Résumés
Abstract
The intricate nature of socio-scientific issues has gained traction among researchers in recent decades. This study explores educational research focused on socio-scientific issues over the last 21 years (2002-2023) using the bibliometric method. The analysis of 350 Scopus-indexed articles was conducted, examining publication trends, influential contributors, and research trajectories through citation, co-occurrence, and co-citation analyses. Co-citation analysis reveals a complex intellectual structure within the field, with a dominant cluster of influential authors and several smaller, specialized research communities emerging. Analysis revealed that the major themes discussed by the examined articles include the nature of science, climate-change decision-making, and education for sustainability, which are crucial in addressing contemporary challenges in education and society. This study highlights the significance of fostering interdisciplinary cooperation and integration of technological aspects into future research. It also identifies the necessity of addressing gaps in research resources, improving knowledge accessibility, and strengthening international collaborations for the field's advancement.
Keywords:
- Socio-Scientific Issues,
- Educational Research,
- Bibliometric Analysis
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- A framework for K-12 science education. (2012). In A Framework for K-12 Science Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
- Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
- Badeo, J. M., & Duque, D. A. (2022). The effect of socio-scientific issues (SSI) in teaching science: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1340
- Ban, S., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2023). Research and trends in socio-scientific issues education: A content analysis of journal publications from 2004 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(15), 11841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511841
- Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3
- Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
- Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<444::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-J
- Ben-Horin, H., Kali, Y., & Tal, T. (2023). The fifth dimension in socio-scientific reasoning: Promoting decision-making about socio-scientific issues in a community. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129708
- Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
- Chowdhury, T. B. M., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2020). Socioscientific issues within science education and their role in promoting the desired citizenry. Science Education International, 31(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.10
- Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
- Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
- Dede, E., & Ozdemir, E. (2022). Mapping and performance evaluation of mathematics education research in Turkey: A bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2021. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202216829
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Ebrahim, N. A., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Tanha, F. H., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), p93. https://doi.org/10.5539/IES.V6N11P93
- Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development - justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a
- Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Osborne, J. (2012). “Should we kill the grey squirrels?” A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
- Evren-Yapicioglu, A. (2018). Advantages and Disadvantages of Socioscientific Issue-Based Instruction in Science Classrooms. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 361–374.
- Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students’ meaning-making of socioscientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617
- Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744595
- Gunasekaran, D., Kumar, A. G., & A., N. (2022). Multicultural education in India: A historical exploration. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies, 17(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-008X/CGP/v17i02/75-82
- Haddow, G., & Genoni, P. (2010). Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals. Scientometrics, 85(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0198-4
- Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science and Education, 28(6–7), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
- Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
- Ignatow, G., & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information Communication and Society, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519
- Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues. Learning and Instruction, 34, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.004
- Jan van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual.
- José de Oliveira, O., Francisco da Silva, F., Juliani, F., César Ferreira Motta Barbosa, L., & Vieira Nunhes, T. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the development of scientific projects. In Scientometrics Recent Advances. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856
- Jukola, P. (2007). Education+: Creativity and multidisciplinary skills. International Astronautical Federation - 58th International Astronautical Congress 2007, 12.
- Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of socioscientific reasoning. Science and Education, 28(6–7), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
- Kavitha, K., & Joshith, V. P. (2024). The transformative trajectory of artificial intelligence in education: The two decades of bibliometric retrospect. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 376–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241231815
- Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science and Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
- Khotinets, V. Yu., & Shishova, E. O. (2023). Cultural and educational environment in the development of younger schoolchildren’s creative potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178535
- Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. In The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350
- Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765
- Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163320
- Li, Y., & Guo, M. (2021). Scientific literacy in communicating science and socio-scientific issues: Prospects and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000
- Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114760
- López-Fernández, M. D. M., González-García, F., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2022). How can socio-scientific issues help develop critical thinking in chemistry education? A reflection on the problem of plastics. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3435–3442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00223
- Mariotti, C. (2022). Elite theory. In A. & F. C. S. & B. A. S. Harris Phil & Bitonti (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of interest groups, lobbying and public affairs (pp. 427–432). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44556-0_67
- Meisner, R., vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., Burch, A., Gammon, B., & Reisman, M. (2007). Exhibiting performance: Co‐participation in science centres and museums. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1531–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701494050
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSU.2010.02.007
- Molinatti, G., Girault, Y., & Hammond, C. (2010). High school students debate the use of embryonic stem cells: The influence of context on decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2235–2251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003622612
- Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
- National Science Education Standards. (1996). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962
- Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
- Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Özcan, E., & Balım, A. G. (2021). The effect of socio-scientific argumentation method on students’ entrepreneurship perceptions. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.18.8.1
- Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
- Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2005). Science education for citizenship : Teaching socio-scientific issues. British Educational Research Journal, 31(6).
- Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). Structure and development of science communication research: Co-citation analysis of a developing field. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030207
- Rossini, P. (2024). Networks as interpretative frameworks: Using co-citation analysis to explore large corpora of early modern letters. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad086
- Sadler, T. D. (2004a). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Sadler, T. D. (2011a). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1
- Sadler, T. D. (2011b). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_20
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-006-9030-9/FIGURES/3
- Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.20023
- Schenk, L., Hamza, K., Arvanitis, L., Lundegård, I., Wojcik, A., & Haglund, K. (2021). Socioscientific issues in science education: An opportunity to incorporate education about risk and risk analysis? Risk Analysis, 41(12), 2209–2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13737
- Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9141-x
- Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649
- Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A. & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
- Tang, K.-Y., Lin, T.-C., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2024). Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: Insights and extensions from a co-word analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 46(11), 1073–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2272603
- Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
- Tomas, L., Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Students’ regulation of their emotions in a science classroom. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach, 53(2), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21304
- Tomaszewski, R. (2023). Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis. Scientometrics, 128(7), 4007–4028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04725-2
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument (Issue 130). Cambridge University Press.
- Van Raan, A. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. TATuP - Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.12.1.20
- Wei, F., & Zhang, G. (2020). A document co-citation analysis method for investigating emerging trends and new developments: A case of twenty-four leading business journals. Information Research, 25(1).
- Wheeler, J., Pham, N. M., Arlitsch, K., & Shanks, J. D. (2022). Impact factions: Assessing the citation impact of different types of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 127(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04467-7
- Wirzal, M. D. H., Nordin, N. A. H. M., Bustam, M. A., & Joselevich, M. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of research on scientific literacy between 2018 and 2022: Science education subject. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1070
- Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2022). The effect of citation behaviour on knowledge diffusion and intellectual structure. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101225
- Zakaria, R., Ahmi, A., Ahmad, A. H., & Othman, Z. (2021). Worldwide melatonin research: A bibliometric analysis of the published literature between 2015 and 2019. Chronobiology International, 38(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1838534
- Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404
- Zeidler, D. (2015). Socioscientific issues. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 998–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_314
- Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009a). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20281
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
- Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1094428114562629,18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629