Résumés
Abstract
This manifesto argues that artificial intelligence operates as a neocolonial epistemic infrastructure, extracting value from Global South data workers while erasing their cultural knowledge. Grounded in ethnographic research across East and Southern Africa, it advances a tripartite praxis of counter-imagination: repair, refusal, and reworlding. Drawing on decolonial theory, feminist scholarship, and African philosophies, the manifesto challenges dominant visual-conceptual frameworks in AI and calls for community-led alternatives rooted in epistemic justice and technological sovereignty. It is a call to reclaim imagination as a liberation technology and to manifest plural technological futures from below.
Résumé
Ce manifeste soutient que l’intelligence artificielle fonctionne comme une infrastructure épistémique néocoloniale, extrayant la valeur des travailleurs du Sud global tout en effaçant leurs savoirs culturels. Fondé sur une recherche ethnographique en Afrique de l’Est et australe, il développe une praxis tripartite de contre-imagination : réparation, refus et recréation du monde. S’appuyant sur la théorie décoloniale, les savoirs féministes et les philosophies africaines, le manifeste remet en cause les cadres visuels dominants de l’IA et appelle à des alternatives communautaires ancrées dans la justice épistémique. Il affirme l’imagination comme technologie de libération pour des futurs pluriels.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- African Union. The Digital Transformation Strategy for Africa (2020–2030).
- Bellacasa, Maria Puig de la. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. MNG University Presses, 2017.
- Benjamin, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. 1^st^ edition, Polity, 2019.
- Brokensha, Susan, et alia. AI in and for Africa: A Humanistic Perspective. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2023.
- brown, adrienne maree. Emergent Strategy – Adrienne Maree Brown. AK Press, 2017, adriennemareebrown.net/book/emergent-strategy/.
- Carter, Jill. “A Moment of Reckoning, an Activation of Refusal, A Project of Reworlding.” Canadian Theatre Review, vol. 186, spring 2021, pp. 13–17.
- Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale UP, 2021.
- Dinika, Adio. “The Human Cost Of Our AI-Driven Future.” Noema Magazine, 25 Sept. 2024, www.noemamag.com/the-human-cost-of-our-ai-driven-future.
- Eke, Damian Okaibedi, et al., editors. Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer International Publishing, 2023. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3.
- Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford UP, USA, 2011.
- Glissant, Édouard, and Betsy Wing. Poetics of Relation. U of Michigan P, 1997.
- Halpern, Orit. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Duke UP, 2004. JSTOR, doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1198xtq.
- Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, 1988, pp. 575–99. JSTOR, doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
- Irani, Lilly. “Difference and Dependence among Digital Workers: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk.” South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 114, no. 1, 2015, pp. 225–34. escholarship.org, doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831665.
- Jackson, Steven J. “Rethinking Repair.” Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, 2014. MIT Press Direct, direct.mit.edu/books/edited-volume/3021/chapter/82557/Rethinking-Repair.
- Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim, editors. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. U of Chicago P, 2015, press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo20836025.html.
- Jobin, Anna, et al. “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines.” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 9, Sept. 2019, pp. 389–99, doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
- Lebaka, Keke. Ubuntu Intelligence: Bridging Human and Artificial Minds. Independently published, 2024.
- Mattern, Shannon. “Maintenance and Care.” Places Journal, Nov. 2018, doi.org/10.22269/181120.
- Mbembe, Achille. On the Postcolony. U of California P, 2001.
- Mensah, Jahaziel, and Aimee Wynsberghe. ‘Where Are the Missing Values: An Exploration of the Need to Incorporate Ubuntu Values into African AI Policy’. AI and Ethics, vol. 5, May 2025, pp. 4365–75. ResearchGate, doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00746-0.
- Miceli, Milagros, and Adio Dinika. “Data Workers’ Inquiry: Recentring Workers’ Epistemic Authority.” FES Future of Work, 2025, futureofwork.fes.de/news-list/e/data-workers-inquiry-recentring-workers-epistemic-authority.html.
- Miceli, Milagros, and Julian Posada. “The Data-Production Dispositif.” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 6, no. CSCW2, Sept. 2022, doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.11963.
- Mignolo, Walter D. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton UP, 2000. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.cttq94t0.
- Mokoena, Katleho K. (2024). “A Holistic Ubuntu Artificial Intelligence Ethics Approach in South Africa.” Verbum et Ecclesia, vol. 45, no. 1, doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.3100.
- Muñoz, José Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. NYU Press, 2009. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qg4nr.
- Norren, D. E. van. “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, UNESCO and the African Ubuntu Perspective.” Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 112–128. Silverchair, doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2022-0037.
- Okolloh, Ory. “Ushahidi, or ‘Testimony’: Web 2.0 Tools for Crowdsourcing Crisis Information.” ResearchGate, 2009,<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233563796_Ushahidi_or_'testimony'_Web_20_tools_for_crowdsourcing_crisis_information>.
- Okyere-Manu, Beatrice. “The Place of the African Relational and Moral Theory of Ubuntu in the Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Discussion: Critical Reflections.” Elgar Companion to Regulating AI and Big Data in Emerging Economies. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 99–114.
- Perrigo, Billy. “Exclusive: The $2 Per Hour Workers Who Made ChatGPT Safer.” Time, 2023, time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
- Ramose, Mogobe B. African Philosophy Through Ubuntu. Mond Books, 1999.
- Sassen, Saskia. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard UP, 2014.
- Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books, 1999.
- Spearey, Susan, et al. “Reckoning, Repairing, Reworlding: The (in)humanities, Artistic Practices, and Planetary Crisis” (guest editors’ introduction). Studies in Social Justice, vol. 18, no. 4, 2024, pp. 658–680.
- Srnicek, Nick. Platform Capitalism. Polity, 2017. Theory Redux.
- Starosielski, Nicole. The Undersea Network. Duke UP, 2015.
- Stoner, Jill, & Ozayr Saloojee. “Repair, Reworld: The Many Ways of Saying ‘No.’” Architectural Design, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 6–13.
- Strubell, Emma, et al. “Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP.” Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, edited by Anna Korhonen et al., Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 3645–50. ACLWeb, doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355.
- Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Duke UP, 2004, doi.org/10.1215/9780822385806.
- Terranova, Tiziana. Network Culture: Politics For the Information Age. Pluto Press, 2004.
- Valdivia, Ana. “The Supply Chain Capitalism of AI: A Call to (Re)Think Algorithmic Harms and Resistance through Environmental Lens.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2118–2134. Taylor and Francis+NEJM, doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2420021. Accessed 8 July 2025.
- Wynter, Sylvia. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 257–337. Project MUSE, muse.jhu.edu/pub/26/article/51630.
- Yilma, Kinfe. “Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the Role of Ubuntu and AI Governance Initiatives.” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 27, no. 2. doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09834-5.

