Résumés
Résumé
En dépit des efforts déployés par les universités pour accompagner les étudiants de première année, il arrive que ceux-ci sous-exploitent les dispositifs pédagogiques conçus à leur intention. Confrontée à ce phénomène, l’Université de Liège s’est penchée sur les freins et les leviers à la participation des primants à un dispositif de mentorat par les enseignants, en recourant à la théorie du comportement planifié. Les résultats montrent l’importance de la représentation qu’ont a priori les étudiants de l’expérience du mentorat et de leur sentiment d’être capable d’y participer, et pointent des croyances relatives à l’attachement, aux mentorés, aux mentors et à l’organisation du dispositif.
Mots-clés :
- Mentorat,
- Aide à la réussite,
- Participation,
- Étudiants de première année,
- Théorie du comportement planifié
Abstract
Despite the efforts made by universities to support first-year students, freshmen sometimes under-utilize the pedagogical tools designed for them. Faced with this phenomenon in the context of a faculty mentoring program, the University of Liège examined the obstacles and levers to freshmen participation using the Theory of Planned Behavior. The results show the importance of students’ a priori representation of the mentoring experience and of their ability to participate, and point to beliefs about attachment, mentees, mentors and organizational aspects.
Keywords:
- Mentoring,
- Academic achievement support,
- Participation,
- Freshmen,
- Theory of Planned Behavior
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179–211. https://www.dphu.org/uploads/attachements/books/books_4931_0.pdf
- Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
- Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
- Armitage, C. J., et Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
- Bergin, C., et Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0
- Bornschlegl, M., Meldrum, K., et Caltabiano, N. J. (2020). Variables related to academic help seeking behaviour in higher education–Findings from a multidisciplinary perspective. Review of Education, 8(2), 486-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3196
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: vol.1. Attachment. London : Hogarth. https://img3.reoveme.com/m/ebec2baa109f2808.pdf
- Brunet, S., Dujardin, C., Louis, V., O’Dorchai, S. et Dehon, C. (2021). Les réformes de l’enseignement supérieur en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles à l’heure de l’évaluation. Dynamiques Régionales, IWEPS, 11, 1-90. https://www.iweps.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/DR11-1.pdf
- Campbell, T. A. et Campbell, D. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 727-742. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024911904627
- De Clercq, M., Galand, B. et Frenay, M. (2020). One goal, different pathways: Capturing diversity in processes leading to first-year students’ achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101908
- De Clercq, M. et Perret, C. (2022). Accompagner la réussite de l’étudiant de l’enseignement supérieur au sein des pratiques enseignantes et du programme de cours : une approche intégrée de la réussite étudiante. Dans AIPU, 30.04 – 3.05.2022, Rennes, France. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/261200
- De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., et Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
- Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.007
- Harlow, H. F. (1959). Love in infant monkeys. Scientific American, 200(6), 68-75.
- Hayes, E. (2001). Factors that facilitate or hinder mentoring in the nurse practitioner preceptor/student relationship. Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners, 5(2), 111– 118. https://doi.org/10.1054/xc.2001.20131
- Huart, J., Leduc, L., Laurent, N., Detroz, P., Martynow, N., Charbaut, C., Malengrez, D., Vierset, V., Lambert, I., Gabriel, L., Vieujean, A.-C., Compère, F. et Verpoorten, D. (2022). Faculty’s barriers to mentoring freshmen within an interinstitutional context: applying the theory of planned behavior, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(5), 503-523, https://10.1080/13611267.2022.2127255
- Huron, D. et Spieth, G. (2013). Valeurs publiques et formations universitaires : le cas des masters en management public. Gestion et Management Public, 2(3), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.3917/gmp.063.0071
- Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505
- Johnson, W. B. (2015). On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. Routledge.
- La Barbera, F., et Ajzen, I. (2022). Instrumental vs. experiential attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour: two studies on intention to perform a recommended amount of physical activity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2022.2161107
- Langevin, L. (2009). Accompagnement pédagogique : une expertise à développer. Dans : Denis Bédard éd., Innover dans l’enseignement supérieur (p. 139-150). Paris cedex : Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.bedar.2009.01.0139
- Larose, S., Cyrenne, D., Garceau, O., Harvey, M., Guay, F. et Deschênes, C. (2009). Personal and social support factors involved in students’ decision to participate in formal academic mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.002
- Larose, S., Tarabulsy, G. et Cyrenne, D. (2005). Perceived autonomy and relatedness as moderating the impact of teacher-student mentoring relationships on student academic adjustment. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1833-3
- Le Mener, M. (2015). Quels comportements des étudiants face aux dispositifs d’aide à la réussite à l’université ? Dans Perret, Cathy (Dir.). Le Plan Réussite en Licence, Quelles actions, quels effets, quelles perspectives ? Éditions Universitaires de Dijon, p. 91-113. halshs-01166125
- Li, S., Malin, J. R., et Hackman, D. G. (2018). Mentoring supports and mentoring across difference: Insights from mentees. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(5), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1561020
- Mouhib, L. (2018). Réussir ses études. Quels parcours ? Quels soutiens ? : Parcours de réussite dans le premier cycle de l’enseignement supérieur-Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, 2014-2017. https://www.ares-ac.be/images/publications/etudes/ARES-Reussir-ses-etudes-2018-rapport-complet.pdf
- Pascarella, E. T. et Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. vol. 2. Wiley, Indianapolis.
- Pham, T. T. L., Teng, C. I., Friesner, D., Li, K., Wu, W. E., Liao, Y. N., Chang, Y.T. et Chu, T. L. (2019). The impact of mentor–mentee rapport on nurses’ professional turnover intention: Perspectives of social capital theory and social cognitive career theory. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(13-14), 2669-2680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14858
- Plumat, J., Baillet, D., Pollet, M. C., Slosse, P., Cobut, B., Vanden Eynde, C., Duchateau, D., Lanotte, A.-F., Delcominette, S., Houart, M., Ntamashimikiro, S., Poncin, C. et Oger, L. (2012). Comment favoriser la présence et la participation active des étudiants aux dispositifs d’aide à la réussite. Dans AIPU 15-18.04.2012, Trois-rivières, Canada. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/111186
- Rice, M. B. et Brown, R. D. (1990). Developmental factors associated with self-perceptions of mentoring competence and mentoring needs. Journal of college student development, 31(4), 293–299.
- Sneyers, E. et De Witte, K. (2018). Interventions in higher education and their effect on student success: A meta-analysis. Educational Review, 70(2), 208-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1300874
- Soucy, N. et Larose, S. (2000). Attachment and control in family and mentoring contexts as determinants of adolescent adjustment at college. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.125
- Tilooby, A., Cunningham, K. L., Lowell, M. L., et McCarthy, V. (2023). Pairing graduate students with faculty to conduct business research: A social exchange model. Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, 7(1), 5–24. https://www.igbr.org/wp-content/Journals/2023/GJBP_Vol_7_No_1_2023.pdf#page=5.
- Tinto, V. (1993), Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2e éd., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
- Virat, M. (2016). Dimension affective de la relation enseignant-élève avec les adolescents : Revue des études longitudinales et perspective de l’attachement. Revue de Psychoéducation, 45(2), 405-430. https://doi.org/10.7202/1039055ar
- von Haeften, I., Fishbein, M., Kasprzyk, D., & Montano, D. (2001). Analyzing data to obtain information to design targeted interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 6(2), 151–164. https://doi:10.1080/13548500125076
- Ward, D. (2007). Valeurs universitaires, gestion des établissements et politiques publiques. Politiques et Gestion de l’Enseignement Supérieur, 2, 9-22. https://www.cairn.info/revue--2007-2-page-9.htm
10.7202/1039055ar