Résumés
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to investigate the concern developments of first-time distance education instructors using the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM). This study used stages of concern (SoC), a component of CBAM, as its theoretical framework. A descriptive case study was implemented, which focused on the adaptation processes of nine instructors lecturing for the first time via distance education. The instructors attended a two-day training, which was designed based on their initial concerns. Then instructors implemented their courses for four weeks via distance education. While the informational and personal stages (self-concerns) decreased compared to the initial findings, the consequence stage increased in intensity. However, self-concerns remained predominant in the process despite the reduction in self-concerns and increase in the consequence stage. Based on the findings, the implications for distance education and recommendations for addressing the instructors’ concerns are discussed. Recommendations for alleviating the concerns of first-time distance education instructors include: the provision of ongoing concern-based interventions that incorporate technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge; providing working examples related to distance education from which instructors can learn vicariously; and encouraging collaboration among instructors.
Keywords:
- stages of concern,
- distance education,
- distance education adoption,
- instructors' concerns,
- concerns-based adoption model
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Almarashdeh, I. (2016). Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.013
- Al-rawajfih, K., Fook, F. S., & Idros, S. N. S. (2010). Stages of concern in integrating e-learning in discovery schools. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 54-63. doi: 10.5539/ass.v6n8p54
- Baltacı-Göktalay, Ş. (2006). Identification and resolution of concerns regarding adoption of online technologies: Challenges facing higher education in a developing country-TURKEY (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 3233089).
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Bawane, J., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383-397. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236536
- Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 21-29. doi: 10.1080/08923649009526701
- Berge, Z. L. (1995). The role of the online instructor/facilitator. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22-30. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238348806_The_Role_of_the_Online_InstructorFacilitator
- Berigel, M. (2013). Öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitim ortamlarına uyum süreçlerinin incelenmesi [Investigating adoption of instructors to distance education environment] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from YÖK TEZ. (Order No. 344510).
- Borgerding, L., Sadler, T., & Koroly, M. (2013). Teachers’ concerns about biotechnology education. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 22(2), 133-147. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z
- Carr-Chellman, A., & Duchastel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 229-241. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00154
- Casey, H. B., & Rakes, G. C. (2002). An analysis of the influence of technology training on teacher stages of concern regarding the use of instructional technology in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 124-132. doi: 10.1080/10402454.2002.10784448
- Conrad, D. (2004). University instructors’ reflections on their first online teaching experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(2), 31-44. Retrieved from http://docushare3.dcc.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Version-9844/FacultyReflectionsTeachingOnline.pdf
- Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
- Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
- Dunn, K. E., & Rakes, G. C. (2010). Learner-centeredness and teacher efficacy: Predicting teachers’ consequence concerns regarding the use of technology in the classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 57-83. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29376/
- Egan, T. M., & Akdere, M. (2005). Clarifying distance education roles and competencies: Exploring similarities and differences between professional and student-practitioner perspectives. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 87-103. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_3
- Erlich, Z., Erlich-Philip, I., & Gal-Ezer, J. (2005). Skills required for participating in CMC courses: An empirical study. Computers and Education, 44(4), 477-487. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.010
- Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295-311. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
- Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 487-496. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00009-8
- George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: SEDL.
- Hall, G. E. (1976). The study of individual teacher and professor concerns about innovations. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 22-23. doi: 10.1177/002248717602700106
- Hall, G. E., & George, A. A. (1979). Stages of concern about the innovation: The concept, initial verification, and some implications. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED187716
- Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED147342
- Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2014). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hardy, J. V. (1999). Teacher attitudes toward and knowledge of computer technology. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 14(3-4), 119-136. doi: 10.1300/J025v14n03_11
- Khoboli, B., & O’toole, J. (2012). The concerns-based adoption model: Teachers’ participation in action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 25(2), 137-148. doi: 10.1007/s11213-011-9214-8
- Lochner, B., Conrad, R.-M., & Graham, E. (2015). Secondary teachers’ concerns in adopting learning management systems: A U.S. perspective. TechTrends, 59(5), 62-70. doi: 10.1007/s11528-015-0892-4
- Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231-252. doi: 10.1080/01587910802395771
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Newlove, B. W., & Hall, G. E. (1976). A manual for assessing open-ended statements of concern about an innovation. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED144207
- Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Shamoail, E. (2005). Teachers’ perception and experiences in adopting “Blackboard” computer program in a Victorian secondary school: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
- Thieman, G. Y. (2008). Using technology as a tool for learning and developing 21st century citizenship skills: An examination of the NETS and technology use by preservice teachers with their K-12 students. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 342-366. Retrieved from https://www.citejournal.org/volume-8/issue-4-08/social-studies/using-technology-as-a-tool-for-learning-and-developing-21st-century-citizenship-skills-an-examination-of-the-nets-and-technology-use-by-preservice-teachers-with-their-k-12-students
- Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C. S. (2008). Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 30-41. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1228
- Wexler, D. H. (2003). Shifting pedagogies: Intersections of computer-supported technologies, education, and power (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 3081662).
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (9th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin.