Résumés
Abstract
In contemporary higher education, the master's level plays a critical role in developing high-level professionals, particularly among Generation-Z students. This stage is marked by significant psychological, social, and professional development, requiring innovative educational strategies that align with the unique traits of this digital-native cohort. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as adaptive-learning systems, intelligent tutoring, and automated-feedback mechanisms, offers transformative potential to address these needs. This study investigates the intersection of generational characteristics and AI integration in master's education through a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews of 300 master's students across various disciplines. The findings reveal predominantly positive attitudes toward AI, with 78% of students recognizing its ability to enhance personalized learning and engagement. However, concerns about data privacy (54%) and reduced human interaction (48%) highlight the need for an ethical and balanced implementation. Grounded in constructivist and activity theories, this research underscores the potential of AI to foster autonomy, self-determination, and personalized educational experiences while addressing generational expectations for immediacy and interactivity. Practical recommendations are provided for educators and policymakers to implement AI effectively, ensuring that it supplements human-centred teaching practices. These insights contribute to the global discourse on AI integration in higher education, and its implications for enhancing lifelong learning and professional growth.
Keywords:
- Professional Development,
- AI,
- Generational Characteristics,
- Graduate Education
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alfredo, R. et al. (2024). Human-centered learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
- Ali, M., Wafik, H.M.A., Mahbub, S., Das, J. (2024). Gen Z and generative AI: Shaping the future of learning and creativity. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i10.001
- Ardelean, T., Edit, V. (2023). Students' perceptions of artificial intelligence in higher education. Proceedings of 10th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2023. 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2023/s08.38.
- Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bui, H.P. (2024). Applied linguistics and language education research methods. IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2603-9.ch005
- Chaika, O. (2023). Role of AI in higher education. Youth & market. Молодь і ринок. http://dx.doi.org/10.24919/2617-0825.6/214.2023
- Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
- Dimock, M. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. PEW Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins
- Dulundu, A. (2024). AI in education: Benefits and concerns. Next Generation Journal for The Young Researchers, 8, 81. https://doi.org/10.62802/3fr4f412
- Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830140209
- Gallagher, K. (2023). Measurement and management: Quantitative data and its presentation. Business Trove. https://www.oxfordbusinesstrove.com/view/10.1093/hebz/9780198809883.001.0001/isbn-9780198809883-book-part-10
- Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
- Ivaniuk, H., Venhlovska, O., Antypin, Y., Vovchok, Y. (2020). Self-development as a factor in the professional growth of future teachers. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(4), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i4.2873
- Jackson, K. (2024). Unlocking Learning Potential With Universal Design in Online Learning Environments. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1269-8.ch004
- Jagadeesan, S., Rao, K., Shamim, M., Otero-Potosi, S., Fuertes-Narváez, E., Rao, A. (2023). AI in education: The potential impact of intelligent tutoring systems and personalized learning. European Chemical Bulletin, 12, 1964-1975. https://doi.org/10.31838/ecb/2023.12.s1-B.193
- Kennedy, B. (2023). Bridging theory, research, and practice to address education dilemmas, Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10914.40647
- Lavigne, A., Good, T. (2019). Enhancing teacher education, development, and evaluation: Lessons learned from educational reform (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630892
- Leontyev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
- Maher, J.K. (2023). Personalized learning through AI. Advances in Engineering Innovation, 5(1), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-3903/5/2023039
- Mardiah, H., Nissa, K. (2024). Generation Z students’ perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI) technology in English language learning. New Language Dimensions, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.26740/nld.v5n1.p1-11
- Mimoudi, A. (2024). AI, personalized education, and challenges. International Conference on AI Research, 4, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3133
- Mousavi A., Mares C., Stonham T. (2015). Continuous feedback loop for adaptive teaching and learning process using student surveys. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 43(4), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419015606618
- Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M.D., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., Hosseini, S. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21. https://doi.org/10.53761/caraaq92
- Niemi, H. (2024). AI in education and learning: Perspectives on the education ecosystem. In M. Streit-Bianchi, & V. Gorini (Eds.), New frontiers in science in the era of AI. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61187-2_11
- Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). W W Norton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
- Seemiller, C., Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.
- Singh, E., Vasishta, P., Singla, A. (2024). AI-enhanced education: Exploring the impact of AI literacy on generation Z's academic performance in Northern India. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0037
- Unger, S., Ongena, Y., Koole, T. (2024). Expanded and non-conforming answers in standardized survey interviews. Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Discourse Communication Studies, 45(1), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2022-0157
- Velasco, M.S., Villanueva, J.C.V., Guerrero, M.R. (2022). Graduate students’ motivational factors and educational performance in pursuance of higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2022.1.2.8
- Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S. (2020). Radical flexibility and relationality as responses to education in times of crisis. Postdigit Sci Educ 2, 849–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00196-3
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4