Résumés
Abstract
Science education scholars agree that it is important for teachers to be prepared to teach science as more than facts and information. Part of this preparation is understanding the nature, history, and philosophy of science and its impact on scientific knowledge. However, research has shown that science teachers are often unfamiliar with the ideas underpinning their discipline. To investigate teachers’ preparation, this study presents the results of an environmental scan of secondary science-education programs across Canada, with respect to the inclusion of the nature, history, and philosophy of science in their course descriptions. Using pedagogical content knowledge as a framework, the exposure of future Canadian secondary-science teachers to the nature, history, and philosophy of science in their content and pedagogical content courses is described. The implications of the lack of inclusion of the nature, history, and philosophy of science in the course descriptions of secondary science teacher education programs are discussed.
Keywords:
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge,
- Science Education,
- Science Content Knowledge
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abd-El-Khalick F., & Lederman N. G. (2000), Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
- Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: Perspectives and resources. Ships Education Press.
- Barak, M., Yachin, T., & Erduran, S. (2023). Tracing preservice teachers’ understanding of nature of science through their drawings and writing. Research in Science Education, 53(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10069-3
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Bugingo, J.B., Yadav, L.L., Mugisha, I.S., & Mashood, K.K. (2024). Improving teachers’ and students’ views on nature of science through active instructional approaches: A review of the literature. Sci & Educ, 33, 29–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00382-8
- Clough, M.P. (2018). Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Science & Education, 27, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0
- Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
- Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes, K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.
- Crocker, R., & Dibbon, D. (2008). Teacher education in Canada: A baseline study. Canadian Electronic Library. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/8m3cc7
- Desjardins, J., & Thomas, L. (2015). Initial teacher education in Québec. In T. Falkenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Canadian research in initial teacher education (pp. 39–60). Canadian Association for Teacher Education.
- Dolphin, G. R., & Tillotson, J. W. (2015). “Uncentering” teacher beliefs: The expressed epistemologies of secondary science teachers and how they relate to teacher practice. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 21–38. https://doi./org/10.12973/ijese.2015.228a
- Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Springer.
- Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2018). Drawing nature of science in pre-service science teacher education: Epistemic insight through visual representations. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9773-0
- Erumit, B. A., & Yuksel, T. (2023). Developing and using physical dynamic models on socioscientific issues to present nature of science ideas. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10296-0
- Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. Teachers College Press.
- Gruno, J., & Gibbons, S. (2022). Types of outdoor education programs for adolescents in British Columbia: An environmental scan. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-021-00090-x
- Hanuscin, D. (2013). Critical incidents in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science: A prospective elementary teacher’s journey. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9341-4
- Hanuscin D. L., Lee M. H. & Akerson V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95, 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20404
- Hodges, B. D., Albert, M., Arweiler, D., Akseer, S., Bandiera, G., Byrne, N., Charlin, B., Karazivan, P., Kuper, A., Maniate, J., Millette, B., Noyeau, E., Parker, S., & Reeves, S. (2011). The future of medical education: A Canadian environmental scan. Medical Education, 45(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03737.x
- Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
- Kurup, R. (2014). The relationship between science teachers’ understandings of the nature of science and their classroom practices. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.889791
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Kluwer Academic.
- Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J, 3, 33501–33514. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
- McComas, W.F. (2020). Considering a consensus view of nature of science content for school science purposes. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 23–34). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6
- McComas, W.F., & Clough, M.P. (2020). Nature of science in science instruction: Meaning, advocacy, rationales, and recommendations. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–22). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6
- McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Nouri, N. (2020). Nature of science and classroom practice: A review of the literature with implications for effective NOS instruction. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 67-111). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6
- McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20377
- McGill University. (2025). Course catalogue. McGill University. https://coursecatalogue.mcgill.ca/en/undergraduate/education/integrated-studies-education/secondary-science-technology-bed/
- McPeck, J. (1984). Stalking beasts, but swatting flies: The teaching of critical thinking. Canadian Journal of Education, 9(1), 28–44.
- Milanovic, V. D., & Trivic, D. D. (2021). Chemistry teachers’ views on the nature of science and history and philosophy of science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1971051
- Milford, T., & Tippett, C. (2019). Setting the scene for a meso-¬level analysis of Canadian science education. In C. Tippett & T. Milford (Eds.), Science education in Canada: Consistencies, commonalities, and distinctions (pp. 1–13). Springer Netherlands.
- Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2012). Views about learning physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9291-2
- Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012
- Neumann, K., Kind, V., & Harms, U. (2019). Probing the amalgam: The relationship between science teachers’ content, pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1497217
- Nouri, N., Saberi, M., McComas, W. F., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Proposed teacher competencies to support effective nature of science instruction: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
- Olson, J. K., Tippett, C. D., Milford, T. M., Ohana, C., & Clough, M. P. (2015). Science teacher preparation in a North American context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9417-9
- Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty first-century: Informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
- Pérez, B. C., & Díaz-Moreno, N. (2022). Promoting pre-service primary teachers’ development of NOSI through specific immersion and reflection. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11795
- Rahm, J., Potvin, P., & Vazquez-Abad, J. (2019). Science education in Québec: La science et la technologie pour tous. In C. Tippett & T. Milford (Eds.), Science education in Canada: Consistencies, commonalities, and distinctions (pp. 129–150). Springer Netherlands.
- Russel, T., & Martin, A. (2023). Learning to teach science. In N. Lederman, D. Zeidler, & J. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume III (pp. 1162–1196). Routledge.
- Schwab, J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. University of Chicago Press.
- Schwartz, R. (2024). Why teach NoS? Combatting science denial and mistrust. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.712
- Şen, M., Demirdöğen, B., & Öztekin, C. (2022). Interactions among topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge components for science teachers: The impact of content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(8), 860–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2012630
- Sengul, O., Enderle, P. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (2020). Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: Linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1068–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748250
- Shaw, B. (1903). Maxims for revolutionists. In L. S. Shulman (1986), Man and Superman. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Tippett, C., & Milford, T. (2017). Canada: An overview of secondary science. In J. Pedersen, T. Isozaki, & T. Horano (Eds.), Model science teacher preparation programs: An international comparison of what works (pp. 163–184). Information Age Publishing.
- Tippett, C., & Milford, T. (2019). Science education in Canada: Consistencies, commonalities, and distinctions. Springer Netherlands.
- University of Alberta. (2025). Course catalogue. University of Alberta. https://apps.ualberta.ca/catalogue/course/hist/294
- University of Regina. (2025). Detailed course information. University of Regina. https://banner.uregina.ca:17023/ssbprod/bwckctlg.p_disp_course_detail?cat_term_in=202520&subj_code_in=ESCI&crse_numb_in=350
- University of Winnipeg. (2025). All course descriptions. University of Winnipeg. https://www.uwinnipeg.ca/academics/calendar/docs/all-course-descriptions.pdf
- Voss, S., Kent-Schneider, I., Kruse, J., & Daemicke, R. (2023). Investigating the development of preservice science teachers’ nature of science instructional views across rings of the family resemblance approach wheel. Science & Education, 32(5), 1363–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00418-7
- Wabeh, N. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852
- Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J., & Weisberg, M. (2021). Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700
- Yavuz, A. (2014). Do students trust in mathematics or intuition during physics problem solving? An epistemic game perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a
- Zetterqvist, A., & Bach, F. (2023). Epistemic knowledge–a vital part of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 45(6), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2166372