Résumés
Abstract
nêhiyaw kesi wâhkotohk (how we are related) is a relationship mapping resource based in the nêhiyaw (Cree) language and worldview. The relationship map was developed incrementally through a five-year process of connecting nêhiyaw worldviews of child and family development with the wisdom and teachings from nêhiyaw knowledge-holders. Over time, in ceremony and with many consultations with wisdom-keepers, the authors began connecting the nêhiyaw teachings into a resource that would allow (mostly non-Indigenous) human service providers working with nêhiyaw children, families, and communities a means to understand and honour the relational worldview and teachings of the nêhiyaw people. This kinship map came to include nêhiyaw kinship terms and teachings on wâhkohtowin (all relations) in order to recognize all the sacred roles and responsibilities of family and community. In addition, the vital role of isîhcikewin (ceremony) and the Turtle Lodge Teachings (nêhiyaw stages of individual, family, and community development) became embedded within this resource, along with the foundational teachings that create balance and wellbeing that enable one to live miyo pimâtisiwin (the good life).
Keywords:
- wâhkohtowin,
- kinship,
- Indigenous child welfare
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abe, J., Grills,. C., Ghavami, N., Xiong, G., Davis, C., & Johnson, C. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Identifying and articulating culture in practice-based evidence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 6(1-2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12266
- Bennet, K. (2015). Cultural permanence for Indigenous children and youth: Reflections from a Delegated Aboriginal Agency in British Columbia. First Peoples Child & Family Review 10(1), 99–115.
- de Finney, S., & di Tomasso, L. (2015). Creating places of belonging: Expanding notions of permanency with Indigenous youth in care. First Peoples Child & Family Review 10(1), 63–85.
- Garwood, M. M., & Williams, S. C. (2015). Differing effects of family finding service on permanency and family connectedness for children new versus lingering in the foster care system. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2015.1008619
- Geen, R. (2004). The evolution of kinship care policy and practice. Future of Children, 14(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602758
- Hardy, K., & Laszloffy, T. (1995). The cultural genogram: Key to training culturally competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00158.x
- Hartman, A. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, 59(8), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104438949507600207
- Kang, H. (2007). Theoretical perspectives for child welfare practice on kinship foster care families. Families in Society, 88(4), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1606%2F1044-3894.3680
- Kerr, M., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. Anchor Books/Doubleday.
- Leon, S., Saucedo, D., & Jachymiak, K. (2016). Keeping it in the family: The impact of a family finding intervention on placement, permanency, and well-being outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.09.020
- Lindstrom, G., & Choate, P. (2016). Nistawatsiman: Rethinking assessment of Aboriginal parents for child welfare following the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. First Peoples Child & Family Review 11(2). 45–59.
- Makokis, L., Shirt, M., Chisan, S., Mageau, A., & Steinhauer, D. (2010). mâmawei-nêhiyaw iyinikahiwewin. Blue Quills First Nations College.
- McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention. Norton.
- McHugh, M. (2009). A framework of practice for implementing a kinship care program. Social Policy Research Centre University of New South Wales. https://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_Report_ImplementingAKinshipCareProgram.pdf
- Naquin, V., Manson, S. M., Curie, C., Sommer, S., Daw, R., Maraku, C., Lallu, N., Meller, D., Willer, C., & Deaux, E. (2008). Indigenous evidence-based effective practice model: Indigenous leadership in action. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 4(1), 14–24.
- Stangeland, J., & Walsh, C. (2013). Defining permanency for Aboriginal youth in care. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 8(2), 24–39.
- Simard, E. (2019). Culturally restorative child welfare practice: A special emphasis on cultural attachment theory. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 14(1), 56–80.
- Warde, B. (2012). The cultural genogram: Enhancing the cultural competency of social work students. Social Work Education, 31(5), 570-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.593623
10.7202/1077183ar