Résumés
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is a transformative technology in education, especially in lesson planning (LP). This research examines pre-service teachers' (PSTs) perceptions of GenAI benefits and ethical risks in LP, with consideration for the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The findings show that PSTs are generally cognizant of the benefits and ethical ramifications of GenAI use. PSTs demonstrated a positive attitude toward integrating GenAI in lesson planning and recognized the relevance and varying levels of incorporation into their current practice. The data also highlighted that the relationship of key TAM variables influenced how PSTs view and adopt GenAI. The findings provided support for the collect construct of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) mediating the relationship between attitude (ATT) and use (AU). These findings contributed relevant information to inform teacher education, illustrating the need for training that balances the practical benefits and ethical dimensions of GenAI. This research can serve as a starting point for future research, curricular design, and policy making regarding the responsible and informed use of GenAI in teacher preparation.
Keywords:
- GenAI,
- Lesson Planning,
- Ethical Risks
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
- Alejandro, I. M. V., Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., & Fernandez, C. B. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education. STEM Education, 5(1), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024024
- Bautista, A., Estrada, C., Jaravata, A. M., Mangaser, L. M., Narag, F., Soquila, R., & Asuncion, R. J. (2024). Preservice Teachers' Readiness towards Integrating AI-Based Tools in Education: A TPACK Approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3
- Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in human behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
- Chen, L., Xiao, S., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Childs, P. R., & Han, J. (2024). An artificial intelligence approach for interpreting creative combinational designs. Journal of Engineering Design, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2377068
- Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
- Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChATGPT: An Exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
- Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
- Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
- Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2021). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
- Hsu, Y., & Ching, Y. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education, Part One: the Dynamic Frontier. TechTrends, 67(4), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9
- Hyde, S. J., Busby, A., & Bonner, R. L. (2024). Tools or fools: Are we educating managers or creating Tool-Dependent robots? Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 48(4), 708–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629241230357
- Istenic, A., Bratko, I., & Rosanda, V. (2021). Are pre‐service teachers disinclined to utilise embodied humanoid social robots in the classroom? British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2340–2358. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13144
- Jaboob, M., Hazaimeh, M., & Al-Ansi, A. M. (2024). Integration of generative AI techniques and applications in student behavior and cognitive achievement in Arab higher education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2300016
- Kaban, A. L., & Ergul, I. B. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of tablets in six EFL classrooms. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series (pp. 284–298). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2104- 5.ch015
- Karpouzis, K., Pantazatos, D., Taouki, J., & Meli, K. (2024). Tailoring education with GenAI: A new horizon in lesson planning. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/educon60312.2024.10578690
- Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
- Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
- Kehoe, F. 2023 Leveraging generative AI tools for enhanced lesson planning in initial teacher education at post primary, Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2):172–182, https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.124
- Klingbeil, A., Grützner, C., & Schreck, P. (2024). Trust and reliance on AI—An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352
- Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328
- Koraishi, O. (2023, May 12). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. https://langedutech.com/letjournal/index.php/let/article/view/48
- Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
- Lee, G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1683–1700. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2024.3401457
- Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
- Matemba, E. D., Li, G., Gogan, I. C. W., & Maiseli, B. J. (2020). Technology acceptance model: recent developments, future directions, and proposal for hypothetical extensions. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 12(4), 315. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtip.2020.109769
- McGrath, C., Farazouli, A., & Cerratto-Pargman, T. (2024). Generative AI chatbots in higher education: a review of an emerging research area. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01288-w
- Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024). Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4
- Ou, S. (2024). Transforming Education: The evolving role of artificial intelligence in the students academic performance. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 13(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.54097/cc1x7r95
- Oveisi, S., Goudarzi, M., & Moein, M. S. (2024). Evaluation and Risk Management Strategies for Developing AI-based Medical Image Products. International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, 7(2), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2024.7.2.2
- Phalaguna, I. B., Kaewsaeng, N. K., & Worabuttara, N. T. (2024). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of AI-Generated English lesson plans for students with Intellectual disabilities. Deleted Journal, 2(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.25078/ijils.v2i2.4251
- Remian, D. (2019). Augmenting education: Ethical considerations for incorporating artificial intelligence in education. ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/instruction_capstone/52/
- Sakamoto, M. A. S. A. N. O. B. U., Tan, S., & Clivaz, S. (2024). Social, cultural and political perspectives of generative AI in teacher education: Lesson planning in Japanese teacher education. Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education, 178.
- Shin, D., Koerber, A., & Lim, J. S. (2024). Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing: How people understand misinformation from generative AI. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241234040
- Stryker, C., & Scapicchio, M. (2024). What is generative AI? IBM.
- Teo, T. (2020). Students and teachers’ intention to use technology: assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117749430
- Van Den Berg, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
- Węcel, K., Sawiński, M., Stróżyna, M., Lewoniewski, W., Księżniak, E., Stolarski, P., & Abramowicz, W. (2023). Artificial intelligence—friend or foe in fake news campaigns. Economics and Business Review/˜the œPoznań University of Economics Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.736
- Yang, S., & Appleget, C. (2024). An exploration of preservice teachers’ perceptions of generative AI: Applying the technological Acceptance Model. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2367573
- Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
- Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7