Résumés
Abstract
This study examined the impact of a teacher professional development (TPD) program on primary school teachers’ skills and self-efficacy in integrated language arts, science, and technology (ILS&T) instruction. The program’s design is based on the four-component instructional-design (4C/ID) model, validated in many areas for developing complex professional skills. Nine teachers from one primary school participated in five TPD group meetings during one school year. The TPD program focused on developing prerequisite skills for ILS&T instruction. Data were collected through lesson observations and interviews to assess teachers’ skills in ILS&T instruction, as well as through a self-efficacy questionnaire. Findings demonstrated varying proficiency levels in the required skills for ILS&T instruction among teachers after the program. This suggests that the program may have provided insufficient support for the development of some, potentially more complex, skills. Although teachers showed an overall increase in self-efficacy, the pre-post-test difference was not statistically significant. There were statistically significant increases in student engagement and instructional strategies subscales. This study discusses the exploratory impact of the TPD program for equipping teachers for ILS&T instruction. A discussion of the findings provides indications for optimizing the program for future large-scale implementation.
Keywords:
- 4C/ID Model,
- Language Arts,
- Science Education,
- Technology Instruction,
- Effectiveness,
- Teacher Efficacy
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
- Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education Horizon Research.
- Bradbury, L. U. (2014). Linking science and language arts: A review of the literature which compares integrated versus non-integrated approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 465-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9368-6
- Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 66.
- Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(4), 193-206.
- Cantrell, S. C., & Hughes, H. K. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802070442
- Carrejo, D. J., & Reinhartz, J. (2012). Exploring the synergy between science literacy and language literacy with English language learners: Lessons learned within a sustained professional development program. SRATE Journal, 21(2), 33-38.
- Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, D. P., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631-658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015
- Choi, S., Kim, N., Choi, S., & Kim, D. (2019). Emphasis manipulation effect in terms of the least-abled sets on cognitive load, transfer, and instructional efficiency. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.228
- Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bagley, E. (2013). Science in writing: Learning scientific argument in principle and practice. E-learning and Digital Media, 10(4), 420-441. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.4.420
- Costa, J. M. (2022). Four-component instructional design (4C/ID) model: A meta-analysis on use and effect. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09373-y
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08331140
- Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum for the twenty-first century. In International handbook of holistic education (pp. 118-128). Routledge.
- Dunning, D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one's own ignorance. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 247-296). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6
- Fishman, E. J., Borko, H., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E., Tseng, A., Million, S., & Berson, E. (2017). A practice-based professional development program to support scientific argumentation from evidence in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 222-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1302727
- Frerejean, J., van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Visscher, A. J. (2021). Ten steps to 4C/ID: training differentiation skills in a professional development program for teachers. Instructional Science, 49(3), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09540-x
- Frerejean, J., Van Strien, J. L. H., Kirschner, P. A., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). Completion strategy or emphasis manipulation? Task support for teaching information problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.048
- Gagné, R. M. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298245
- Gerde, H. K., Pierce, S. J., Lee, K., & van Egeren, L. A. (2018). Early childhood educators’ self-efficacy in science, math, and literacy instruction and science practice in the classroom. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1360127
- Gopher, D. (2006). Emphasis change as a training protocol for high-demand tasks. In A. F. Kramer, D. A. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 209-224). Oxford University Press.
- Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621087
- Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017). Examining elementary teachers’ engineering self-efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12205
- Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 475-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162604
- Heppt, B., Henschel, S., Hardy, I., Hettmannsperger-Lippolt, R., Gabler, K., Sontag, C., Mannel, S., & Stanat, P. (2022). Professional development for language support in science classrooms: Evaluating effects for elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103518
- Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). Ten steps to complex learning: A new approach to instruction and instructional design. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 244-253). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
- Knoef, M. J., Visscher, A. J., van Keulen, H., & Gijsel, M. A. R. (2024). Integrated language and science & technology instruction: A cognitive task analysis of the required teacher expertise. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(8), 883-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2024.2361980
- Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
- Kreutz, J., Leuders, T., & Hellmann, K. (2020). Professionsorientierung in der lehrerbildung: kompetenzorientiertes lehren nach dem 4-component-instructional-design-modell. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
- Magnusson, C. G., Luoto, J. M., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2023). Developing teachers’ literacy scaffolding practices-successes and challenges in a video-based longitudinal professional development intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104274
- Meutstege, K., Van Geel, M., & Visscher, A. (2023). Evidence-based design of a teacher professional development program for differentiated instruction: A whole-task approach. Education Sciences, 13(10), 985. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/10/985
- National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/18290
- Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Kennedy, C. (2017). Comparing two inquiry professional development interventions in science on primary students’ questioning and other inquiry behaviours. Research in Science Education, 47, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9487-5
- Nixon, D., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Building bridges: Using science as a tool to teach reading and writing. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790400200245
- Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20345
- Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459-463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595
- Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2013). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exploring the contribution of integrated curriculum. Routledge.
- Rhodes, M. J., Visscher, A. J., Gijsel, M. A. R., & van Keulen, H. (2024a). Equipping teachers for integrated language, science and technology instruction: The design of a 4C/ID based professional development program. Education Sciences, 14(4), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040411
- Rhodes, M. J., Visscher, A. J., Gijsel, M. A. R., & van Keulen, H. (2024b). The impact of integrated language and science and technology interventions on students learning in elementary education. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 373-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116738
- Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/2626
- Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.1.50-60
- Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Straetmans, G. J. J. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Integrating authentic assessment with competence‐based learning in vocational education: The Protocol Portfolio Scoring. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 60(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820802042438
- Smit, J., Gijsel, M., Hotze, A., & Bakker, A. (2018). Scaffolding primary teachers in designing and enacting language-oriented science lessons: Is handing over to independence a fata morgana? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.006
- Solomon, B. G., Klein, S. A., & Politylo, B. C. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers' treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087518
- Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10040
- Tofel-Grehl, C., & Feldon, D. F. (2013). Cognitive task analysis-based training: A meta-analysis of studies. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7(3), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343412474821
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2006, April). Sources of self-efficacy beliefs: Four professional development models and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
- van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2014). Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 600-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.805300
- Van den Berg, E., & Van Keulen, H. (2011). A science and technology knowledge base for
- primary teachers. In M. de Vries, H. van Keulen, S. Peters, & J. Walma van der Molen (Eds.), Professional development for primary teachers in science and technology (pp. 49-62). Sense Publishers.
- van der Scheer, E. A., & Visscher, A. J. (2016). Effects of an intensive data-based decision making intervention on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.025
- van Driel, S., Slot, E., & Bakker, A. (2018). A primary teacher learning to use scaffolding strategies to support pupils’ scientific language development. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3115
- van Merriënboer, J. J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Educational Technology Publications.
- van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). The four-component instructional design model: An overview of its main design principles. Maastricht University. M. a. L. S. School of Health Professions Education Faculty of Health, Maastricht University.
- van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Routledge.
- van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2
- Wildeman, E., Koopman, M., & Beijaard, D. (2023). Content and language integrated learning in technical vocational education: Teachers’ practical knowledge and teaching behaviour. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(3), 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1899269
- Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007