Résumés
Abstract
This reflective article describes an initiative that created a publicly accessible e-book comprised of digital media (podcast, video, web essay) research assignments produced by Bachelor of Education students at a Canadian university. A teacher- education instructor and a learning specialist designed and undertook the project collaboratively. The article is written as a conversation that moves between our two perspectives on the project. We share the project as an innovative model that encourages students, particularly suited for those in professional programs or graduate studies, to produce assignments that contribute to the scholarly body of knowledge on a given subject.
Keywords:
- Open Publishing,
- Student Research Projects,
- Reflective Practice
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aguti, B., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2014). Effective use of e-learning technologies to promote student-centered learning paradigms within higher education institutions. International Journal for e-Learning Security, 4(3/4), 391-398.
- Bowen, E. R. (2003). Student engagement and its relation to quality work design: A review of the literature. Action Research Exchange, 2(1), 1-13.
- Britt, L. L., Ball, T. C., Whitfield, T. S., & Woo, C. W. (2022). Students’ Perception of the Classroom Environment: A Comparison between Innovative and Traditional Classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.30735
- Cheng, Z., Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., & Janakiraman, S. (2020). Attitudinal learning in large-enrollment classrooms: A case study. TechTrends, 64(1), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00462-7
- Chong, S. (2011). Developing student teachers’ professional identities: An exploratory study. International Education Studies, 4(1), 30-38.
- DeRosa, R., & Jhangiani, R. (2017). Open pedagogy. Pressbooks. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://press.rebus.community/makingopentextbookswithstudents/chapter/open-pedagogy/
- Friend, C. (2024). Student-authored textbooks: Challenging expertise, establishing authority, shaping discourse. Composition Studies, 52(2), 29-49. https://compstudiesjournal.com/current-issue-fall-2024-52-2/
- Gibson J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
- Hawley, R., & Allen, C. (2018). Student-generated video creation for assessment: Can it transform assessment in higher education? International Journal for Transformative Research, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijtr-2018-0001
- Hendricks, C., Reinsberg, S. A., & Rieger, G. W. (2017). The adoption of an open textbook in a large physics course: An analysis of cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3006
- Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Learning and instruction in the digital age. In M. J. Spector, P. Isaías, D. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, & Kinshuk (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 3–10). Springer US.
- Jhangiani, R. S., & Derosa, R. (2017). Open pedagogy. In E. Mays (Ed.), A guide to making open textbooks with students. Rebus Community. Pressbooks. https://press.rebus.community/makingopentextbookswithstudents/chapter/open-pedagogy/
- Katz, S., & Van Allen, J. (2020). Evolving into the open: A framework for collaborative design of renewable assignments. In K. D. Hoffman & A. Clifton (Eds.), Open pedagogy approaches: Faculty, library and student collaborators. Pressbooks. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/openpedagogyapproaches/chapter/evolving-into-the-open-a-framework-for-collaborative-design-of-renewable-assignments/
- Keller, J. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Retrieved Feb.17, 2003, from http://www.netg.com/research/whitepapers/kellerwp.asp
- McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 309–231. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1136
- Moodle. (2024, November 30). H5P. Retrieved March 27, 2025, from https://docs.moodle.org/405/en/H5P
- Mossop, L. (2014). The curse of the teenage learner. Medical Education, 48(3), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12405
- Norman D. A. (2002). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
- Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. MIT Press.
- Reeve, J., & Shin, S. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451
- Reeve, J., Matos, L., Jang, H., & Gargurevich, R. (2022). When students show some initiative: Two experiments on the benefits of greater agentic engagement. Learning & Instruction, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101564
- Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education & Learning, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
- Stachoviak, B. (Host). (2021, September 30). How to use podcasts in teaching with Barb Honeycutt (No. 381) [Audio podcast episode]. In Teaching in Higher Ed. Innovate Learning, LLC. https://teachinginhighered.com/podcast/how-to-use-podcasts-in-teaching/
- Sumara, D. J., & Luce-Kapler, R. (1996). (Un)becoming a teacher: Negotiating identities while learning to teach. Canadian Journal of Education, 21(1), 65–83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1495065
- Vanner, C. (2022b). EDUC 5202: Foundations of practice part II: Classroom practice. University of Windsor.
- Vanner, C. (Ed.). (2022a). Classroom practice in 2022. Pressbooks. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/educ5202/
- Vaz de Carvalho, C., & Bauters, M. (2021). Technology to support active learning in higher education. In C. Vaz de Carvalho & M. Bauters, Technology supported active learning: Student-centered approaches (pp. 1-11). Springer Singapore.
- Wiley, D. (2013). What is open pedagogy? Improving Learning. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975
- Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J.L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601