Résumés
Abstract
This study focused on procedures for creating, testing, and developing a set of reusable online resources for use in English for academic purposes programmes. The aim of the materials was to help migrants and refugees develop the linguistic and cultural skills, knowledge, and understanding they would need to engage, interact, and collaborate effectively in a multicultural context. Development of the materials involved an iterative process using a three-stage approach:
1. Expert review: Experts in relevant fields worked through the first version of the materials and providedcritical feedback, which guided initial revisions.
2. Usability testing groups: Small groups of target users (students and teachers) used the revised materialsin workshop settings, and data were gathered from observations, interviews, and written comments.
3. Wider evaluation: Larger-scale use and evaluation of the materials (which is ongoing, beyond the scopeof this paper).
This article reports on the second stage.
Keywords:
- usability testing,
- language and culture,
- EAP,
- OER,
- open educational resource,
- English for academic purposes
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Barnum, C. M. (2020). Usability testing essentials: Ready, set ... test! (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
- Borthwick, K., & Gallagher-Brett, A. (2014). “Inspiration, ideas, encouragement”: Teacher development and improved use of technology in language teaching through open educational practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818560
- Brook, J. (2011). The affordances of YouTube for language learning and teaching. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 9(1, 2), 37–56. https://hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/2011/9_1-2_Brook.pdf
- Burrows, K. M., Staley, K., & Burrows, M. (2022). The potential of open educational resources for English language teaching and learning: From selection to adaptation. English Teaching Forum, 60(2), 2–9. https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/60_2_pg02-09_cx2_corrected.pdf
- Chang, H., Windeatt, S., & Stockwell, E. (2025). Communication across cultures. University of Southern Queensland. https://usq.pressbooks.pub/interculturalcommunication/
- Doubleday, E. G., O’Loughlin, V. D., & Doubleday, A. F. (2011). The virtual anatomy laboratory: Usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 4(6), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.252
- Dumas, J. S., & Redish, G. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing (rev. ed.). Intellect Books.
- Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024) Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y
- Kessler, G., & Plakans, L. (2001). Incorporating ESOL learners’ feedback and usability testing in instructor-developed CALL materials. TESOL Journal, 10(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2001.tb00012.x
- Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
- Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118482070
- Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T.K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of the INTERCH93: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Netherlands, 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.16916
- Olivier, J. (2019) Towards a multiliteracies framework in support of self- directed learning through open educational resources. In E. Mentz, J. de Beer, & R. Bailey (Eds.), Self-directed learning for the 21st century: Implications for higher education (pp. 167–201). AOSIS Scholarly Books. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.BK134.06
- Rubin. J., & Chisnell., D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-571931-cbc66f3178.pdf
- Sanders, J., & Lafferty, N. (2010). Twelve tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 956–960. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.507709
- Sugar, W. (1999). Novice designers’ myths about usability sessions: Guidelines to implementing user-centered design principles. Education Technology, 36(6), 40–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428569
- Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
- UNESCO. (2019, November 25). Recommendation on open educational resources (OER). UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer
- Weller, M. (2010). Big and little OER. In Open Ed 2010 Proceedings. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Open Universiteit Nederland, & Brigham Young University. https://hdl.handle.net/10609/4851
- Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L., III. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601