Résumés
Abstract
This reflection explores the design and implementation of cultural learning portfolios as alternative assessments in undergraduate language courses. Responding to tensions between traditional assessment practices and the complex, lived nature of language-and-culture learning, we replaced standardized tests and essays with reflective, multimodal portfolios. These portfolios allowed students to engage with cultural experiences of their choosing and demonstrate growth through multilingual and cross-cultural reflection. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from relational and participatory pedagogy (Gachago et al., 2022) and plurilingual assessment (Bonvino & Cortés Velásquez, 2024), we illustrate how portfolios reposition students as co-constructors of knowledge. Through survey data (Likert-scale and open-ended questions) and interviews with students in Arabic, German, Italian, and Spanish courses, we reflect on how this assessment model reshaped our understanding of what meaningful assessment can look like in language education. Rather than offering a prescriptive model, we share insights from our experience. Both the successes and challenges invite continued dialogue about assessment as a relational, reflective, evolving practice.
Keywords:
- alternative assessment,
- language learning,
- cultural portfolio,
- plurilingualism,
- intercultural competence
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Bonvino, E., & Cortés Velásquez, D. (2024). Plurilingual assessment. In C. Fäcke, X. A. Gao, & P. Garrett-Rucks (Eds.), The handbook of plurilingual and intercultural language learning (pp. 349–364). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
- Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
- CAST. (2024). The UDL guidelines, version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Din, C., Alharbi H., MacInnis M., Mardjetko, A., Archer-Kuhn, B., Jamniczky, H., & Jacobsen, M. (2022). Leadership, SoTL, and mentorship in a teaching scholars community of practice. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 5, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/pplt.v5Y2022.73283
- Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
- Gachago, D., Bali, M., & Pallitt, N. (2023). Compassionate learning design as a critical approach to instructional design. In J. Quinn, M. Burtis, & S. Jhangiani (Eds.), Toward a critical instructional design. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://pressbooks.pub/criticalinstructionaldesign/
- López-Crespo, G., Blanco-Gandía, M. C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Fidalgo, C., & Sánchez-Pérez, N. (2022). The educational e-portfolio: Preliminary evidence of its relationship with students’ self-efficacy and engagement. Education and information technologies, 27(4), 5233–5248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10827-2
- Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Curry.
- Su, Y.-C. (2011). The effects of the cultural portfolio project on cultural and EFL learning in Taiwan’s EFL college classes. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388721
- Yeo, M., Miller-Young, J., & Manarin, K. (2024). SoTL research methodologies: A guide to conceptualizing and conducting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447054
- Zapata, G. C. (2019). L2 Spanish university students’ perceptions of the pedagogical benefits of culture portfolios. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1457682
- Ziegler, N. A. (2014). Fostering self‐regulated learning through the European language portfolio: An embedded mixed methods study. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12147

