 152–57. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/25887/33825.
- Chetan, S. V. 2024. “Women and Queer Researchers Cited, But Not in Sight: Rethinking APA Citation Style.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 26 (5): Article 13. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol26/iss5/13.
- Chou, Chuing Prudence, Hsiao Fang Lin, and Yun-Ju Chiu. 2013. “The Impact of SSCI and SCI on Taiwan’s Academy: An Outcry for Fair Play.” Asia Pacific Education Review 14 (1): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9245-1.
- Citational Justice Collective, Gabriela Molina León, Lynn Kirabo, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Naveena Karusala, Neha Kumar, Nicola Bidwell, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Pranjal Protim Borah, Radhika Garg, Sushil K. Oswal, Tee Chuanromanee, and Vishal Sharma. 2021. “Following the Trail of Citational Justice: Critically Examining Knowledge Production in HCI.” In CSCW ‘21 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, edited by Jeremy Birnholtz, Luigina Ciolfi, Sharon Ding, Susan Fussell, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Sean Munson, Irina Shklovski, and Mor Naaman. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481732.
- Citational Justice Collective, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Sareeta Amrute, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Nicola Bidwell, Tawanna Dillahunt, Sane Gaytán, Naveena Karusala, Neha Kumar, Rigoberto Lara Guzmán, Maryam Mustafa, Bonnie Nardi, Lisa Nathan, Nassim Parvin, Beth Patin, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Rebecca Rouse, Katta Spiel, Soraia Silva Prietch, Ding Wang, and Marisol Wong-Villacrés. 2022. “Citational Justice and the Politics of Knowledge Production.” Interactions 29 (5): 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3556549.
- Citational Justice Collective, Amy Ogan, Frederick van Amstel, Gabriela Molina León, Juan Fernando Maestre, Kristin Williams, Nicola J. Bidwell, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Saiph Savage, Sushil Oswal, and Vishal Sharma. 2023. “Why Do We Need to Learn about Citational Practices? Recognizing Knowledge Production from the Global Souths and Beyond.” XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 29 (3): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589256.
- Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). 2022. “Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment.” https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/.
- Coalter, Jodi H. 2023. “Citation Power: Overcoming Marginalization One Citation at a Time.” In Perspectives on Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Libraries, edited by Nandita S. Mani, Michelle A. Cawley, and Emily P. Jones. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7255-2.ch004.
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 2024a. “COPE Position: Editors Requiring Authors to Cite Papers in Their Journal.” https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/editors-requiring-authors-cite-papers-their-journal.
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 2024b. “COPE Position: Handling Citation Manipulation.” https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/handling-citation-manipulation.
- Conference on College Composition and Communication. 2022. “Position Statement on Citation Justice in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies.” https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/citation-justice.
- Craft-Morgan, Sheila. 2024. “Citational Justice: How Librarians Can Improve Equity in Measuring Research Impact.” American Libraries 55 (6): 54. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2024/06/03/citational-justice/.
- Craven, Christa. 2021. “Teaching Antiracist Citational Politics as a Project of Transformation: Lessons from the Cite Black Women Movement for White Feminist Anthropologists.” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 120–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12036.
- Cronin, Blaise, and Cassidy R. Sugimoto, eds. 2015. Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing. Information Today.
- Dadze-Arthur, Abena, and Mary S. Mangai. 2024. “The Journal and the Quest for Epistemic Justice.” Public Administration and Development 44 (4): 326–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2064.
- Davies, Sarah W., Hollie M. Putnam, Tracy Ainsworth, Julia K. Baum, Colleen B. Bove, Sarah C. Crosby, Isabelle M. Côté, Anne Duplouy, Robinson W. Fulweiler, Alyssa J. Griffin, Torrance C. Hanley, Tessa Hill, Adriana Humanes, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Anna Metaxas, Laura M. Parker, Hanny E. Rivera, Nyssa J. Silbiger, Nicola S. Smith, Ana K. Spalding, Nikki Traylor-Knowles, Brooke L. Weigel, Rachel M. Wright, and Amanda E. Bates. 2021. “Promoting Inclusive Metrics of Success and Impact to Dismantle a Discriminatory Reward System in Science.” PLOS Biology 19 (6): e3001282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282.
- Dawson, Emily, Mehita Iqani, and Simon Lock. 2024. “Why Should We Think About Social Justice in Science Communication?” Journal of Science Communication 23 (04): E. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23040501.
- Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). 2012. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” https://sfdora.org/read/.
- D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001.
- Dworkin, Jordan, Perry Zurn, and Danielle S. Bassett. 2020. “(In)citing Action to Realize an Equitable Future.” Neuron 106 (6): 890–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.011.
- Egghe, Leo. 2010. “The Hirsch Index and Related Impact Measures.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 44: 65–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109.
- Else, Holly, and Jeffrey M. Perkel. 2022. “The Giant Plan to Track Diversity in Research Journals.” Nature 602 (7898): 566–70. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.
- Fowler, Marsha. 2020. “Citation Justice.” Nursing Inquiry 27 (1): e12331. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12331.
- Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT), “FORRT’s Citation Politics Toolkit—A Walkthrough,” Posted 2025, by FORTT. YouTube, 18:36. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuQEmrME6uk.
- Garfield, Eugene. 1999. “Journal Impact Factor: A Brief Review.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 161 (8): 979–80. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/161/8/979.short.
- Gingras, Yves. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10719.001.0001.
- Godskesen, Tove, Gert Helgesson, and Stefan Eriksson. 2025. “Implementation, Barriers, and Improvement Strategies for CRediT: A Scoping Review.” Accountability in Research, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2528953.
- Gomez, Charles J., Andew C. Herman, and Paolo Parigi. 2022. “Leading Countries in Global Science Increasingly Receive More Citations Than Other Countries Doing Similar Research.” Nature Human Behaviour 6: 919–29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01351-5.
- Hammarfelt, Björn. 2016. “Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities.” In Research Assessment in the Humanities : Towards Criteria and Procedures, edited by Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4.
- “Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication.” 2019. Helsinki: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Committee for Public Information, Finnish Association for Scholarly Publishing, Universities Norway & European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/.
- Hernigou, Philippe, and Marius M. Scarlat. 2024. “Unlocking Citation Obsession and Academic Identity: The Importance of ORCID Numbers.” International Orthopaedics 48 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06069-1.
- Hicks, Diana, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520 (7548): 429–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a.
- Hirsch, J. E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (46): 16569–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
- Hovland, Ingie, and Britt Halvorson. 2024. “Problems of Citation in the Study of Religion: Who Do We Cite and Why?” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 53 (2): 167–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241245663.
- Huang, Chun-Kai, Cameron Neylon, Lucy Montgomery, Richard Hosking, James P. Diprose, Rebecca N. Handcock, and Katie Wilson. 2024. “Open Access Research Outputs Receive More Diverse Citations.” Scientometrics 129 (2): 825–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0.
- Ibrahim, Hazem, Fengyuan Liu, Yasir Zaki, and Talal Rahwan. 2025. “Citation Manipulation Through Citation Mills and Pre-print Servers.” Scientific Reports 15: Article 5480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88709-7.
- Ioannidis, John P. A. 2015. “A Generalized View of Self-Citation: Direct, Co-Author, Collaborative, and Coercive Induced Self-Citation.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78 (1): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008.
- Itchuaqiyaq, Cana Uluak. 2025. “Citational Checkup for an Antiracist, Justice-Oriented Field.” In The Routledge Handbook of Social Justice in Technical and Professional Communication, edited by Natasha N. Jones, Laura Gonzales, Angela M. Haas, and Miriam F. Williams. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003455158.
- Itchuaqiyaq, Cana Uluak, and Jordan Frith. 2022. “Citational Practices as a Site of Resistance and Radical Pedagogy: Positioning the Multiply Marginalized and Underrepresented (MMU) Scholar Database as an Infrastructural Intervention.” Communication Design Quarterly 10 (3): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3507870.3507872.
- Joshi, Payal B., and Manoj Pandey. 2024. “Deception Through Manipulated Citations and References as a Growing Problem in Scientific Publishing.” In Scientific Publishing Ecosystem: An Author-Editor-Reviewer Axis, edited by Payal B. Joshi, Prathamesh P. Churi, and Manoj Pandey. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4.
- King, Molly M., Carl T. Bergstrom, Shelley J. Correll, Jennifer Jacquet, and Jevin D. West. 2017. “Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-Citation Across Fields and Over Time.” Socius 3: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903.
- Kraemer-Mbula, Erika, Robert Tijssen, Matthew L. Wallace, and Robert McLean. 2020. “Introduction.” In Transforming Research Excellence: New Ideas from the Global South, edited by Erika Kraemer-Mbula, Robert Tijssen, Matthew L. Wallace, and Robert McLean. African Minds. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23441.
- Kumar, Neha, and Naveena Karusala. 2021. “Braving Citational Justice in Human-Computer Interaction.” In CHI EA ‘21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, edited by Yoshifumi Kitamura, Aaron Quigley, Katherine Isbister, and Takeo Igarashi. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450389.
- Kwon, Diana. 2022. “The Rise of Citational Justice.” Nature 603 (7902): 568–71. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00793-1.
- Lancaster, Amber, and Carie S. Tucker King. 2025. “Empowerment Through Authorship Inclusivity: Toward More Equitable and Socially Just Citation Practices.” Communication Design Quarterly 12 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3658438.3658440.
- Larivière, Vincent, David Pontille, and Cassidy R. Sugimoto. 2021. “Investigating the Division of Scientific Labor Using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT).” Quantitative Science Studies 2 (1): 111–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00097.
- Lazarus, Suleman. 2025. “An Autoethnographic Perspective on Scholarly Impact, Citation Politics, and North-South Power Dynamics.” Life Writing 22 (3): 603–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2024.2430666.
- Ledgerwood, Alison, Katherine M. Lawson, Michael W. Kraus, Johanna Ray Vollhardt, Jessica D. Remedios, Dulce Wilkinson Westberg, Ayse K. Uskul, Adeyemi Adetula, Colin Wayne Leach, Joel E. Martinez, Laura P. Naumann, Geetha Reddy, Charlotte Chucky Tate, Andrew R. Todd, Katherine Weltzien, NiCole Buchanan, Roberto González, L. James Montilla Doble, Rainer Romero-Canyas, Erin Westgate, and Linda X. Zou. 2024. “Disrupting Racism and Global Exclusion in Academic Publishing: Recommendations and Resources for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.” Collabra: Psychology 10(1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121394.
- Lenharo, Mariana. 2025. “Breaking Language Barriers: ‘Not Being Fluent in English Is Often Viewed as Being an Inferior Scientist.’” Nature, February 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00157-5.
- Light, Ryan, Aaron Gullickson, and Jill Ann Harrison. 2025. “Inequality in Measuring Scholarly Success: Variation in the h-index Within and Between Disciplines.” PLOS One 20 (1): e0316913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316913.
- Ma, Lai. 2019. “From Metrics to Representation: The Flattened Self in Citation Databases.” Information Research 24 (4): paper colis1927. https://informationr.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1927.html.
- MacLeod, Lorisia. 2021. “More Than Personal Communication: Templates for Citing Indigenous Elders and Knowledge Keepers.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 5 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.135.
- MacRoberts, M. H., and Barbara R. MacRoberts. 1996. “Problems of Citation Analysis.” Scientometrics 36 (3): 435–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129604.
- Maggio, Lauren A., Alyssa Jeffrey, Stefanie Haustein, and Anita Samuel. 2022. “Becoming Metrics Literate: An Analysis of Brief Videos That Teach About the h-index.” PLOS One 17 (5): e0268110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268110.
- Mason, Shannon, and Margaret Merga. 2021. “Less ‘Prestigious’ Journals Can Contain More Diverse Research, by Citing Them We Can Shape a More Just Politics of Citation.” LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/10/11/less-prestigious-journals-can-contain-more-diverse-research-by-citing-them-we-can-shape-a-more-just-politics-of-citation/.
- Mattiazzi, Alicia, and Martin Vila-Petroff. 2024. “Unveiling the Ethical Void: Bias in Reference Citations and Its Academic Ramifications.” Current Research in Physiology 7: 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100130.
- McLeod, Sam. 2021. “Should Authors Cite Sources Suggested by Peer Reviewers? Six Antidotes for Handling Potentially Coercive Reviewer Citation Suggestions.” Learned Publishing 34 (2): 282–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1335.
- Mehregan, Mina, and Mohammad Moghiman. 2024. “The Unnoticed Issue of Coercive Citation Behavior for Authors.” Publishing Research Quarterly 40 (2): 164-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-024-09994-0.
- Miller-Nesbitt, Andrea. 2025. “Citation Justice in STEMM.” McGill University Library. https://libraryguides.mcgill.ca/citation_justice.
- Mills, David, and Toluwase Asubiaro. 2024. “Does the African Academy Need Its Own Citation Index?” Global Africa (7): 115–25. https://doi.org/10.57832/18yw-xv96.
- Moed, Henk F. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7.
- Moher, David, Florian Naudet, Ioana A. Cristea, Frank Miedema, John P. A. Ioannidis, and Steven N. Goodman. 2018. “Assessing Scientists for Hiring, Promotion, and Tenure.” PLOS Biology 16 (3): e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089.
- Mott, Carrie, and Daniel Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation Toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement.’” Gender, Place and Culture 24 (7): 954–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022.
- Moutinho, Sofia. 2024. “Breaking the Glass.” Science 386 (6726): 1087–89. https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.adv0401.
- Muller, Jerry Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.
- Murdie, Amanda. 2018. “We Need a New International Norm: Eradicating the Gender Citation Gap.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 345–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.27.
- Narin, Francis. 1976. Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Computer Horizons.
- Ochsner, Michael. 2021. “Bibliometrics in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences.” In Handbook Bibliometrics, edited by Rafael Ball. De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610.
- Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel, eds. 2016. Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4.
- Okune, Angela. 2019. “Self-Review of Citational Practice.” Zenodo. https://www.researchdatashare.org/content/okune-angela-2019-may-21-self-review-citational-practice-zenodo.
- O’Leary, H., T. Gantzert, A. Mann, E. Z. Mann, N. Bollineni, and M. Nelson. 2024. “Citation as Representation: Gendered Academic Citation Politics Persist in Environmental Studies Publications.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 14 (3): 525–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00928-y.
- Oravec, Jo Ann. 2019. “The ‘Dark Side’ of Academics? Emerging Issues in the Gaming and Manipulation of Metrics in Higher Education.” The Review of Higher Education 42 (3): 859–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0022.
- Orduña-Malea, Enrique, and Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo. 2023. “ChatGPT and the Potential Growing of Ghost Bibliographic References.” Scientometrics 128 (9): 5351–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04804-4.
- Owens, Brian. 2024. “How to Make Academic Hiring Fair: Database Lists Innovative Policies.” Nature, January 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00273-8.
- Patin, Beth, Melinda Sebastian, Jieun Yeon, Danielle Bertolini, and Alexandra Grimm. 2021. “Interrupting Epistemicide: A Practical Framework for Naming, Identifying, and Ending Epistemic Injustice in the Information Professions.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 72 (10): 1306–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24479.
- Poquet, Oleksandra, Srecko Joksimovic, and Pernille Brams. 2024. “The Role of Gender in Citation Practices of Learning Analytics Research.” In LAK ‘24: Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636878.
- Potter, William Gray. 1981. “Introduction.” Library Trends 30 (1): 5–7. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/7138.
- Project TARA. 2024. DORA. https://sfdora.org/project-tara/.
- Quave, Kylie E., and Savannah Hagen Ohbi. 2024. “Teaching and Learning a Joyful Citation Praxis: Affective Relations for Fostering Community Through Our Compositions.” Radical Teacher 128: 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2024.1219.
- Radovic, Ljubisa R. 1996. “Citation Justice.” Chemical & Engineering News, October 28.
- Ray, Keisha S., Perry Zurn, Jordan D. Dworkin, Dani S. Bassett, and David B. Resnik. 2022. “Citation Bias, Diversity, and Ethics.” Accountability in Research 31 (2): 158–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257.
- Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004.
- Rowson, Bethany, Stefan M. Duma, Michael R. King, Igor Efimov, Ann Saterbak, and Naomi C. Chesler. 2021. “Citation Diversity Statement in BMES Journals.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 49 (3): 947–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02739-6.
- Royal Society of Chemistry. 2023. “Joint Commitment for Action on Inclusion and Diversity in Publishing.” https://www.rsc.org/policy-evidence-campaigns/inclusion-diversity/joint-commitment-for-action-inclusion-and-diversity-in-publishing/.
- Rushforth, Alexander, and Björn Hammarfelt. 2023. “The Rise of Responsible Metrics as a Professional Reform Movement: A Collective Action Frames Account.” Quantitative Science Studies 4 (4): 879–97. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00280.
- Santangelo, L. C. 2023. “Reconceptualizing Citation Practices as ‘Feminist Memory.’” Feminist Pedagogy 3 (4): Article 12. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/feministpedagogy/vol3/iss4/12/.
- Sarol, Maria Janina, Shufan Ming, Shruthan Radhakrishna, Jodi Schneider, and Halil Kilicoglu. 2024. “Assessing Citation Integrity in Biomedical Publications: Corpus Annotation and NLP Models.” Bioinformatics 40 (7): btae420. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae420.
- Sauvé, Sarah A., Sara L. Middleton, Helena M. Gellersen, and Flavio Azevedo. 2025. In Pursuit of Citational Justice: A Toolkit for Equitable Scholarship. Framework for Open and Responsible Research Training. https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/qjecy_v2.
- Schmidt, Januschka. 2022. “Whom We Cite: A Reflection on the Limits and Potentials of Critical Citation Practices.” In Diversity, Inclusion, and Decolonization: Practical Tools for Improving Teaching, Research, and Scholarship, edited by Abby Day, Lois Lee, Dave S. P. Thomas, and James Spickard. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2jn920v.18.
- Shi, Julie. 2023. “Articulations of Language and Value(s) in Scholarly Publishing Circuits.” Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 9 (April): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38148.
- Simons, Kai. 2008. “The Misused Impact Factor.” Science 322 (5899): 165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165316.
- Smeyers, Paul, and Nicholas C. Burbules. 2011. “How to Improve Your Impact Factor: Questioning the Quantification of Academic Quality.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00787.x.
- Smith, Christen A. 2021. “An Introduction to Cite Black Women.” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12050.
- Smith, Christen A., and Dominique Garrett-Scott. 2021. “’We Are Not Named’: Black Women and the Politics of Citation in Anthropology.” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12038.
- Smith, Christen A., Erica L. Williams, Imani A. Wadud, Whitney N. L. Pirtle, and The Cite Black Women Collective. 2021. “Cite Black Women: A Critical Praxis (A Statement).” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12040.
- Smith, Linda C. 1976. “Artificial Intelligence in Information Retrieval Systems.” Information Processing & Management 12 (3): 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(76)90005-4.
- Smith, Linda C. 1980. “‘Memex’ as an Image of Potentiality in Information Retrieval Research and Development.” SIGIR ’80: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Butterworth. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/636669.636692.
- Smith, Linda C. 1981. “Citation Analysis.” Library Trends 30 (1): 83–106. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/7149.
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology. 2025. “Guidelines for Promoting Inclusive Citing Practices.” https://spsp.org/professional-development/publishing-resources/resources-for-inclusive-practices/guidelines-for-promoting-inclusive-citing-practices.
- Springshare. n.d. “LibGuides Community.” https://community.libguides.com/.
- Sugimoto, Cassidy R., and Vincent Larivière. 2018. Measuring Research: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
- Sugimoto, Cassidy R., and Vincent Larivière. 2023. Equity for Women in Science: Dismantling Systemic Barriers to Advancement. Harvard University Press.
- Sumner, Jane Lawrence. 2018. “The Gender Balance Assessment Tool (GBAT): A Web-Based Tool for Estimating Gender Balance in Syllabi and Bibliographies.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (2): 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002074.
- Sweetland, James H. 1989. “Errors in Bibliographic Citations: A Continuing Problem.” The Library Quarterly 59 (4): 291–304. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4308405.
- Tahamtan, Iman, and Lutz Bornmann. 2019. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? An Updated Review of Studies on Citations in Scientific Documents Published Between 2006 and 2018.” Scientometrics 121 (3): 1635–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03243-4.
- Taşkın, Zehra. 2025. “Sustaining the ‘Frozen Footprints’ of Scholarly Communication Through Open Citations: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) Paper.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24982.
- Teaching Citational Practice. n.d. General Overview. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/citationalpractice/generaloverview.
- Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. 2024. “The Inaccurate Representation of an Author’s Publishing Name, and Impact on Reference Accuracy.” Scientometrics 129 (5): 2923–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05029-9.
- Thelwall, Mike. 2025. Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation: Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence. University of Sheffield. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.00135.
- Thelwall, Mike, and Maria M. Delgado. 2015. “Arts and Humanities Research Evaluation: No Metrics Please, Just Data.” Journal of Documentation 71 (4): 817–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2015-0028.
- Thelwall, Mike, Kayvan Kousha, Emma Stuart, Meiko Makita, Mahshid Abdoli, Paul Wilson, and Jonathan Levitt. 2023. “In Which Fields Are Citations Indicators of Research Quality?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74 (8): 941–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24767.
- Trueblood, Jennifer S., David B. Allison, Sarahanne M. Field, Ayelet Fishbach, Stefan D. M. Gaillard, Gerd Gigerenzer, William R. Holmes, Stephan Lewandowsky, Dora Matzke, Mary C. Murphy, Sebastian Musslick, Vencislav Popov, Adina L. Roskies, Judith ter Schure, and Andrei R. Teodorescu. 2025. “The Misalignment of Incentives in Academic Publishing and Implications for Journal Reform.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 (5): e2401231121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401231121.
- UNESCO. 2021. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.
- Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2006. “Afterword: Critical Information Studies: A Bibliographic Manifesto.” Cultural Studies 20 (2-3): 292-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500521091.
- Velho, Léa. 1986. “The ‘Meaning’ of Citation in the Context of a Scientifically Peripheral Country.” Scientometrics 9 (1–2): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016609.
- White, Howard D., and Katherine W. McCain. 1998. “Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (4): 327-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4.
- Wilsdon, James, Liz Allen, Eleonora Belfiore, Philip Campbell, Stephen Curry, Steven Hill, Richard Jones, Roger Kain, Simon Richard Kerridge, Mike Thelwall, Jane Tinkler, Ian Viney, Paul Wouters, Jude Hill, and Ben Johnson. 2015. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363.
- Wood, Felicity. 2021. “The Cult of the Quantifiable: The Fetishism of Numbers in Higher Education.” Prometheus 37 (1): 8–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0008.
- Woolston, Chris. 2023. “How to Measure the Societal Impact of Science.” Nature 614: 375–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00345-1.
- Wright, Lori, Neisha Wiley, Elizabeth VanWassenhove, Brandelyn Tosolt, Rae Loftis, and Meg L. Hensley. 2022. “Feminist Citational Praxis and Problems of Practice.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 50 (3/4): 124–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27201442.
- Zurn, Perry, Danielle S. Bassett, and Nicole C. Rust. 2020. “The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, a Way of Life.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24 (9): 669–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009.
- Zurn, Perry, Erin G. Teich, Samantha C. Simon, Jason Z. Kim, and Dani S. Bassett. 2022. “Supporting Academic Equity in Physics Through Citation Diversity.” Communications Physics 5: Article 240. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-022-00999-9.