Résumés
Abstract
The study investigated the effectiveness of using the engineering design process (EDP) to enhance student learning outcomes in a physics course. A mixed-methods approach was used in this study. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group (CG) design was applied for the quantitative phase, while a semi-structured interview was employed for the qualitative phase. The study sample consisted of two classes randomly assigned from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at a technical college, which served as the experimental group (EG) and the other as the CG. Before the intervention, the pretest was administered to both groups. The EDP was implemented in the EG during the intervention, whereas the CG was taught using conventional teaching methods. After the intervention, the posttest was administered to both groups, and a semi-structured interview was conducted with eight students in the EG. The quantitative data were analyzed using independent-samples Mann–Whitney U-tests. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed a statistically significant difference in mean scores between the EG and the CG, indicating that learning physics through the EDP model improved students' physics learning outcomes in the EG. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis revealed that students in the EG perceived EDP as an effective and contextually appropriate approach for learning physics within an engineering context.
Keywords:
- Engineering Design,
- Problem-Solving,
- Physics Learning Outcome,
- Physics Competencies,
- Integrating Approach
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6
- AlOmani, N. H. A. (2023). The role of physics in engineering and modern technology: Historical contributions and contemporary examples. International Journal of Mathematics and Physical Sciences Research, 11(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7948100
- Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Implementation of engineering design process in the k-12 science classrooms: Trends and issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x
- Becker, K., & Mentzer, N. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students’ performance and knowledge. 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 5–12. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7318218/
- Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
- Brand, B. R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: Outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–13.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
- Chiwaridzo, M., Chikasha, T. N., Naidoo, N., Dambi, J. M., Tadyanemhandu, C., Munambah, N., & Chizanga, P. T. (2017). Content validity and test-retest reliability of a low back pain questionnaire in Zimbabwean adolescents. Archives of Physiotherapy, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-017-0031-y
- Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8–38). Teachers College Press.
- Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854.
- Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design(tm) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2
- Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
- National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18802
- Ngo, V. T. (2024). Applying the engineering design process to teach the physics course for engineering students using the flipped classroom combined with an instructional design model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-07-2023-0095
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
- Puchongprawet, P. (2023). Effects of instruction using STEM education emphasized on the engineering design process (EDP) to enhance secondary students’ collaborative problem-solving skills. Journal of Education Studies, 51(1), 45–59.
- Safikhani, S., Sundaram, M., Bao, Y., Mulani, P., & Revicki, D. A. (2013). Qualitative assessment of the content validity of the dermatology life quality index in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 24(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2011.631980
- Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
- Schnittka, C. G., Bell, R. L., & Richards, L. G. (2010). Save the penguins: Teaching the science of heat transfer through engineering design. Science Scope, 34(3), 82–91.
- Serway, R. A., & Vuille, C. (2007). Essentials of college physics. Thomson Brooks/Cole
- Syukri, M., Halim, L., Mohtar, L. E., & Soewarno, S. (2018). The impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’ science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297
- Wolff, K. (2017). Engineering problem-solving knowledge: The impact of context. Journal of Education and Work, 30(8), 840–853.
- Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6